>
> Hello Paul,
>
> Thank you for the update on the status of the system and the Munin graphs.
> I think it's a good idea to wait until after the bookworm release to
> investigate further.
>
> However, I would like to take you up on the offer to schedule and/or
> arrange access to an LXC container
Hi Elizabeth,
On 18-04-2023 22:46, Elizabeth K. Joseph wrote:
I noticed that the Munin graphs are showing that the queue problems
from earlier this year seem to have been reduced now, is that correct,
or has the VM just not been restarted lately? It would be helpful to
have a starting point.
On Sun, Feb 12, 2023 at 1:39 PM Paul Gevers wrote:
> I can provide logging from the host, but I'll need detailed instructions
> of what people find useful to look at. Recently Antonio taught me a
> trick to provide temporary access to a lxc container on any of our
> hosts, so if it helps to be on
Hi,
On 28-02-2023 01:39, James Addison wrote:
Attempting to sum together what look, to me, like a pair of 2s:
* The s390x Debian CI queue size[1] is growing again.
Yes, but this time it's because some test seems to be misbehaving (only
on s390x or big endian or... ) and fills the disk
Attempting to sum together what look, to me, like a pair of 2s:
* The s390x Debian CI queue size[1] is growing again.
* A recent bug report[2] by Dipak describes userspace processes
getting stuck on an s390 Linux kernel version that Debian's CI infra
has been using
The bug does seem to have
Hi,
On 21-02-2023 17:46, Dipak Zope1 wrote:
I am wondering whether we have downgraded the machines to 5.10.0-20
kernel to get rid of the kernel bug.
I think I mentioned it before, we downgraded indeed:
root@ci-worker-s390x-01:~# uname -a
Linux ci-worker-s390x-01 5.10.0-20-s390x #1 SMP Debian
I am wondering whether we have downgraded the machines to 5.10.0-20 kernel to
get rid of the kernel bug which is known to cause issue in user processes at
random - described in the cover letter here:
https://lists.debian.org/debian-s390/2023/02/msg00019.html
The following patch fixes this
On 16.02.23 17:49, Paul Gevers wrote:
As you can see e.g. here [1,2] it comes and goes (albeit sometimes the
queue was empty). I don't think its very different, I just never got out
of the s390x host what I was expecting. Long time I blamed it on the
"stealing" that happens on a shared host,
Hi,
On 17.02.23 17:04, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
So there is for sure something wrong with the client-server connection
there. Reworking the client for robustness is on my TODO list for a
while.
There's a lot of these:
Feb 14 08:56:25 ci-worker-s390x-01 debci[1155941]: waiting for header
> James Addison suggested in [3] to increase a prefetch counter in amqp
> (although its the same on all hosts); I have done so on the s390x host and at
> least initially it seems to help keeping the host busier.
Thanks for applying that - I was hoping that the change might also
result in
On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 09:42:09PM +0100, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Hi Phil,
>
> On 13-02-2023 08:57, Philipp Kern wrote:
> > On 12.02.23 22:38, Paul Gevers wrote:
> > > I have munin [1], but as said, I'm not a trained sysadmin. I don't
> > > know what I'm looking for if you ask "statistics on the
Hi,
On 13-02-2023 15:59, Dipak Zope1 wrote:
There is some issue with 5.10.0-21 kernel and we are working on it. This
can cause performance impact on CI servers.
I have rebooted to the old kernel yesterday. That helps a bit indeed,
although most of the issues I reported predate that kernel
Hi Phil,
On 13-02-2023 08:57, Philipp Kern wrote:
On 12.02.23 22:38, Paul Gevers wrote:
I have munin [1], but as said, I'm not a trained sysadmin. I don't
know what I'm looking for if you ask "statistics on the network".
This is more of a software development / devops question than a
porting team
From: Philipp Kern
Date: Monday, 13 February 2023 at 1:28 PM
To: Paul Gevers , debian-s390
, bar...@velocitysoftware.com
, Paul Flint
Cc: Debian CI team
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: help needed to manage s390x host for ci.debian.net
Hi,
On 12.02.23 22:38, Paul Gevers wrote:
> I h
Hi,
On 12.02.23 22:38, Paul Gevers wrote:
I have munin [1], but as said, I'm not a trained sysadmin. I don't know
what I'm looking for if you ask "statistics on the network".
This is more of a software development / devops question than a sysadmin
question, but alas. What I am interested in
I am not CI/networking expert, but I will be more than happy to assist.
I am at +0530 hrs available widely.
Thanks,
-Dipak Zope
Debian s390 porting team
On 13/02/23, 3:09 AM, "Paul Gevers" wrote:
Hi Phil and all others offering help,
On 12-02-2023 20:32, Philipp Kern wrote:
> On 11.02.23
Hi Phil and all others offering help,
On 12-02-2023 20:32, Philipp Kern wrote:
On 11.02.23 18:18, Paul Gevers wrote:
* [suspect 1] network issues between the s390x and the main ci.d.n
server (the results (log files) of the autopkgtests are transferred to
the main server). Our ppc64el hosts
On 11.02.23 18:18, Paul Gevers wrote:
* [suspect 1] network issues between the s390x and the main ci.d.n
server (the results (log files) of the autopkgtests are transferred to
the main server). Our ppc64el hosts are also located at Marist, so I
would expect commonality here, but also ppc64el
Dear all,
This is a call for help, mostly for s390x specifically and debugging our
s390x host,
ci.debian.net is the infrastructure that enables the Debian Release Team
to run autopkgtest as part of the quality assurance for
unstable-to-testing migration. Historically, that used to be
19 matches
Mail list logo
