On Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 02:59:11PM +0100, Thibaut VARENE wrote:
And I see nothing wrong with breaking packages in unstable, but maybe
there too I'm mistaken.
Yes, as you breaking a package in unstable may:
a) Break other packages
b) Remove the ability to update via unstable if a RC bug does
tags 692614 + wheezy-ignore
tags 692619 + wheezy-ignore
tags 692624 + wheezy-ignore
tags 692625 + wheezy-ignore
tags 692627 + wheezy-ignore
tags 692628 + wheezy-ignore
tags 692629 + wheezy-ignore
tags 692630 + wheezy-ignore
tags 692631 + wheezy-ignore
tags 692613 + wheezy-ignore
tags 692615 +
On Sat, Jul 07, 2012 at 04:22:58PM -0600, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
Ansgar has been experimenting with .deb sizes to make the packages
needed for a minimal desktop installation fit in the first CD. It looks
like that's doable by switching to xz compression for the involved
binaries. Would
Hi,
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 12:58:53PM +0300, Jari Aalto wrote:
| The Fix
|Add required font package to debian/control::Depends
|
+Recommends: xfonts-100dpi
+ .
+ NOTE: If you experience problems with the F1 help key, please
+ make sure you have package xfonts-100dpi
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 12:19:04PM +0300, Jari Aalto wrote:
2012-07-10 20:00 Neil McGovern ne...@debian.org:
| Hi,
|
| On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 12:58:53PM +0300, Jari Aalto wrote:
| | The Fix
| |Add required font package to debian/control
| |
|
| +Recommends: xfonts
On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 10:49:51PM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
the python-weblib package in Debian has recently been taken over by
me. The package has a long-standing mis-name bug, since it should be
called python-pyweblib to be in alignment with the python policy.
Would it be possible to do
severity 658139 serious
reassign 658139 evince
tags 658139 + patch
retitle 658139 missing mime entry
On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 12:09:27AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
It does seem quite annoying. Have you considered asking the release
team whether they would be inclined to agree that this bug
.
Thanks,
Neil
On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 04:34:35PM -0600, Neil McGovern wrote:
Hence, I consider this bug serious and thus RC, and am reassigning to evince.
Feel free to pop it over to tech-ctte if you don't agree.
Thanks,
Neil
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ
Hi,
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 12:24:12AM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
The problem with mumble and the celt codec has been referred to the TC
- see the bug mentioned above. I would be interested to hear from the
security and release teams.
I consider there to be two issues which would concern me
[resent... signed this time. Again]
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 05:45:27PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
* That the package is likely to be able to communicate with
non-debian
derived distributions.
The information we seem to be getting is that it is indeed likely that
the mumble we have will be
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 05:45:27PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
* That the package is likely to be able to communicate with non-debian
derived distributions.
The information we seem to be getting is that it is indeed likely that
the mumble we have will be able to do so, because mumble
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 12:48:34PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
Can you please make sure that mumble 1.2.3-349-g315b5f5-2 does not
migrate to wheezy ? In particular, please do not accept an unblock
request for it or for any later version.
I've commented out the automatic unblock it was
Hi,
On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 09:56:24PM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
On Wed, 2012-06-20 at 09:42:18 +0100, Neil McGovern wrote:
Advancing that as much as you can would certainly be useful to catch any
errors, and to ensure translators get a chance to contribute.
So, the upload happened few
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 06:38:21PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 15:14:15 +0100, Neil McGovern wrote:
That is of course, your perogative. However, if you could kindly prepare
a patchset between 1.16.5 and whatever you want to migrate, with all the
translation
On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 01:51:32PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
If it's the solution that the TC decide on to resolve the issue, it
sounds like something we could work with, at least imho, from what I've
seen so far. I've CCed -release for any further comments, as I don't
know how many
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 07:18:29PM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
On Mon, 2012-07-23 at 17:51:56 +0100, Neil McGovern wrote:
Nope, 1.16.5. I'd like to see that to get a view as to why 1.16.5 was
broken. Once we've managed to have a look at that, it may give a clue as
to if it's worth reviewing
On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 11:59:07AM +0200, Neil McGovern wrote:
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 07:18:29PM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
On Mon, 2012-07-23 at 17:51:56 +0100, Neil McGovern wrote:
Nope, 1.16.5. I'd like to see that to get a view as to why 1.16.5 was
broken. Once we've managed to have
On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 07:52:18PM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
On Sat, 2012-07-28 at 11:59:07 +0200, Neil McGovern wrote:
Right, the delta diff was small enough that I actually put in the time
to look at the full diff. This took a number of hours, but anyway:
Well then, thanks for taking
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 10:07:14PM +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote:
On 07/30/2012 10:02 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
Or if you prefer, I can remove the package from
wheezy, that works just as well as far as I'm concerned, but I thought
I'd give it a chance.
feel free to do so if you think that
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 11:27:07AM -0400, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso wrote:
Emacs 24 has been in pre-release mode
So... not actually released then.
