Bug#1037690: hfst-ospell: ftbfs with GCC-13

forwarded 1037690 https://github.com/hfst/hfst-ospell/issues/57 thanks -- Tino Didriksen -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#1037663: foma: ftbfs with GCC-13

forwarded 1037663 https://github.com/mhulden/foma/pull/148 thanks -- Tino Didriksen -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#1028061: apertium-hbs-eng: Errors shown against many translated words

is remove the eng-hbs direction. (The PR (now merged) was just comments, so it couldn't affect quality.) -- Tino Didriksen On Fri, 6 Jan 2023 at 13:57, Peter Blackman wrote: > Package: apertium-hbs-eng > Version: 0.5.1-2.1 > Severity: normal > Tags: upstream > X-Debbugs-Cc: pe...@pbl

Bug#1016327: Forwarding bitrotted Apertium pairs

forwarded 1016338 https://github.com/apertium/organisation/issues/32 forwarded 1016327 https://github.com/apertium/organisation/issues/32 thanks -- Tino Didriksen OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers

Bug#1008348: Forwarding bitrotted Apertium pairs

https://github.com/apertium/organisation/issues/32 forwarded 1013648 https://github.com/apertium/organisation/issues/32 forwarded 1013646 https://github.com/apertium/organisation/issues/32 thanks -- Tino Didriksen OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- debian-science

Bug#1005670: apertium-kaz-tat: FTBFS: ERROR: Transducer contains epsilon transition to a final state. Aborting.

forwarded 1005670 https://github.com/apertium/apertium-kaz-tat/issues/4 thanks -- Tino Didriksen OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin

Bug#1012894: apertium: ftbfs with GCC-12

forwarded 1012894 https://github.com/apertium/apertium/issues/166 thanks -- Tino Didriksen -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#1011176: apertium-recursive: fails to detect EOF condition on unsigned char archs

Fix applied upstream https://github.com/apertium/apertium-recursive and new release pushed to https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/apertium-recursive awaiting upload. -- Tino Didriksen -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net https://alioth

Bug#1008329: apertium-spa-arg: FTBFS: configure: error: Package requirements (apertium-lex-tools >= 0.2.7) were not met

queue"? -- Tino Didriksen On Sat, 26 Mar 2022 at 22:06, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > Source: apertium-spa-arg > Version: 0.5.0-1 > Severity: serious > Justification: FTBFS > Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs > User: lu...@debian.org > Usertags: ftbfs-20220326 ftbfs-bookworm > > Hi,

Bug#1007985: apertium-lex-tools: fatal error: lttoolbox/ltstr.h: No such file or directory

We are in the process of updating all the packages that use lttoolbox, so this is fully expected. -- Tino Didriksen On Sat, 19 Mar 2022 at 23:03, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > Source: apertium-lex-tools > Version: 0.2.7-1 > Severity: serious > Tags: ftbfs sid bookworm > X-Deb

Re: hfst_3.15.4-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

that since 2021-02-13. -- Tino Didriksen On Sat, 5 Feb 2022 at 11:00, Thorsten Alteholz < ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org> wrote: > > Hi, > > our hardworking trainees added a note to your package: > > - back-ends/foma/cpp-version/apply.cc mentions GNU General Public License

Bug#991241: lrx-proc: command not found

Fixed in https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/apertium-swe-dan - was missing a dependency on apertium-lex-tools -- Tino Didriksen -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science

Bug#988129: hfst-ospell: FTBFS on sparc64 due to test failures

forwarded 988129 https://github.com/hfst/hfst-ospell/issues/43 thanks -- Tino Didriksen -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#984785: apertium-arg-cat: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye

d/control wrongly mentions python - it does not need python to build. Should just be removed. -- Tino Didriksen On Mon, 8 Mar 2021 at 12:39, Matthias Klose wrote: > Package: src:apertium-arg-cat > Version: 0.2.0-1 > Severity: serious > Tags: sid bullseye > User: debian-pyt...@l

Bug#984786: apertium-separable: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye

Whoops. That's an oversight in d/control - it should say python3 instead of python. This was fixed upstream last year ( https://github.com/apertium/apertium-separable/issues/28), so I was certain this must be a bogus bug report - but no, I plain forgot to adjust d/control. -- Tino Didriksen

Re: hfst_3.15.3-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

the freeze window, and that's ok. -- Tino Didriksen On Fri, 18 Dec 2020 at 22:00, Joerg Jaspert wrote: > > Hi Maintainer, > > sorry, rejected this time around. > > The review notes from one trainee are below: > > Comments > > > [ d/c : debian/copy

Bug#978364: apertium-ukr: FTBFS: Error: Invalid dictionary (hint: the left side of an entry is empty)

. -- Tino Didriksen On Sun, 31 Jan 2021 at 18:33, Nilesh Patra wrote: > Hi Tino, > > On Tue, 5 Jan 2021 01:13:56 +0100 Tino Didriksen > wrote: > > apertium-ukr should be removed from Debian. The pair that needed it has > > been upgraded to bundle the required version i

Bug#978364: apertium-ukr: FTBFS: Error: Invalid dictionary (hint: the left side of an entry is empty)

apertium-ukr should be removed from Debian. The pair that needed it has been upgraded to bundle the required version instead: https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/apertium-rus-ukr -- Tino Didriksen -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net

Bug#978377: apertium-eo-fr: FTBFS: Error: Invalid dictionary (hint: entry on the right beginning with whitespace)

Fixed in Salsa https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/apertium-eo-fr -- Tino Didriksen -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#978359: apertium-br-fr: FTBFS: Error: Invalid dictionary (hint: entry on the right beginning with whitespace)

