Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Andreas Tille ti...@debian.org
* Package name: r-cran-polyclip
Version : 1.2-0
Upstream Author : Adrian Baddeley adrian.badde...@uwa.edu.au
* URL : http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/polyclip/
* License : Boost
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hi,
I was inspecting packages of the pkg-scicomp team which is merged with
Debian Science. I noticed that the package cpushare did not had uploads
since 2008 nor changes in VCS since 2009-03-14 (which only added a watch
file to a now not existing web
Hi Ghislain,
pyfftw does not build in a pbuilder environment:
...
removing
'/home/andreas/debian-maintain/alioth/debian-science/git/packages/build-area/pyfftw-0.9.2/.pybuild/pythonX.Y_2.7/build'
(and everything under it)
'build/bdist.linux-x86_64' does not exist -- can't clean it
Hi Ghislain,
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 08:33:08AM +, Ghislain Vaillant wrote:
I too experience this error when using pbuilder. It builds fine however if
I install the required dependencies on my machine and then run pbuilder. If
any of them are missing, for instance the -dbg packages, then
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 10:37:25AM +, Ghislain Vaillant wrote:
I admit if I would have had a quick clue I would have provided it
immediately. Despite I'm using pbuilder basically all the time I never
experienced this problem ... most probably since I never added any *-dbg
package
Hi Ghislain,
thanks for your work on this.
On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 09:45:08AM +, Ghislain Vaillant wrote:
- Pbuilder now successfully runs, but you need python-numpy-dbg and
python3-numpy-dbg to be installed before hand. Seems that pybuild calls
python setup.py clean before dependency
Hi Leopold,
since I have trouble building ompl when I tried to sponsor it (see
extract of build log below) in a pbuilder environment I think it really
helps if you open an RFS bug where we could keep a record of this
problem.
Kind regards
Andreas.
...
cd
Hi Ghislain,
On Sun, Mar 09, 2014 at 09:47:31PM +, Ghislain Vaillant wrote:
The latest update of PyFFTW now builds nicely with pbuilder and is ready
for review. All the previously reported issues are now fixed.
Thanks for working on this.
I can confirm that the package builds but I see
On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 03:06:03PM +0100, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote:
Perfect,
now ompl compiles.
... and uploaded.
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
--
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi Julián,
I generally prefer open discussion on mailing lists - in this case it is
the maintainers mailing list and to keep other interested people
informed (and no private content seems to be in this mail) I answer on
list as well.
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 11:15:53AM -0500, Julián Moreno Patiño
Hi Ghislain,
I would like to sponsor ismrmrd but there are some issues with the
packaging.
1. The pristine-tar branch is missing. Please use
git import-orig --pristine-tar origtarball
as it is explained in the team policy
2. Please set the Science team mailing list as
Hi Ghislain,
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 09:13:14PM +, Ghislain Vaillant wrote:
I am guessing that the licensing of the docs/html/* files come from the
fact that it is built from sphinx. In that case what should be the license
for it ?
I think Thorsten was not primarily refering to the *.html
Hi Ghislain,
On Sun, Mar 16, 2014 at 09:11:12PM +, Ghislain Vaillant wrote:
On Sun, 2014-03-16 at 21:04 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
I would like to sponsor ismrmrd but there are some issues with the
packaging.
Thank you for stepping-up again to mentor one of my packages.
Sure
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 06:24:45AM +0200, Anton Gladky wrote:
3) Remove all binaries and do dfsg-tarball (*.dll, *.lib etc)
I'd recommend using Files-Excluded in uscan of recent devscripts
versions to approach this.
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
--
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 08:05:52PM +0200, Anton Gladky wrote:
2014-04-08 8:34 GMT+02:00 Andreas Tille andr...@an3as.eu:
I'd recommend using Files-Excluded in uscan of recent devscripts
versions to approach this.
Andreas, how to use it? If I just do uscan --force-download it
does
Hi Julien,
it seems you did not properly setup your environment. It would help if
you would commit with your real name.