Anyways, this doesn't answer my question, which I've asked thrice.
Here it goes again: is this a done deal, and we're getting an ancient
(yes,
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 02:35:17PM +0200, Michael Prokop wrote:
Please approve fai 3.4.1 for squeeze.
Unblocked by luk
Neil
--
* stockholm calls netapp
* stockholm calls someone else
Ganneff you are typing random numbers on your phone?
stockholm yes. my newest attempt to close our budget
On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 10:54:45PM +0200, Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
[Adam D. Barratt, 2010-09-06]
So upstream have verified the result of 2to3 on their software?
yes
On a related note, will the build system allow for the result of 2to3 to
be easily overridden? For example, if whilst
On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 11:25:30AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
Sometimes 2to3 will find a place in your source code that needs to be
changed, but 2to3 cannot fix automatically. In this case, 2to3 will
print a warning beneath the diff for a file. You should address the
warning in order to have
On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 05:53:59PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 03:54:56PM +0100, Neil McGovern wrote:
On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 11:25:30AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
Sometimes 2to3 will find a place in your source code that needs to be
changed, but 2to3 cannot
On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 06:43:42PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
The upstream policy for the python branches is to fix documentation
and bugs, not to introduce new features or change semantics of
existing features. lib2to3 does evolve in in the py3k branch only.
Plus, the 2.6 now only sees
This mail should be sent to the debian-release mailing list, copying in.
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 12:32:57AM +0200, Erik Schanze wrote:
please let me kindly ask for setting squeeze-ignore tag for
serious Bug #509287.
Afio has a problematic license, but in my opinion it should
not block the
On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 12:54:57PM -0500, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
Hi!
On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 12:36:41PM -0400, Camm Maguire wrote:
Greetings! I uploaded a fix for 591862 together with a minor upstream
point release that just missed the freeze. Would it be possible to
permit the fixed
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 06:42:18PM -0400, Ralph Amissah wrote:
unblock request for sisu 2.6.3-6 (documentation reliability fixes for
Squeeze)
Unblocked.
Neil
--
A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion
Q. Why is top posting bad?
gpg key - http://www.halon.org.uk/pubkey.txt ;
Hello,
As previously announced[RT:PM], the Debian Release Team held a meeting
on 2 and 3 Oct, 2010 in Paris, France. The meeting was kindly sponsored
by IRILL[RT:PMS]. The attendees were Adam D. Barratt (adsb), Luk Claes
(luk), Julien Cristau (jcristau), Mehdi Dogguy (mehdi), Philipp Kern
(pkern)
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 03:30:03PM +0100, Tony Houghton wrote:
Hi,
Please could a freeze exception be made for roxterm 1.18.5-3 which fixes
bug 598971. Although there are no reported symptoms in Debian the faulty
code contributed to quite a serious problem in Ubuntu ie a terminal
emulator
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 09:25:52PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
Thomas Goirand wrote:
Can we move forward and discuss what should be done now, rather than
discussing the past?
Thomas
It's been more than 10 days, and I still have no answer to what I will
be allowed to change/fix. Each
in Cambridge with 9 other DDs, I feel alone
here in Shanghai (lucky, Li Daobing lives here now)! :)
Neil McGovern wrote:
Hi Thomas,
Firstly, please accept my apologies for the lack of reply to your mail.
As you can probably appreciate, there's a lot of work that the release
team have to do
Hi Michael, thanks for getting in touch.
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 01:40:50PM +0200, Michael Meskes wrote:
The only part of your email that I do not agree with is the part about
removing. Yes, it's not easily possible, but I don't understand why this is
even considered.
Just on this point,
Hi Bernd,
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 09:30:50AM +0200, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
Give it more time for testing in unstable then.
That's one of the things that's being considered, if you'd carefully
read the thread.
Virtualbox is important enough to have the latest version of it in the
next release.
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 11:35:03AM +0200, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
Neil,
On Mon Oct 25, 2010 at 09:49:00 +0100, Neil McGovern wrote:
3) Remove the package from squeeze
did you had a look at it's r-depends? Removing is not an option.
I should have probably made it more clear, those
On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 10:47:54PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
As it stands, it's unreasonable to even try working on the 0.30.x branch
for Squeeze, given the short amount of time remaining. I feel very sad
about it, but as there's no way to convince the RT that the 0.32.x
branch is in a very
Hi Peter, thanks for getting in touch
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 02:13:56PM +0200, Peter Pentchev wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Thanks for your efforts towards great Debian releases!
I've made some changes
Hi Arnaud,
I've just rejected your upload to SPU for nut.
We generally cannot accept 58,000 line changes in SPU. Especially
without requesting it on debian-release@lists.debian.org
Additionally, you have added a file, called :. This seems to be a
copy of debian/changelog.
It also seems to
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 09:48:54PM -0700, Zack Weinberg wrote:
The botan library snafu has been resolved. It looks like the package
needs to wait for the latest botan and sqlite, and something weird
happened on the hppa buildd which I *hope* is not the beginning of
another horrible round of
On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 11:05:05AM -0300, UlisesVitulli wrote:
I've found a problem which breaks functionality on one of my packages
and I've prepared a patch to solve it.
It's really very simply as you may find attached.
Hi,
That's fine. Please upload to SPU.
Thanks,
Neil
--
A. Because
On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 04:25:36PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
When do the release team plan to start publishing approved release
goals? Any hope of having this done now during debconf?
Hi Peter,
Apologies for the delay in replying. There should be a notification to
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 03:45:01PM +0200, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
Is this patch a valid candidate for inclusion in the next point
release?
Hi Julian,
I'm afraid we can't accept this:
* There's a change to the uploaders (which is a bit useless for a stable
point release)
* We don't really
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 11:40:35PM +0300, Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote:
Please do so nlkt 0.3.2.1-3 fixing FTBFS bug can migrate to testing.
E-mail to sparc buildd was sent at Jul 18 and received no answer.
Hi Eugene,
It seems that this comes back from w-b:
nlkt: has uninstallable
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 12:32:20AM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
GRUB 2 should be the default bootloader on x86.
Hi,
Could you fill in a goal page similar to ones in
http://wiki.debian.org/ReleaseGoals?
Thanks,
Neil
--
A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion
Q. Why is top
On Mon, Sep 07, 2009 at 11:53:41AM +0200, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
As reflected in http://bugs.proftpd.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3284 upstream
has recently fixed a long standing issue in proftpd which negatively
impacts its performances. I would be inclined to propose a PU but
I'd like having
pkg-clamav-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Bcc:
Subject: ClamAV supportability in stable releases
Reply-To:
Hi,
The release team have been asked to remove ClamAV from testing (and
hence the next stable release. See bug #587058.
The issue seems to be that it's not supportable in stable due to
Hi Debian Science team,
I was wondering what your plans were with regard to Atlas and bug
#588280?
I don't particularly want to remove atlas and all its rdeps, but there
hasn't been any activity or reply to that RC bug in a month now.
Thanks,
Neil
--
Maulkin Damned Inselaffen. Oh, wait, that's
Hi,
With regards to #554788, is there a chance that this could be fixed, or
even replied to? I really would rather not remove courier from testing.
Neil
--
enrico What is a sane place to look for washing machines around Manchester?
mhy enrico: the canals :-)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 02:29:50PM +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
On 08/07/2010 11:15, Patrick Schoenfeld wrote:
Is it okay to upload?
Yes, please do.
Hi Patrick,
I'm sorry to mess you about, but it now seems that we're not going to
have space in the transition queue for this one. My
On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 08:21:03PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Fri, 2010-07-09 at 10:22 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Wed, June 23, 2010 14:59, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Wed, June 23, 2010 14:36, Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote:
I would like to upload libetpan 1.0 to unstable (it
On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 05:02:28PM +0200, Bernhard R. Link wrote:
I do not think it makes sense to release xprintmon in squeeze.
(Actually I think noone but me uses it, so I'm also considering
to have it removed from unstable, but I most likely will not
think enough about that before squeeze
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 10:54:12PM -0400, Don Armstrong wrote:
Release team: if you think this bug makes runit-run unreleaseable,
please indicate as such; otherwise I think it's reasonable for the
maintainer to downgrade the severity of this bug if the maintainer
feels that it is releasable.
On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 07:00:00PM +0300, Yavor Doganov wrote:
Neil McGovern wrote:
As mentioned in the previous mail, we would freeze when various
transitions are completed or being handled.
I sincerely hope you haven't forgetten #561944, and that ditching
GNUstep packages out of squeeze
On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 07:23:33PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Our proposal would therefore be that we look again at the number and
severity of outstanding issues related to moving to Perl 5.12 once the
Python transition has finished and evaluate at that point whether it
would be feasible to
On Sat, Aug 07, 2010 at 12:12:05AM +0200, Benjamin Drung wrote:
I like to see these three packages migrating to testing:
Hi,
As you can potentially see from running grep-excuses, or reading the
mail I sent to d-d-a carfully, it's already unblocked.
Thanks,
Neil
--
A. Because it breaks the
Well, it seems that other people haven't taken an interest in the bug,
and we've now frozen, again.
As there isn't a resolution in sight, I'll add a hint at the end of
August for the removal of the package unless there's significant
progress to fixing the issue.
Neil
--
liw the hacklab room is
Hi Joey,
On Sat, Aug 07, 2010 at 07:23:12AM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
My plan for v8 was to put in as many good things as possible before
the freeze, and call it finished when the freeze happened. This will
avoid needing to backport debhelper when backporting packages that use
v8, after the
On Sat, Aug 07, 2010 at 02:59:38AM -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote:
The plan is to get the poppler issue fixed via NMU as soon as possible,
which will let 3.02-9 enter testing (that should be automatic?), then
we will need your OK to upload 3.02-10.
Hrm,
maul...@cheshire:/home/repos/xpdf$ git
On Sat, Aug 07, 2010 at 11:00:09AM -0400, Chris Butler wrote:
Can you please unblock libdatetimex-easy-perl to go into testing. It
removes the dependency on libdatetime-format-datemanip-perl, which is
RC buggy and has been removed from unstable.
Unblocked.
Neil
--
A. Because it breaks the
On Sat, Aug 07, 2010 at 11:52:18AM -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote:
Attached is the debdiff. A couple of the longer differences are the
copyright file rewrite and dropping the update-xpdfrc script and its
manpage.
Hi,
Please upload and then re-prod us when it hits unstable for an unblock.
On Sun, Aug 08, 2010 at 01:56:04AM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
On Sun, Aug 08, 2010 at 01:31:13AM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Aug 07, 2010 at 03:23:43PM +0100, Neil McGovern wrote:
On Sat, Aug 07, 2010 at 02:59:38AM -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote:
The plan is to get the poppler
On Sun, Aug 08, 2010 at 09:33:08PM +0300, Yavor Doganov wrote:
The cure for #581940 (gorm.app) depends on -base/-gui from
experimental. The specific fix can be backported easily if a new
upstream gorm.app release is not acceptable at this point. Gürkan is
the de-facto maintainer, so he can
Hi,
As per bug 592071, it seems that deborphan shoudn't be in squeeze
without a maintainer who'll take care of it. I'm ccing the maintainers
of the depending packages to see if they'd be interested in taking it
over. If I don't hear anything in a week, I'll go ahead and remove it
from testing.
On Mon, Aug 09, 2010 at 11:32:06AM +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
I think the best thing to do at this stage is probably to split out the
Zemanta plugin into a separate package (with a clear warning about what
it does) in order to avoid the risk of delving into the code and
making
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 12:20:44PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
Neil McGovern ne...@debian.org writes:
As per bug 592071, it seems that deborphan shoudn't be in squeeze
without a maintainer who'll take care of it. I'm ccing the maintainers
of the depending packages to see if they'd
Hi Matthias,
Sorry for not getting back to you sooner.
On Sat, Aug 07, 2010 at 11:42:42PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
gcc-4.5 should be released with squeeze, at least on amd64 and i386.
gcc-4.5.1 was released a week ago, the first bug and regression fix
release after the initial gcc-4.5.0
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 01:04:49PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
The request is, therefore, not for an advance freeze exception (since
I know you'll want to look at the package as uploaded), but for an
indication of whether such a new release has a reasonable chance of being
accepted if it is
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 09:54:36PM +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 07:56:52PM +0100, Neil McGovern wrote:
On Mon, Aug 09, 2010 at 11:32:06AM +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
I think the best thing to do at this stage is probably to split out the
Zemanta plugin
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 12:36:34PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
On 11.08.2010 23:16, Neil McGovern wrote:
Hi Matthias,
Sorry for not getting back to you sooner.
On Sat, Aug 07, 2010 at 11:42:42PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
gcc-4.5 should be released with squeeze, at least on amd64
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 05:17:32PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
I'm not sure there are any in the original, plugins and a greater
optimisation level certainly aren't things which will solve specific
problems. Could you highlight them for me?
Having these features available for developers,
On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 04:13:34PM +0200, Niels Thykier wrote:
Personally I am okay with doing it and it is the intention of the Java
Team to make openjdk the default on all architectures. The question is
if we should do it now or after Squeeze (CC'ed the release team) for
their comments.
On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 09:33:19PM +0100, Neil McGovern wrote:
On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 04:13:34PM +0200, Niels Thykier wrote:
Personally I am okay with doing it and it is the intention of the Java
Team to make openjdk the default on all architectures. The question is
if we should do it now
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 07:58:06PM +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 07:15:14PM +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 10:16:52PM +0100, Neil McGovern wrote:
Ok, please upload.
Changes committed to git, but I will wait and see whether #591975
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 10:59:12PM +0900, Atsuhito Kohda wrote:
I think it's your point of view and I don't agree with you here.
I have a good relation with the upstream author and don't
think it is necessary for me to understand the code.
Umm, sorry again but I'd like to know if you can add
On Fri, Dec 15, 2006 at 07:09:22PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
On 2006-12-14, Isaac Clerencia [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've just uploaded a new moodle version which only includes a new
patch for a XSS security problem.
Isaac, this is the 34th security problem in Moodle since 2004.
On Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 04:22:16PM +0100, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
On Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 11:53:28AM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
* Andreas Barth ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061214 10:45]:
* Francesco P. Lovergine ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061214 10:38]:
proftpd-dfsg (1.3.0-17) unstable;
Hi all,
Could I please have the following:
gaim - priority bump
1:2.0.0+beta5-8 to 1:2.0.0+beta5-9
no CVE ID yet, crash when receiving an invalid UPnP response
libarchive - unfreeze
1.2.53-2 to 1.3.1-1
CVE-2006-5680 - DoS (CPU consumption)
nexuiz - unfreeze/bump
Hi team,
Can I have an unblock for:
kdenetwork from 4:3.5.5-3 to 4:3.5.5-4
CVE-2006-6811 - remote DoS
debdiff show that only the fix is present in the changed version
Thanks,
Neil
--
moray hm, maybe wearing a black t-shirt while dusting my bedroom for the
first time in
Hi all,
Can I have a unblock for:
phpmyadmin from 4:2.9.1.1-1 to 4:2.9.1.1-2
CVE-2007-0203 / CVE-2007-0204 - XSS
Diff is fine.
Cheers,
Neil
--
gwolf bah Germans. You just put 100 DDs in one country and then they all
become friends of each other.
signature.asc
On Wed, Jan 17, 2007 at 07:55:49AM +1300, Andrew Mitchell wrote:
Hi,
phpGroupware had an RC bug (#401045) filed against it due to it being
incompatible with PHP 5.2, and had an NMU to drop PHP 5 dependencies
from the package. However 0.19.16.011-3 has been uploaded to unstable
which has a
On Mon, Jan 22, 2007 at 08:06:29AM +0100, Ondřej Surý wrote:
* SECURITY UPDATE: Denial of Service.
* New patch, 108_CVE-2007-0104; limits recursion depth of the parsing tree
to
100 to avoid infinite loop with crafted documents; CVE-2007-0104; from
Ubuntu's 0.4.2-0ubuntu6.8;
On Fri, Jan 26, 2007 at 10:30:40PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
Can you check, whether the changes in bcfg2 in sid can be allowed in?
Otherwise this will need to be fixed through t-p-u.
FWIW, there's a packages waiting in NEW on klecker with the security fix
in. This should make it's way
On Fri, Jan 26, 2007 at 10:30:40PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
If anyone has some time available, please NMU 406628.
geoip 1.3.17-1.1 uploaded, please unblock :)
Neil
--
gwolf bah Germans. You just put 100 DDs in one country and then they all
become friends of each other.
Hi,
I've just uploaded hinfo 1.02-3.1 which fixes a DoS with hinfo-update
and potential arbitary code execution.
Please unblock :)
Thanks,
Neil
--
Tolimar Debian women - porting the most succesfull operating system to the
most unknown architecture
signature.asc
Description: Digital
On Sat, Jan 27, 2007 at 06:14:23PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
Neil McGovern wrote:
Hi,
I've just uploaded hinfo 1.02-3.1 which fixes a DoS with hinfo-update
and potential arbitary code execution.
Please unblock :)
You do now that hinfo was removed from testing?
Was it? Oops
On Tue, Jan 30, 2007 at 02:36:23AM +0200, Achilleas Kotsis wrote:
Hello,
according to CVE-2007-0460, ulogd is prone to several vulnerabilities
due to improper string length calculations. ulogd is running as root,
and the vulnerability is thought to be remotely exploitable, so I guess
this
On Mon, Jan 29, 2007 at 04:07:13PM -0700, LaMont Jones wrote:
Like the subject says, bind9_9.3.4-2 should be promoted to testing,
either now, or in 2 days when it's old enough. :-) (And yes, I know it
just went through dinstall today...) It is currently built on alpha,
amd64, hppa, i386,
On Sun, Jan 28, 2007 at 06:14:48PM +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Please approve egroupware 1.2.106-2.dfsg-1 for etch. This is a
maintenance release over what is currently in etch, and it is required
to be able to use PHP 5 and/or PostgreSQL 8.1.
FWIW:
On Tue, Jan 30, 2007 at 04:09:07PM -0700, LaMont Jones wrote:
On Tue, Jan 30, 2007 at 02:47:27PM +, Neil McGovern wrote:
On Mon, Jan 29, 2007 at 04:07:13PM -0700, LaMont Jones wrote:
Both marked as fixed in 1:9.3.4-2 in our tracker, HOWEVER:
355 files changed, 42564 insertions(+), 23165
On Tue, Jan 30, 2007 at 02:39:31PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I'm the new maintainer of libnids and I would like to ask you to move libnids
version 1.21-1 to testing release because it is in freeze state.
This has reverse depends. Is there a good reason why this should be
On Sat, Jan 27, 2007 at 05:55:11PM +, Neil McGovern wrote:
On Sat, Jan 27, 2007 at 06:13:09PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
Neil McGovern wrote:
On Fri, Jan 26, 2007 at 10:30:40PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
Can you check, whether the changes in bcfg2 in sid can be allowed
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 10:28:23AM +0100, Martin Waitz wrote:
Hello,
at the moment I am away and without Internet access (well, mostly ;-)
and can't upload the fix for a crash in qalculate-gtk myself.
Can somebody please make an NMU for qalculate-gtk #404241 with the patch
from upstream?
On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 08:27:18PM +0100, Bart Martens wrote:
Hi Debian-Release,
These packages entered Debian recently. It would be nice to see them
added to Etch, if they match your criteria.
freedroidrpg 0.10.0+d070110-1
gwhere 0.2.3.dfsg.1-2
gmorgan 0.25-2
grhino 0.15.2-3
gamazons
On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 10:02:48PM +, Kai Hendry wrote:
http://packages.qa.debian.org/w/wordpress.html
Right, as I mentioned on IRC, but you may have missed it:
This needs an update through t-p-u, and as it's a security issue, I'll
send a DTSA for it. So, can you produce patches which fix
On Fri, Feb 09, 2007 at 09:56:29PM +0100, Daniel Kobras wrote:
Moi!
Please consider the following versions currently in unstable for
inclusion in etch:
# Security fix for CVE-2007-0578
mpg123/2.7.5-6
For info, our tracker says:
NOTES: Not much of a security problem; user will abort
Hi there,
I've uploaded blootbot/1.2.0-6 with a couple of translation updates, and
a minor change to debian/rules, changing binary to binary-indep and
binary-arch.
Please unblock :)
Thanks,
Neil
--
mooch If stockhom sees my banana, he will want to eat it
signature.asc
Description: Digital
On Sun, Apr 08, 2007 at 03:46:05PM +, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
A couple of mirror changes which will hit the UK over the next couple of
months.
Thanks for the info,
I've forwarded this on to the relevent team.
Cheers,
Neil
--
A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion
Q.
On Thu, Jun 21, 2007 at 09:01:34PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
* You must be a Debian developer. Please include your name, and
Debian username on your application. The position will entail
work that requires login access to Debian machines which is
only
On Fri, Jul 20, 2007 at 11:51:47AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
On Fri, Jul 20, 2007 at 11:33:01AM +0200, Johannes Berg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Fri, 2007-07-20 at 10:16 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
Does any port still need to stick with GCC 4.1 for a while? Feedback
from hppa,
On Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 08:28:41AM +0200, Bart Martens wrote:
Hi Stable Debian-Release,
Hi Security Team,
Not speaking in any official capacity here, but:
Lets have a look at the vulnerabilities which still affect etch:
CVE-2007-2022 - Unspecified vulnerability ... unspecified impact and
1 - 100 of 422 matches
Mail list logo