Fixed in Salsa https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/apertium-br-fr -- Tino Didriksen -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#978369: apertium-eo-ca: FTBFS: Error: Invalid dictionary (hint: entry on the right beginning with whitespace)

Fixed in Salsa https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/apertium-eo-ca -- Tino Didriksen -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#979134: apertium-anaphora: please make the build reproducible

Fixed upstream and in Salsa https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/apertium-anaphora -- Tino Didriksen -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#979134: apertium-anaphora: please make the build reproducible

Apertium tools. -- Tino Didriksen On Sun, 3 Jan 2021 at 11:48, Chris Lamb wrote: > Source: apertium-anaphora > Version: 1.0.1-1 > Severity: wishlist > Tags: patch > User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org > Usertags: environment > X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-b...@li

Bug#978662: apertium-cy-en: autopkgtest failure

This is a chicken-and-egg problem that should solve itself. New apertium 3.7.1 can't migrate until apertium-cy-en is fixed, but fixed apertium-cy-en won't build correctly with existing apertium 3.6.1. -- Tino Didriksen -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@alioth

Bug#978369: apertium-eo-ca: FTBFS: Error: Invalid dictionary (hint: entry on the right beginning with whitespace)

forwarded 978369 https://github.com/apertium/apertium-eo-ca/issues/2 thanks Fixed in upstream. -- Tino Didriksen -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#978359: apertium-br-fr: FTBFS: Error: Invalid dictionary (hint: entry on the right beginning with whitespace)

forwarded 978359 https://github.com/apertium/apertium-br-fr/issues/4 thanks Fixed in upstream. -- Tino Didriksen -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#977753: apertium: FTBFS on s390x: test failures

Fixed in v3.7.1, both upstream and https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/apertium -- Tino Didriksen -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#977753: apertium: FTBFS on s390x: test failures

forwarded 977753 https://github.com/apertium/apertium/issues/112 thanks -- Tino Didriksen -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#916192: closed by Ghislain Antony Vaillant (Bug#916192: fixed in foma 1:0.9.18+r243-6)

. But build log doesn't lie...I'll re-add the flag. -- Tino Didriksen On Wed, 8 Jul 2020 at 13:16, Adrian Bunk wrote: > Control: found -1 1:0.9.18+r243-7 > > On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 07:51:04PM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > >... > > foma (1:0.9.18+r243-6) uns

Bug#963324: apertium-apy: FTBFS: AttributeError: module 'tornado.web' has no attribute 'asynchronous'

forwarded 963324 https://github.com/apertium/apertium-apy/issues/148 thanks Fixed in upstream. -- Tino Didriksen -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#958291: foma: memory leak on repeated define

Not sure that's even a bug, but please ask/report that upstream: https://github.com/mhulden/foma -- Tino Didriksen On Mon, 20 Apr 2020 at 09:48, Kevin Ryde wrote: > Package: foma > Version: 1:0.9.18+r243-6+b1 > Severity: normal > > Repeated redefines with the "define&qu

Bug#957216: foma: ftbfs with GCC-10

forwarded 957216 https://github.com/mhulden/foma/issues/88 thanks -- Tino Didriksen -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#957334: hfst-ospell: ftbfs with GCC-10

forwarded 957334 https://github.com/hfst/hfst-ospell/issues/49 thanks Fixed in upstream. -- Tino Didriksen -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#957001: apertium-lex-tools: ftbfs with GCC-10

forwarded 957001 https://github.com/apertium/apertium-lex-tools/issues/42 thanks Fixed in upstream. -- Tino Didriksen -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#957002: apertium: ftbfs with GCC-10

forwarded 957002 https://github.com/apertium/apertium/issues/72 thanks Fixed upstream. -- Tino Didriksen -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Re: apertium-cat-ita_0.2.1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

e Apertium Project Management Committee ( http://wiki.apertium.org/wiki/PMC ). -- Tino Didriksen On Sat, 21 Mar 2020 at 20:00, Thorsten Alteholz < ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org> wrote: > > Hi Kartik, > > COPYING says that the license is GPL-2 only. > Please add a note in your

Bug#942911: apertium-cat: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye

Haven't forgotten this bug, nor #942950. This and all the other Apertium single language packages (regex apertium-[a-z]{3} except apertium-apy) should be removed, but only after their reverse dependencies have been updated to not need them. The work is ongoing. -- Tino Didriksen On Wed, 23 Oct

Bug#945643: giella-core: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye

forwarded 945643 http://giellatekno.uit.no/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2607 thanks -- Tino Didriksen -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#942944: apertium-spa-cat: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye

An update that also happens to fix this issue has been pushed to https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/apertium-spa-cat -- Tino Didriksen On Wed, 23 Oct 2019 at 04:38, wrote: > Source: apertium-spa-cat > Version: 2.1.0~r79717-2 > Severity: normal > Tags: sid bullseye > U

Bug#936970: lttoolbox: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye

I've pushed an update that also fixes #936970 to https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/lttoolbox -- Tino Didriksen -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#936698: hfst: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye

I've pushed an update that also fixes #936698 to https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/hfst -- Tino Didriksen -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Re: Comments regarding apertium-pol_0.1.1-1_amd64.changes

ons of intent and even more open dual-licensing in the mailing list. Nobody has time to go through everything, but everyone is in agreement about what should be done. -- Tino Didriksen -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net https://alioth-list

Bug#911226: lttoolbox: FTBFS on several architectures: test failures

forwarded 911226 https://github.com/apertium/lttoolbox/issues/33 thanks -- Tino Didriksen -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers