Re: Request for review of ruby-with-advisory-lock

2024-10-21 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Thu, Oct 17, 2024 at 12:21:25PM -0700, Soren Stoutner wrote: > I have packaged the with_advisory_lock gem, which is a dependency of the new > version of Redmine. > > https://salsa.debian.org/soren/ruby-with-advisory-lock > > This was mostly done using gem2deb. As this is my first Ruby gem pa

Re: Request for assistance updating the Redmine package

2024-09-21 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Wed, Sep 18, 2024 at 04:33:49PM -0700, Soren Stoutner wrote: > I am attempting to update the Redmine package. After updating to the latest > upstream and adjusting the patches I am able to start the build process, but > it fails when running a database test. > > cp debian/database.test.yml i

Re: corner case for versioned dependencies with gems shipped by ruby

2024-09-08 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Fri, Aug 30, 2024 at 06:17:59PM -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > On Thu, Aug 29, 2024 at 11:21:51PM +0200, Cédric Boutillier wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I have been looking at the gem dependency failure with nanoc > > https://people.debian.org/~boutil/ruby3.3/m

Re: corner case for versioned dependencies with gems shipped by ruby

2024-08-30 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Thu, Aug 29, 2024 at 11:21:51PM +0200, Cédric Boutillier wrote: > Hi, > > I have been looking at the gem dependency failure with nanoc > https://people.debian.org/~boutil/ruby3.3/mass-rebuild/builds/10/nanoc/nanoc_4.13.0-1+rebuild1724942411_amd64-2024-08-29T14:40:12Z.build > > nanoc-core.gemsp

Re: I stepped down some ruby package uploader

2024-08-29 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Thu, Aug 29, 2024 at 11:14:27AM +0900, d...@debian.org wrote: > Hi all, > > I stepped down below packages uploader for personal reasons (health issues): Thanks for everything you have done, and I wish you a good recovery. > * itamae > * ruby-formatador > * ruby-gnome > * ruby-guard > * ruby-

Re: [DRE-maint] ruby-liquid-c is marked for autoremoval from testing

2024-08-23 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Thu, Aug 22, 2024 at 11:44:03PM -0500, Piper McCorkle wrote: > On Thursday, 22 August 2024 23:39:07 CDT Debian testing autoremoval watch > wrote: > > ruby-liquid-c 4.1.0-2 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2024-09-04 > > > > It is affected by these RC bugs: > > 1077072: ruby-liquid-c:

Re: Ruby 3.3 transition

2024-07-19 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Fri, Jul 19, 2024 at 01:48:26PM +0200, Cédric Boutillier wrote: > Hi Lucas, > > Thanks for your efforts on that! > > I was wondering if you had a personal Debian repository with the > arch:any packages which successfully built with 3.3 we could add to your > sbuild receipe, or at least if you

Re: Pass command line parameters from dh_ruby to extconf.rb

2023-10-30 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Mon, Oct 30, 2023 at 05:07:30PM +0200, Andrius Merkys wrote: > Hello, > > Please keep me in CC, I am not subscribed. > > I am building a package with Ruby bindings. My debian/rules has the > following: > > execute_after_dh_auto_install: > dh_auto_install --buildsystem ruby > > I noti

Re: name transition of an application implemented in Ruby

2023-10-17 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 08:25:30PM +0200, Norwid Behrnd wrote: > Dear Antonio, > > Initially, package `ruby-gem` was assembled by `gem2deb` which is why I assume > it were acceptable to retain a name reflecting the language of implementation > in the name of the repository. Meanwhile, the RFS on

Re: name transition of an application implemented in Ruby

2023-10-10 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Sat, Oct 07, 2023 at 07:56:23PM +0200, Norwid Behrnd wrote: > > Dear subscribers, > > I seek assistance to rename an application in Ruby, especially the sequence to > file a RFS. > > Just prior to the freeze of Debian bookworm, I packaged `ruby-mdl` from > rubygems with `gem2deb`. Though it

Re: RFS: ruby-health-check 3.1.0

2023-10-08 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Sun, Oct 08, 2023 at 09:38:44PM +0200, Norwid Behrnd wrote: > Hi, > > On Sun, 8 Oct 2023 15:07:10 +0100 > Oyindamola Olatunji wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > The following packages are ready to be uploaded (I also verified the > > points listed on > > http://wiki.debian.org/Teams/Ruby/Packaging#Req

Re: Bug#1049999: vagrant: the future of packaging vagrant in Debian

2023-08-24 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Thu, Aug 24, 2023 at 01:46:11AM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote: > Hi! > > On Fri, 2023-08-18 at 08:07:44 -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > > FWIW, I have been maintaining vagrant in Debian for several years. > > BTW, thank you for having done that, it's been much appreci

Re: Bug#1049999: vagrant: the future of packaging vagrant in Debian

2023-08-22 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Sat, Aug 19, 2023 at 06:46:06AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > Hi, > > This license change is so disappointing... > > On 18/08/23 at 08:07 -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > > > Plan B. > > > > > > - Drop vagrant because of that changed licence

Re: Bug#1049999: vagrant: the future of packaging vagrant in Debian

2023-08-18 Thread Antonio Terceiro
Hi, FWIW, I have been maintaining vagrant in Debian for several years. Thank you for raising this as I have been too lazy to push this discussion. I am copying the Debian Ruby team plus all the people that I could find listed as maintainer or uploader of vagrant related packages (mostly plugins,

Re: RFC: rails: bookworm-pu: ruby-activerecord vs ruby-arel [was: RFC: ruby-arel: obsolete, remove?]

