Hi kentaro,
> On 08/17/2024 10:43 AM IST Kentaro Hayashi wrote:
> I'm now working on packaging gr-framework, [1] then
> pushed recent WIP repository to salsa.d.o [2].
>
> But I can't finish to run CI/CD yet because path of CI/CD
> configuration file is not set.
>
> Could you set CI/CD configura
On Mon, Aug 05, 2024 at 02:53:16PM +0200, Michael R. Crusoe wrote:
> I fixed all the gcc-14 bugs in NCL that I could find, but one, in
> https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/ncl/-/commit/32b3ee86925703050ca330352207885e210e6e4c
>
> > NclHDF5.c:5745:52: error: initialization of 'NhlErrorTypes (*)
On Sun, Jul 07, 2024 at 11:17:17AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Am Mon, Jul 01, 2024 at 01:42:06PM -0700 schrieb Diane Trout:
> > Is there a way we could coordinate and split up updating packages? I
> > think the widgets package has been missing the javascript libraries
> > forever.
> >
> > Also
Hi Michael, Yaroslav,
I have been the only person fixing bugs and updating seaborn
since almost 4 years by now. From what I can see from the upload
history, your last upload for the package was in 2016.
Are you still interested to maintain this package?
If not, in order to reflect the uploaders
On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 11:44:25AM +0100, Markus Blatt wrote:
> Just Maintainer of some packages but not alberta.
That should change in a few minutes? :-)
$ dcut dm --uid mar...@dr-blatt.de --allow alberta
Uploading commands file to ftp.upload.debian.org (incoming: /pub/UploadQueue/)
Pick
On Tue, Feb 06, 2024 at 08:43:28PM -0500, Yogeswaran Umasankar wrote:
> I have updated ‘python-quantities’ with new upstream version 0.15.0 and
> updated the patch accordingly for your review [0]. Autopkgtest shows
> PASS (superficial) locally.
The patch to remove _version import was un-necessary
On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 08:05:35AM +, Rebecca N. Palmer wrote:
> In particular, I'd like the seaborn fix uploaded before pandas, so I can set
> Breaks for it. (The pandas documentation build-depends on seaborn.)
https://tracker.debian.org/news/1498923/accepted-seaborn-0132-1-source-into-unsta
On Sat, Jan 13, 2024 at 09:03:07AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> This is surely due to the removal of versioneer in upstream commit
> 6fca42bc1cd0acea2153b074658b834231a4d00f - but I can't imaginge upstream
> simply left the according responsible line
>
> sparse/__init__.py:from ._version import
On Sun, Dec 31, 2023 at 03:30:09PM +0100, Thomas Schiex wrote:
> Dear Debian-science maintainers,
> Dear Nilesh,
>
> I have solved all the errors I had for packaging toulbar2
> (https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/toulbar2), now tested on sid.
>
> The remaining "privacy-breach-generic" warnings
Hi Thomas,
On Sat, Dec 30, 2023 at 06:11:55PM +0100, Thomas Schiex wrote:
> I have uploaded a new version of toulbar2
> (https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/toulbar2) but I'm facing two issues:
>
> 1. when I try a debuild -B (on bookworm) after cloning and installing
>build dependencies, th
On Sun, Oct 08, 2023 at 12:55:28PM +0100, Rebecca N. Palmer wrote:
> Hence, if nobody objects I intend to take over maintenance of this package.
> I will need either DM permissions or sponsorship to upload it.
I have processed this bit for you, HTH.
$ dcut dm --uid rebecca_pal...@zoho.com --allow
On Fri, Jul 14, 2023 at 11:33:37AM +0100, Dave Love wrote:
> (I'd contribute to Debian packaging if it didn't require an account on
> salsa, which requires Recaptcha.)
