hi,
thanks alot for your reply.
I expected this answer - I just wanted to give it a try! ;-)
thx alot,
Tom
Am Samstag, 24. Januar 2009 schrieb Adeodato Simó:
* Thomas Mueller [Sat, 24 Jan 2009 20:06:21 +0100]:
dear release team,
10 days have passed since the upload of quassel
Is someone working on the de-translations?
Need help?
This is the only langauge I can offer support.
Just let me know!
take care
Tom
Am Samstag, 24. Januar 2009 schrieb W. Martin Borgert:
Hello world,
sorry for repeating myself: It's high time to translate the
release notes. The current
Hello Thomas,
On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 10:22:32AM +0100, Thomas Mueller wrote:
Is someone working on the de-translations?
Yes.
Need help?
Yes. Please join the work on debian-l10n-german. In essence:
a) Checkout the current version (see below, i.e. svn co
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 11:11:50PM +1100, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 08:41:45PM +1100, Anibal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 08:34:22AM +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
Aníbal Monsalve Salazar ani...@debian.org writes:
please unblock
* Thomas Weber [Sat, 24 Jan 2009 22:08:31 +0100]:
I've patched 1.0.6 instead, it turned out to be only a one-line change.
Sadly, the package now FTBFS on ARM only,
/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lgfortranbegin
Sigh, back to square one.
Okay, CC'ing the arm buildd maintainers to see if the
Dear Release Team,
In the clamav packaging team we had recurring discussion about how to deal with
clamav in the near (== lenny) and more distant (= squeeze) future. The current
situation is as follows:
- We've got severly outdated clamav packages in etch(-security).
- A few packages depend on
Michael Tautschnig wrote:
In the clamav packaging team we had recurring discussion about how to deal
with
clamav in the near (== lenny) and more distant (= squeeze) future. The
current
situation is as follows:
- We've got severly outdated clamav packages in etch(-security).
- A few
Please consider for testing:
gcc-4.1 (4.1.2-25) sid; urgency=low
* Update backport for PR28322 (Gunther Nikl).
gcc-4.2 (4.2.4-6) unstable; urgency=low
* Update to SVN 20090117 from the ubuntu/gcc-4_2-branch.
- Fix PR c++/38850, PR c++/36019.
* Update backport for PR28322
This one time, at band camp, Martin Schulze said:
Michael Tautschnig wrote:
In the clamav packaging team we had recurring discussion about how to deal
with
clamav in the near (== lenny) and more distant (= squeeze) future. The
current
situation is as follows:
- We've got severly
On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 11:10:46PM +0100, W. Martin Borgert wrote:
Hello world,
sorry for repeating myself: It's high time to translate the
release notes. The current statistics doesn't look good:
(...)
es: 0 translated messages, 734 untranslated messages.
The current stats for Spanish are
hi everyone,
excuse the cross-posting, i just want to make sure everyone's on the
same page for what should be next for php5 - lenny
quick recap:
when we last left off[1] Raphael was seeking pre-approval of a
lenny-targeted upload of php5. because of library dependency changes,
this needed to
sean finney wrote:
hi everyone,
Hi
excuse the cross-posting, i just want to make sure everyone's on the
same page for what should be next for php5 - lenny
Ok, though I don't think it's that controversial :-)
someone suggested to look at using testing-security as a path to lenny for
this
Stephen Gran wrote:
This one time, at band camp, Martin Schulze said:
Michael Tautschnig wrote:
In the clamav packaging team we had recurring discussion about how to
deal with
clamav in the near (== lenny) and more distant (= squeeze) future. The
current
situation is as
Hi,
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 11:28:15PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
Marc Haber wrote:
Please unblock clamav-data as this will bring more virus signatures
into lenny. The package is built and tested automatically inside the
debian-volatile infrastructure.
unblocked
Thanks. I immediately
On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 01:22:19PM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote:
* Thomas Weber [Sat, 24 Jan 2009 22:08:31 +0100]:
I've patched 1.0.6 instead, it turned out to be only a one-line change.
Sadly, the package now FTBFS on ARM only,
/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lgfortranbegin
Sigh, back to square
On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 10:18:19PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 01:22:19PM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote:
* Thomas Weber [Sat, 24 Jan 2009 22:08:31 +0100]:
I've patched 1.0.6 instead, it turned out to be only a one-line change.
Sadly, the package now FTBFS on ARM only,
Here we go:
da: 0 translated messages, 751 untranslated messages.
de: 595 translated messages, 16 fuzzy translations, 140 untranslated messages.
es: 574 translated messages, 98 fuzzy translations, 79 untranslated messages.
fi: 1 translated message, 750 untranslated messages.
fr: 691 translated
On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 01:22:19PM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote:
* Thomas Weber [Sat, 24 Jan 2009 22:08:31 +0100]:
I've patched 1.0.6 instead, it turned out to be only a one-line change.
Sadly, the package now FTBFS on ARM only,
/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lgfortranbegin
Sigh, back to
Il giorno lun, 26/01/2009 alle 00.26 +0100, W. Martin Borgert ha
scritto:
Here we go:
da: 0 translated messages, 751 untranslated messages.
de: 595 translated messages, 16 fuzzy translations, 140 untranslated messages.
es: 574 translated messages, 98 fuzzy translations, 79 untranslated
On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 11:50:43PM +0100, Thomas Weber wrote:
On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 10:18:19PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 01:22:19PM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote:
* Thomas Weber [Sat, 24 Jan 2009 22:08:31 +0100]:
I've patched 1.0.6 instead, it turned out to be
20 matches
Mail list logo
