Re: normaliz_3.0.0+ds-2_amd64.changes REJECTED

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello: On 20/11/15 10:31, Graham Inggs wrote: > On 20/11/2015 10:57, Andreas Tille wrote: >> On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 03:36:31AM +0100, Jerome BENOIT wrote: >>> >>> Just to confirm that the original source (version 3.0.0+ds.orig) material >>> was not

Re: normaliz_3.0.0+ds-2_amd64.changes REJECTED

On 20/11/2015 10:57, Andreas Tille wrote: On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 03:36:31AM +0100, Jerome BENOIT wrote: Just to confirm that the original source (version 3.0.0+ds.orig) material was not touched. I was just building from Git with pristine-tar. The problem is the orig.tar in the archive is

Re: normaliz_3.0.0+ds-2_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Jerome, On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 03:36:31AM +0100, Jerome BENOIT wrote: > > Just to confirm that the original source (version 3.0.0+ds.orig) material was > not touched. I was just building from Git with pristine-tar. Please try to find a different sponsor - I'll might be not able to work on

Re: normaliz_3.0.0+ds-2_amd64.changes REJECTED

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Andreas: On 19/11/15 19:49, Debian FTP Masters wrote: > > normaliz_3.0.0+ds.orig.tar.xz: Does not match file already existing in the > pool. > > Just to confirm that the original source (version 3.0.0+ds.orig) material was not touched. h

Re: 4ti2_1.6.6+ds-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Weird ! This package reached testing 11 days ago: https://packages.qa.debian.org/4/4ti2/news/20151108T163910Z.html Jerome On 19/11/15 08:48, Debian FTP Masters wrote: > > > Version check failed: > Your upload included the source package 4

Processed: Re: Bug#805395: predict.gbm() using single.tree=TRUE does not return the correct predictions with multinomial distribution

Processing control commands: > reassign -1 r-cran-gbm 2.1-1 Bug #805395 [gbm] predict.gbm() using single.tree=TRUE does not return the correct predictions with multinomial distribution Warning: Unknown package 'gbm' Bug reassigned from package 'gbm' to 'r-cran-gbm'. No longer marked as found in v

Re: Bug#805395: predict.gbm() using single.tree=TRUE does not return the correct predictions with multinomial distribution

Control: reassign -1 r-cran-gbm 2.1-1 On Ma, 17 nov 15, 09:29:12, David Paulsen wrote: > Package: gbm > Version: 2.1.1 > > For the bernoulli distribution model, predict.gbm(model, n.trees=c(1,2), > single.tree=TRUE) returns the correct results. > > For the multinomial distribution model with 3

Re: Comments regarding icestorm_0~20151006git103e6fd-1_i386.changes

> >Can we keep /usr/share/icestorm to be "upstream compatible"? > > I would suggest to talk to the current icestorm maintainer whether this > might create conflicts. That sounds like a very reasonable thing to do! However, I realized that the package was already diverging from upstream which use

Re: Comments regarding icestorm_0~20151006git103e6fd-1_i386.changes

On Mon, 16 Nov 2015, Ruben Undheim wrote: What about renaming it to "fpga-icestorm"? Sounds good. Can we keep /usr/share/icestorm to be "upstream compatible"? I would suggest to talk to the current icestorm maintainer whether this might create conflicts. Thorsten -- debian-science-

Re: Comments regarding icestorm_0~20151006git103e6fd-1_i386.changes

Hi Ruben, Am 16/11/15 um 19:34 schrieb Ruben Undheim: >> ... If there is a >> package providing something and we allow a package of that name in that >> is something completely different, then Debian would turn inconsistent. >> Somewhere we apparently lost that email to the ftpmasters that informs

Re: Comments regarding icestorm_0~20151006git103e6fd-1_i386.changes

Hi! > ... If there is a > package providing something and we allow a package of that name in that > is something completely different, then Debian would turn inconsistent. > Somewhere we apparently lost that email to the ftpmasters that informs > them about this name conflict, once we had become a

Re: Comments regarding icestorm_0~20151006git103e6fd-1_i386.changes

Hello, Am 16/11/15 um 18:00 schrieb Ruben Undheim: >> your package Recommends: arachne-pnr. Can you please tell me where I can >> find this? > icestorm is a build-dependency for arachne-pnr, and the plan was therefore to > upload > arachne-pnr once/if icestorm is accepted into sid. > > It has be

