Hi neuro and science team,
while fixing the build of itksnap with VTK 9.1 [1], it seems that the
package fails due to java libraries not found at runtime, beside it
build-depends on "default-jre" package.
The salsa CI fails [2] with:
"warning: cannot resolve item 'libjaw
Package: wnpp
Owner: Ole Streicher
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, debian-as...@lists.debian.org,
debian-j...@lists.debian.org, debian-science@lists.debian.org
* Package name: unity-java
Version : 1.1b
Upstream Author : Norman Gray
* URL
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Pierre Gruet
User: debian-science@lists.debian.org
Usertags: field..science
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, debian-science@lists.debian.org
* Package name: xgboost-predictor-java
Version : 0.3.1
Upstream Author : KOMIYA Atsushi
collaborators
* URL : https://jgrapht.org/
* License : LGPL-2.1 or EPL-2.0
Programming Lang: Java
Description : Java library of graph theory data structures and algorithms
JGraphT is a free Java class library that provides mathematical graph-theory
objects and algorithms. In
On Sun, Jun 07, 2020 at 11:38:07PM +0200, Vincent Prat wrote:
> Le 07/06/2020 à 23:11, PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel a écrit :
> > done you are now maintainer for debian science team
>
> Thank you very much.
Yes! DONE messages
Objet : Re: netcdf-java: need Maintainer rights request
Thank you Geert for trying to help me.
Let me explain into more detail the problem I have.
As you guessed, I recently created the empty Salsa repository
https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/netcdf-java.
When I try to push commits, git
done yu are now maintainer for debian science team
De : Vincent Prat [vincep...@free.fr]
Envoyé : dimanche 7 juin 2020 23:02
À : Geert Stappers; debian-science@lists.debian.org
Objet : Re: netcdf-java: need Maintainer rights request
Thank you Geert for
Thank you Geert for trying to help me.
Let me explain into more detail the problem I have.
As you guessed, I recently created the empty Salsa repository
https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/netcdf-java.
When I try to push commits, git complains that no default branch is set
and that I am not
On Wed, Jun 03, 2020 at 09:55:38AM +0200, Fellow Member wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 01, 2020 at 07:41:09PM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 01, 2020 at 07:23:59PM +0200, Vincent Prat wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > Yesterday, I created an empty re
: C++, Python
Description : Scalable, Portable and Distributed Gradient
Boosting (GBDT, GBRT or GBM) Library, for Python, R, Java, Scala, C++
and more
XGBoost is an optimized distributed gradient boosting library designed
to be highly efficient, flexible and portable. It implements machine
On Mon, Jun 01, 2020 at 07:41:09PM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 01, 2020 at 07:23:59PM +0200, Vincent Prat wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Yesterday, I created an empty repository for the package netcdf-java
>
>
> Probably https://salsa.debian.org/science-t
On Mon, Jun 01, 2020 at 07:23:59PM +0200, Vincent Prat wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Yesterday, I created an empty repository for the package netcdf-java
Probably https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/netcdf-java
> that I intend to package within the team.
> However, I am not able t
Hello,
Yesterday, I created an empty repository for the package netcdf-java
that I intend to package within the team.
However, I am not able to push anything.
Could someone please grant me Maintainer rights for this project?
Thank you in advance.
Vincent Prat
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-science@lists.debian.org, debian-j...@lists.debian.org
* Package name : netcdf-java
Version : 5.3.2
Upstream Author : University Corporation for Atmospheric
Research/UnidataName
* URL : https://www.unidata.ucar.edu
Hi,
On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 03:21:44PM +0100, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
> I don't have a preference :)
I took my preference from the two facts
1. Maintainer set to Java team
2. I have project removal permissions in Science team
to move the package to java-team and remove the reposit
Hello
I don't have a preference :)
I will fix that for the next upload (if earlier if someone else watns to
do it)
S
Le 24/09/2018 à 15:19, Andreas Tille a écrit :
> Hi Sylvestre,
>
> I stumbled upon competing repositories for libjlatexmath-java: One is
> in java-team and
Hi Sylvestre,
I stumbled upon competing repositories for libjlatexmath-java: One is
in java-team and changelog/control says:
https://salsa.debian.org/java-team/libjlatexmath-java/blob/master/debian/changelog
libjlatexmath-java (1.0.6-1.1) UNRELEASED; urgency=medium
* Non-maintainer upload
ot to obtain your sources in a convenient way.
