On Monday 18 September 2006 09:18, Frans Pop wrote:
* Installation Guide
Add note in the introduction that m68k is not officially supported.
Otherwise the same as d-i: continue building and uploading into
unstable. I'd suggest to just keep the development version available on
alioth [3].
Hi folks,
It's with some regret that I have to confirm that m68k is not going to be a
release architecture for etch. I don't expect that this comes as any great
surprise; m68k's shortfalls with regards to the release standards have been
documented for some time, and in spite of what I know has
On Monday 18 September 2006 08:55, Steve Langasek wrote:
It's with some regret that I have to confirm that m68k is not going to
be a release architecture for etch.
Firstly my condolences to the m68k porters. I know it is not for lack of
good intentions and hard work. In my experience the m68k
Frans Pop wrote:
On Monday 18 September 2006 09:18, Frans Pop wrote:
* Installation Guide
Add note in the introduction that m68k is not officially supported.
Otherwise the same as d-i: continue building and uploading into
unstable. I'd suggest to just keep the development version
On Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 05:21:23PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
It looks like we'll have a new ocaml transition soon.
Have discussed this a bit with Sven on IRC already. The two main
considerations are: 1) please wait for the python 2.4 transition to complete
first, 2) please try to check
It's with some regret that I have to confirm that m68k is not going to be a
release architecture for etch. I don't expect that this comes as any great
Well, I actually expected this to happen a lot sooner. When did we first
discuss the new release criteria? Back then, I thought being mostly
* Michael Schmitz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060918 14:18]:
It's with some regret that I have to confirm that m68k is not going to be a
release architecture for etch. I don't expect that this comes as any great
Well, I actually expected this to happen a lot sooner. When did we first
discuss the
Hi everyone,
I just got back from vacation to find that GNUstep-gui finally got
built on the last architecture yesterday, which means that now it
should be safe to reupload your packages to rebuild against the new
packages. So please upload your packages now, if you haven't done so
already.
Hubert Chan wrote:
So please upload your packages now, if you haven't done so already.
Please don't NMU lusernet.app; I'm working with Sergey Golovin to port
it to Pantomime 1.2. It's basically ready but I need more time to
test it thoroughly. This will allow us to drop pantomime1 from the
On Mon, Sep 18, 2006 at 09:26:18AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
On Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 05:21:23PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
It looks like we'll have a new ocaml transition soon.
Have discussed this a bit with Sven on IRC already. The two main
considerations are: 1) please wait for
10 matches
Mail list logo