Re: Comments regarding icestorm_0~20151006git103e6fd-1_i386.changes

Hi Thorsten! > your package Recommends: arachne-pnr. Can you please tell me where I can find > this? icestorm is a build-dependency for arachne-pnr, and the plan was therefore to upload arachne-pnr once/if icestorm is accepted into sid. It has been ready for upload for quite some time: git:/

Processed: Re: Bug#804246: transition: gsl

Processing control commands: > block -1 by 804495 804496 804497 804498 804499 804500 804501 804502 Bug #804246 [release.debian.org] transition: gsl 804246 was not blocked by any bugs. 804246 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 804246: 804501, 804497, 804495, 804502, 804496, 804498

Processed: Re: Processed: reassign 804358 to libstdc++6

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 804358 python-guiqwt Bug #804358 [libstdc++6] Install issue with x86_64? Bug reassigned from package 'libstdc++6' to 'python-guiqwt'. Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #804358 to the same values previously set Ignoring requ

Re: Bug#802263: RFP: r-cran-rjsonio - serialize R objects to JSON

hi, > [adding bugreport to our conversation] > > Quoting Jonas Smedegaard (2015-10-19 00:02:23) >> Quoting Jonathon Love (2015-10-18 23:19:06) >>> i was originally going to package this, but it turns out it's built >>> on libjson, which makes it non-free: >>> >>> https://wiki.debian.org/qa.debia

Re: Bug#802263: RFP: r-cran-rjsonio - serialize R objects to JSON

[adding bugreport to our conversation] Quoting Jonas Smedegaard (2015-10-19 00:02:23) > Quoting Jonathon Love (2015-10-18 23:19:06) >> i was originally going to package this, but it turns out it's built >> on libjson, which makes it non-free: >> >> https://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/jsonevil >

RE: partnership

I have a business investment to propose to you,my email mr.ongengh...@yahoo.com.hk if interested. -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Processed: Re: libgetdata-doc: fails to upgrade from 'testing' - trying to overwrite /usr/share/man/man3/gd_frameoffset.3.gz

Processing control commands: > found -1 0.9.0-1 Bug #799340 {Done: Alastair McKinstry } [libgetdata-doc] libgetdata-doc: fails to upgrade from 'testing' - trying to overwrite /usr/share/man/man3/gd_frameoffset.3.gz Marked as found in versions libgetdata/0.9.0-1; no longer marked as fixed in ver

Processed: Re: Bug#803552: libeigen3-dev: Upgrade from 3.2.x to 3.3~alpha causes gnudatalanguage to FTBFS on arm64

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forwarded 803552 http://eigen.tuxfamily.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=1103 Bug #803552 [libeigen3-dev] libeigen3-dev: Upgrade from 3.2.x to 3.3~alpha causes gnudatalanguage to FTBFS on arm64 Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'http://eigen.tuxfamily.org/b

Re: Reproduction of #798601: limereg on mips

Damn. If I execute it in qemu (Mips), all tests pass. Cannot reproduce it (yet). -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Re: Bug Analyzation

I wonder what might be the best way, to test my fix for MIPS. Esp. I wonder how the Debian build server operates. I would normally assume a cross-compile - but the tests seem to be executed on a real MIPS. Might it be emulated ? On 28.09.2015 22:53, Roelof Berg wrote: I assume, the software i

Processed: Re: Bug#802955: libeigen3-dev: Eigen/LeastSquares is missing in version 3.3~alpha1-2

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 802955 freecad Bug #802955 [libeigen3-dev] libeigen3-dev: Eigen/LeastSquares is missing in version 3.3~alpha1-2 Bug reassigned from package 'libeigen3-dev' to 'freecad'. No longer marked as found in versions eigen3/3.3~alpha1-2. Ignoring

Processed: Re: Bug#799340 closed by Alastair McKinstry (Bug#799340: fixed in libgetdata 0.8.9-3)

Processing control commands: > found -1 0.8.9-3 Bug #799340 {Done: Alastair McKinstry } [libgetdata-doc] libgetdata-doc: fails to upgrade from 'testing' - trying to overwrite /usr/share/man/man3/gd_frameoffset.3.gz Marked as found in versions libgetdata/0.8.9-3; no longer marked as fixed in ver

