Bug#857088: graywolf: Incomplete debian/copyright?

2017-03-08 Thread Ruben Undheim
Nice catch, Chris. This is a plain oversight from me.. I was even the one accepting the patch from Staf upstream, and should have remembered to update the copyright file before uploading version 0.1.4-1. Thanks for letting me know. Cheers Ruben -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list

Bug#818566: Root cause fixed

2016-05-10 Thread Ruben Undheim
The root cause for this has been fixed in libosmocore. With a binNMU on openbsc, the bug will be fixed. -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#823616: fpga-icestorm-chipdb: please make the build reproducible (randomness)

2016-05-06 Thread Ruben Undheim
Hi Daniel, Thanks a lot for figuring out why it wasn't reproducible. I wasn't sure where to start. I will apply your patch. Cheers! Ruben On Fri, May 06, 2016 at 05:08:10PM +, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > Source: fpga-icestorm > Version: 0~20160218gitf2b2549-1 > Severity: wishlist > Tags:

Re: Comments regarding icestorm_0~20151006git103e6fd-1_i386.changes

2015-11-16 Thread Ruben Undheim
Hi Thorsten! > your package Recommends: arachne-pnr. Can you please tell me where I can find > this? icestorm is a build-dependency for arachne-pnr, and the plan was therefore to upload arachne-pnr once/if icestorm is accepted into sid. It has been ready for upload for quite some time:

Re: Comments regarding icestorm_0~20151006git103e6fd-1_i386.changes

2015-11-16 Thread Ruben Undheim
Hi! > ... If there is a > package providing something and we allow a package of that name in that > is something completely different, then Debian would turn inconsistent. > Somewhere we apparently lost that email to the ftpmasters that informs > them about this name conflict, once we had become

Re: Comments regarding icestorm_0~20151006git103e6fd-1_i386.changes

2015-11-16 Thread Ruben Undheim
> >Can we keep /usr/share/icestorm to be "upstream compatible"? > > I would suggest to talk to the current icestorm maintainer whether this > might create conflicts. That sounds like a very reasonable thing to do! However, I realized that the package was already diverging from upstream which

Bug#786916: berkeley-abc: Crashes on some architectures because of memory alignment problems

2015-05-26 Thread Ruben Undheim
Package: berkeley-abc Version: 1.01+20140822hg4d547a5+dfsg Severity: important Tags: jessie, patch Dear Maintainer, This patch fixes the issue (already fixed in unstable): Index: berkeley-abc/Makefile === ---

Bug#782027: berkeley-abc: Broken on big-endian architectures

2015-04-06 Thread Ruben Undheim
Package: berkeley-abc Version: 1.01+20141105hg5b5af75+dfsg-1 Severity: normal Tags: upstream A bug has been found and fixed by Clifford Wolf. It makes some operations in berkeley-abc broken for big-endian architectures, and may cause unstability also for other architectures. The following

Bug#764740: qrouter: FTBFS on various architectures recompile with -fPIC

2014-10-13 Thread Ruben Undheim
Hi, Thank you Jurica. However, I've already prepared a package and it is ready for upload, but I notice now that I've completely forgotten to keep this bug updated. It has been fixed upstream, and the new version is 1.3.3. It fixes this bug and #764743. If there is any DD here reading this,

Bug#764740: Thanks

2014-10-13 Thread Ruben Undheim
Thanks a lot, Andreas! cme worked great. Ruben -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers