On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 11:38:21AM -0600, Bill Allombert wrote:
On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 01:45:11AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
You may redistribute the hardware specific firmware binary file
under the following terms:
1. Redistribution of source code (only if applicable
On Wed, Jan 11, 2006 at 01:38:51PM +1000, Andrew Pollock wrote:
yadda yadda yadda
Hint yadded.
Cheers,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED
On Wed, Jan 11, 2006 at 07:08:14PM -0500, Jay Berkenbilt wrote:
Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
while this *particular* spurious dependency will go away with a
simple rebuild of the application (already queued on the
autobuilders for each of these packages BTW), the underlying
On Wed, Jan 11, 2006 at 10:16:59PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
Steve Langasek wrote:
the fact that the mips/mipsel guys do their own thing in their own way is i
believe etch-RC though, and need to be solved in the next 6 month.
That's a decision that needs to be made together
libmysqlclient12 | 4.0.24-10sarge1 | testing | alpha, arm, hppa, i386,
ia64, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc
libmysqlclient12 | 4.0.24-10sarge1 | unstable | alpha, arm, hppa, i386,
ia64, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc
$
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long
On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 03:03:10PM +0100, Laurent Bonnaud wrote:
could you please launch a binNMU for glcpu?
See bug #337246.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL
On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 09:51:35AM +0100, Norbert Preining wrote:
Hi Frank, hi Steve!
On Don, 12 Jan 2006, Frank Küster wrote:
source package or anywhere in Debian (main). Thus it seems the package
is not even functional.
On Don, 12 Jan 2006, Steve Langasek wrote:
However
On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 01:55:47PM +0100, Max Vozeler wrote:
The package is held back because it builds an udeb (which is not
used in debian-installer so far). Please hint it so that it can
enter testing.
Hinted.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough
that will need to be addressed so that
partial upgrades work correctly, though (#348018). Probably needs a
versioned conflicts on one of the guile/slib packages, or an outright name
change...
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer
autobuilder is apparently down
right now, I've gone ahead and forced the update in.
Cheers,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http
, control-center_1:2.12.2-1
on alpha/i386/m68k/mips/mipsel/powerpc/s390; gnome-screensaver and
update-notifier are experimental-only, you're on your own for those. :)
Cheers,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set
be Very Badtm.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Mon, Jan 16, 2006 at 03:43:37PM -0700, Grant Grundler wrote:
On Mon, Jan 16, 2006 at 09:03:59AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
This is a pretty short list... Would anyone object to binNMUs of the
effected packages on hppa, once a fixed glibc is uploaded?
If the bug is in glibc, why
of a need to account for packages that build udebs for the
installer. Thanks for the note; this e2fsprogs update should now go in with
the next run.
Cheers,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move
an update to stable. The
ultimate decision rests with Joey, the Stable Release Manager.
Cheers,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED
to come down on tetex-base.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
signature.asc
Description: Digital
the question of ABI co-installability.
Cheers,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
signature.asc
Description
only.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Thu, Jan 19, 2006 at 11:04:57AM -0500, Christopher Martin wrote:
On Thursday 19 January 2006 03:28, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 09:16:53PM -0500, Christopher Martin wrote:
Instead, the KDE team proposes to simply merge kdelibs-bin into
kdelibs4c2a. The general
-NMU safe, needs bin-NMU on all archs
sdl-mixer1.2, looks bin-NMU safe, needs bin-NMU on all archs
libsdl-sound1.2, looks bin-NMU safe, needs bin-NMU on all archs
tecnoballz, looks bin-NMU safe, needs bin-NMU on all archs
Queued.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long
; with luck this will all clear up
shortly.
imagemagick
too young
In today.
koffice
too young
And blocked on an RC bug in kdelibs...
php4
too young
php5
too young
Both should get in as soon as hppa can build them.
Cheers,
--
Steve Langasek
.
Hints added.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
packages.
For instance, there was no mention in the release team plans for etch:
Because it only affects a handful of packages that are using a non-default
compiler, which are being picked off one-by-one. :)
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer
this back, unfortunately; I'll go ahead and
start trying to re-pull those packages that weren't in testing previously,
but for packages where only the new version was being held out, we're
probably stuck with those new versions in testing.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long
On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 10:00:21AM +, Colin Watson wrote:
On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 04:39:26PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 07:08:31PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
Santiago Vila wrote:
I temporarily upgraded Bug#348667 to serious to prevent procmail from
entering
-1.6, and guile-1.6
FTBFS on ia64. Someone will need to get that fixed before gnucash can be
usefully hinted.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED
to get xorg-x11 in.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
britney
doesn't know about version tracking yet; so I've added this now for
tetex-base.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED
build should be requeued on arm.