Re: polyml 5.5.2-3

Great, thank you once again! James > On 22 Oct 2015, at 16:25, Gianfranco Costamagna > wrote: > > Hi, yes, this is a false positive! > > anyway, Built&Signed&Uploaded thanks for your contribution to Debian! > > cheers, > > G. signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using G

Re: polyml 5.5.2-3

Hi, yes, this is a false positive! anyway, Built&Signed&Uploaded thanks for your contribution to Debian! cheers, G. Il Mercoledì 21 Ottobre 2015 2:46, James Clarke ha scritto: My guess is the version of lintian on mentors.debian.net is not completely up to date. Lintian has only accepted

Re: polyml 5.5.2-3

My guess is the version of lintian on mentors.debian.net is not completely up to date. Lintian has only accepted the trigger since 2015-09-10 (https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/lintian/lintian.git/commit/?id=5468a38e208e7041279fa6b68ab7116a38263865) with 2.5.37 being the first version to contain i

Re: polyml 5.5.2-3

For some reason, mentors is giving a lintian error for "postinst-must-call-ldconfig”, although I have extracted the control information from the package and the contents of triggers is: > # Triggers added by dh_makeshlibs > activate-noawait ldconfig as expected, which is supposed to make lintia

Processed: Re: Bug#751395: approach to fix "vtk6: Do not compress perl scripts"

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 751395 +pending Bug #751395 [vtk6-doc] do not install runtime perl scripts in /usr/share/doc/ Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 751395: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugre

Re: Bug#802263: RFP: r-cran-rjsonio - serialize R objects to JSON

Quoting Jonathon Love (2015-10-18 23:19:06) > i was originally going to package this, but it turns out it's built on > libjson, which makes it non-free: > > https://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/jsonevil > > so it can't be used with GPL code (without violating the GPL). > > you might find that

Re: Bug#802263: RFP: r-cran-rjsonio - serialize R objects to JSON

hey, i was originally going to package this, but it turns out it's built on libjson, which makes it non-free: https://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/jsonevil so it can't be used with GPL code (without violating the GPL). you might find that r-cran-rjson fits your needs - we ported all our work a

Re: Bug#787861: review: polyml

it is fine, the first upload is always tricky, after things are easier :) cheers, G. Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android From:"James Clarke" Date:Sat, 17 Oct, 2015 at 17:33 Subject:Bug#787861: review: polyml Hi Gianfranco, >> I have uploaded 5.5.2-2 to mentors (and updated my git repository)

Re: Bug#787861: review: polyml

Hi Gianfranco, >> I have uploaded 5.5.2-2 to mentors (and updated my git repository) enabling >> all hardening flags. I also realised that the new polyc shell script >> requires gcc and >libffi-dev to produce standalone executables, so I have >> added those as dependencies for polyml. > > wond

Re: Bug#787861: review: polyml

Hi James, > > >I have uploaded 5.5.2-2 to mentors (and updated my git repository) enabling >all hardening flags. I also realised that the new polyc shell script requires >gcc and >libffi-dev to produce standalone executables, so I have added those >as dependencies for polyml. wonderful, I'

Re: Bug#787861: review: polyml

Hi Gianfranco, > I sponsored the package Thank you again for all your help. > (BTW I was intending to subscribe to debian-science, but also debian-devel is > nice to be subscribed) I have subscribed to debian-science as well. > However, I would appreciate a fix for the following missing flags

Re: Bug#787861: review: polyml

Hi James, I sponsored the package (BTW I was intending to subscribe to debian-science, but also debian-devel is nice to be subscribed) However, I would appreciate a fix for the following missing flags in a future release: CXXFLAGS missing (-fPIE): LDFLAGS missing (-Wl,-z,now) CFLAGS missing (-

Re: Bug#787861: review: polyml

to build-dependencies and enable it in > configure script. Done (upstream’s configure.ac forces libffi to be configured and is apparently needed, even in this case, so don’t be alarmed by that being mentioned in the logs!) I have re-uploaded 5.5.2-1 to mentors. I have also forked de

Re: Bug#787861: review: polyml

Hi, >I have uploaded the latest version to mentors. Currently, the old maintainers >are still listed in debian/control. I’m happy to assume responsibility for bug >>reports etc, so do I need to add myself to Uploaders? I don’t want to tread >on anyone’s toes though if that’s bad form. well, fo