2023-08-10 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Thu, Aug 10, 2023 at 01:49:23PM +, Georg Faerber wrote: > Dear team, > > Any comments on the mail below? > > Thanks, > Georg > > On 23-07-29 13:00:20, Georg Faerber wrote: > > Dear team, > > > > I recently uploaded rails 2:6.1.7.3+dfsg-2 to unstable [1] with the > > following change: > >

Re: RFC: ruby-arel: obsolete, remove?

2023-06-24 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Sat, Jun 24, 2023 at 10:20:17AM +, Georg Faerber wrote: > Hi all, > > It seems that #1038935 is happening if ruby-arel is installed. > > Looking at ruby-arel: > > Upstream tells, since 2018/04/24 [1]: > > Arel is now bundled in the Active Record gem, and maintained in the > rails/r

Re: [RFS] -- ruby-i18n-data 0.13.0

2023-03-01 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Wed, Mar 01, 2023 at 02:42:58PM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote: > > > On Tue, Feb 28 2023 at 07:49:16 PM -03:00:00 -03:00:00, Antonio Terceiro > wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Wed, Mar 01, 2023 at 01:00:15AM +0530, Vinay wrote: > > > Hello Team, > > &

Re: [RFS] -- ruby-i18n-data 0.13.0

2023-02-28 Thread Antonio Terceiro
Hi, On Wed, Mar 01, 2023 at 01:00:15AM +0530, Vinay wrote: > Hello Team, > Requesting sponsorship for the package ruby-i18n-data [1] required for > GitLab 15.7.6 > > Have updated it to the version 0.13.0 > > > [1] https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/ruby-i18n-data Note that we are in the middle

Re: ruby-faraday-middleware and its dependency on ruby-safe-yaml

2023-01-26 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 02:03:39AM +0100, Daniel Leidert wrote: > Hi, > > some packages are scheduled for autoremoval due to ruby-faraday-middleware > FTBFS. The FTBFS was easy to fix, unfortunately it introduces a dependency on > ruby-safe-yaml. That is suboptimal because I don't think that we ca

Re: Help Needed: ruby-aws-sdk-core

2023-01-26 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 07:30:01PM +0530, Vivek K J wrote: > Hi Team, > >         For fixing #1028285 in stable version, I created a proposed > update(#1028396) for uploading fixed version 3.104.3-3+deb11u1 to bullseye. > But after taking the debdiff between this version and previous stable > vers

Re: jekyll

2023-01-20 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 12:20:57AM +0100, Daniel Leidert wrote: > Am Donnerstag, dem 19.01.2023 um 10:42 +0100 schrieb Cédric Boutillier: > > > > When reading the email from the release team this morning, I realized > > that the deadline to (re)introduce new packages in testing is just a > > coupl

Re: Why does my package (apt-listbugs) FTBFS in bookworm?

2022-12-27 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Tue, Dec 27, 2022 at 04:15:52PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote: > What's not clear to me is: why does it attempt to run the test suite > for ruby3.0 in bookworm, but not in unstable? It's an artifact of how binNMUs work. The binNMUs done to drop the support for ruby3.0 have migrated to testing bef

Re: Speedbump while running tests for ruby-omniauth-rails-csrf-protection

2022-10-25 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Tue, Oct 25, 2022 at 09:43:13PM +0530, Abraham Raji wrote: > and why we are running tests for two different versions of Ruby. Because we are about to switch to ruby3.1 as default, and that process includes having both versions in the archive during some time so the transition can happen. sign

Re: [RFS] -- redmine

2022-09-12 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 07:04:16PM +0530, Vivek K J wrote: > Hi, > >     I've updated redmine package for using ruby-rouge version 3.30.0 instead > of 3.28.0. The updated package is available > https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/redmine/. With this, ruby-rouge 3.30.0 > can be migrated to unstable

Starting ruby3.1 transition: important bugs now marked as serious

2022-09-12 Thread Antonio Terceiro
severity 1015305 serious severity 1015309 serious severity 1015310 serious severity 1015322 serious severity 1015327 serious severity 1015328 serious severity 1015329 serious severity 1015334 serious thanks Hi, We are about to start the ruby3.1 transition. I will coordinate this with the release

