Re: Bug#774890: Is this bug really RC?

2015-01-16 Thread Axel Beckert
Hi together, Andreas Tille wrote: I stumbled upon this bug since it affects staden maintained by Debian Med. Same here with gnudatalanguage. When reading the bug report I stumbled upon The errors seems to date back to the lenny-squeeze update ... Well, you (Andreas T) did not cite a

Re: Bug#774890: Is this bug really RC?

2015-01-16 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Axel, On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 12:03:41PM +0100, Axel Beckert wrote: Well, you (Andreas T) did not cite a possible relevant part here: | This was observed on the following upgrade paths: | | lenny - squeeze - wheezy - jessie Yes, I was a bit short. I'm seriously wondering whether

Re: Bug#774890: Is this bug really RC?

2015-01-16 Thread Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
2015-01-16 13:38 Andreas Tille: On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 12:03:41PM +0100, Axel Beckert wrote: One more thing I'm still curious about: How the fuck do you stumble upon such a bug? :-) I don't expect that Andreas runs piuparts starting with Lenny on a daily business or without reason. I expect

Re: Bug#774890: Is this bug really RC?

2015-01-16 Thread Niels Thykier
On 2015-01-16 12:03, Axel Beckert wrote: Hi together, Andreas Tille wrote: [...] I'm seriously wondering whether this issue is RC critical for Jessie release To be honest: I think this is generally an RC-level issue and should be fixed. [...] TL;DR - it seems like this bug is

Bug#686054: [monkeysphere] Bug#682518: Bug#677565: RC bugs in msva-perl

2013-02-19 Thread Jonathan Wiltshire
Control: tag -1 + pending On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 02:03:48PM -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: On 02/08/2013 04:14 AM, intrigeri wrote: I'm going to test it during a few days. thank you very much, intrigeri! Looks like a good plan, but I suggest waiting a bit longer for: 1. You

Processed: Re: Bug#686054: [monkeysphere] Bug#682518: Bug#677565: RC bugs in msva-perl

2013-02-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: tag -1 + pending Bug #686054 [release.debian.org] pre-approval: msva-perl/0.8.1-1 Added tag(s) pending. -- 686054: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=686054 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE,

Re: Bug#686054: [monkeysphere] Bug#682518: Bug#677565: RC bugs in msva-perl

2013-02-15 Thread intrigeri
Hi, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote (08 Feb 2013 19:03:48 GMT) : now that i have a volunteer other than myself to test it, i will wait until i hear back from you :) I've been using the proposed msva-perl's integration into the SSH client for a week and have not experienced any regression.

Bug#686054: [monkeysphere] Bug#682518: Bug#677565: RC bugs in msva-perl

2013-02-08 Thread intrigeri
Hi, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote (08 Feb 2013 05:48:55 GMT) : I've just pushed a proposed upstream msva-perl/0.8.1 targetted bugfix tag to git://lair.fifthhorseman.net/~dkg/msva-perl, and a wheezy branch that uses that and targets testing-proposed-updates. Excellent! Thanks a lot. I've tested

Bug#686054: [monkeysphere] Bug#682518: Bug#677565: RC bugs in msva-perl

2013-02-08 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
On 02/08/2013 04:14 AM, intrigeri wrote: I'm going to test it during a few days. thank you very much, intrigeri! Looks like a good plan, but I suggest waiting a bit longer for: 1. You and someone else (I volunteer) to try the proposed package for a few days: given t-p-u uploads

Bug#686054: Bug#682518: Bug#677565: RC bugs in msva-perl

2013-02-07 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
On 02/04/2013 01:28 PM, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: On Sat, Feb 02, 2013 at 03:31:33PM +0100, intrigeri wrote: FWIW, I've asked about the same on the Monkeysphere mailing-list last October, see dkg's answer there: https://lists.riseup.net/www/arc/monkeysphere/2012-10/ I've just pushed a

Bug#686054: Bug#677565: RC bugs in msva-perl

2013-02-04 Thread Dominic Hargreaves
On Sat, Feb 02, 2013 at 03:31:33PM +0100, intrigeri wrote: Hi, Dominic Hargreaves wrote (02 Feb 2013 13:19:21 GMT) : As the release team aren't too happy about the size of the 0.9 debdiff, what do you think about my suggestion - are these the right commits to fix the RC bugs in question

Bug#686054: Bug#677565: RC bugs in msva-perl

2013-02-02 Thread intrigeri
Hi, Dominic Hargreaves wrote (02 Feb 2013 13:19:21 GMT) : As the release team aren't too happy about the size of the 0.9 debdiff, what do you think about my suggestion - are these the right commits to fix the RC bugs in question (one of them needs rebasing/porting; the other appears to be

Re: Bug#389881: RC-ness of this bug

2007-03-09 Thread Robert Millan [ackstorm]
On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 11:21:05AM +, Colin Watson wrote: + uuid=$(PATH=/lib/udev:$PATH vol_id -u $fs) + if [ $uuid ]; then + printf # %s\n $(mapdevfs $fs) + printf %-15s %-15s %-7s %-15s %-7s %s\n UUID=$uuid ${mp} $type $options