Re: Bug#787861: review: polyml

Hi Gianfranco, > On 15 Oct 2015, at 10:56, Gianfranco Costamagna > wrote: > > Hi James > > >> I have uploaded 5.5.2-1~rc2 to mentors. > > > > please call it 5.5.2-1 and nothing more :) > you can push the same version many times on mentors with no problems. Changed >> 1) Do I need to send

Re: Bug#787861: review: polyml

Hi James >I have uploaded 5.5.2-1~rc2 to mentors. please call it 5.5.2-1 and nothing more :) you can push the same version many times on mentors with no problems. >1) Do I need to send a separate email to this then? I also filed #801793 for a >transition, but that has already been closed as u

Re: Bug#787861: review: polyml

Hi Gianfranco, I have uploaded 5.5.2-1~rc2 to mentors. 1) Do I need to send a separate email to this then? I also filed #801793 for a transition, but that has already been closed as unnecessary since there are no rdeps. 2) Added 6) The compiler is indeed forcing your code to be linked against

Re: Bug#787861: review: polyml

Hi James, >Thank you for continuing to look at this. I have just uploaded the newest >version (5.5.2-1~rc1) to https://mentors.debian.net/package/polyml. thanks to you for caring! >1) I have sent a request to join debian-science. Presumably I should wait >until the package is ready to be upl

Re: COLLADA-related packages location (was: Re: [collada-dom] branch master updated (b58c9b1 -> 2b8de90))

El Dimarts, 13 d'octubre de 2015, a les 07:24:08, Rene Engelhard va escriure: > Hi, > > On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 03:27:15AM +, Wookey wrote: > > This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. > > > > wookey pushed a change to branch master > > in repository collada-dom. >

COLLADA-related packages location (was: Re: [collada-dom] branch master updated (b58c9b1 -> 2b8de90))

Hi, On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 03:27:15AM +, Wookey wrote: > This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. > > wookey pushed a change to branch master > in repository collada-dom. I just happened to see other the other commits yesterday. Given COLLADA is 3D assets etc, wou

Processed: Re: Bug#800101: libeigen3-dev: CholmodSupport.h uses UF_long which has been removed in SuiteSparse 4.4

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forwarded 800101 http://eigen.tuxfamily.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=1086 Bug #800101 {Done: Anton Gladky } [libeigen3-dev] CholmodSupport.h uses UF_long which has been removed in SuiteSparse 4.4 Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'http://eigen.tuxfamily

RE

I have an urgent proposal for you, kindly contact this email: kossi44...@gmail.com Best Regards, Williams kossi. -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

RE

I have an urgent proposal for you, kindly contact this email: kossi44...@gmail.com Best Regards, Williams kossi. -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#801060: Fwd: Re: Bug#798256: transition: hdf5

CCing #801060 for the record. Courriel original Objet: Re: Bug#798256: transition: hdf5 Date: 2015-10-06 12:59 De: Gilles Filippini À: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort Cc: 798...@bugs.debian.org, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort Le 2015-10-06 11:07, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort a écrit : On 05/10

Processed: Re: Bug#774640: liblapack3: SVD throws error -4 in 3.5.0-4 while it runs with version 3.4.1.

Processing control commands: > tags -1 + upstream Bug #774640 [liblapack3] liblapack3: SVD throws error -4 in 3.5.0-4 while it runs with version 3.4.1. Added tag(s) upstream. > forwarded -1 http://icl.cs.utk.edu/lapack-forum/viewtopic.php?t=4808 Bug #774640 [liblapack3] liblapack3: SVD throws err

Processed: Re: Bug#798652: scilab: scilab doesn't work on ppc64el: could not find the Java configuration for the model <>

Processing control commands: > block -1 by 779482 Bug #798652 [scilab] scilab: scilab doesn't work on ppc64el: could not find the Java configuration for the model 798652 was not blocked by any bugs. 798652 was blocking: 798651 Added blocking bug(s) of 798652: 779482 -- 798652: http://bugs.debi

Processed: Re: Bug#800101: libeigen3-dev: CholmodSupport.h uses UF_long which has been removed in SuiteSparse 4.4

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 800101 +pending Bug #800101 [libeigen3-dev] CholmodSupport.h uses UF_long which has been removed in SuiteSparse 4.4 Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 800101: http://bugs.d

Processed: Re: Bug#774640: liblapack3: SVD throws error -4 in 3.5.0-4 while it runs with version 3.4.1.

Processing control commands: > tag -1 + moreinfo Bug #774640 [liblapack3] liblapack3: SVD throws error -4 in 3.5.0-4 while it runs with version 3.4.1. Added tag(s) moreinfo. -- 774640: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=774640 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.o

Processed: Re: Bug#800101: libeigen3-dev: CholmodSupport.h uses UF_long which has been removed in SuiteSparse 4.4

Processing control commands: > tags -1 + patch Bug #800101 [libeigen3-dev] CholmodSupport.h uses UF_long which has been removed in SuiteSparse 4.4 Added tag(s) patch. -- 800101: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=800101 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with

Processed: Re: src:yade: FTBFS against suitesparse 4.4: 'UF_long' was not declared in this scope

Processing control commands: > clone -1 -2 Bug #793765 [src:yade] src:yade: FTBFS against suitesparse 4.4: 'UF_long' was not declared in this scope Bug 793765 cloned as bug 800101 > reassign -2 libeigen3-dev 3.2.5-4 Bug #800101 [src:yade] src:yade: FTBFS against suitesparse 4.4: 'UF_long' was no

Processed: Re: Bug#799958: nmu: enblend-enfuse_4.1.3+dfsg-2

Processing control commands: > block -1 with 794736 Bug #799958 [release.debian.org] nmu: enblend-enfuse_4.1.3+dfsg-2 799958 was not blocked by any bugs. 799958 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 799958: 794736 -- 799958: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=799958 D

RE: DO YOU LOVE TO BE OUR COMPANY REPRESENTATIVE?

do you love to be our company representative please emil us now. chiyodasteelcorporati...@gmail.com Vindt u deze informatie onduidelijk? Wij geven graag een toelichting. Geef het door aan de afzender wanneer deze e-mai

RE: DO YOU LOVE TO BE OUR COMPANY REPRESENTATIVE?

do you love to be our company representative please emil us now. chiyodasteelcorporati...@gmail.com Vindt u deze informatie onduidelijk? Wij geven graag een toelichting. Geef het door aan de afzender wanneer deze e-mai

Re: Buone notizie

Imprese HEINEKEN Inc. 1759-2015, PIÙ DI 250 ANNI DI ESISTENZA DELLA SOCIETÀ BIRRA HEINEKEN "la promozione di HEINEKEN". © L'azienda HEINEKEN lancia la nuova campagna a livello internazionale, abbiamo questa e-mail ti informa che hai appena vinto € 60.000 (sessantamila euro) tramite un'e-mail casu

Re: Buone notizie

Imprese HEINEKEN Inc. 1759-2015, PIÙ DI 250 ANNI DI ESISTENZA DELLA SOCIETÀ BIRRA HEINEKEN "la promozione di HEINEKEN". © L'azienda HEINEKEN lancia la nuova campagna a livello internazionale, abbiamo questa e-mail ti informa che hai appena vinto € 60.000 (sessantamila euro) tramite un'e-mail casu

Re: Buone notizie

Imprese HEINEKEN Inc. 1759-2015, PIÙ DI 250 ANNI DI ESISTENZA DELLA SOCIETÀ BIRRA HEINEKEN "la promozione di HEINEKEN". © L'azienda HEINEKEN lancia la nuova campagna a livello internazionale, abbiamo questa e-mail ti informa che hai appena vinto € 60.000 (sessantamila euro) tramite un'e-mail casu

Re: Buone notizie

Imprese HEINEKEN Inc. 1759-2015, PIÙ DI 250 ANNI DI ESISTENZA DELLA SOCIETÀ BIRRA HEINEKEN "la promozione di HEINEKEN". © L'azienda HEINEKEN lancia la nuova campagna a livello internazionale, abbiamo questa e-mail ti informa che hai appena vinto € 60.000 (sessantamila euro) tramite un'e-mail casu

Re: Buone notizie

Imprese HEINEKEN Inc. 1759-2015, PIÙ DI 250 ANNI DI ESISTENZA DELLA SOCIETÀ BIRRA HEINEKEN "la promozione di HEINEKEN". © L'azienda HEINEKEN lancia la nuova campagna a livello internazionale, abbiamo questa e-mail ti informa che hai appena vinto € 60.000 (sessantamila euro) tramite un'e-mail casu