>However, I'm a bit confused about the versioning. Can you give some
>hint what version I should use for the libsis-jhdf5-java package. The
>old version was 14.12.6 and I wonder what might be your next versioning
>step. I simply wan
onvenient way.
However, I'm a bit confused about the versioning. Can you give some
hint what version I should use for the libsis-jhdf5-java package. The
old version was 14.12.6 and I wonder what might be your next versioning
step. I simply want to make sure that this prerelease has a highter
version
at HDF5 is I can not help myself
> and as far as Gilles Filippini stated[1] chances are pretty low that we
> from Debian will be able to come up with a patch. What do you think
> about the remark
>
>Have you considered using libhdf5-java[2] or libjhdf5-java instead?
>
> Wel
at HDF5 is I can not help myself
> and as far as Gilles Filippini stated[1] chances are pretty low that we
> from Debian will be able to come up with a patch. What do you think
> about the remark
>
>Have you considered using libhdf5-java[2] or libjhdf5-java instead?
>
> Wel
ith a patch to bridge to time that would be greatly
> appreciated!
Since I personally do not even know what HDF5 is I can not help myself
and as far as Gilles Filippini stated[1] chances are pretty low that we
from Debian will be able to come up with a patch. What do you think
about the r
Hi,
On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 07:24:55PM +0200, Gilles Filippini wrote:
> > is there anybody out there who can help with some HDF5 1.10 transition?
> >
> > I admit I have no experience with HDF5 neither with Java - but the
> > migration would help a lot.
>
> As alrea
Hi,
Andreas Tille a écrit le 28/05/2018 à 11:29 :
> Hi folks from Debian Science,
>
> is there anybody out there who can help with some HDF5 1.10 transition?
>
> I admit I have no experience with HDF5 neither with Java - but the
> migration would help a lot.
Hi folks from Debian Science,
is there anybody out there who can help with some HDF5 1.10 transition?
I admit I have no experience with HDF5 neither with Java - but the
migration would help a lot.
Kind regards
Andreas.
On Mon, May 28, 2018 at 09:18:28AM +0200, Bernd Rinn wrote:
> He
On 20/08/17 15:25, Andreas Tille wrote:>
please consider packaging this in either Debian Science or pkg-java
team.
I'd recommend the Java Team for this one and read Markus' tutorial for
maven [1] before debianizing. The source package should be named
libjtransforms-java
Hi Carnë,
please consider packaging this in either Debian Science or pkg-java
team.
Kind regards
Andreas.
On Thu, Aug 03, 2017 at 03:00:58PM +0100, Carnë Draug wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Followup-For: Bug #655420
> Owner: =?utf-8?q?Carn=C3=AB_Draug?=
>
>
--
http://fam-tille.de
> * Package name: geoapi
> Version : 3.0.0
> Upstream Author : 2003-2011 Open Geospatial Consortium, Inc.
> * URL : http://www.geoapi.org
> * License : geoapi (BSDish)
> Programming Lang: Java
> Description : Set of Java interfaces fo
like jdeb.
Emmanuel Bourg
Le 29/08/2013 21:07, Daniel Kahn Gillmor a écrit :
> hey folks--
>
> (please cc me in replies, i don't think i'm subscribed to debian-science
> or pkg-java-maintainers at the moment)
>
> Has any packaging work been done on debian packaging f
hey folks--
(please cc me in replies, i don't think i'm subscribed to debian-science
or pkg-java-maintainers at the moment)
Has any packaging work been done on debian packaging for Open Source
Physics? [0]
[0] http://www.compadre.org/OSP/
I recently got a request to package Tracke
Le 28/05/2013 15:42, Florian Rothmaier a écrit :
> You could try (I give the commands from the beginning):
>
> git clone http://anonscm.debian.org/git/debian-science/packages/jsamp.git
> cd jsamp/
> git checkout -b upstream origin/upstream
> git checkout debian
> git-buildpackage -us -uc --git-d
--git-upstream-tree=branch
--git-upstream-branch=upstream
This way I was able to build the package.