Set dep-wait, so dx should get picked up again automatically once lesstif2
is fixed.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED
and oldstable?
That's ultimately up to Joey, but my experience suggests that once such a
bug is present in stable, it stays there unless it's an actual copyright
violation...
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set
force tetex-base/3.0-13
hint tetex-base/3.0-13
http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/hints/vorlon
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED
sudo
Are you aware of the complaints regarding the solution implemented in the
sudo DSA?
http://bugs.debian.org/349729
http://bugs.debian.org/349196
http://bugs.debian.org/349549
http://bugs.debian.org/349587
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian
QA Group [EMAIL PROTECTED]
nco
Torsten Landschoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
gmt
Brian Mays [EMAIL PROTECTED]
netcdf-perl
Sam Hocevar (Debian packages) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
genesis
Queued on all architectures.
Cheers,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough
look good at all to me. Better ask release managers,
hence CCing debian-release.
This bug is already being ignored (manually) for testing. Please don't
munge bugs just to make britney happy.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer
On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 01:15:03PM +0100, Denis Barbier wrote:
On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 03:21:03AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
This bug is already being ignored (manually) for testing. Please don't
munge bugs just to make britney happy.
Great, thanks. So all we need now is an upload
, no. :P
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
semiautomatically), and then normal udeb sync.
This will only happen if the package is hinted in via britney, AFAIK. Hint
added.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED
On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 03:26:35PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
approx still depends on ocaml-base-nox-3.09.0 on hppa, m68k, mips,
mipsel, s390. Could you trigger a binNMU on these architectures for the
transition to 3.09.1?
Queued.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek Give me
if no compatible version is found.
What does this mean, exactly? Should that be upgrade instead of
startup? And how does that help us improve users' experience when
upgrading?
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set
On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 12:07:11PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 02:37:21AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
Anyway, I don't see that this is a very good solution. Disabling all of the
available boot options for the system doesn't prevent incidental breakage,
it just
the old udev live
until then ?
- installs without trouble.
- works fine when the newer kernel is booted into.
- Doesn't fuck the system if you lose power part-way through the
dist-upgrade after udev has been unpacked and no newer kernel has been
installed.
--
Steve Langasek
On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 07:54:01PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 03:45:28AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
Then what does this have to do with the problem people are trying to solve?
The problem is that there is *no* kernel available in sarge that meets the
needs
On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 10:45:23PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 01:21:22PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
- Doesn't fuck the system if you lose power part-way through the
dist-upgrade after udev has been unpacked and no newer kernel has been
installed.
Hehe
On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 10:57:27PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 01:30:51PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
No, they need to reboot after installing udev/lvm, not before.
Then you've once again left the user without any assurance that their system
is bootable at the end
On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 04:19:05PM +0100, Daniel Kobras wrote:
On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 08:48:57PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 05:10:28PM +0100, Daniel Kobras wrote:
Helen Faulkner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
labplot
Dep-Waits on current vtk on m68k. hppa build appears
, and I think we should be honest about that.
I also think it's within the realm of reason for us to decide that source
for things like firmware, fonts, and documentation is less important than it
is for programs.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian
anyway, and for packages that you think should be
removed from unstable as well, getting the ftp team to remove them from
unstable means fewer people have to be involved.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I
in all of the reverse-dependencies? If not, I'm inclined
to NMU gnustep-base and gnustep-gui to Provide: the old names of these -dev
packages and schedule binNMUs for the affected packages, so that this
gnustep transition doesn't continue to drag on.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever
with a binNMU. Do you know how to schedule these?