Re: Buone notizie

Imprese HEINEKEN Inc. 1759-2015, PIÙ DI 250 ANNI DI ESISTENZA DELLA SOCIETÀ BIRRA HEINEKEN "la promozione di HEINEKEN". © L'azienda HEINEKEN lancia la nuova campagna a livello internazionale, abbiamo questa e-mail ti informa che hai appena vinto € 60.000 (sessantamila euro) tramite un'e-mail casu

Processed: Re: mbt: 3.2.10-5 must not be in jessie

Processing control commands: > tag -1 jessie Bug #767193 [mbt] mbt: 3.2.10-5 must not be in jessie Added tag(s) jessie. -- 767193: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=767193 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- debian-science-maintainers mailin

Processed: Re: release.debian.org: boost1.58/icu/gcc5 transition

Processing control commands: > forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/boost1.58.html Bug #794458 [release.debian.org] release.debian.org: boost1.58/icu/gcc5 transition Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/boost1.58.html'. > block -1 with

Processed: Re: Bug#778540: suitesparse-metis: FTBFS with parmetis 4

Processing control commands: > severity -1 serious Bug #778540 [src:suitesparse-metis] suitesparse-metis version 3.1.0-2 failed to build with parmetis in experimental Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' > tag -1 sid stretch Bug #778540 [src:suitesparse-metis] suitesparse-metis version 3.1.

Processed: Re: cernlib: FTBFS on arm64

Processing control commands: > tag -1 patch Bug #766482 [src:cernlib] cernlib: FTBFS on arm64 Added tag(s) patch. -- 766482: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=766482 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list

Processed: Re: Bug#798308: freecad: Cannot install freecad

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 798308 minor Bug #798308 [src:freecad] freecad: Cannot install freecad Severity set to 'minor' from 'grave' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 798308: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport

Processed: Re: flann: transition may be needed for g++-5 ABIs

Processing control commands: > unblock -1 by 791067 Bug #797718 [src:flann] flann: transition may be needed for g++-5 ABIs 797718 was blocked by: 791067 797718 was not blocking any bugs. Removed blocking bug(s) of 797718: 791067 -- 797718: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=797718

Re: mathicgb upload

On 09/05/2015 04:50 PM, Anton Gladky wrote: > I think it is OK that the newer version with appended v5-name > to the library was uploaded. It should help to track the > migration process. Sounds good. Thanks again! Doug -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@list

Re: mathicgb upload

Hi Doug, I think it is OK that the newer version with appended v5-name to the library was uploaded. It should help to track the migration process. Cheers Anton 2015-09-05 22:37 GMT+02:00 Doug Torrance : > Hi Anton! > > I noticed that you set mathic to Done on the SoB page. This was > actually

Re: mathicgb upload

Hi Anton! I noticed that you set mathic to Done on the SoB page. This was actually a new request, but I'm wondering if it was even necessary. A new RC bug [1] was filed against the version that you uploaded a couple days ago. I imagine they just grepped the exported symbols, saw that they inclu

Processed: Re: [Pkg-octave-devel] Bug#794443: octave: should not recommend libopenblas-base

Processing control commands: > reassign -1 libopenblas-base 0.2.12-1 Bug #794443 [octave] octave: should not recommend libopenblas-base Bug reassigned from package 'octave' to 'libopenblas-base'. No longer marked as found in versions octave/3.8.2-4. No longer marked as fixed in versions octave/4.0

Processed: Re: Bug#797092: woo: FTBFS on non-x86: inappropriately builds with -march=core2

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > notfixed 797092 1.0-2 Bug #797092 {Done: Anton Gladky } [src:woo] woo: FTBFS on non-x86: inappropriately builds with -march=core2 No longer marked as fixed in versions woo/1.0-2. > found 797092 1.0-2 Bug #797092 {Done: Anton Gladky } [src:woo] wo

Processed: Re: Bug#791283: siscone: library transition may be needed when GCC 5 is the default

Processing control commands: > reopen 791283 Bug #791283 {Done: Mehdi Dogguy } [src:siscone] siscone: library transition may be needed when GCC 5 is the default Bug reopened Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #791283 to the same values previously set -- 791283: http://bugs.debian.