You can send patches via BTS, if you don't want to create a salsa
account. BTS is the standard way of filing/reacting to bug repor
On Sat, Apr 29, 2023 at 07:44:24PM +0530, Nilesh Patra wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 18, 2023 at 03:54:23PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> >2. Remove the package from testing for the moment. The only
> > rdepends is currently pan-grazing-incidence which will be
> > low
On Tue, Apr 18, 2023 at 03:54:23PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> and we have other errors for other architectures which all contain
> the string "numba". IMHO this is a mess we can hardly fix in hard
> freeze. I see only two chances:
I haven't done a thorough research but it is probably originat
On Fri, Apr 21, 2023 at 08:32:55AM +0200, Martin Dosch wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gummi":
>
> * Package name : gummi
>Version : 0.8.3-1
Uploaded. Please file an unblock request as per freeze policy for it to
make it to next stable/migrate to testing.
ht
On 3/11/23 20:48, Sascha Steinbiss wrote:
I agree. At the moment, though, I must admit I don't really need it anymore
since the package that I originally needed it for as a dependency (vast) is no
longer a priority for me. So for me there would be little motivation to keep it
updated (and also
On 20 December 2021 9:17:40 pm IST, Sascha Steinbiss wrote:
>TLDR: I have prepared a package to cover as much of Arrow as is possible
>with what we have in Debian, dependency-wise. There is still a review of
>d/copyright missing, and some bundled code might need some extra love or
>removal.
>
>
reopen 1016732
stop
Hi Yadd,
On Fri, Jan 27, 2023 at 07:45:35PM +, Krüger, Sebastian wrote:
> I'm not a Shiny user either (so far), however the plan is for our institute
> to provide Shiny applications for certain users. (I will probably write some
> of these applications at some point, and
On Sat, Jan 14, 2023 at 11:12:07AM +, Rebecca N. Palmer wrote:
> theano has been mostly abandoned upstream since 2018. (The Aesara fork is
> not abandoned, but includes interface changes including the import name, so
> would break reverse dependencies not specifically altered for it.)
>
> Its
On 6 January 2023 1:26:05 pm IST, "Rebecca N. Palmer"
wrote:
>Should this go ahead before the freeze? I think yes if the new dask works,
>but am open to disagreement.
The version of dask is same since few months. What do you mean by new dask?
>skbio #1017574
This has been fixed in latest
On Fri, Oct 28, 2022 at 10:47:01PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Am Sat, Oct 29, 2022 at 01:32:59AM +0530 schrieb Nilesh Patra:
> > >
> > On Wed, Oct 26, 2022 at 11:17:38AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > > Shayan, do you think you can fix this patch you once obtai
On Mon, Nov 28, 2022 at 05:45:02PM +1100, Stuart Prescott wrote:
> On 28/11/2022 10:55, Dima Kogan wrote:
> > Hi. I've been manually checking the merge requests, and have been
> > accepting most of them. There is one thing the janitor does that I don't
> > agree with, and I'd be against any automat
On Sun, Nov 27, 2022 at 03:55:05PM -0800, Dima Kogan wrote:
> Hi. I've been manually checking the merge requests, and have been
> accepting most of them. There is one thing the janitor does that I don't
> agree with, and I'd be against any automated merging of those patches.
> This is adding Build-
Shayan, do you think you can fix this patch you once obtained from some
> project that seems to have stalled since 9 years? Otherwise I'd tend to
> remove the patch and thus the OCaml support again.
I am interested in knowing as to why are we keeping ocaml support in the first
place?
In other w
On Fri, Oct 21, 2022 at 10:03:49AM -1000, Chiara Marmo wrote:
> > The dust settled much sooner than I had imagined. I tested your patch and
> > it works
> > fine there.
> > I replied to the g/h issue as well.
> >
> >
> Thanks!
> I have pushed a -4 version to salsa with the patch.
> If it is worth t
On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 10:30:58AM -1000, Chiara Marmo wrote:
> >
> > No need to jump that many hoops, all DDs have access to a bunch of
> > machines[2]
> > so I could test it for you.
> >
> >
> Oh, wonderful then! :)
The dust settled much sooner than I had imagined. I tested your patch and it
wo
On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 09:03:12AM -1000, Chiara Marmo wrote:
> Dear list,
>
> the joblib test test_joblib_pickle_across_python_versions_with_mmap fails
> on big endian architecture s390x.
> I have offered a patch to upstream [1]: the developers seem inclined to
> merge but they are wondering if i
On Wed, Oct 05, 2022 at 11:58:56AM +0200, Andrea Pappacoda wrote:
> I always fear to mess something up, but you're right; I'll push directly to
> the repo :)
If you want to get this uploaded, can you push your changes to salsa?
--
Best,
Nilesh
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 08:19:18AM -1000, Chiara Marmo wrote:
> The test I was supposed to skip is still run
eeks! that is because it is an autopkgtest and not a build time
test -- you did not skip that and I completely forgot to
check it before upload.
I uploaded a new revision. Situation sh
On Sun, Oct 09, 2022 at 12:47:14PM -0400, Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
> Nilesh Patra writes:
>
> > I could push the package to new again, with a new revision
> > but I fear another CVE being discovered meanwhile and we run into circles.
>
> You can temporarily have a s
On Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 06:06:00PM -1000, Chiara Marmo wrote:
> Sorry for the noise... I mixed up two similar tests... :(
> I have now pushed the right skip on salsa.
... And, I have uploaded again with your changes.
> In the meanwhile I have taken a deeper look to the failure and opened an
> iss
Hi Chiara,
Unfortunately joblib fails its test on s390x, and I don't have any time
to dig further -- could you take a look please?
https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/s390x/j/joblib/26916492/log.gz
--
Best,
Nilesh
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Sun, Oct 09, 2022 at 10:52:45AM -1000, Chiara Marmo wrote:
> > I could push the package to new again, with a new revision
> > > but I fear another CVE being discovered meanwhile and we run into
> > circles.
> >
> >
> Thanks Nilesh for the upload and your explanations.
>
>
> > You can temporari
Hi Chiara,
On Sun, Sep 18, 2022 at 11:31:34AM -1000, Chiara Marmo wrote:
> I have updated joblib to 1.2.0 on salsa.
> If someone has sometime to review or upload... thanks for your help.
I uploaded 1.2.0-1 to unstable. But I selectively reverted a commit -- in
particular
I removed the -doc packa
On Sun, Oct 02, 2022 at 10:04:07PM +0200, Andrea Pappacoda wrote:
> Il giorno dom 2 ott 2022 alle 20:54:01 +02:00:00, Ghislain Vaillant
> ha scritto:
> > Feel free to assist with maintenance of any of my packages under the
> > Debian science team umbrella.
> >
> > You don't need to ask for permis
On Sat, Sep 17, 2022 at 09:40:22PM +0200, Andrea Pappacoda wrote:
> Il giorno sab 17 set 2022 alle 23:19:48 +05:30:00, Nilesh Patra
> ha scritto:
> > I have added you to the science team. Feel free to ping me if you still
> > run into any issues with permissions.
>
>
On 9/17/22 22:40, Andrea Pappacoda wrote:
Hi list, I've recently started maintaining the glm package (special thanks to
Pierre and Anton for the help and feedback!), and while I'm now allowed to do
DM uploads to it, I still don't have write access to the science-team/glm Salsa
repo.
Could som
Hi Mo,
It seems that the migration of oneTBB to testing is stalled (since 16 days) due
to FTBFS on ppc64el with some linker errors[1]
I am not sure what is up there, could you please take a look?
[1]:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=onetbb&arch=ppc64el&ver=2021.5.0-13&stamp=166226
On 8/13/22 13:34, Andreas Tille wrote:
The drawback of this solution is that we will not get any warning for
new *potentially more important* issues since all test failures will be
ignored now. For me this is outweighted by the advantage that we can
present upstream a full log of all issues in c
On 7/23/22 1:21 PM, Antonio Valentino wrote:
Dear debian science maintainers,
Il 19/07/22 08:50, Debian FTP Masters ha scritto:
ACL dm: not allowed to upload source package 'python-rioxarray'
could someone please grant me permissions to upload the python-rioxarray
package as described on [
On 7/20/22 4:50 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
Hi,
Am Sat, Jul 16, 2022 at 05:58:33PM +0200 schrieb julien.pu...@gmail.com:
[1]:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=scikit-learn&arch=armel&ver=1.1.1-1&stamp=1653343638&raw=0
I would open a bug report to upstream pointing to that log, and
Hi,
scikit-learn has been stuck for sometime from migrating.
I checked the build logs, most of them is due to some precision error -- no big
deal.
However, the build log on armel is worrying me a bit because it seems to
segfault[1]
Would someone know how to go about it?
[1]:
https://buildd.deb
On Wed, Jul 06, 2022 at 01:08:53PM +0530, Shobhit Singh wrote:
> I want to start contribute to Debian Science (especially maths and logic).
If you are interested in math, you might want to check out the debian math
team[1]
> What are all the ways I can contribute to this team?
Number of ways,
On Mon, Jun 06, 2022 at 10:49:11AM +0200, Agathe Porte wrote:
> Hi Debian Science Team,
>
> I am currently maintaining ortools into the science-team Salsa namespace
> [1]. However, it seems that I cannot merge pull-requests on the ortools repo
> [2]. Could you please provide me the rights to do so
On 6/2/22 2:37 PM, PIERRE SARAMITO wrote:
Hi Nilesh Patra,
> From Nilesh Patra:
> I'm a bit confused with the branches though,
> isn't debian/sid the branch we should be using for uploads?
> Atleast I am seeing prev commits on that branch.
> Please move your co
On 2 June 2022 11:57:38 am IST, PIERRE SARAMITO wrote:
>I just commit with git a new release 7.2-1 of the debianization of the rheolef
>package.
>This corresponds to a new version 7.2 of the upstream package
>
>Could you please upload it in debian ?
I can do it later today.
I'm a bit confu
On Mon, May 23, 2022 at 11:52:39PM -1000, Chiara Marmo wrote:
> Since this is a major version change, you need to also rebuild
> >> reverse-dependencies (basically
> >> the packages that depend on joblib) with ratt[1] or r-t/meta[2] as
> >> otherwise
> >> it might end up breaking a number of packag
On Mon, May 23, 2022 at 10:34:26AM -1000, Chiara Marmo wrote:
> > This is a major version upgrade, and joblib is an important package with a
> > number
> > of reverse-deps some of which are key ones (like dask for instance) -- have
> > you tested using ratt or something similar as to how compatible
On Mon, May 23, 2022 at 09:44:07AM -1000, Chiara Marmo wrote:
> Dear list,
>
> I've taken the liberty to merge my merge requests.
>
> Joblib version 1.1.0 is now on salsa [1] ready for review and upload if
> some with upload rights is available to do so.
This is a major version upgrade, and jobl
On Sun, May 22, 2022 at 05:40:10PM -1000, Chiara Marmo wrote:
> Dear list,
>
> scikit-learn 1.1.1 is on salsa available for upload, if anyone with upload
> rights could take some time to do so.
Uploaded, thanks!
--
Best,
Nilesh
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On 5/20/22 8:31 PM, Bill Allombert wrote:
On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 08:39:56PM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote:
I've just started looking at lean. One of the issues around packaging
it is that different lean "scripts" (not sure the correct word here)
require different versions of lean. There is a scr
On 2 May 2022 1:23:31 pm IST, Markus Blatt wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Would be cool if someone with the necessary right would press "giveback" for
>the arm64 build at [1]. Unfortunately, I cannot do that myself (as a Debian
>Maintainer) as buildd says "You need to be in the "debian" group for now.".
>Th
On 27 April 2022 7:41:40 pm IST, Andreas Tille wrote:
>> Um, weird.
>> It works fine for me (checked on a clean system in a chroot), are you using
>> terser provided by "uglifyjs.terser"?
>
>No, just terser from unstable.
Then maybe you have an older copy. Terser is a virtual package now.
On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 03:22:59PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Thanks a lot for your help on this (deserves another $drink from me ;-) )
This count is increasing with each passing day :)
> Those three failing tests are patched out now.
Fine
> > BTW please repack all the minified files and mi
On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 10:59:25AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> ── Error (test-theme-base-colors.R:45:3): bs3 base colors
> ──
> Error in `compile_data(sass_input, options)`: Error: Invalid CSS after "...
> floor(math": expected expression (e.g. 1px, bold), was ".div($gri
On Tue, Apr 26, 2022 at 04:21:44PM -0400, Eric Brown wrote:
> Hi Nilesh,
> That's good news - however on a fresh debian unstable, when I
> installed shiny-server from experimental, starting it results in an
> immediate segmentation fault.
Weird, and unfortunately I am not able to reproduce this, t
Good news folks, shiny-server is in our archive (experimental suite) now \o/
- Forwarded message from Debian FTP Masters
-
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2022 18:00:17 +
From: Debian FTP Masters
To: Nilesh Patra , Debian Med Packaging Team
Subject: node-shiny-server_1.5.17.973-1_amd64
Listmasters seem to have processed our request[1] for new mailing list. The new
list is now available at:
https://lists.debian.org/debian-math/
[1]: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=998244#65
Regards,
Nilesh
On 4/14/22 12:19 AM, Eric Brown wrote:
This works well. So we did it, shiny-server now runs packaged for Debian.
Thanks for confirming. I uploaded sockjs with relevant changes.
Finally, I have uploaded node-shiny-server to NEW queue, targetting
experimental \o/
Thanks to everyone who contrib
On 4/13/22 9:18 PM, Eric Brown wrote:
Thank you Yadd! In my testing with the builds from Nilesh, the problem
with node-sockjs-client is fixed.
And thank you Nilesh for building for me and trying to address to
node_modules directory issue. The build of shiny-server you shared
doesn't work, shiny-
On 4/13/22 10:27 AM, Yadd wrote:
I pushed on unoptimized build-with-gulp. Could you test it?
Thanks a lot, Yadd!
@Eric, I have pushed the corresponding .deb here[1] and the
rest of the fixes as per your other email here[2]
Could you please consider testing your apps with these debs?
That'd be
Hi Eric,
Apologies again for the late reply, I am more or less on a VAC these days :(
On 4/7/22 10:58 AM, Eric Brown wrote:
Thanks and no worries. I have pushed the changes to the
node-shiny-server repo that correspond to the fixes in my previous
email. I am new to Debian packaging so please re
Hi Yadd,
On 4/13/22 12:31 AM, Eric Brown wrote:
Actually it looks like our packaging of shiny-server does
work fine with node-sockjs-client 1.6.0 but there's an issue with the
Debian version of node-sockjs-client. So there is no need to roll back
to 1.5.2.
When the upstream built dist/sockjs.js
Hello and apologies for late reply, I am really swamped with work and real life
stuff
these days.
On Tue, Apr 05, 2022 at 09:05:39PM -0400, Eric Brown wrote:
> Hi Nilesh, Andreas et al.
>
> We spoke about this in the Debian med videoconference. In summary,
> Nilesh noted he will likely be able t
Hi Eric,
On Sun, Mar 27, 2022 at 06:18:49PM +0530, Nilesh Patra wrote:
> > > 3. update outdated node-shiny-server-client to latest upstream
> >
> > Seems a wise thing to do.
>
> I have done so.
>
> @Eric, if you can try with the newer versions of these packages
On Sun, Mar 27, 2022 at 09:17:14AM +0300, Andrius Merkys wrote:
> Sorry I cannot keep up with all the developments. I have no idea how
> shiny-server work,
Me neither, I was looking into docs and running it. Well, someone has to
do it.
> Replying only to Eric's summary of nodejs dependencies.
>
Hi Eric,
On Sat, Mar 26, 2022 at 12:20:59PM -0400, Eric Brown wrote:
> > I will try to update the package and see. If it's not too much work, I'll
> > push an update.
>
> Great thanks, and I'd be happy to test again.
I have updated to the latest version and pushed to my personal repo. I did
not
Hi Eric and Andreas,
Replying to both in the same mail
On 26 March 2022 11:20:22 am IST, Andreas Tille wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Am Fri, Mar 25, 2022 at 08:37:52PM -0400 schrieb Eric Brown:
>> Thank you Nilesh for explaining why we can't have the example files
>> placed in /srv automatically. It's not c
Also adding andreas to the loop in case he has time to check.
Andreas, if you happen to build shiny-server, please remember to add
https://people.debian.org/~nilesh/shiny-server/
to your pbuilder extra-repos.
On Fri, Mar 25, 2022 at 11:10:04AM +0530, Nilesh Patra wrote:
> Hi E
Hi Eric,
thanks for the feedback
On Thu, Mar 24, 2022 at 09:40:30PM -0400, Eric Brown wrote:
> First, there are missing symlinks at /srv/shiny-server. I think the
> expected behaviour is for there to be symbolic links to an index.html
> [...]
I don't think this can happen in the debian land, unf
Hi Eric,
On 3/24/22 10:05 PM, Eric Brown wrote:
Hi Nilesh,
I'm not sure whether you are running the current shiny-server version
on salsa (upstream 1.5.14.948) but if so, the errors may be because it
is out of date and subsequent to that release there were some changes
to the iputils.js file
(h
On 3/24/22 3:09 PM, Nilesh Patra wrote:
On Thu, Mar 24, 2022 at 10:12:13AM +0200, Andrius Merkys wrote:
Oh right, it is 'node-send' which needs patching:
[...]
However, I have no idea how to fix this in 'node-send'.
I figured out the problem. It is so because the debian
On Thu, Mar 24, 2022 at 10:12:13AM +0200, Andrius Merkys wrote:
> Oh right, it is 'node-send' which needs patching:
> [...]
> However, I have no idea how to fix this in 'node-send'.
I figured out the problem. It is so because the debian package node-send is
patched[1]
to use node-mime-types inste
Hi Andrius,
On Thu, Mar 24, 2022 at 08:41:01AM +0200, Andrius Merkys wrote:
> Looking deeper into it, the problem seems to be that node-mime-types has
> dropped define() in v2.0.0, as per
> /usr/share/doc/node-mime-types/HISTORY.md.gz:
>
> 2.0.0 / 2014-09-02
> ==
>
> * Use `mim
On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 05:21:04PM +0200, Andrius Merkys wrote:
> Revisiting shiny-server, I have turned on the build time tests to have a
> better understanding of what is left to be done. Tests now fail due to
> missing rewire:
I uploaded rewire to NEW. On testing locally with rewire, I get:
|
On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 05:01:01PM +0100, Diego M. Rodriguez wrote:
> What would be the most sensible way to signal either that help would be
> needed, or that the effort has stopped? We informally thought of
> orphaning the package, but if there is indeed interest, might not be the
> best approach
On 3/14/22 11:51 AM, Andreas Tille wrote:
Hi,
Am Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 12:13:50AM + schrieb Torrance, Douglas:
On Sun 13 Mar 2022 04:50:32 PM EDT, M. Zhou wrote:
Recently I'm not able to test the build of libtbb-dev's reverse dependencies
as my build machine was out of access. That blocks
Hi Mo,
On 2/23/22 11:01 AM, M. Zhou wrote:
Hello guys. Finally it's all green on our release architectures
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=onetbb&suite=experimental
I shall request the slot for transition once finished the rebuild
of its reverse dependencies and filed FTBFS bugs
On Sun, Mar 13, 2022 at 01:49:53PM +0100, Tino Didriksen wrote:
> Tools updated and pushed to Salsa:
> - https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/cg3
> - https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/hfst-ospell
> - https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/lttoolbox
> - https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/aper
On Sun, Mar 13, 2022 at 01:28:29PM +0530, Kartik Mistry wrote:
> Hi Nilesh,
>
> Thanks for heads up but we are aware about these RC bugs and upstream
> is working on these bugs. It requires the latest hfst and lexd to
> migrate to testing (Both were accepted/uploaded in the last 2 weeks)
> and we
Hi Kartik/Tino,
As you might have noticed, the latest version of apertium in debian
changed a requirement on one command line option, and that has opened
several RC bugs in the language pair packages[1]
Tino told me several months back[2] that they plan on removing these lang pairs
altogether
an
Hi Diego/Luciano,
qiskit-{aer,terra,ibmq-provider} has not been in testing for a fairly long
time, and had long un-resolved RC bugs - which somehow gives me a feeling
that it isn't very well maintained.
I happened to fix them yesterday and uploaded; but I noticed that
the version in debian severe
Hi Diego/Luciano,
qiskit-{aer,terra,ibmq-provider} has not been in testing for a fairly long
time, and had long un-resolved RC bugs - which somehow gives me a feeling
that it isn't very well maintained.
I happened to fix them yesterday and uploaded; but I noticed that
the version in debian severe
On 2/22/22 5:36 PM, Anton Gladky wrote:
> Hello Drew,
>
> It is a very good idea!
>
> Though I would separate this task from QA-work on Debian Science
> packages. [...]
Anton, Google is reviewing our projects (as I saw one of the admins saying that
on IRC)
So you might want to add atleast one p
On 2/17/22 8:52 PM, Nilesh Patra wrote:
Optionally it would be nice to also upload the new versions of opm-material
and opm-model, where mainly fix the Architectures in d/control such that
buildd will try to build them on all available architectures. But I can also
do that later, when key is
On 25 February 2022 2:36:28 am IST, Andrius Merkys wrote:
>On Thu, 24 Feb 2022, 22:21 Andreas Tille, wrote:
>> > I have turned this commit into a patch, and now sockjs-client builds and
>> > passes its autopkgtest successfully. So we do not have to wait for the
>> > next release.
>>
>> Would y
Hi Markus,
On Tue, Feb 22, 2022 at 02:17:02PM +0100, Markus Blatt wrote:
> Seems like the failing tests on platforms might still prevent migration
> to testing:
> [...]