Kind regards and thanks for working on pynac
Andreas.
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 02:41:18PM +, $DEBFULLNAME wrote:
This is an automated email from the git
Hi Ghislain,
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 01:16:13PM +0100, Ghislain Vaillant wrote:
Are you still interested in sponsoring this package ?
I have no specific wish to sponsor this package and if somebody else
wants to step in I'd be more than happy. However, I just went the SoB
route and uploaded to
Hi Jose,
you are welcome to add a line to the table in the Sponsering of Blends Wiki
https://wiki.debian.org/DebianPureBlends/SoB
and I'll act as soon as possible.
Kind regards
Andreas.
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 02:05:57AM +0200, Jose Luis Rivero wrote:
Hi all:
I would need an
Hi Santiago,
thanks for your bug report. I really appreciate hints like this. I
would also welcome if those people creating PPAs would rather file
a bug report (or commit right to SVN and ping me for an upload).
Santiago, it would help me adjusting my idea about maintaining R
packages if you
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Andreas Tille ti...@debian.org
* Package name: r-cran-expm
Version : 0.99-1.1
Upstream Author : Martin Maechler and others
* URL : http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/expm/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: R
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Andreas Tille ti...@debian.org
* Package name: r-cran-gsl
Version : 1.9-10
Upstream Author : Robin K. S. Hankin hankin.ro...@gmail.com
* URL : http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/gsl/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Andreas Tille ti...@debian.org
* Package name: r-cran-randomfields
Version : 3.0.10
Upstream Author : Martin Schlather schlat...@math.uni-mannheim.de
* URL : http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/RandomFields/
* License
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Andreas Tille ti...@debian.org
* Package name: r-cran-misctools
Version : 0.6-16
Upstream Author : Arne Henningsen arne.henning...@gmail.com
* URL : http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/miscTools/
* License : GPL
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Andreas Tille ti...@debian.org
* Package name: r-cran-learnbayes
Version : 2.15
Upstream Author : Jim Albert alb...@bgsu.edu
* URL : http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/LearnBayes/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: R
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Andreas Tille ti...@debian.org
* Package name: r-cran-batchjobs
Version : 1.2
Upstream Author : Bernd Bischl bernd_bis...@gmx.net
* URL : http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/BatchJobs/
* License : BSD
Programming
Hi Thorsten,
reuploaded with fixed d/copyright. Please review.
Thanks for your work as ftpmaster
Andreas.
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 01:00:06PM +, Thorsten Alteholz wrote:
Hi Andreas,
unfortunately I have to reject your package.
Please add the license of src/convhull2D.cc and
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Andreas Tille ti...@debian.org
* Package name: r-cran-spdep
Version : 0.5-74
Upstream Author : Roger Bivand roger.biv...@nhh.no
* URL : http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/spdep/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: R
Hi Jose,
I did some minor changes - please `git pull` - and uploaded afterwards.
Thanks for your preparation
Andreas.
On Tue, Jul 01, 2014 at 05:05:52PM +0200, Jose Luis Rivero wrote:
Hi all:
I would need a sponsor to upload the revision 5 of sdformat where I'm
trying to solve the
Hi Leopold,
On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 12:23:01AM +0200, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote:
- I have not found any license file with GPLv2+ in upstream sources. Please,
could you tell me which one?
I have not tried but perhaps the script licensecheck from devscripts might
help you spotting the
Hi Thorsten, (Gregor in CC)
libinline-c-perl is in NEW - may be just waiting would help in this
case?
Gregor, what do you think? (BTW, feel free to NMU according to your
opinion!)
Kind regards
Andreas.
On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 10:25:10AM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
Source:
Hi,
in beginning of February you injected an empty repository coot.git into
Debian Med team Git. I might have forgotten whether you did some
announcement about this but for the moment I see no point in keeping
any empty repository in our space. Moreover there is some existing
packaging at
.
- Forwarded message from Thorsten Alteholz
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org -
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2014 11:51:55 +
From: Thorsten Alteholz ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org
To: Debian Science Team debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org,
Andreas Tille ti...@debian.org
Cc: Debian FTP Masters
Hi Roger,
thanks for your very fast response. I keep our ftpmaster in CC since he
finally needs to decide. I attached a proposed diff for the
debian/copyright file.
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 05:12:58PM +0200, Roger Bivand wrote:
Hi Andreas,
On Wed, 30 Jul 2014, Andreas Tille wrote:
Hi
Hi Roger,
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 09:36:22PM +0200, Roger Bivand wrote:
Hi Andreas,
This isn't a patch to my spdep/inst/README file.
No, it's not! :-)
I have no knowledge
of any debian/copyright file, and cannot take responsibility for
that
This was never intended - it was just for our
Hi Roger,
I'm very astonished that this thread which started with two very simple
questions exagerated to such a time consuming discussion. Since I read
a lot of frustration in you mail and no chance to clarify things easily
I just repeat the main point: inst/README says:
File: src/soigraph.c
Hi Roger,
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 03:47:34PM +0200, Roger Bivand wrote:
I'm very astonished that this thread which started with two very simple
questions exagerated to such a time consuming discussion.
Most questions are not as simple as they appear, think ontologies.
Mine differs from
Hi Roger,
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 06:42:06PM +0200, Roger Bivand wrote:
Hi Andreas,
Given surveillance rather than my (wrong) guess, I'm willing to do
what I can - I agree that actual use in epidemiology is worth
facilitating. Should the soigraph issue prove problematic, I'll look
at a
Hi Roger,
On Fri, Aug 01, 2014 at 09:33:21AM +0200, Roger Bivand wrote:
What is the r-cran-maptools issue - I'm also the maintainer of that
package? I'm not aware of what might be non-free there; maybe the
data files for examples and testing? Nobody has asked me about that.
To explain this
Hi Christopher,
I try to upgrade the Debian package of msm to the latest version but
failed tu run the according test suite:
library(testthat)
test_check(msm)
Loading required package: msm
analytic transition probability matrices :
...
msm data
Hi Dominique,
the changelog in SVN says
openigtlink (1.9.8~git20130725+bacab6f8b1-2) experimental; urgency=low
openigtlink (1.9.2~svn7468-1) unstable; urgency=low
but we have
$ LANG=C apt-cache policy openigtlink-doc
openigtlink-doc:
Installed: (none)
Candidate: 1.10.5-1
Version
Hi Alex,
thanks for your patch. Just for your information: Upstream has
orphaned this for years and Debian is de facto upstream. In this sense
the tag upstream does not help a lot (but for sure you can become
upstream ;-)). Anybody can feel free to team upload this nice
enhancement.
Kind
Hi David,
I can confirm this problem. However, I have no idea why this happens.
The critical point is a makefile containing
# Flags to enable native support of most classical image file formats, using
the Magick++ library.
# ( http://www.imagemagick.org/Magick++/ )
CIMG_MAGICK_CFLAGS =
Hi Thorsten,
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 12:50:48PM +, Thorsten Alteholz wrote:
ping?
pong?
I was waiting on some comments in the thread starting at
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/debian-science-maintainers/2014-July/026476.html
I have no idea what change you would accept for
Hi Lucas,
I'm just idling with fixing this bug since your suggested solution does
not fit, I can not reproduce the problem and you did not yet answered.
Any news from your side?
Kind regards
Andreas.
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 03:44:00PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
Hi Lucas,
On Wed
didn't work in this package after I sent you my patch, but I will try
to restart my work to solve this bug when I have free time.
Regards.