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
signature.asc
On Tue, Feb 14, 2006 at 04:08:46PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
They need to go in together for the C++ allocator transition.
easy zipios++/0.1.5.9+cvs.2004.02.07-3.3 enigma/0.92.3-1
Added, thanks.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian
On Sun, Feb 12, 2006 at 10:45:42PM -0700, Hubert Chan wrote:
On Sun, 12 Feb 2006 00:56:22 -0800, Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Are there really differences in the new version that warrant forcing
sourceful changes in all of the reverse-dependencies? If not, I'm
inclined to NMU
On Wed, Feb 15, 2006 at 01:03:40PM -0700, Hubert Chan wrote:
On Wed, 15 Feb 2006 02:01:55 -0800, Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
However, due to the directory structure changes for FHS compliance,
none of the new -dev packages can be installed at the same time as
any of the old -dev
On Sat, Feb 11, 2006 at 08:11:34AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 04:20:02PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
This means you're not guaranteed to get /usr/sbin/sshd, which many admins
use exclusively for system administration where remote kvm is not an
affordable option
On Sat, Feb 18, 2006 at 05:44:54PM -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| My tkrplot package is 33 days old but not in testing as it waits for ia64.
| Could you please schedule a build?
Dep-wait cleared.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian
upstream makes their move.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
if multiarch happened, so
that making a lib multiarch-safe only required adjusting the paths the
package installs to, consistently across *all* architectures, and no more
fiddling with package names and doing double-builds on each architecture and
so on...
Cheers,
--
Steve Langasek Give
follow up either to that bug report, or to debian-user.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org
On Mon, Feb 20, 2006 at 11:10:41AM -0700, Bdale Garbee wrote:
On Mon, 2006-02-20 at 02:23 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
If there's
consensus that putting this stuff in /usr/lib32 on amd64 is prettier than
/emul/ia32-linux, I see no reason not to move forward.
My sense is that the concensus
!
no clue why this isn't going in
Bad autobuild on hppa during the period while the sudo security update was
causing packages to be pulled from stable. Queued for binNMU.
Cheers,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer
for the upgrade path
when (...if) dpkg is extended to support installing Arch: i386 multiarch
debs directly on amd64? I suppose it should just be a Replaces:, but it
still seems like it will be an extra unnecessary transition.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
-release; MFT set to -devel.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
signature.asc
Description: Digital
- linux-kernel-di-i386-2.6
- linux-kernel-di-ia64-2.6
- linux-kernel-di-m68k-2.6
- linux-kernel-di-powerpc-2.6
- linux-kernel-di-sparc-2.6
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move
right now -- we really need to have support for
multiarch in dpkg an apt before usefully proceeding further.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED
On Sun, Feb 26, 2006 at 05:31:15PM +0100, Mattia Dongili wrote:
Hello,
On Wed, Feb 15, 2006 at 03:34:42PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
[...]
Well, let me know when libsysfs2
actually hits unstable then...
cpufrequtils needs to rebuild to link
reason to allow the new version into testing. Hinted.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
signature.asc
On Fri, Mar 03, 2006 at 08:32:53PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Fri, Mar 03, 2006 at 08:02:21PM -0600, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
On Fri, Mar 03, 2006 at 02:55:03PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
Is this something that would be fixed with a binNMU
On Fri, Mar 03, 2006 at 10:27:27PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Fri, Mar 03, 2006 at 08:32:53PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
It rebuilds ftgl-dev with the current g++, changing the exception
handling symbols in the static library to match
On Sat, Mar 04, 2006 at 01:41:04AM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ok. So this is only an issue because ftgl was last built on these
architectures in 2004, using g++-3.3; i.e., it only affects
static-*only* libraries that haven't yet been rebuilt
not, which means the ABI of the
libcurl3 used to build libraptor1 does not match the one in the archive.
That's the only reason that you're getting link errors.
A binNMU of liblrdf *should* be done, but the build will just fail with this
same error.
--
Steve Langasek Give me
On Sun, Mar 05, 2006 at 01:00:19AM +0100, Robert Jordens wrote:
On Sat, 2006-03-04 at 15:43 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
This looks like a bug either in libcurl3, or in the maintainer's build of
libraptor1 on his system -- some version of libcurl3 defined these versioned
symbols
this transition.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
. :)
URL:http://packages.qa.debian.org/l/ltsp.html
Hint added.
Cheers,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org
it's
probably worth just doing it (listed by source package, mostly):
I've started working through these, FWIW; that's why your list starts at 'e'
instead of 'a'. :) I'm only doing a few at a time, so I can keep track of
their build status across architectures more easily.
--
Steve Langasek
performance
problems as sparc64 for applications that don't require the extra address
space.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED
to age in unstable.
That's AFAIK. We at DebianGis are all awaiting since a month or so :-/
I thought you had been waiting a month for the gdal soname change in
unstable...