>
>
> Otherwise it builds fine with debuild, I checked with OpenJDK 6 & 7. It
> even rebuilds without problem which is nice.
>
>
> Emmanuel Bourg
Cheers,
Florian
>
--git-debian-branch=debian, I get
this message:
gbp:error: upstream/1.3-3 is not a valid treeish
Otherwise it builds fine with debuild, I checked with OpenJDK 6 & 7. It
even rebuilds without problem which is nice.
Emmanuel Bourg
Le 28/05/2013 12:53, Florian Rothmaier a écrit :
> D
Dear Debian Science and Java Team,
I've updated my package "jsamp" (binary package: "libjsamp-java").
The current upstream version is "1.3-3". Moreover, the package
contains a watch file and a file "debian/orig-tar.sh" which
provides an "orig
Florian Rothmaier writes:
> but then the matching files would all have the name "fits_src.jar" and "uscan"
> would not see if one of them is newer than the local version. Or am I wrong?
You can have uscan just look for the directory, as with ncbi-tools6:
http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=debi
Hi Ole (cc: hi Steffen),
thank you very much for your very useful comments!
Am 03.12.2012 17:02, schrieb Olе Streicher:
> Hi Florian,
>
> Florian Rothmaier writes:
>> Section: science
> [...]
>>
>> So far, my binary package is called "libfits-java".
Hi Florian,
Florian Rothmaier writes:
> Section: science
[...]
>
> So far, my binary package is called "libfits-java". In that case,
> lintian complains about the section chosen for the package:
>
> W: libfits-java: wrong-section-according-to-package-name libfits-jav
xtra
Maintainer: Debian Science Maintainers
So far, my binary package is called "libfits-java". In that case,
lintian complains about the section chosen for the package:
W: libfits-java: wrong-section-according-to-package-name libfits-java => java
N:
N:This package has a name sug
ource) package "fits" since this is too short
> and misleading (I would expect a generic fits handling package there,
> not a java specific one). Since it is a java package, "fits-java" or
> "libfits-java" (the same as your library package) would IMO
hi,
as ole already mentioned the source package name is far too generic.
I'm not familiar with java packaging policies, but I would also expect
nom.tam to appear somewhere in the package name or description.
It would make it clear on first sight which java fits library it is.
--
To UNSUBS
Original-Nachricht
Betreff: Bug#694418: ITP: fits -- Java library for the I/O handling of FITS
files
Weitersenden-Datum: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 11:09:02 +
Weitersenden-Von: Florian Rothmaier
Weitersenden-An: debian-bugs-d...@lists.debian.org
Weitersenden-CC: froth...@ari.uni
rsion : 2.0.1
> Upstream Author : Konstantin Metlov
> * URL : http://www.gnu.org/software/jel/
> * License : GPL-3
> Programming Lang: Java
> Description : library for evaluating algebraic expressions in Java
>
> The JEL library enables users
Dear Heinrich,
On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 03:30:16PM +0100, Xypron wrote:
> thank you for taking care of the bug.
>
> Unfortunately in your upload the dependencies are wrong.
>
> GLPK-Java 1.0.13 requires libglpk-dev >= 4.43 (due to glpk_error_hook()).
Thanks for pointing this
Hello Kumar,
thank you for taking care of the bug.
Unfortunately in your upload the dependencies are wrong.
GLPK-Java 1.0.13 requires libglpk-dev >= 4.43 (due to glpk_error_hook()).
