* Johannes Schauer [2016-10-19 10:40]:
> I see. This is the upstream packaging with only very minor modifications by
> Jochen (liblti-dev is not packaged yet either, so it got removed from B-D).
Yeah, that was only a quick shot to try some stuff. Feel free to rework
it.
> The question remains, w
Hi,
Quoting Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda (2016-10-19 09:52:32)
> orocos-bfl is packaged (not perfect), but not officially. See:
>
> https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/debian-science/packages/orocos/bfl.git/
>
> The project is not dead, but AFAIK upstream is the orocos team, specially
> Klaas Gadeyne.
El Dimecres, 19 d'octubre de 2016, a les 09:31:40, Johannes Schauer va
escriure:
> Hi,
>
> I intend to package ROS bfl but have several questions for the ROS people
> among you.
>
> ROS bfl (http://wiki.ros.org/bfl) seems to be a copy of orocos bfl
> (http://www.orocos.org/bfl). Not only does RO
Hi,
I intend to package ROS bfl but have several questions for the ROS people among
you.
ROS bfl (http://wiki.ros.org/bfl) seems to be a copy of orocos bfl
(http://www.orocos.org/bfl). Not only does ROS distribute an outdated version
(0.7.0 versus 0.8.0) but using the ROS library is also differen