On Thu, 18 Sep 2014 17:15:17 +0200
Andreas Tille andr...@an3as.eu wrote:
Hi Lucas,
I'm just idling with fixing this bug since your suggested
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 03:12:36PM -0300, Lucas Kanashiro wrote:
Andreas,
You have to install debci via apt and execute setup command of debci, where
debci
will set up a schroot environment (follow the README). After the schroot was
created, I downloaded the source of r-cran-learnbayes
Hi Thorsten,
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 08:07:05AM +, Thorsten Alteholz wrote:
Hi Andreas,
I marked your package for accept, but now you created this lintian warning:
W: r-cran-spam source: unknown-paragraph-in-dep5-copyright paragraph at line
11
IMHO this is a false positive of lintian
Hi,
On Sun, Oct 26, 2014 at 09:51:48AM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
* Andreas Tille (andr...@an3as.eu) [141026 08:04]:
could you please have a look what might be wrong here:
https://release.debian.org/migration/testing.pl?package=blitz++
You could check yourself via buildd.debian.org
Hi Ivo,
thanks for the bug report.
On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 10:14:00PM +0100, Ivo De Decker wrote:
package: blitz++
version: 1:0.10-2
severity: serious
It seems the latest upload of blitz++ failed on mips, but it built fine
before. This prevents migration to testing.
I'm aware of this
).
Duration of array test execution on cavium board is:
304m40.451s.
On broadcom board,
package builds successfully.
Duration of array test execution on broadcom board is:
12m50.570s.
Best Regards,
Dejna
From: Andreas Tille [andr
/changelog
+++ viewmol-2.4.1/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,12 @@
+viewmol (2.4.1-21) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+ * Team upload.
+ * Create executable on all architectures (Thanks for the patch to
+Graham Inggs gra...@nerve.org.za)
+Closes: #763909
+
+ -- Andreas Tille ti...@debian.org Mon, 03
Hi Graham,
it would be great if you could revise the patch. I admit that the
package is in a quite outdated packaging state. :-(
Just ping me if you found a better solution and I'll do my best
to upload quickly.
Kind regards
Andreas.
On Mon, Nov 03, 2014 at 09:30:59PM +0200, Graham
target does not work
with your patch. Do you see a chance to skip the getmachine call in the
clean target which should be sufficient to work around the problem?
Kind regards
Andreas.
On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 07:14:27AM +0100, Niels Thykier wrote:
On 2014-11-04 06:41, Andreas Tille wrote
Hi Graham,
On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 02:41:27PM +0200, Graham Inggs wrote:
Hi Andreas
So far, I haven't been able to get the package to build at all
without switching to source format 3.0.
Well, I personally do not agree with the set freeze rules but we need to
follow if we want to see
[CCing DebiChem since viewmol might be in the interest of this team.
I'd consider moving the package from Debian Science to DebiChem
for Jessie+1.]
Hi Graham,
On Wed, Nov 05, 2014 at 11:16:30AM +0200, Graham Inggs wrote:
Some progress.
I pre-applied
Hi Graham,
On Wed, Nov 05, 2014 at 12:54:48PM +0200, Graham Inggs wrote:
On 05/11/2014 11:40, Andreas Tille wrote:
To bad that we stumbled to late about this problem to block the way more
simple solution sith source format and debhelper. :-)
Yeah, that would have been simpler.
Running
Hi Anton,
besides this I wonder whether we could / should / are able to get
libvtk6-java back since the removal in #773422 was no solution
everybody is happy about. Did you tried consulting debian-java
list (and if not would you be interested if somebody else would
try?) I'm tempted to reopen
:11:03 AM, Andreas Tille (andr...@an3as.eu) wrote:
On Sat, Jan 04, 2014 at 04:59:04AM -0800, Patrick Huck wrote:
Hi Andreas,
With Alioth being back up again, I requested membership in the Debian
Science Team but am still waiting for a reply. Meanwhile, I got 'ckon'
compiled
Hi,
On Sun, Feb 08, 2015 at 09:28:50PM +0100, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
Dear Daniele,
Le vendredi 16 janvier 2015 à 16:18 +0100, Daniele E. Domenichelli a
écrit :
I'm sorry if this is the wrong place, but I don't know the what is the
policy for this kind of request...
I would like
Hi Anton,
On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 11:01:59AM +0100, Anton Gladky wrote:
onwer 588340 !
retitle 588340 ITP: sfepy -- Simple finite elements in Python
thanks
The package will soon be uploaded under Debian
Science team.