Re: mathicgb upload

On 09/02/2015 02:22 PM, Anton Gladky wrote: Uploaded! Thanks! The powerpc build issue hasn't been fixed yet. I'm in contact with upstream and hope to have that fixed before too long. Doug -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://

Re: mathicgb upload

Uploaded! Anton 2015-09-01 13:18 GMT+02:00 Doug Torrance : > Hi Anton, > > On 09/01/2015 12:50 AM, Anton Gladky wrote: >> your package mathicgb_1.0~git20131006-3 FTBFSs with the >> following message: >> >> ... >> >> It can be connected to a current GCC-5 transition. > > Yeah, I had noticed this

Processed: Re: h5py: FTBFS - Broken test: test_file.py

Processing control commands: > severity -1 normal Bug #797476 [src:h5py] h5py: FTBFS - Broken test: test_file.py Severity set to 'normal' from 'serious' -- 797476: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=797476 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --

Re: mathicgb upload

Hi Anton, On 09/01/2015 12:50 AM, Anton Gladky wrote: > your package mathicgb_1.0~git20131006-3 FTBFSs with the > following message: > > ... > > It can be connected to a current GCC-5 transition. Yeah, I had noticed this a few days ago. It's definitely because of the GCC-5 transition -- in parti

Re: Bug#793998: apophenia: FTBFS: tests fail on certain architectures

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello: On 31/08/15 22:38, Aaron M. Ucko wrote: > notfixed 793998 0.999b+ds3-3 > found 793998 0.999b+ds3-3 > thanks > > "Aaron M. Ucko" writes: > >> * distribution_tests fails on *i386 and ppc64el. >> * ../eg/test_updating fails on arm64, (tradition

Processed: Re: apophenia: FTBFS: tests fail on certain architectures

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > notfixed 793998 0.999b+ds3-3 Bug #793998 {Done: Jerome Benoit } [src:apophenia] apophenia: FTBFS: tests fail on certain architectures The source 'apophenia' and version '0.999b+ds3-3' do not appear to match any binary packages Ignoring request t

Processed: Re: Bug#796771: science-geography: Depends on no longer built qgis-plugin-grass

Processing control commands: > reassign -1 src:debian-science 1.4 Bug #796771 [src:science-geography] science-geography: Depends on no longer built qgis-plugin-grass Warning: Unknown package 'src:science-geography' Bug reassigned from package 'src:science-geography' to 'src:debian-science'. No lo

Processed: Re: Bug#796715: coinor-osi: working diff

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tag 796715 + pending Bug #796715 [src:coinor-osi] coinor-osi: library transition needed with GCC 5 as default Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 796715: http://bugs.debian.org/c

Processed: Re: Bug#796891: libvtk6-dev: Reference to non-existant vtkGUISupportQtModule.h in /usr/include/vtk-6.2/QVTKWidget.h

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 796891 +pending Bug #796891 [libvtk6-dev] libvtk6-dev: Reference to non-existant vtkGUISupportQtModule.h in /usr/include/vtk-6.2/QVTKWidget.h Added tag(s) pending. > severity 796891 important Bug #796891 [libvtk6-dev] libvtk6-dev: Reference

Processed: Re: ignition-math2: FTBFS: test suite fails on some platforms

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > found 789826 2.2.2+dfsg1-1 Bug #789826 {Done: Jose Luis Rivero } [src:ignition-math2] ignition-math2: FTBFS: test suite fails on some platforms Marked as found in versions ignition-math2/2.2.2+dfsg1-1; no longer marked as fixed in versions ignit

Re: Comments regarding getfem++_4.2.1~beta1~svn4635~dfsg-4_amd64.changes

Hi Scott, thanks for accepting getfem++. This python-support issue is already fixed in our git and will be uploaded shortly with a newer version. Regards Anton 2015-08-25 4:45 GMT+02:00 Scott Kitterman : > Nothing that would block an upload, but please take note of: > > E: getfem++ source: bui

Re: Erroneous minuit in paw in Debian 7

Hi Mikhail, could you please a bug against a corresponding package, so we will be able properly track it. Thanks Anton 2015-08-24 10:48 GMT+02:00 Mikhail Ukhanov : > Dear maintainer, > > The following kumac gives erroneous result in Debian 7 (wheezy) > -

Processed: Re: qwtplot3d: library transition may be needed when GCC 5 is the default

Processing control commands: > tags -1 patch Bug #791264 [src:qwtplot3d] qwtplot3d: library transition may be needed when GCC 5 is the default Added tag(s) patch. -- 791264: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=791264 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with pro

