Philipp Kern wrote:
> Release Team,
>
> am Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 01:45:12AM +0200 hast du folgendes geschrieben:
>> please unblock consolekit_0.2.10-2.
>
> consolekit/0.2.10-1 got an automatic freeze exemption. Although the
> ultimate authority is with the RMs to approve and reject packages we
>
Release Team,
am Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 01:45:12AM +0200 hast du folgendes geschrieben:
> please unblock consolekit_0.2.10-2.
consolekit/0.2.10-1 got an automatic freeze exemption. Although the
ultimate authority is with the RMs to approve and reject packages we
considered new upstream versions as
Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
[Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt]
If you continue to ignore our widely announced rules, then yeah, you
waste your time. And ours.
Here again, yet another insulting message to one of your fellow debian
developer. I wonder if this is how the release team wish to
communicate wi
[Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt]
> If you continue to ignore our widely announced rules, then yeah, you
> waste your time. And ours.
Here again, yet another insulting message to one of your fellow debian
developer. I wonder if this is how the release team wish to
communicate with the rest of the develope
Petter Reinholdtsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt]
>> Please don't. You've made perfectly clear that you do not understand
>> how the freeze works.
> Not sure if it is intentional, but your message leave me with the
> impression that your attitude towards fellow developers i
[Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt]
> Please don't. You've made perfectly clear that you do not understand
> how the freeze works.
Not sure if it is intentional, but your message leave me with the
impression that your attitude towards fellow developers is such that
it is a waste of my time trying to work wi
Petter Reinholdtsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt]
> please unblock consolekit_0.2.10-2.
Rejected, too massive changes this late in the release process.
>>> Which changes are OK to include in Lenny?
>> Small ones.
> Your reply make me suspect I was unable to make my
[Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt]
please unblock consolekit_0.2.10-2.
>>> Rejected, too massive changes this late in the release process.
>> Which changes are OK to include in Lenny?
>
> Small ones.
Your reply make me suspect I was unable to make myself understood, so
I try again. I was wondering wh
Petter Reinholdtsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt]
>> Michael Biebl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> please unblock consolekit_0.2.10-2.
>> Rejected, too massive changes this late in the release process.
> Which changes are OK to include in Lenny?
Small ones.
Marc
--
BOFH
[Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt]
> Michael Biebl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> please unblock consolekit_0.2.10-2.
>
> Rejected, too massive changes this late in the release process.
Which changes are OK to include in Lenny? A lot of them seem to be
required to get consolekit working out of the box, an
[Michael Biebl]
> Not quite. pam_foreground was as Ubuntu specific package and the
> tags that it created in /var/run/console were/are not compatible
> with the ones pam_console (which was never part of Debian), creates.
> dbus understand pam_console tags and needed a patch (which the
> ubuntu pac
Michael Biebl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> please unblock consolekit_0.2.10-2.
Rejected, too massive changes this late in the release process.
Marc
--
Fachbegriffe der Informatik - Einfach erklärt
99: EDV
Experimentelle Daten Verarbeitung (Andreas Frackowiak)
pgpTdo4UOq1rl.pgp
Descript
Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
[Michael Biebl]
Although this is a new upstream release, I really like to get this
version into lenny. The major new feature is, that consolekit now
creates pam_console compatible tag files. This means, dbus services
can make use of the "at_console" policy, a long stan
[Michael Biebl]
> Although this is a new upstream release, I really like to get this
> version into lenny. The major new feature is, that consolekit now
> creates pam_console compatible tag files. This means, dbus services
> can make use of the "at_console" policy, a long standing request!
> That m
Hi,
please unblock consolekit_0.2.10-2.
Although this is a new upstream release, I really like to get this
version into lenny. The major new feature is, that consolekit now
creates pam_console compatible tag files. This means, dbus services can
make use of the "at_console" policy, a long stan
15 matches
Mail list logo
