Re: state of the rust ecosystem (and particularly rust-cbindgen) in Debian (was: Requesting backport of cbindgen > 0.10.0 to buster)

Hi, On 11-04-2020 17:59, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > there are plans > (I don't know at which point they are) to *also* consider failing > autopkgtest in testing as RC. This already happened last year, see https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2019/07/msg2.html [All autopkgtest failures

Re: state of the rust ecosystem (and particularly rust-cbindgen) in Debian (was: Requesting backport of cbindgen > 0.10.0 to buster)

On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 05:47:33PM +0100, peter green wrote: > It seems that in the end Paul Gevers (elbrus) decided to just do a > mass removal of rust stuff from testing, this did un-jam some stuff > but it also excarbated the autopkgtest issues because a test that is > already failing in testing

Re: [Pkg-rust-maintainers] state of the rust ecosystem (and particularly rust-cbindgen) in Debian (was: Requesting backport of cbindgen > 0.10.0 to buster)

Le 10/04/2020 à 18:47, peter green a écrit : (note: these are my observations as a maintainer of a derivative) The rust ecosystem in Debian recently had (and I expect still has) trouble to properly migrate to testing Indeed there are still issues, most notablly IMO that firefox-esr's build-d

state of the rust ecosystem (and particularly rust-cbindgen) in Debian (was: Requesting backport of cbindgen > 0.10.0 to buster)

(note: these are my observations as a maintainer of a derivative) The rust ecosystem in Debian recently had (and I expect still has) trouble to properly migrate to testing Indeed there are still issues, most notablly IMO that firefox-esr's build-dependencies have been unsatisfiable in testing