Processed: Re: Bug#791173: libstxxl: library transition may be needed when GCC 5 is the default

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 791173 +pending Bug #791173 [src:libstxxl] libstxxl: library transition may be needed when GCC 5 is the default Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 791173: http://bugs.debia

Processed: Re: Bug#790984: blitz++: library transition may be needed when GCC 5 is the default

Processing control commands: > tags 790984 + patch pending Bug #790984 [src:blitz++] blitz++: library transition may be needed when GCC 5 is the default Added tag(s) pending and patch. -- 790984: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=790984 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bu

Processed: Re: Bug#796544: osrm: FTBFS: undefined reference to `google::protobuf::io::StringOutputStream::StringOutputStream(std::string*)'

Processing control commands: > block -1 by 791173 Bug #796544 [src:osrm] osrm: FTBFS: undefined reference to `google::protobuf::io::StringOutputStream::StringOutputStream(std::string*)' 796544 was blocked by: 791246 796544 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 796544: 791173 -- 79

Processed: Re: Bug#791173: libstxxl: library transition may be needed when GCC 5 is the default

Processing control commands: > reopen -1 Bug #791173 {Done: Simon McVittie } [src:libstxxl] libstxxl: library transition may be needed when GCC 5 is the default Bug reopened Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #791173 to the same values previously set -- 791173: http://bugs.debian.

Processed: Re: Bug#792715: opencv: FTBFS with Sphinx 1.3: wrong code to detect Sphinx version

Processing control commands: > reassign -1 src:opencv 2.4.9.1+dfsg-1.1 Bug #792715 [python-sphinx] opencv: FTBFS with Sphinx 1.3: wrong code to detect Sphinx version Bug reassigned from package 'python-sphinx' to 'src:opencv'. No longer marked as found in versions sphinx/1.3.1-3. Ignoring request

Processed: Re: Bug#791226: opencv: library transition may be needed when GCC 5 is the default

Processing control commands: > tags 791226 + patch pending Bug #791226 [src:opencv] opencv: library transition is needed when GCC 5 is the default Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #791226 to the same tags previously set -- 791226: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=791226 792

Processed: Re: Bug#791226: opencv: library transition may be needed when GCC 5 is the default

Processing control commands: > tags 791226 + patch pending Bug #791226 [src:opencv] opencv: library transition is needed when GCC 5 is the default Added tag(s) pending. -- 791226: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=791226 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org wi

Re: Sponsorship of mathematical package

Hi Anton, The package has already been uploaded by someone else, but thanks anyway! That being said, I'd like to maintain geoproof with Debian Science, so I've just made a request to join on Alioth, and I'll be certain to ask you to upload once I've packaged it. Thanks, Riley On Tue, 18 Aug 20

Re: Bug#792715: opencv: FTBFS with Sphinx 1.3: wrong code to detect Sphinx version

Control: reopen 792715 On Sat, 15 Aug 2015 at 15:54:33 +, Debian Bug Tracking System forwarded: >* Fix message when calling sphinx-build without arguments > (print_help.diff; closes: #792715). I'm looking into NMUing opencv for the libstdc++ transition. This change does not actually

Processed: Re: etsf-io: ftbfs with GCC-5

Processing control commands: > tags -1 pending Bug #777844 [src:etsf-io] etsf-io: ftbfs with GCC-5 Added tag(s) pending. -- 777844: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=777844 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- debian-science-maintainers maili

Processed: Re: etsf-io: ftbfs with GCC-5

Processing control commands: > tags -1 pending Bug #793823 [src:etsf-io] etsf-io: Build dependency on libnetcdff-dev required for netcdf transition Added tag(s) pending. -- 793823: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=793823 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org w

Processed: Re: Bug#795963: dune-istl: FTBFS: bcrsimplicitbuild.cc:269:51: error: no match for 'operator<<'

Processing control commands: > tag -1 upstream fixed-upstream Bug #795963 [src:dune-istl] dune-istl: FTBFS: bcrsimplicitbuild.cc:269:51: error: no match for 'operator<<' Added tag(s) fixed-upstream and upstream. > fixed -1 2.4~20150506gee6e5f6-1 Bug #795963 [src:dune-istl] dune-istl: FTBFS: bcrsi

<    6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   >