Re: RFC: dropping Ruby-Versions fields

2022-08-28 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Sat, Aug 20, 2022 at 01:45:38PM -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > Hello, > > Today, we have XS-Ruby-Versions and XB-Ruby-Versions: fields in our > source packages. There are two fields: > > - XS-Ruby-Versions is required by gem2deb to even build the package, and > is

Re: RFS emails missing the actual intent of the request

2022-08-24 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 02:47:14AM +0530, Utkarsh Gupta wrote: > Hey, > > Thanks for all your work in the past weeks but all (or at least most) > of your emails are missing an important aspect of the RFS mail: the > main intent behind the work. For instance, you say package X is > updated and is l

RFC: dropping Ruby-Versions fields

2022-08-20 Thread Antonio Terceiro
Hello, Today, we have XS-Ruby-Versions and XB-Ruby-Versions: fields in our source packages. There are two fields: - XS-Ruby-Versions is required by gem2deb to even build the package, and is supposed to indicate which Ruby versions the package _should_ be built for. For native (arch: any) pack

Re: RFS: ruby-http-form-data 2.3.0-1

2022-08-05 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Sun, Jul 31, 2022 at 04:56:24PM +0100, 'Tunji wrote: > Hi, > > I just updated the package ruby-http-form-data from version 2.2.0-2 to > 2.3.0-1 > > > kindly check it out at > https://salsa.debian.org/thegodtune/ruby-http-form-data > > > Could you please sponsor it? > > > ruby-http-fo

Re: RFS: ruby-will-paginate 3.3.1

2022-08-05 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Sat, Jul 30, 2022 at 08:45:29PM +0100, Caleb Adepitan wrote: > > Hi, > > I just updated ruby-will-paginate from 3.3.0 to 3.3.1 > > https://salsa.debian.org/calebpitan/ruby-will-paginate > > Could you please sponsor them? > > ruby-will-paginate 3.3.1 > > Thank you! You forgot to push the

Re: RFS: ruby-http-cookie 1.0.5-1

2022-08-05 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Sat, Jul 30, 2022 at 04:15:12PM +0100, 'Tunji wrote: > Hi, > > I just updated the package ruby-http-cookie from version 1.0.3-2 to 1.0.5-1 > > > kindly check it out at https://salsa.debian.org/thegodtune/ruby-http-cookie > > > Could you please sponsor it? > > > ruby-http-cookie 1.0.5-1 U

Re: new restriction in rubygems: installing symlink pointing to parent path not allowed - causes ruby-handlebars-assets to ftbfs

2022-07-21 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Mon, Jun 06, 2022 at 06:53:06PM -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > On Fri, Jun 03, 2022 at 09:52:17PM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote: > > > > > > On വ്യാ, ജൂൺ 2 2022 at 08:58:37 വൈകു -03:00:00 -03:00:00, Antonio Terceiro > > wrote: > > > On Thu, Jun 02, 2022

ruby3.1 transition

2022-07-11 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Mon, Jul 11, 2022 at 11:48:37AM -0300, Lucas Kanashiro wrote: > Hi everyone, > > DebConf is approaching (some of you might be already enjoying DebCamp) > and I'd like to ask for ideas of topics to be discussed during our BoF. > It is scheduled to next Friday (22nd of July) at 12:00 UTC if I am

Re: faker,ruby-faker: error when trying to install together

2022-07-05 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Tue, Jul 05, 2022 at 06:44:15PM +0200, Timo Röhling wrote: > On Mon, 23 May 2022 01:58:56 +0200 Andreas Beckmann wrote: > > Package: faker,ruby-faker > > Severity: serious > > Tags: sid bookworm > > User: trei...@debian.org > > Usertags: edos-file-overwrite > > Control: found -1 0.9.3-0.1 > > C

Re: new restriction in rubygems: installing symlink pointing to parent path not allowed - causes ruby-handlebars-assets to ftbfs

2022-06-06 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Fri, Jun 03, 2022 at 09:52:17PM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote: > > > On വ്യാ, ജൂൺ 2 2022 at 08:58:37 വൈകു -03:00:00 -03:00:00, Antonio Terceiro > wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 02, 2022 at 06:03:47PM -0300, Lucas Kanashiro wrote: > > > Em 01/06/2022 15:42, Pirate Praveen es

Re: new restriction in rubygems: installing symlink pointing to parent path not allowed - causes ruby-handlebars-assets to ftbfs

2022-06-02 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Thu, Jun 02, 2022 at 06:03:47PM -0300, Lucas Kanashiro wrote: > Em 01/06/2022 15:42, Pirate Praveen escreveu: > > On Sun, 13 Feb 2022 08:59:18 +0100 Lucas Nussbaum > > wrote: > > > During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build > > > on amd64. > > > > > > > > > Relevant p

Bug#1011239: RM: ruby2.7 -- ROM; obsolete, superseded by ruby3.0

2022-05-18 Thread Antonio Terceiro
Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal X-Debbugs-CC: debian-ruby@lists.debian.org Please remove ruby2.7 from unstable, as we have completed the switch to ruby3.0. As of today there will be 2 dependencies broken by this, but that's because the failed the transition are currently broken. When the

Re: Ruby team BoF at DebConf 22

2022-04-13 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Mon, Apr 11, 2022 at 12:22:24PM -0300, Lucas Kanashiro wrote: > Hi everyone, > > Should we submit our regular BoF to DebConf this year? Are people > planning to attend in-person? Are there people willing to attend remotely? Yes. I should be there. signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: Change in bundler behaviour for gems installed in vendor_ruby directory?

2022-01-24 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 04:32:02AM +0100, Daniel Leidert wrote: > Am Montag, dem 24.01.2022 um 01:46 +0530 schrieb Pirate Praveen: > > On ഞാ, ജനു 23 2022 at 08:09:19 വൈകു +0100 +0100, > > Daniel Leidert wrote: > > [..] > > > But could we make it the default? Maybe with the current > > > debhelp

Re: Change in bundler behaviour for gems installed in vendor_ruby directory?

2022-01-23 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Sun, Jan 23, 2022 at 03:18:36PM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote: > On ഞാ, ജനു 23 2022 at 08:20:38 രാവിലെ +0100 +0100, Cédric Boutillier > wrote: > > Hi Praveen, > > > > Thanks for all the converted packages! > > > > So many packages just for gitaly, and I think gitlab will have even more > packa

Re: Ruby 3.0 is the default in experimental

2022-01-18 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Thu, Dec 02, 2021 at 09:16:46PM +0100, Daniel Leidert wrote: > Am Donnerstag, dem 02.12.2021 um 16:57 -0300 schrieb Lucas Kanashiro: > > > > FYI I just uploaded ruby-defaults/1:3.0~exp1 to experimental, and now > > ruby3.0 is the default and ruby2.7 support was removed. In unstable no > > cha

Re: webgen again

2022-01-17 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Sun, Jan 16, 2022 at 01:24:58PM +0100, Klaumi Klingsporn wrote: > Hi, > > over a year ago I started my attempt to bring webgen and > the packages it depends on back into Debian. Last year in > march the new webgen package (thanks to Daniel) was > finally uploaded into the Debian new queue - but

Re: Ruby 3.0 is the default in experimental

2021-12-03 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Thu, Dec 02, 2021 at 04:57:52PM -0300, Lucas Kanashiro wrote: > Hi, > > FYI I just uploaded ruby-defaults/1:3.0~exp1 to experimental, and now > ruby3.0 is the default and ruby2.7 support was removed. In unstable no > change was made. FWIW I installed ruby, ruby-dev and ruby-all-dev from experi

Re: Rails 6.1 transition

2021-12-02 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 08:53:00AM +0100, Daniel Leidert wrote: > Hi, > > This is a short information about the status: > > - puma was blocked by an issue in ruby-async-rspec/ruby-rspec-memory, but I > think I got this fixed yesterday > > - there was another block due to ruby-warnings not having

Bug#1000140: ruby-moneta: FTBFS: mysqld fails to start

2021-11-18 Thread Antonio Terceiro
Source: ruby-moneta Version: 1.0.0-9 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs X-Debbugs-CC: debian-ruby@lists.debian.org Hi, ruby-moneta fails to build from source. This is a recurring problem. We have a ton of scritps to start mysql for running tests, they are all slightl

Re: RFH: Skripts in /usr/bin relying on version specific extensions and shebang line in these scripts

2021-11-01 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Mon, Nov 01, 2021 at 01:14:49PM +0100, Daniel Leidert wrote: > Hi there, > > while working on ruby-byebug I came across a question I cannot answer myself. > So in case of this package there is a script with a shebang line like > > #!/usr/bin/env ruby > > This line at the moment will lead to t

Re: the sorted_set problem

2021-10-14 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 07:52:07AM +0200, Cédric Boutillier wrote: > Le Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at 09:51:39PM -0300, Antonio Terceiro a écrit : > > On Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at 10:10:12PM +0200, Cédric Boutillier wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > I am packaging sorted_set, a

Re: the sorted_set problem

2021-10-13 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at 10:10:12PM +0200, Cédric Boutillier wrote: > Hi, > > I am packaging sorted_set, as it was extracted from the standard library > as an independent gem for ruby3.0. I stumbled on the following issue: > > - sorted_set depends on set >= 1.0 > - set is available as an independe

Re: ruby-webrick and ruby2.7

2021-10-11 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Sun, Oct 10, 2021 at 11:16:14PM +0200, Cédric Boutillier wrote: > > The list of packages containing files with either > require "webrick" > or > require 'webrick' > > is > > avro-java > bazel-bootstrap > cgit > drkonqi > git > gitaly > gitlab > gitlab-shell > global > hiki > ifetch-tools > j