Re: Bug#389881: RC-ness of this bug

2007-03-08 Thread Robert Millan [ackstorm]
On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 04:09:48PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: I don't believe this should be changed for etch at this point in the release process, and that's speaking as someone who's run into this problem myself with SCSI device renumbering -- it's awkward and annoying to have to

Re: Bug#389881: RC-ness of this bug

2007-03-08 Thread Colin Watson
On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 02:03:35PM +0100, Robert Millan [ackstorm] wrote: On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 09:55:45AM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: I don't know how invasive those changes might be. AFAIK Ubuntu already does it (Colin?) and wouldn't be too hard to pick the changes from them but we

Re: Bug#389881: RC-ness of this bug

2007-03-08 Thread Colin Watson
On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 12:44:05AM +0100, David Härdeman wrote: I've attached a patch which implements persistent device names in partman by checking for devices which are mounted under /target and which have a suitable link in /dev/disk/by-id/* I've attached the Ubuntu patch for the same

Re: Bug#389881: RC-ness of this bug

2007-03-08 Thread Colin Watson
Oh, at least one additional thing that's likely needed in this scenario is the attached patch to make busybox's mkswap generate UUIDs. * util-linux/mkswap.c: Set UUIDs on version 1 swap areas. * util-linux/Makefile.in: mkswap needs uuid/uuid.h from e2fsprogs. * e2fsprogs/Makefile.in: Build

Re: Bug#389881: RC-ness of this bug

2007-03-08 Thread Otavio Salvador
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 12:44:05AM +0100, David Härdeman wrote: I've attached a patch which implements persistent device names in partman by checking for devices which are mounted under /target and which have a suitable link in /dev/disk/by-id/* I've

Re: Bug#389881: RC-ness of this bug

2007-03-07 Thread Robert Millan [ackstorm]
On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 09:44:31AM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marco d'Itri) writes: On Mar 06, Robert Millan [ackstorm] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I urge you to reconsider severity of this problem. There's another situation that makes it much worse: The correct

Re: Bug#389881: RC-ness of this bug

2007-03-07 Thread Otavio Salvador
Robert Millan [ackstorm] [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 09:44:31AM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marco d'Itri) writes: On Mar 06, Robert Millan [ackstorm] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I urge you to reconsider severity of this problem. There's another

Re: Bug#389881: RC-ness of this bug

2007-03-07 Thread Otavio Salvador
Robert Millan [ackstorm] [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 09:33:47AM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: Robert Millan [ackstorm] [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 09:44:31AM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marco d'Itri) writes: On Mar 06,

Re: Bug#389881: RC-ness of this bug

2007-03-07 Thread Robert Millan [ackstorm]
On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 09:33:47AM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: Robert Millan [ackstorm] [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 09:44:31AM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marco d'Itri) writes: On Mar 06, Robert Millan [ackstorm] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Re: Bug#389881: RC-ness of this bug

2007-03-07 Thread Otavio Salvador
Robert Millan [ackstorm] [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 09:55:45AM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: With USB, you can't just boot a rescue system and repair a broken install from there, because /dev/sda will still be your USB drive. Of course, there are lots of hacks

Re: Bug#389881: RC-ness of this bug

2007-03-07 Thread Robert Millan [ackstorm]
On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 09:55:45AM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: With USB, you can't just boot a rescue system and repair a broken install from there, because /dev/sda will still be your USB drive. Of course, there are lots of hacks you can do to workaround that, but if we go this way,

Re: Bug#389881: RC-ness of this bug

2007-03-07 Thread David Härdeman
On Wed, March 7, 2007 13:55, Otavio Salvador said: I don't know how invasive those changes might be. AFAIK Ubuntu already does it (Colin?) and wouldn't be too hard to pick the changes from them but we would also need RM and Frans approval :( initramfs-tools already supports using

Re: Bug#389881: RC-ness of this bug

2007-03-07 Thread David Härdeman
On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 03:18:19PM +0100, David Härdeman wrote: On Wed, March 7, 2007 13:55, Otavio Salvador said: I don't know how invasive those changes might be. AFAIK Ubuntu already does it (Colin?) and wouldn't be too hard to pick the changes from them but we would also need RM and Frans

Re: Bug#389881: RC-ness of this bug

2007-03-07 Thread David Härdeman
On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 04:09:48PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 12:44:05AM +0100, David Härdeman wrote: I've attached a patch which implements persistent device names in partman by checking for devices which are mounted under /target and which have a suitable link in

Re: Bug#389881: RC-ness of this bug

2007-03-06 Thread Otavio Salvador
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marco d'Itri) writes: On Mar 06, Robert Millan [ackstorm] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I urge you to reconsider severity of this problem. There's another situation that makes it much worse: The correct solution is to make d-i use labels in fstab and to find the root file

Re: Bug#400952: rc order of portmap,nis,autofs

2007-01-25 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
[Jan Christoph Nordholz] the present situation has portmap at 18 and autofs and nis at 19; this is a problem even at normal bootup. Nis moving to 18 would improve things, but not fix them wholly for systems which switch to single-user and back - and that's where we are, discussing whether

