Re: temporary oot-modules for 2.6.16

2006-07-31 Thread Andreas Barth
* Steve Langasek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060731 02:00]: On Thu, Jul 27, 2006 at 02:39:28PM +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote: is it ok to have temporary packages for oot-modules build against kernel 2.6.16 (temporary as in 'as soon as waldi has his linux-modules-extra ready)? squashfs and unionfs

Re: temporary oot-modules for 2.6.16

2006-07-30 Thread Steve Langasek
On Thu, Jul 27, 2006 at 02:39:28PM +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote: is it ok to have temporary packages for oot-modules build against kernel 2.6.16 (temporary as in 'as soon as waldi has his linux-modules-extra ready)? squashfs and unionfs can't go into testing without dropping archs atm,

temporary oot-modules for 2.6.16

2006-07-27 Thread Daniel Baumann
Hi, is it ok to have temporary packages for oot-modules build against kernel 2.6.16 (temporary as in 'as soon as waldi has his linux-modules-extra ready)? squashfs and unionfs can't go into testing without dropping archs atm, therefore the wish to have them in testing, at least, without these