Re: your sks upload to unstable

2010-09-15 Thread Christoph Martin
Hi Julien, sorry to bother you again. Am 06.09.2010 21:59, schrieb Julien Cristau: I'll take the easy way out and trust you that there's no code change in the new upload. Unblocked the unstable version. Due to a type in the rules file (see #596563) on the architectures where the ocaml

Re: your sks upload to unstable

2010-09-15 Thread Julien Cristau
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 11:54:38 +0200, Christoph Martin wrote: Due to a type in the rules file (see #596563) on the architectures where the ocaml interpreter is needed the respective dependency was missing. So I had to do a new upload of sks with this fix in place. There is again no code

Re: your sks upload to unstable

2010-09-06 Thread Christoph Martin
Hi Julien, Am 03.09.2010 17:07, schrieb Julien Cristau: you uploaded sks 1.1.1+dpkgv3-2 to unstable fixing an RC bug a few days ago. Unfortunately that upload appears to have many non-critical changes over the version in testing, in particular the change from dbs tar-in-tar to dpkg v3 makes

Re: your sks upload to unstable

2010-09-06 Thread Julien Cristau
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 08:41:13 +0200, Christoph Martin wrote: Hi Julien, Am 03.09.2010 17:07, schrieb Julien Cristau: you uploaded sks 1.1.1+dpkgv3-2 to unstable fixing an RC bug a few days ago. Unfortunately that upload appears to have many non-critical changes over the version in

your sks upload to unstable

2010-09-03 Thread Julien Cristau
Hi Christoph, you uploaded sks 1.1.1+dpkgv3-2 to unstable fixing an RC bug a few days ago. Unfortunately that upload appears to have many non-critical changes over the version in testing, in particular the change from dbs tar-in-tar to dpkg v3 makes it impossible for us to review the changes for