Please continue discussion in this *NEW* bug.
On 2017-01-24 23:25, Maarten van Gompel wrote:
> Hi Andreas, Mattia,
>
> Quoting Andreas Beckmann (2017-01-24 19:04:24)
>>>
>>> Oops... Well spotted, I just fixed it in git, but it is probably overkill
>>> to prepare/upload a new release just
>>>
On 2017-01-24 23:25, Maarten van Gompel wrote:
I'll reply to 852...@bugs.debian.org
Andreas
--
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Hi Andreas, Mattia,
Quoting Andreas Beckmann (2017-01-24 19:04:24)
> >
> > Oops... Well spotted, I just fixed it in git, but it is probably overkill
> > to prepare/upload a new release just
> > for that now I guess?
>
> Correct. But let me see what else I found:
>
> jessie-> sid upgrades:
>
On 2017-01-24 19:30, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> Wow, upgrades issues are so full of cases.
> Anyhow, I still don't think we should fix these, if nothing to try to
> have the newer upstream versions and their fairly big diffs into
> stretch.
>
> I suggest you (Andreas) file a new bug(s) copy-pasting
On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 07:04:24PM +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> On 2017-01-24 09:32, Maarten van Gompel wrote:
> > Quoting Andreas Beckmann (2017-01-24 02:54:36)
> >> On 2017-01-24 02:51, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> >>> spotted a typo (trailing "a") in frogdata.maintscript
> >>>
> >>> echo
On 2017-01-24 09:32, Maarten van Gompel wrote:
> Quoting Andreas Beckmann (2017-01-24 02:54:36)
>> On 2017-01-24 02:51, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
>>> spotted a typo (trailing "a") in frogdata.maintscript
>>>
>>> echo "rm_conffile /etc/frog/${subdir}Frog.mbt.1.0.known.dddwfWaw.wgt
>>> 0.13.7~"a
>>
On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 09:32:38AM +0100, Maarten van Gompel wrote:
> Quoting Andreas Beckmann (2017-01-24 02:54:36)
> > On 2017-01-24 02:51, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> > > spotted a typo (trailing "a") in frogdata.maintscript
> > >
> > > echo "rm_conffile
Quoting Andreas Beckmann (2017-01-24 02:54:36)
> On 2017-01-24 02:51, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> > spotted a typo (trailing "a") in frogdata.maintscript
> >
> > echo "rm_conffile /etc/frog/${subdir}Frog.mbt.1.0.known.dddwfWaw.wgt
> > 0.13.7~"a
>
> but that's harmless, its still a valid version
Hi,
just browsed the git commits in the web interface
spotted a typo (trailing "a") in frogdata.maintscript
echo "rm_conffile /etc/frog/${subdir}Frog.mbt.1.0.known.dddwfWaw.wgt 0.13.7~"a
BTW, you could also add the slash here:
for subdir in "" "nld/" "nl/"
besides that, everything looks
On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 08:31:01PM +0100, Maarten van Gompel wrote:
> This is what I was looking for yes, I knew something must exist to take care
> of
> this but didn't know what it was. I now followed Andreas' instructions, but
> on but upon gbp buildpackage I now get
> errors like:
>
>
Hi Mattia, Andreas,
@Mattia: Thanks! I'm trying to finalize the packages but still running into
something:
> use debian/$package.maintscript instead of doing it directly in maintscripts
>
> put in there lines like
>
> rm_conffile /etc/ucto/tokconfig-es 0.4-1~
>
> no
On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 07:48:34PM +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> On 2017-01-23 19:17, Maarten van Gompel wrote:
> > Hi Andreas, Mattia, et. al.
Hi Maarten :)
> >
> >> uploads should happen early enough to allow automatic migration after 10
> >> days on Feb 05 (so probably at most 2 days
On 2017-01-23 19:17, Maarten van Gompel wrote:
> Hi Andreas, Mattia, et. al.
>
>> uploads should happen early enough to allow automatic migration after 10
>> days on Feb 05 (so probably at most 2 days left)
>
> Right. We have prepared new upstream releases for uctodata, ucto, frogdata and
> frog
On 2017-01-23 12:06, Maarten van Gompel wrote:
> Hi Andreas et al,
>
> Short follow up: we discussed it internally and think it's indeed best to just
> move the 'configuration' files to /usr/share, as you pointed out; simplifying
> the package and
> resolving the conflicts.
so you'll need to
Hi Andreas et al,
Short follow up: we discussed it internally and think it's indeed best to just
move the 'configuration' files to /usr/share, as you pointed out; simplifying
the package and
resolving the conflicts.
We're currently working on new upstream releases for
ucto, uctodata, frogdata,
Hi Andreas,
Thanks for your elaborate response! It seems this has indeed opened quite a can
of worms.. Here we go:
Quoting Andreas Beckmann (2017-01-22 22:27:08)
> TL;DR: You have an ambitious task before you.
So I see...
> Let me see if I understand what's going on.
>
> Renaming conffiles and
On 2017-01-22 09:48, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> es.abr was a conffile in the jessie ucto, that needs additional treatment.
>
> The solution might be using mv_conffile from dpkg-maintscript-helper(1)
> in a .maintscript to move the conffile to the new name spa.abr and the
> new package (es.abr is now
Adding Andreas, the BTS does not Cc the submitter on messages.
On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 08:17:03PM +0100, Maarten van Gompel wrote:
> Quoting Andreas Beckmann (2017-01-16 17:24:19)
> > Followup-For: Bug #838112
> > Control: found -1 0.3.1-1
> > Control: affects -1 + ucto
> >
> > that bug has just
Quoting Andreas Beckmann (2017-01-16 17:24:19)
> Followup-For: Bug #838112
> Control: found -1 0.3.1-1
> Control: affects -1 + ucto
>
> that bug has just reappered:
>
> Preparing to unpack .../ucto_0.9.5-1_amd64.deb ...
> Unpacking ucto (0.9.5-1) over (0.5.3-3.1+b1) ...
> dpkg: warning:
Followup-For: Bug #838112
Control: found -1 0.3.1-1
Control: affects -1 + ucto
Hi,
that bug has just reappered:
Preparing to unpack .../ucto_0.9.5-1_amd64.deb ...
Unpacking ucto (0.9.5-1) over (0.5.3-3.1+b1) ...
dpkg: warning: unable to delete old directory '/etc/ucto': Directory not
Package: uctodata
Version: 0.1.1-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from
'jessie'.
It installed fine in 'jessie', then the upgrade to 'sid' fails
because it tries to overwrite other
21 matches
Mail list logo