Best regards
Heinrich
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-science-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 06:11:28PM -0500, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
> tags 572958 + pending patch
> thanks
>
> Dear Debian Science,
>
> There is an RC bug against glpk-java, which has been open for a couple
> of weeks. I took the submitters advice and packaged the new version,
&g
tags 572958 + pending patch
thanks
Dear Debian Science,
There is an RC bug against glpk-java, which has been open for a couple
of weeks. I took the submitters advice and packaged the new version,
and it seems to build and pass all tests. The package is available
here:
dget http
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 01:53:21PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Le Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 12:08:35AM +0200, Sylvestre Ledru a écrit :
> >
> > 4. All publications or advertising materials mentioning features or use of
> > this software must acknowledge that it was developed by the National
> >
Le Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 12:08:35AM +0200, Sylvestre Ledru a écrit :
>
> 4. All publications or advertising materials mentioning features or use of
> this software must acknowledge that it was developed by the National
> Center for Supercomputing Applications at the University of Illinois,
On 1 July 2009 at 20:14, Charles Plessy wrote:
| I have found today a nice R GUI written in Java, JGR (speak 'Jaguar').
| http://jgr.markushelbig.org/JGR.html
Yes -- I had of course been aware of it for years and had versions on my
box. JGR had won a software price in the R world whe
Dear all
I have found today a nice R GUI written in Java, JGR (speak 'Jaguar').
http://jgr.markushelbig.org/JGR.html
Using CDBS, it was very easy to make draft Debian source packages for it and
its dependancies (r-cran-javagd, r-cran-iplots). The GUI seems to run fine,
althoug a bit s
care
| > of atlas and an upgrade to atlas 3.8 as well? else I would suggest to Chris
to
| > just go ahead and maybe CC debian-java.
| I am currently working on atlas (see the work in the svn of pkg-scicomp)
| but it is a big work (especially solving the problem of the specific
| optimisation fo
likely to be of interest to debian-science, so I'm
> > sending this mail there too.
>
> if jblas seems to be of interest to debian-science, please would you take care
> of atlas and an upgrade to atlas 3.8 as well? else I would suggest to Chris to
> just go ahead and maybe C
t; >
> > This package seems likely to be of interest to debian-science, so I'm
> > sending this mail there too.
>
> if jblas seems to be of interest to debian-science, please would you take care
> of atlas and an upgrade to atlas 3.8 as well? else I would suggest to
l there too.
if jblas seems to be of interest to debian-science, please would you take care
of atlas and an upgrade to atlas 3.8 as well? else I would suggest to Chris to
just go ahead and maybe CC debian-java.
Matthias
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-science-requ...@lists.debian.org
sk.
And here is the rest of the description for debian-science readers.
> Version : 0.1
> Upstream Author : Mikio Braun mikiocs.tu-berlin.de
> * URL : https://ml01.zrz.tu-berlin.de/trac/jblas/
> * License : BSD
> Programming Lang: Java
> De
On Saturday 13 January 2007 14:58, Francesco Pietra wrote:
> That's OK and jmol 11 is running here, although not
> yet tried. Thank you.
OK, good to hear that.
> If anything, I was surprised that jmol does not look
> into MPQC.
Ah, well... I have never noticed it before. Looks interesting. If y
day 11 January 2007 21:42, Carlo Segre
> wrote:
> > > Use the deb java-package to install that .bin
> version.
> >
> > Maybe I am mistaken but isn't Sun Java in
> non-free? I find
> >
> > Package sun-java5-bin
> >
> > * testing
On Thursday 11 January 2007 21:42, Carlo Segre wrote:
> > Use the deb java-package to install that .bin version.
>
> Maybe I am mistaken but isn't Sun Java in non-free? I find
>
> Package sun-java5-bin
>
> * testing (libs): Sun Java(TM) Runtime Environment
or self-extracting
> >> filename "jre-1_5_0_10-linux-i586.bin"
> >> I must confess I am unfamiliar with installations
> of
> >> the latter type of file.
> >
> > Use the deb java-package to install that .bin
> version.
> >
>
Hello Francesco,
you can need to include the binary files (executable binary JVM) in your
PATH, include something like this in your .bash_profile or .bashrc
export JAVA_HOME=/usr/local/jdk1.6.0 # Path to JVM
export
CLASSPATH=./:/home/sfmb/apps/Jess61p5/jess.jar:/home/sfmb/src/java/three
Francesco Pietra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> jmol-11.0.RC4-binary.tar.gz
> decompressed, gives
> jmol.jar
> as executable.
