Re: upgrade-i386

2004-10-05 Thread Nathanael Nerode
Steve Langasek wrote: On Fri, Oct 01, 2004 at 01:07:25PM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote: So I produced a kernel intended for the upgrade-i386 directory. See http://lists.debian.org/debian-kernel/2004/08/msg02087.html I wanted it to be tested, but nobody has paid any attention. I don&#

Re: upgrade-i386

2004-10-01 Thread Steve Langasek
On Fri, Oct 01, 2004 at 01:07:25PM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote: > So I produced a kernel intended for the upgrade-i386 directory. > See http://lists.debian.org/debian-kernel/2004/08/msg02087.html > I wanted it to be tested, but nobody has paid any attention. I don't > curre

upgrade-i386

2004-10-01 Thread Nathanael Nerode
So I produced a kernel intended for the upgrade-i386 directory. See http://lists.debian.org/debian-kernel/2004/08/msg02087.html I wanted it to be tested, but nobody has paid any attention. I don't currently have a place to upload it. I send this message to debian-release in hopes

Re: Bug#241497: Critical bug still not addressed: upgrade-i386

2004-08-10 Thread Steve Langasek
t; > from the main archive as well as part of the upgrade process. As such, we > > can probably dispense with security support for the upgrade-i386 kernel > > packages if necessary. > If we force it to be intermediate, that's fine (ie, we force 2.4.24 or > something upon

Re: Bug#241497: Critical bug still not addressed: upgrade-i386

2004-08-10 Thread Andres Salomon
ch, we > can probably dispense with security support for the upgrade-i386 kernel > packages if necessary. If we force it to be intermediate, that's fine (ie, we force 2.4.24 or something upon the user, and then force them to upgrade to the latest 2.4 kernel during the rest of the sarge upg

Re: Bug#241497: Critical bug still not addressed: upgrade-i386

2004-08-10 Thread Steve Langasek
On Tue, Aug 10, 2004 at 11:37:00AM -0400, Andres Salomon wrote: > On Tue, 10 Aug 2004 00:56:45 -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote: > > Reminder: the directory > > dists/sarge/main/upgrade-i386 > > still has not been created, let alone populated. > Oh, yuck. This is the

Re: Bug#241497: Critical bug still not addressed: upgrade-i386

2004-08-10 Thread Andres Salomon
On Tue, 10 Aug 2004 00:56:45 -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote: > Reminder: the directory > dists/sarge/main/upgrade-i386 > still has not been created, let alone populated. Oh, yuck. This is the first I've heard of this problem. > > I would expect this to be a hard requirement

Critical bug still not addressed: upgrade-i386

2004-08-10 Thread Nathanael Nerode
Reminder: the directory dists/sarge/main/upgrade-i386 still has not been created, let alone populated. I would expect this to be a hard requirement before sarge can be released; otherwise upgrades from woody for real i386 machines will not be possible. It will need to contain a kernel for

Contents for potato/main/upgrade-i386

2000-05-06 Thread J.A. Bezemer
anything in the archive, since it's not really a part of it. Therefore, speaking for the CD team, I ask you to create a directory debian/dists/potato/main/upgrade-i386 with contents found in http://panic.et.tudelft.nl/~costar/potato/upgrade-i386.tar Please tell me when it's done