> On those platforms there are no binary packages due to missing dependencies.
> that use "Restrictions: skip-not-installable"
Hi Markus,
On Mon, Feb 21, 2022 at 03:55:51PM +0100, Markus Blatt wrote:
> > Looks like opm-upscaling and opm-simulators are not building on buildd
> > machines
> > as seen here[1][2]
> > It chokes at missing B-D[3]
> >
> > | opm-upscaling build-depends on missing:
> > | - libsuperlu3-dev:amd64
On Sun, Feb 20, 2022 at 08:43:44PM +0100, Timo Röhling wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just fixed an RC bug in genetic and uploaded the packages, but
> apparently I'm not allowed to push my changes to protected branches
> (in this case, the master branch of the repository). Could a Salsa
> group owner please i
Hi Markus,
On Thu, Feb 17, 2022 at 10:28:58PM +0100, Markus Blatt wrote:
> > Done, thanks for your work!
>
> Thanks a lot.
Looks like opm-upscaling and opm-simulators are not building on buildd machines
as seen here[1][2]
It chokes at missing B-D[3]
| opm-upscaling build-depends on missing:
| -
Hi Markus,
> these packages have been accepted by ftp-master into Debian.
> Thanks a lot for the work of everybody involved.
>
> You can find the status quo at
> https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/opm-grid
> https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/opm-simulators
> https://salsa.debian.org/science
Hi Maarten,
On 2/9/22 11:51 PM, Maarten L. Hekkelman wrote:
Op 9-2-2022 om 17:38 schreef Andrius Merkys:
By the way, maybe you have tested the reverse dependencies?
ehm, how am I supposed to do that? Is there a simple way to test this?
I guess I should know the answer, but I don't.
Three
Hi Drew,
You uploaded new version of sklearn a week ago, but unfortunately it seems
to not build on several architectures and also has a failing autopkgtest on
amd64.
Would you have any plans to fix the situation?
[1]: https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=scikit-learn
Regards,
Nilesh
si
On 4 December 2021 5:43:35 pm IST, Tobias Hansen wrote:
>On 11/3/21 4:08 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
>> Am Wed, Nov 03, 2021 at 04:55:54PM +0100 schrieb Julien Puydt:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Le lundi 01 novembre 2021 à 15:28 +0100, Andreas Tille a écrit :
How to move a package:
In Salsa:
On 11 November 2021 5:44:09 am IST, Drew Parsons wrote:
>On 2021-11-10 20:19, Rebecca N. Palmer wrote:
>> Source: pandas
>>
>> On 10/11/2021 17:14, Andreas Tille wrote:
>>> pandas is lagging behind upstream by several versions. I guess we
>>> should try to get in sync with upstream a bit more
On 11 November 2021 1:37:57 am IST, Gordon Ball wrote:
>On Wed, Nov 10, 2021 at 07:32:53PM +0100, Timo Röhling wrote:
>> Hi Andreas,
>>
>> * Andreas Tille [2021-11-10 18:14]:
>> > nbsphinx.NotebookError: TypeError in user_guide/style.ipynb:
>> > 'coroutine' object is not subscriptable
>> T
On Wed, Nov 10, 2021 at 02:02:08PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > Probably i just forgot to commit to git..
>
> Yes, I've just seen some -1 Version in experimental...
The tracker also does not show the repository (VCS: unknown) and also
an ancient S-V (3.9.8)
would you consider modernizing it wh
On Wed, Nov 10, 2021 at 09:55:47AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am Tue, Nov 09, 2021 at 08:50:08PM +0530 schrieb Nilesh Patra:
> > Maybe, it is also a fine idea to move packages which are important in the
> > science team,
> > but are unmaintained.
>
>
On Wed, Nov 10, 2021 at 09:55:47AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am Tue, Nov 09, 2021 at 08:50:08PM +0530 schrieb Nilesh Patra:
> > Maybe, it is also a fine idea to move packages which are important in the
> > science team,
> > but are unmaintained.
>
>
On Mon, Nov 08, 2021 at 10:54:35AM -0500, M. Zhou wrote:
> Hi,
>
> At this point I have some doubt on "what should be moved to
> math team." The borderline and the expected outcome are
> not discussed in some specific cases.
>
> In my understanding, domain-specific mathematical applications,
> su
1 - 100 of 165 matches
Mail list logo