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set
On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 08:40:40PM +0100, Francesco Paolo Lovergine wrote:
On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 10:42:51AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 04:12:46PM +0100, Francesco Paolo Lovergine wrote:
I thought you had been waiting a month for the gdal soname change
packages to be ready since
Feb. 10.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
signature.asc
Description: Digital
to the versioned
symbols this was no big deal and was almost finished. Then came 5.0.19...
On 2006-03-13 Steve Langasek wrote:
On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 01:25:21AM +0100, Christian Hammers wrote:
During the last month I have build my libmysqlclient15 with
shared symbols that looked
into the netcdf transition that we've been waiting on for a
while, so I'm pushing up the timeline on that transition before rebuilding
octave-forge in order to keep the two transitions separate.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer
.udebs it
provides to the installer.
This will have to wait until after the Beta2 release of D-I has happened
(which should happen within the next couple of days).
D-I beta2 is now out. please let reiserfsprogs migrate to testing.
Hint added, with Frans's approval.
Thanks,
--
Steve
On Sat, Mar 18, 2006 at 03:43:02PM +0100, Denis Barbier wrote:
It was blocked by some critical bugs which have been lowered and/or
properly tagged, so the only remaining issue is that it is frozen
because of udebs. Can you please let it enter testing?
Yes, hint added.
Cheers,
--
Steve
neither package was going
to be able to migrate to testing ahead of hdf5.
Cheers,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http
On Mon, Mar 20, 2006 at 01:42:29AM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
Please do bin-NMUs for tagcoll, debtags and libapt-front on i386.
They are linked against gcc 4.1.
BinNMUs queued.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer
On Mon, Mar 20, 2006 at 09:22:33PM +0100, Christian Hammers wrote:
On 2006-03-16 Steve Langasek wrote:
During the last month I have build my libmysqlclient15 with
shared symbols that looked in objdump -T like:
0013a154 gDO .bss 0004 MYSQL_5.0 my_dont_interrupt
On Mon, Mar 20, 2006 at 12:51:40PM +0100, Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
* Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-03-20 01:04]:
Do you mind if I ask why you feel such notification is important?
Because I, for instance, was not aware of the bin-NMU until Thomas sent
his message this morning
an exception here *if* multiarch doesn't happen for etch;
but in the meantime, I think this bug should be kept on the radar.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL
think dpkg-sig has
something similar.
Cheers,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
signature.asc
.
http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/update_output.txt.gz
Feel free to let us know why the existing hint is insufficient.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED
comments on a separate line in
your email :)
Cheers,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
signature.asc
On Thu, Mar 23, 2006 at 07:28:02PM +0100, Max Vozeler wrote:
please hint loop-aes-utils 2.12r-6 to enter testing when it's
old enough. It's frozen due to a udeb that is not used in
debian-installer.
Hint added.
Cheers,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough
their word size.
The real fix is to not depend on the contents of the file to determine the
size of a static memory allocation; but there may be some security
implications to be considered here before making that change.
So in the meantime, I think downgrading this bug is best.
Cheers,
--
Steve
would make the other ones uninstallable (which is more
or less correct).
It would be much better if britney would consider updating all packages
together, because that should work perfectly.
Hint added.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian
.
Queued.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
to have to support. i think i saw
this discussed on d-d a few months back but don't recall anything coming
of it.
Patches exist; I don't know why they haven't yet been integrated into dpkg.
Perhaps the dpkg mailing list holds more clues.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever
On Sat, Apr 01, 2006 at 02:05:03AM +0300, Lior Kaplan wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
quoting http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?excuse=fribidi :
Not touching package, as requested by freeze (contact debian-release if
update is needed)
Hint added.
Thanks,
--
Steve
at this point, but I think uploads
(including NMUs) should be encouraged.
Cheers,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http
been downgraded since.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
...
It looks like the hdf5 transition should be ready to go in the next day or
two, btw, so please hold off on any more comedically erroneous uploads for
now. :)
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move
able to complete this; you should
get mail when the current version of directfb reaches testing.
I'm not aware of any other transitions that might conflict, so it should be
safe at that point to upload.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian
On Tue, Apr 04, 2006 at 10:42:16PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
On Tuesday 04 April 2006 22:21, Steve Langasek wrote:
As discussed on IRC, directfb is tied into the libsysfs ABI transition,
so please don't upload before that transition is completed in testing.
Will the libsysfs1 packages
501 - 600 of 2767 matches
Mail list logo