> Could you please direct me where to learn how to run
> jar with either java or classmath installed from
I'm no Java expert, but I have one J
jmol-11.0.RC4-binary.tar.gz
decompressed, gives
jmol.jar
as executable.
Could you please direct me where to learn how to run
jar with either java or classmath installed from
debian?
Thank you
francesco
--- Francesco Pietra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 23:04:18 -
--- Charles Plessy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Le Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 05:55:43PM +0100, Egon
> Willighagen a écrit :
> >
> > The deb packages for Jmol 10.00 can be downloaded
> from:
> >
> > http://debian.wgdd.de/debian/
> >
> > And Aliot
Le Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 05:55:43PM +0100, Egon Willighagen a écrit :
>
> The deb packages for Jmol 10.00 can be downloaded from:
>
> http://debian.wgdd.de/debian/
>
> And Alioth java a subdir for Jmol, so the pkg-java project is looking into
> it...
Do not hesitate to
a rpm package (thus, not for debian)
or self-extracting
filename "jre-1_5_0_10-linux-i586.bin"
I must confess I am unfamiliar with installations of
the latter type of file.
Use the deb java-package to install that .bin version.
Maybe I am mistaken but isn't Sun Java in non-free?
(thus, not for debian)
> or self-extracting
> filename "jre-1_5_0_10-linux-i586.bin"
> I must confess I am unfamiliar with installations of
> the latter type of file.
Use the deb java-package to install that .bin version.
> > Classpath 0.9x can run it too, but gene
--- Egon Willighagen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi Francesco,
>
> On Thursday 11 January 2007 17:06, Francesco Pietra
> wrote:
> > Has anyone tried to run jmol 11.0.RC4
> (SourceForge)?
> > Which java >=4 package? Is java runtime from
> debian
>
Hi Francesco,
On Thursday 11 January 2007 17:06, Francesco Pietra wrote:
> Has anyone tried to run jmol 11.0.RC4 (SourceForge)?
> Which java >=4 package? Is java runtime from debian
> repositories ok to this purpose? Or which java from
> Sun?
Sun 1.4 or better is fine.
Classpa
Hi Francesco,
On Thursday 11 January 2007 17:06, Francesco Pietra wrote:
> Has anyone tried to run jmol 11.0.RC4 (SourceForge)?
> Which java >=4 package? Is java runtime from debian
> repositories ok to this purpose? Or which java from
> Sun?
Sun 1.4 or better is fine.
Classpa
Hi Francesco:
On Thu, 11 Jan 2007, Francesco Pietra wrote:
Has anyone tried to run jmol 11.0.RC4 (SourceForge)?
Which java >=4 package? Is java runtime from debian
repositories ok to this purpose? Or which java from
Sun?
There are unofficial debian package available and they work fine.
Has anyone tried to run jmol 11.0.RC4 (SourceForge)?
Which java >=4 package? Is java runtime from debian
repositories ok to this purpose? Or which java from
Sun?
Sorry for asking about something non-free, though jmol
would solve problems of viewing (and getting geometric
parameters) in carry
Egon Willighagen writes:
>
> cc: debian-java -> I need a bit of help here, see below
>
> On Wednesday 11 October 2006 15:48, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> > | > Unfortunately, JGR is still somewhat outside Debian as it wants Sun's
> > | > Java JDK
cc: debian-java -> I need a bit of help here, see below
On Wednesday 11 October 2006 15:48, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> | > Unfortunately, JGR is still somewhat outside Debian as it wants Sun's
> | > Java JDK so I don't think I'll ever package it directly. Now, if
&
I'm setting up Blackdown Java on my debian desktop. I've done a
successful apt-get install from their repository. I will be using it
to investigate/use some .jar files that I've downloaded from the web.
I'm an adept user of C++ but have no experience with Java. I see
mention
74 matches
Mail list logo
