Re: subversion transition from 1.0.9 to 1.1.1

2004-12-09 Thread David Kimdon
On Wed, Dec 08, 2004 at 06:35:51PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: The library package name hasn't changed in experimental, which means that dependent packages shouldn't have to be rebuilt, right? That is correct. 1.1 just added some symbols. This appears to be a low-risk transition in terms of

Re: subversion transition from 1.0.9 to 1.1.1

2004-12-08 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sun, Dec 05, 2004 at 07:24:41PM +0100, Laszlo 'GCS' Boszormenyi wrote: Talking with the subversion upstream, and as 1.1.1 is a mature release, we would like to upload svn 1.1.1 to unstable, which currently in experimental only. We already asked dependant package maintainers about their

subversion transition from 1.0.9 to 1.1.1

2004-12-05 Thread Laszlo 'GCS' Boszormenyi
Dear RMs, Talking with the subversion upstream, and as 1.1.1 is a mature release, we would like to upload svn 1.1.1 to unstable, which currently in experimental only. We already asked dependant package maintainers about their opinion and feedback on this issue, and provide a separate dependant