Re: Ruby 3.0 enabled in unstable

2021-10-03 Thread Antonio Terceiro
Hi, On Fri, Oct 01, 2021 at 04:36:43PM -0300, Lucas Kanashiro wrote: > Hi everyone, > > This is just a FYI that ruby3.0 is now enabled by ruby-defaults in unstable. > From now on, building packages in unstable will trigger tests and build > extensions for both, 2.7 and 3.0. > > I'll be rebuildin

Re: ruby:Depends and epoch in rails

2021-10-02 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Sun, Oct 03, 2021 at 02:13:11AM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote: > Hi, > > This issue [1] is open for a while, but since lintian now recommends using > ruby:Depends we are seeing this issue in more cases (since even packages > that were not using ruby:Depends now starts using it). > > https://sals

Bug#995587: transition: ruby3.0-add

2021-10-02 Thread Antonio Terceiro
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition We would like to add support for ruby3.0 in ruby-defaults. Ben file: title = "ruby3.0-add"; is_affected = (.depends ~ /ruby2.7 | .depends ~ /ruby3.0/) & !.source ~ /^(ruby2.7|ruby3.0|r

Re: RFC: Revoke membership for janitor bot

2021-10-01 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Fri, Oct 01, 2021 at 03:34:22PM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote: > > > On 1 October 2021 7:30:23 am IST, Daniel Leidert wrote: > >Hi there, > > > >most of you know that janitor/jenkins is committing to our repositories > >directly. However, I recently saw that it starts to commit changes targette

Re: Bug#993829: Please ship nokogiri.h header file

2021-09-22 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Sun, Sep 19, 2021 at 10:48:47PM +0200, Cédric Boutillier wrote: > Hi Daniel, > > Le Sun, Sep 19, 2021 at 10:13:59PM +0200, Daniel Leidert a écrit : > > Am Sonntag, dem 19.09.2021 um 17:31 +0200 schrieb Cédric Boutillier: > > > I have been looking at the bugs on ruby-nokogiri before trying to up

Re: RFH: Make ruby-jekyll-data tests find the test-theme

2021-09-03 Thread Antonio Terceiro
the locations up > via > the Gemfile when running "bundle exec rake". Any idea? > > [1] https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/ruby-jekyll-data You can use a custom Gemfile, plus an extra option to the test run command. See the attached patch. From 7ee664cb3a6852880b166679b35fbf0

Re: ruby-google-protobuf: Missing lib/google/protobuf directory and fails require

2021-08-09 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Mon, Aug 09, 2021 at 01:35:43AM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote: > On Mon, Aug 9, 2021 at 12:12 am, Pirate Praveen > wrote: > > [copying debian-ruby list] > > > > On Sun, 08 Aug 2021 22:08:39 +0530 Akshay S Dinesh > > wrote: > > > Package: ruby-google-protobuf > > > Version: 3.17.3-1 > > > Severi

Re: Should we drop ruby-interpreter dependency from all packages which ships a ruby script?

2021-07-16 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Fri, Jul 16, 2021 at 06:20:38AM -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > On Fri, Jul 16, 2021 at 11:26:08AM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote: > > Hi, > > > > This is reported against asciidoctor but probably affects more packages. > > > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bu

Re: Should we drop ruby-interpreter dependency from all packages which ships a ruby script?

2021-07-16 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Fri, Jul 16, 2021 at 11:26:08AM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote: > Hi, > > This is reported against asciidoctor but probably affects more packages. > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?archive=no&bug=991015 Yes. Even better, we should migrate to using ${ruby:Depends}, which already d

Re: Is there a way to specify test-only dependency for autodep8 tests?

2021-04-29 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 06:54:14PM +0530, Nilesh Patra wrote: > Hi, > > At present it looks like the autodep8 tests (which is run via > gem2deb-test-runner) takes in the package, installs dependencies and > runs the upstream tests as autopkgtests - great! > > However, is there a way to specify ex

Re: Bug#986742: unblock: ruby2.7/2.7.3-1

2021-04-20 Thread Antonio Terceiro
618744303&raw=0 I just uploaded -2 with the following fix: ----8<8<8<- From: Antonio Terceiro Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2021 17:50:12 + Subject: Revert "Make host_* values consistent with target_*" See https://bugs

Re: CVE-2021-28965

2021-04-17 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 03:22:24PM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote: > On Mon, 12 Apr 2021 12:05:29 +0200 Moritz Muehlenhoff > wrote: > > https://www.ruby-lang.org/en/news/2021/04/05/xml-round-trip-vulnerability-in-rexml-cve-2021-28965/ > > > > Why is there a separate package duplicating rexml from src

Re: plan for cinc, chef and ohai and some of its components packaging

2021-04-09 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Fri, Apr 09, 2021 at 02:26:29PM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote: > > > On Wed, Apr 7, 2021 at 7:47 pm, Pirate Praveen > wrote: > > Hi, > > > > We had to remove chef due to trademark issues, details here > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=963750 > > > > Now gitlab from 13.10.0

Re: webgen (finally)

2021-03-09 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Mon, Mar 08, 2021 at 08:33:23PM +0100, Klaumi Klingsporn wrote: > Hi team, > > after all needed packages for webgen are at least in > unstable now I started finishing the webgen package itself. > > It didn't built with ruby 2.7 and tests enabled (and I had > some trouble using it for my person

Re: ruby-vcr: DFSG violation (Hippocratic license)

2021-03-08 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Mon, Mar 08, 2021 at 02:50:18PM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote: > > > On 2021, മാർച്ച് 8 1:24:48 AM IST, Antonio Terceiro > wrote: [...] > >I don't think that will be needed. I reverted to 5.0.0 locally, added a > >few patches, and at least all of our reverse depen

Re: ruby-vcr: DFSG violation (Hippocratic license)

2021-03-07 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Sun, Mar 07, 2021 at 11:01:16PM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote: > [adding release team] > > On Sun, Mar 7, 2021 at 10:49 pm, Utkarsh Gupta wrote: > > Hi Praveen, > > > > On Sun, Mar 7, 2021 at 10:15 PM Pirate Praveen > > wrote: > > > It looks like we will have to remove ruby-vcr and we will ha

Re: newbie questions while packaging webgen

2021-02-14 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Sun, Feb 14, 2021 at 07:09:38PM +0100, Klaumi Klingsporn wrote: > Hi team, > > While working on my webgen package I ran into 3 questions: > > 1. > While working on my first update of the ruby-cmdparse > package Daniel Leidert advised me to add the line > > export DH_RUBY = --gem-install > >

Re: Mass rebuild against ruby 3.0

2021-01-14 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 09:45:39AM -0300, Lucas Kanashiro wrote: > Hi team, > > I have done a mass rebuild of all ruby reverse dependencies against ruby > 3.0, and here are the results: > > https://people.debian.org/~kanashiro/ruby3.0/builds/ > > Please check it out, and let's try to file bugs a

Re: FYI: NMUs to expect for packages missing builds on buildds

2020-12-31 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Thu, Dec 31, 2020 at 02:40:15PM +0100, Daniel Leidert wrote: > Hi, > > Holger Levsen announced in d-devel around 3000 NMUs to do source-only uploads > for packages which are missing binary builds on our buildds. With the release > of buster it became mandatory to build all binary packages on ou

Re: RFC: Split autopkgtest-pkg-ruby

2020-11-16 Thread Antonio Terceiro
Hi Daniel, On Sat, Nov 14, 2020 at 03:12:35AM +0100, Daniel Leidert wrote: > Hi there, > > I'd like to propose a minor change to how the automatic tests are created and > run in autopkgtest. By adding Testsuite: autopkgtest-pkg-ruby we enable some > automatically created autopkgtests. These are d

Re: Bug#973731: ITP: ruby-launchy -- helper class for launching cross-platform applications

2020-11-04 Thread Antonio Terceiro
Hi Daniel, On Wed, Nov 04, 2020 at 03:45:34AM +0100, Daniel Leidert wrote: > Sent back to the list and CC to Antonio > > Am Mittwoch, den 04.11.2020, 07:54 +0530 schrieb Pirate Praveen: > > On 2020, നവംബർ 4 7:05:29 AM IST, Daniel Leidert wrote: > > > Package: wnpp > > > Severity: wishlist > > >

Re: ${ruby:Depends}

2020-10-05 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Mon, Oct 05, 2020 at 01:23:22AM +0200, Daniel Leidert wrote: > Am Samstag, den 03.10.2020, 23:23 +0200 schrieb Cédric Boutillier: > > Dear Team members, > > > > I had a couple of questions about packaging workflow, which are maybe > > naive. Hopefully, answers will be useful for others too! > >

Re: [Reminder] Ruby team meeting tomorrow (04-09-2020) at 1630 UTC

2020-09-03 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Thu, Sep 03, 2020 at 10:58:45PM +0530, Utkarsh Gupta wrote: > Hi, > > We have a Ruby team meeting tomorrow, 04th September at 1630 UTC. Thanks for organizing. > This will *not* be *yet another* meeting, we'll try to be more > interactive, perhaps a Jitsi call (with, of course, discussions on

Re: Rails 6 transition - current status and blockers

2020-08-26 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 08:13:10PM -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 02:03:41AM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote: > > Hi, > > > > As discussed in today's ruby team BoF, I'm sending the list of current > > blockers for rails 6 transition. >

Re: Rails 6 transition - current status and blockers

2020-08-26 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 02:03:41AM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote: > Hi, > > As discussed in today's ruby team BoF, I'm sending the list of current > blockers for rails 6 transition. > > 1. node-yarnpkg blocked by node-babel removal (need to port to node-babel7) > - via ruby-webpackager which is cur

Re: no ri docs for packages outide of core ruby?