Re: Bug#400952: rc order of portmap,nis,autofs

2007-01-25 Thread Stephen Gran
This one time, at band camp, Mark Brown said: On Thu, Jan 25, 2007 at 01:35:20AM +, Stephen Gran wrote: I may be missing something, but why does it need to be moved? It starts in rcS as well as rc2, so this should only ever be an issue in the rare The more noticable issue is the

Re: Bug#400952: rc order of portmap,nis,autofs

2007-01-24 Thread Luk Claes
On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 01:28:46PM +1100, An?bal Monsalve Salazar wrote: On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 02:27:35AM +0100, Jan Christoph Nordholz wrote: block 341140 by 400952 thankyou Hi Anibal and Javier, I (as the new maintainer of autofs) would like to have the issue settled before Etch is

Bug#341140: Info received (Bug#400952: rc order of portmap,nis,autofs)

2007-01-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this problem report. It has been forwarded to the package maintainer(s) and to other interested parties to accompany the original report. Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s): Jan Christoph Nordholz [EMAIL

Re: Bug#400952: rc order of portmap,nis,autofs

2007-01-24 Thread Mark Brown
On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 06:28:01PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote: What's wrong with Steinar's suggestion to change the name of the autofs script to be something between 19nis and 20apache? It's gross but it should work. At this late stage in the release cycle it looks like the best option. -- You

Re: Bug#400952: rc order of portmap,nis,autofs

2007-01-24 Thread Jan Christoph Nordholz
Hi Luk, So, that's something we don't want to do, certainly not at this stage of the release cycle. What's wrong with Steinar's suggestion to change the name of the autofs script to be something between 19nis and 20apache? conclusion first: If that's the ultimate response of the release

Re: Bug#400952: rc order of portmap,nis,autofs

2007-01-24 Thread Steinar H. Gunderson
On Thu, Jan 25, 2007 at 01:17:18AM +0100, Jan Christoph Nordholz wrote: But IMO this solution is an ugly hack and highly counterintuitive - init scripts are config files after all, and if I wanted to adapt a package's initscript to my needs, I'd expect to find it at /etc/init.d/${package}, not

Re: Bug#400952: rc order of portmap,nis,autofs

2007-01-24 Thread Jan Christoph Nordholz
On Thu, Jan 25, 2007 at 01:19:33AM +0100, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote: You don't need to rename the /etc/init.d file, just the symlink in /etc/rc?.d. Sure, if I reimplemented the update-rc.d functionality in postinst, which I'm not very fond of either. Maybe it's worth it, to keep the hack as

Re: Bug#400952: rc order of portmap,nis,autofs

2007-01-24 Thread Stephen Gran
This one time, at band camp, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar said: On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 02:27:35AM +0100, Jan Christoph Nordholz wrote: The present situation forces all users of nisautofs to manually shuffle their init scripts around, and this is a very common setup... Moving autofs to start

Re: Bug#400952: rc order of portmap,nis,autofs

2007-01-24 Thread Jan Christoph Nordholz
On Thu, Jan 25, 2007 at 01:35:20AM +, Stephen Gran wrote: I may be missing something, but why does it need to be moved? It starts in rcS as well as rc2, so this should only ever be an issue in the rare cases when you have to switch to runlevel 1 and back, right? This seems like a rare

Re: Bug#400952: rc order of portmap,nis,autofs

2007-01-04 Thread Aníbal Monsalve Salazar
On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 02:27:35AM +0100, Jan Christoph Nordholz wrote: block 341140 by 400952 thankyou Hi Anibal and Javier, I (as the new maintainer of autofs) would like to have the issue settled before Etch is released... what consequences do you fear could arise from moving the script?

Would a still depends on libkpathsea3 bug be RC? (was: How to prevent a library transition)

2005-09-29 Thread Frank Küster
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, 28 Sep 2005, Frank Küster wrote: If my second interpretation is right, we depend on maintainers' action for that. In order to make all dependencies on the old version disappear, would a still depends on libkpathsea3 bug be RC

Re: Would a still depends on libkpathsea3 bug be RC? (was: How to prevent a library transition)

2005-09-29 Thread Andreas Barth
disappear, would a still depends on libkpathsea3 bug be RC? Yes, fixable with a quick-and-dirty NMU that only does a rebuild against the new one... That was what I was thinking about; but the question is whether the release team would actually support such a severity; I don't want to support

Re: this bug is RC

2004-06-12 Thread Steve Langasek
can someone step up and get a fixed package into the archive? An alternative fix would be to remove kernel-image-2.6.6-1-386 (et al) from testing. The 2.6.5 version is still available in testing, and works. Since this bug *is* RC, that would be an appropriate response, IMHO. == remove kernel

this bug is RC

2004-06-11 Thread Joey Hess
? An alternative fix would be to remove kernel-image-2.6.6-1-386 (et al) from testing. The 2.6.5 version is still available in testing, and works. Since this bug *is* RC, that would be an appropriate response, IMHO. (I see a slightly different bug with this kernel and my test laptop. When the frame