On Tue, Feb 21, 2006 at 07:25:50PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
ffmpeg
28 days old!
FTBS on mips, mipsel, apparently generates broken control file
Pretty sure this is a transient buildd problem, actually. Given back.
imagemagick
7 days old
blocked by perl
Looks like
On Tue, Feb 21, 2006 at 07:25:50PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
Note, I've switched over to using
http://idssi.enyo.de/tracker/status/dtsa-candidates to make these
reports; the backend data is the same.
I uploaded a new version of metamail to close CVE-2006-0709.
Changes:
metamail (2.7-51)
Note, I've switched over to using
http://idssi.enyo.de/tracker/status/dtsa-candidates to make these
reports; the backend data is the same.
blender
13 days old
FTBS on mips, mipsel
coreutils
96 days old!
FTBFS on ia64, test suite failure
RC bugs
ffmpeg
On Tue, Feb 21, 2006 at 07:25:50PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
Note, I've switched over to using
http://idssi.enyo.de/tracker/status/dtsa-candidates to make these
reports; the backend data is the same.
[...]
powersave
11 days old
needs to go in with kpowersave, which is 5/10 days old
Steve Langasek wrote:
fuse
11 days old
3 RC bugs
suggest removal from testing
Hinted for removal.
FWIW, there's been a DTSA for this now.
gpdf
too young
And waits on gnome-vfs2/dbus/avahi; with luck this will all clear up
shortly.
And this shortly.
--
see
On Sat, Jan 21, 2006 at 04:28:49PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
The list is back. Not very interesting at the moment though from a RM
POV. These packages have fixed security holes that are still present in
testing:
amanda
20 days old
FTBFS alpha due to missing gnuplot deps, probably
The list is back. Not very interesting at the moment though from a RM
POV. These packages have fixed security holes that are still present in
testing:
amanda
20 days old
FTBFS alpha due to missing gnuplot deps, probably needs requeue
apache2
too young
blender
too
On Sat, Dec 10, 2005 at 05:48:50PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
centericq
9 days old
missing s390 upload (built successfuly 4 days ago)
blocked by gcc-4.0
DTSA issued
Also blocked by fribidi, which needed (and now has) a hint for its udeb.
As mentioned earlier, gcc-4.0 is
centericq
9 days old
missing s390 upload (built successfuly 4 days ago)
blocked by gcc-4.0
DTSA issued
chmlib
38 days old!
bocked by xchm, which is blocked by gcc-4.0
coreutils
23 days old!
RC bug
FTBFS on ia64 (pwd test
Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
curl
2 days old
FTBFS on hppa
blocked by krb5 (bug #341898 needs to be closed on Dec 13th)
Yup, I'm watching it. The only remaining issue that I want to see dealt
with is a fix to libapache-mod-auth-kerb before krb5 breaks the version
Joey Hess wrote
tetex-bin
too young
blocked by gcc-2.0
^^^
Wow, really? ;-)
I guess that shows that this is a manually generated list :-)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Well, this turned out to be boring..
amd64-libs
29 days old
blocked by glibc and zlib
chmlib
15 days old
needs to go in at same time as xchm, which is missing arm,
mipsel, powerpc builds and is blocked by gcc-4.0
courier
too young
blocked by
* Steve Langasek:
Heh. Would it be worth posting summaries of the unfixed RC security bugs
somewhere from time to time, to try to get more people involved with NMUing
them? Or are most of these not RC security bugs at this point?
There is http://idssi.enyo.de/tracker/status/release/unstable
On Thu, Nov 03, 2005 at 04:58:17PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
enigmail
17 days old
blocked by mozilla and mozilla-thunderbird
mozilla
23 days old
vorlon is forcing it, hope that works
mozilla-thunderbird
23 days old
vorlon is forcing it, hope that works
On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 04:18:23AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Thu, Nov 03, 2005 at 04:58:17PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
uim
scheduled for removal
Has reverse deps, though, so it's not going anywhere at the moment. Frank,
thoughts on this?
Someone should be begin with actually
Steve Langasek wrote:
Heh. Would it be worth posting summaries of the unfixed RC security bugs
somewhere from time to time, to try to get more people involved with NMUing
them? Or are most of these not RC security bugs at this point?
The majority of them are not RC. The majority of them may
On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 03:18:25PM +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 04:18:23AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Thu, Nov 03, 2005 at 04:58:17PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
uim
scheduled for removal
Has reverse deps, though, so it's not going anywhere at the moment.
Steve asked me to send in one of these amazingly easy to generate mails
again now that kde is in.
aduser
goes in tomorrow
amd64-libs
15 days old
blocked by glibc
asterisk
80 days old
3 RC bugs
- 335079: Not clear if this affects a large
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Steve Langasek wrote:
endloop: 73+157: a-6:a-8:h-7:i-8:i-6:m-157:m-6:m-5:p-6:s-8:s-13
now: 76+157: a-6:a-8:h-7:i-11:i-6:m-157:m-6:m-5:p-6:s-8:s-13
* i386: mozilla-locale-fr, mozilla-locale-lt,
mozilla-thunderbird-locale-sv
It is
Joey Hess a écrit :
Steve Langasek wrote:
endloop: 73+157: a-6:a-8:h-7:i-8:i-6:m-157:m-6:m-5:p-6:s-8:s-13
now: 76+157: a-6:a-8:h-7:i-11:i-6:m-157:m-6:m-5:p-6:s-8:s-13
* i386: mozilla-locale-fr, mozilla-locale-lt, mozilla-thunderbird-locale-sv
I have uploaded a new version of
Rolandas Juodzbalis wrote:
It is mozilla-locale-lt or mozilla-locale-it?
In report I see -lt, but bug filled for -it?
It's -lt, Joey reassigned it.
--
ksig --random|
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, Oct 30, 2005 at 04:43:31PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
Another look at security fixes that have not reached testing. Pretty
boring this time, it's almost all blockage due to kde. Very few missing
builds are (directly) causing propigation problems for security fixes
right now, in contrast
Hi
On Mon, 10 Oct 2005, Joey Hess wrote:
Another one of my periodic mails generated by checking every security holes
listed on http://spohr.debian.org/~joeyh/testing-security.html as fixed in
unstable but not in testing.
CCing this time to the mailing lists for the ports that appear in the
On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 06:33:41AM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
* lintian 1.23.6 needed, have 1.23.3 for CAN-2004-1000
Uploaded at low urgency, 2 days old, should its priority be raised?
Please don't do that unless one of the lintian maintainers approved.
While fixing the security bug I
Here I am again with the weekly report on packages that have security
fixes in sid that arn't in sarge yet. I've made a web page that has
essentially the same info, if you ignore the open bugs also listed
there. Not sure if it will make sense for me to keep up the reports or
not given this page.
At Fri, 8 Oct 2004 10:46:44 +0200,
Martin Schulze wrote:
It means release process won't start without testing-security.
What's status of this structure?
It needs to be set up.
Please donate time and cookies to Ryan Murray.
OK, cheer up Ryan! I'll give enough cookies when you visit my
Kenshi Muto wrote:
At 25 Sep 04 06:33:13 GMT,
Joey Hess wrote:
Steve's plan does not define N, but sets a minimum value of N for
October 6th. My plan makes the minimum value of N be October 15th, but
as far as I can see, does not conflict with Steve's plan otherwise.
N+0 days
~140
Hi, Martin Schulze wrote:
Please donate time and cookies to Ryan Murray.
I can donate time.
The cookies will have to wait until debconf5 or so. ;-)
--
Matthias Urlichs
Hi,
I remember JoeyH's mail of debian-boot.
At 25 Sep 04 06:33:13 GMT,
Joey Hess wrote:
Steve's plan does not define N, but sets a minimum value of N for
October 6th. My plan makes the minimum value of N be October 15th, but
as far as I can see, does not conflict with Steve's plan otherwise.
29 matches
Mail list logo
