Re: sparc uninstallability review

2006-07-19 Thread Steve Langasek
On Mon, Jul 17, 2006 at 09:22:06PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Mon, Jul 17, 2006 at 14:55:32 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > > I'll do as Bastian and list packages currently uninstallable on sparc in > > testing: > So, this means that the following is needed: > - ktrack 0.3.0-alpha1-8+b1 >

Re: sparc uninstallability review

2006-07-17 Thread Andreas Barth
* Julien Cristau ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060717 14:55]: > - hwinfo 8.38-5 hwinfo (sparc) uninstallable > Still FTBFS in unstable. > > - stalin 0.9+0.10alpha2-1 stalin (sparc) uninstallable > FTBFS - failure in the test-suite. These two might need some porters work then? Cheers, Andi -- http://ho

Re: sparc uninstallability review

2006-07-17 Thread Julien Cristau
On Mon, Jul 17, 2006 at 14:55:32 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > Hi, > > I'll do as Bastian and list packages currently uninstallable on sparc in > testing: So, this means that the following is needed: - ktrack 0.3.0-alpha1-8+b1 - sound-juicer 2.12.3-4 Should be requeued. - python-visual 3.2.1-

sparc uninstallability review

2006-07-17 Thread Julien Cristau
Hi, I'll do as Bastian and list packages currently uninstallable on sparc in testing: - asterisk 1:1.2.7.1.dfsg-2 asterisk-bristuff (sparc) uninstallable asterisk 1:1.2.7.1.dfsg-2 asterisk-classic (sparc) uninstallable Built in unstable, but failed on arm with a weird error. - asterisk-oh323 0.