Re: stable proposed update: ser2net, fixing #535159

2010-10-05 Thread Marc Haber
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 09:47:02PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Thanks. Please go ahead with the upload. Uploaded. Greetings Marc -- - Marc Haber | "I don't trust Computers. They | Mailadresse im Header Mann

Re: stable proposed update: ser2net, fixing #535159

2010-09-28 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Tue, 2010-09-28 at 22:01 +0200, Marc Haber wrote: > On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 05:07:18PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > Looking at the code, only the changes in the third hunk (around line > > 583) actually appear to make any practical difference; the others > > shouldn't hurt though, for a "be

Re: stable proposed update: ser2net, fixing #535159

2010-09-28 Thread Marc Haber
Hi, On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 05:07:18PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Looking at the code, only the changes in the third hunk (around line > 583) actually appear to make any practical difference; the others > shouldn't hurt though, for a "belt and braces" approach. It is the patch published by u

Re: stable proposed update: ser2net, fixing #535159

2010-09-19 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Tue, 2010-09-14 at 22:50 +0200, Marc Haber wrote: > please review the attached patch against ser2net for inclusion in the > next stable point release. It is supposed to fix #535159, which I > don't understand zilch, so I applied it verbatim. Sorry for not getting back to you sooner. Looking at

stable proposed update: ser2net, fixing #535159

2010-09-14 Thread Marc Haber
Hi, Stable Release Team, please review the attached patch against ser2net for inclusion in the next stable point release. It is supposed to fix #535159, which I don't understand zilch, so I applied it verbatim. Please indicate whether it's worth the trouble to actually pbuild and upload the packa