2020-08-06 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Sat, Aug 01, 2020 at 08:34:10PM -0400, salew...@att.net wrote: > Hi Folks, > > Is it intentional that 'ri' documentation is not provided for ruby-foo > packages? If so, what is the rationale? I often use ri for getting help about core classes, and wholehartly agree that it would be nice to hav

Re: Backporting ruby 2.7 for gitlab

2020-06-30 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 06:06:56PM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote: > > > On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 09:26, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 05:21:53PM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > gitlab stopped working with ruby

Re: Backporting ruby 2.7 for gitlab

2020-06-30 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 05:21:53PM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote: > Hi, > > gitlab stopped working with ruby 2.5 (they officially dropped support long > ago, but it was working fine till now). See > https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/225251 for details. In last > stable release we were lu

Bug#963750: RM: chef -- ROM; trademark issues

2020-06-26 Thread Antonio Terceiro
Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal As per #959981, Chef packages in Debian have trademark issues according to their upstream. https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=959981 The claims are questionable, are argued by Steve Langasek in a corresponding Ubuntu bug. https://bugs.laun

Re: heads up about lxc default network change (for meta/setup)

2020-05-31 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Sun, May 31, 2020 at 12:50:42AM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote: > Hi, > > I was asked about this change in lxc configuration when I did an apt update > on sid. > > --- /etc/lxc/default.conf 2020-02-03 18:58:42.920817709 +0530 > +++ /etc/lxc/default.conf.dpkg-new 2020-05-25 21:41:32.0 +053

Re: [DRE-maint] Bug#960229: RFP: pdfbeads -- utility to take scanned page images and convert them to a single PDF file

2020-05-12 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 10:45:52PM +, Georg Faerber wrote: > (Adding the Ruby team to the loop.) > > Hi team, Rogério, > > On 20-05-11 15:22:04, Rogério Brito wrote: > > On May 10 2020, Georg Faerber wrote: > > > On 20-05-10 17:24:12, Rogério Brito wrote: > > > > Since I don't know much ruby,

Re: gem2deb stable-bpo problem

2020-05-02 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Sat, May 02, 2020 at 04:41:12PM +0200, Daniel Leidert wrote: > Am Samstag, den 02.05.2020, 10:49 -0300 schrieb Antonio Terceiro: > > On Sat, May 02, 2020 at 03:11:19PM +0200, Daniel Leidert wrote: > > > Am Samstag, den 02.05.2020, 14:12 +0900 schrieb Marc Dequènes (du

Re: gem2deb stable-bpo problem

2020-05-02 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Sat, May 02, 2020 at 03:11:19PM +0200, Daniel Leidert wrote: > Am Samstag, den 02.05.2020, 14:12 +0900 schrieb Marc Dequènes (duck): > > Quack, > > > > If I rebuild redmine using gem2deb >= 1 I end-up with this error: > > gem2deb-test-runner : Breaks: ruby-mime-types (< 3.3.1-1~) but 3.2.2-1

Bug#959115: ruby-curses: Incorrect/misleading Maintainer: field

2020-04-29 Thread Antonio Terceiro
Source: ruby-curses Severity: normal This package says its maintained by the Debian Ruby team, but it's not in the team repositories. Maintainer: Debian Ruby Extras Maintainers Uploaders: Andrej Shadura [...] Vcs-Browser: https://browse.dgit.debian.org/ruby-curses.git/ Vcs-Git: https://git.dgi

Re: Weird issue with bundler

2020-04-27 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Sat, Apr 25, 2020 at 06:11:08PM +0200, Daniel Leidert wrote: > Am Samstag, den 25.04.2020, 16:20 +0200 schrieb deivid: > > [..] > > > I believe this is not about the number of gems in the block. When you > > > create a jekyll application, jekyll runs `bundle install` for you, so > > > the oth

Re: Should libruby2.x have Provides: ruby-foo (= x.y.z) for the gems it ships?

2020-04-13 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 01:03:47AM +0200, Daniel Leidert wrote: > Hi there, > > the libruby2.x packages ship special versions of some gems. Also in Ruby 2.7 > parts were split out into gems and we already packaged them separately. So the > gem is available from libruby2.7 and ruby-. But libruby ac

Re: Salsa team, and updating ruby-build

2020-04-06 Thread Antonio Terceiro
Hello Piper, Thanks for your contribution. On Mon, Apr 06, 2020 at 03:38:24PM +0200, Daniel Leidert wrote: > Am Montag, den 06.04.2020, 02:02 -0700 schrieb Piper McCorkle: > > On 4/6/20 12:28 AM, Piper McCorkle wrote: > > > once I get the changes pushed to Salsa > > I've accepted you. > > Pleas

Re: Bug#955583: ruby-defaults breaks ruby-mousetrap-rails autopkgtest: TypeError: no implicit conversion of String into Integer

2020-04-03 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Fri, Apr 03, 2020 at 07:58:03PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote: > Hi Antonio, > > On 03-04-2020 15:38, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > >> Bundle complete! 19 Gemfile dependencies, 77 gems now installed. > >> Use `bundle info [gemname]` to see where a bundled gem is install

Re: Bug#955583: ruby-defaults breaks ruby-mousetrap-rails autopkgtest: TypeError: no implicit conversion of String into Integer

2020-04-03 Thread Antonio Terceiro
Hi On Thu, Apr 02, 2020 at 09:38:26PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote: > Source: ruby-defaults, ruby-mousetrap-rails > Control: found -1 ruby-defaults/1:2.7 > Control: found -1 ruby-mousetrap-rails/1.4.6-6 > Severity: serious > Tags: sid bullseye > X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org > User: debian.

