mini-freeze for apt/libsigc++/gtkmm2.0

2005-10-17 Thread Steve Langasek
Hi all, This is a quick note to let you know that things are nearly ready to allow updates of apt, libsigc++1.2, gtkmm2.0, and related packages into etch as part of the C++ ABI transition. At this point, the main blocker is perl, which is expected to be a candidate for testing soon once a new

Re: mini-freeze for apt/libsigc++/gtkmm2.0

2005-10-17 Thread Michael Koch
Hi release team, This is a quick note to let you know that things are nearly ready to allow updates of apt, libsigc++1.2, gtkmm2.0, and related packages into etch as part of the C++ ABI transition. At this point, the main blocker is perl, which is expected to be a candidate for testing soon

Re: mpich C++ transition status

2005-10-17 Thread Steffen Moeller
Dear Steve, the package was ready and in place but the URL wrong, the debian subdir was missing http://bioinformatics.pzr.uni-rostock.de/~moeller/clustalw-mpi http://bioinformatics.pzr.uni-rostock.de/~moeller/debian/clustalw-mpi/ I am happy to sponsor an upload of this package for you if you

Re: KDE transition

2005-10-17 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sun, Oct 16, 2005 at 04:07:00PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: The big elephant being swallowed by the snake of the gcc-4 transition is currently the KDE libraries, right? This impacts me because gnucash/libofx/opensp can't move into testing until kmymoney2 is ready, which ties it in

kfreebsd-i386

2005-10-17 Thread Robert Millan
Hi! Please, could you add kfreebsd-i386 to etch_arch_qualify.html ? I've filled up a wiki page with the information: http://wiki.debian.org/kfreebsd-i386EtchReleaseRecertification -- Robert Millan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?

Re: kfreebsd-i386

2005-10-17 Thread Andreas Barth
* Robert Millan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [051017 17:24]: Please, could you add kfreebsd-i386 to etch_arch_qualify.html ? Basically, the page is restricted to architectures in unstable. The only exception is amd64, because we consider the addition of amd64 to unstable as an release blocker.

Re: kfreebsd-i386

2005-10-17 Thread Robert Millan
On Mon, Oct 17, 2005 at 05:33:55PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: * Robert Millan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [051017 17:24]: Please, could you add kfreebsd-i386 to etch_arch_qualify.html ? Basically, the page is restricted to architectures in unstable. The only exception is amd64, because we consider

Version 0.9.8a with symbol versioning released

2005-10-17 Thread Christoph Martin
Hi Kurt (etc.), I just uploaded openssl version 0.9.8a which features symbol versioning. It will hit the archive in the next hours and get autobuilded. I think we should do a proper anouncement to d-d(-a) about the upload and that the maintainers should at least rebuild their shared library

Re: Statement(s) on libssl situation desired

2005-10-17 Thread Florian Weimer
* Nathanael Nerode: Note the following apparent facts: * libssl0.9.7 and libssl0.9.8, if linked in the same binary, will cause unpredictable failure due to symbol conflicts. * This could be fixed if libssl0.9.8 had versioned symbols, which it doesn't yet. Are you sure? I think it's not

Aurore Ashbee debian-release@lists.debian.org

2005-10-17 Thread Bernhard Bohannon
Averett Arif debian-release@lists.debian.org

BinNMUs wanted for libpng issues

2005-10-17 Thread Nathanael Nerode
Please forward this whereever appropriate. The following packages were built against the libpng with overly strict shlibs on one or more architectures, and to ease testing transition problems, binNMUs are desired. (See http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2005/10/msg00149.html )