Hi all,
Some more findings:
$ /usr/bin/autopkgtest -d -u debci
/home/georg/code/debian/ruby-team/build-area/ruby-sequel_5.7.0-1.dsc -- lxc
--sudo autopkgtest-sid
11:32
autopkgtest: DBG: autopkgtest options: Namespace(add_
Hi all,
I'm not sure if I'm on the right track here, but:
- Using a stretch container, AUTOPKGTEST_NORMAL_USER is set to 'nobody'.
- Using a unstable container, AUTOPKGTEST_NORMAL_USER is set to
'systemd-coredump'.
That is the default, without setting -u/--user explicitly.
root@autopkgtest-si
Hi,
I noticed that debian's ruby2.5_2.5.1.orig.tar.gz (sha1
e95ff19092f2026b161e6e6d7759489d646e10aa) differs from the actual
upstream ruby 2.5.1 release tarball
(93fafd57a724974b951957c522cdc4478a6bdc2e)
The only difference is some gems removed from the Debian tarball:
$ diff -ur upstream-orig/
Hi John,
On 18-04-06 17:14:57, John Leach wrote:
> I noticed that debian's ruby2.5_2.5.1.orig.tar.gz (sha1
> e95ff19092f2026b161e6e6d7759489d646e10aa) differs from the actual
> upstream ruby 2.5.1 release tarball
> (93fafd57a724974b951957c522cdc4478a6bdc2e)
>
> The only difference is some gems re
Hi Georg,
On Fri, 2018-04-06 at 18:34 +0200, Georg Faerber wrote:
>
> On 18-04-06 17:14:57, John Leach wrote:
> > I noticed that debian's ruby2.5_2.5.1.orig.tar.gz (sha1
> > e95ff19092f2026b161e6e6d7759489d646e10aa) differs from the actual
> > upstream ruby 2.5.1 release tarball
> > (93fafd57a724
On 04/05/2018 05:00 AM, Cédric Boutillier wrote:
> The package looks good and builds fine.
> Could you please just not install the file README.md as docs, but
> instead maybe examples.txt?
>
> I forcibly removed the debian/5.0.13-1 tag on salsa, as the package was
> not accepted yet. Please ensure
6 matches
Mail list logo