Re: planning to upload ruby-excon 0.72 to unstable causing ruby-vcr to ftbfs

2020-03-29 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Sun, Mar 29, 2020 at 02:15:02PM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote: > Hi ruby team, > > ruby-excon 0.72 causes ftbfs in ruby-vcr (all other reverse dependencies > still work) > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=954731 upstream did not > respond for over a month. If someone is intereste

REMOVED packages: please move repositories to ruby-team/attic

2020-03-27 Thread Antonio Terceiro
Hi, When packages get removed from the archive, please move their git repositories to the "Attic" subgroup so we keep an archive, and if necessary those repositories can still be used for stable updates. https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/attic signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: RFH: Need an explanation to fix #952027

2020-03-25 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 06:32:10PM +0100, Daniel Leidert wrote: > Hi, > > I just worked on fixing #952027. The issue at hand is easily fixable and I > already pushed the patch to Git. Unfortunately two more test failures appeared > recently, both of the same kind: > > https://salsa.debian.org/rub

Re: RFS: ruby-aws-sdk (second try)

2020-03-13 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 06:47:12PM +0100, David Suárez wrote: > El vie., 13 mar. 2020 18:30, Pirate Praveen > escribió: > > > > > > > On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 10:28 pm, Cédric Boutillier > > wrote: > > > Dear David, > > > > > > I am re-reading your mail > > > > > https://lists.debian.org/CAJg5+Z2

Re: parser vs ruby_parser gems

2020-03-13 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 01:41:37PM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote: > > > On 2020, മാർച്ച് 12 7:58:34 PM IST, Antonio Terceiro > wrote: > >On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 07:05:42PM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote: > >> On 2020, മാർച്ച് 12 12:28:52 AM IST, Kiran Skunjumon > &

Re: parser vs ruby_parser gems

2020-03-12 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 07:05:42PM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote: > On 2020, മാർച്ച് 12 12:28:52 AM IST, Kiran Skunjumon > wrote: > >their is two gem parser and ruby_parser. > >In debian ruby_parser is packaged under ruby-parser instead of > >ruby-ruby-parser. > >parser is a dependency of unparser

Re: Reminder for virtual meeting #1 \o/

2020-03-01 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Sun, Mar 01, 2020 at 09:01:31AM -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > On Sat, Feb 29, 2020 at 10:52:06PM +0530, Utkarsh Gupta wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Given that we decided that we'd have a virtual meeting once a month > > now, here's the first reminder for t

Re: Reminder for virtual meeting #1 \o/

2020-03-01 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Sat, Feb 29, 2020 at 10:52:06PM +0530, Utkarsh Gupta wrote: > Hi all, > > Given that we decided that we'd have a virtual meeting once a month > now, here's the first reminder for the same \o/ > > To find a common date for the meeting, here's a poll: > https://framadate.org/ruby-team-virtual-me

Re: new warning in meta/build-and-upload

2020-02-29 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Sat, Feb 29, 2020 at 02:17:10PM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote: > Hi, > > Thanks Antonio for the new changes in meta/build-and-upload > > But I think this warning, > > WARNING: No reverse dependencies that can be tested identified; proceed with > care > > should differentiate between a package

Bug#952792: RM: chef/13.8.7-6

2020-02-29 Thread Antonio Terceiro
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: rm X-Debbugs-CC: stefa...@debian.org, debian-ruby@lists.debian.org Please remove chef from testing. It's marked for autoremoval due to a RC bug; fixing the RC bug will take a while (needs a new upst

Re: Problem with ruby-espeak and CSV.parse changes

2020-02-26 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 01:07:17PM +0100, Daniel Leidert wrote: > Hi there, > > the newly accepted ruby-espeak (one of the Kali packages) fails to test > successfully with Ruby2.7. The reason seems that CSV.parse() has a behavior > change. It does not parse the file test/fixtures/voices.txt anymor

Re: RFH: Trying to make the ruby-rouge tests work

2020-02-20 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 12:00:29AM +0100, Daniel Leidert wrote: > Hi everybody, > > I need some help fixing the test run for ruby-rouge. The package built from > the > gem in the past and didn't have the tests. So for the latest release I changed > the source and used the github tarballs. Unfortu

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   >