Cool. Please note that it is not yet mentioned in the Debian Science
Hi Johannes,
feel free to add a row at bottom of the SoB page:
https://wiki.debian.org/DebianPureBlends/SoB
Note, that I'll be mostly offline until tomorrow evening - I'm fine if
somebody beats me in uploading.
Kind regards
Andreas.
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 01:12:41PM +0100,
Hi Anton,
just a hint: We now have libcolt-free-java in main which is
libcolt-java with stripped of non-free code. The Debian Med
reverse depends are building fine and hopefully are running
fine (needs testing in practice). May be this is helpful for
sumo as well.
Kind regards
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package debian-science
According to previous discussion about Blends metapackages[1] I'd like
you to unblock debian-science 1.4. I simply rerendered the status of
the
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 11:56:13PM +0200, Roelof Berg wrote:
Thanks Andreas, I will check if this works for me as final
acceptance test. I wonder about the state of limereg. After I fixed
the reason for the rejection, which you kindly offered to accept
some days ago, thanks, I saw neither an
:
Thanks, Andreas, for being so enthusiast and helpful. Maybe my setup is to
new (SID). Would it be allowed to git-package in my home-folder on Alioth ? I
assume, then I'd have a more compatible setup (?)
Von meinem Mobiltelefon gesendet.
Am 16.04.2015 um 08:47 schrieb Andreas Tille andr
Hi Alex,
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 11:34:31AM +0100, Alex Coplan wrote:
I’m not sure if this is the right place to be asking, but if someone could at
least point me in the right direction that would be great. I would like to
suggest an update to the Poly/ML package
...@irisa.fr -
Date: Tue, 05 May 2015 09:25:23 +0200
From: Olivier Sallou olivier.sal...@irisa.fr
To: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Help needed to update to latest fastqc
On 05/04/2015 10:52 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
Hi Olivier,
On Mon, May 04, 2015 at 06:41:10PM +0200, Olivier Sallou
Hi Roelof,
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 12:06:14AM +0200, Roelof Berg wrote:
I fixed below mentioned issue in:
ssh://rberg-gu...@git.debian.org/git/debian-science/packages/limereg.git
Fine. I'm rebuilding while writing this mail.
Though I read a lot of documents about Debian packaging, the
Hi,
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 01:15:03PM +0200, Roelof Berg wrote:
would anyone want to sponsor Limereg V1.4.0 ? That'd be awesome. It's on
alioth at
Done. Sorry for the SoB-delay. I'm catching up slowly from vacation.
Other SoB candidates might keep on pinging me in urgent cases.
Thanks for
Hi,
I had a look into the said issue but failed with
...
No package 'vte' found
Package vte was not found in the pkg-config search path.
Perhaps you should add the directory containing `vte.pc'
to the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable
No package 'vte' found
...
When looking at the upstream
Hi David,
On Sat, Jul 04, 2015 at 09:18:43PM +0200, David Tschumperlé wrote:
There are other images distributed within the CImg packages that are not
free but also distributable, so I'm a bit surprised the bug report
focuses only on the Lena image.
I guess the only reason why the bug report
Hi again,
On Sun, Jul 05, 2015 at 12:11:20AM +0200, David Tschumperlé wrote:
Would you consider a free license for these images?
Of course, pick the license you want for these. CeCILL-C is probably fine.
Thanks.
From a Debian point of view we are not allowed to include non-free
Hi Bastien,
thanks for this bug report, which I'm hereby forwarding upstream.
David, do you have any acceptable free replacement which works
similarly good as example?
Kind regards
Andreas.
On Sat, Jul 04, 2015 at 01:32:17PM +0200, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote:
Package: src:cimg
Severity:
Roelof,
On Sat, Aug 22, 2015 at 09:38:12AM +0200, David Bremner wrote:
Roelof Berg rb...@berg-solutions.de writes:
Hi,
this is about the third or fourth time I'm asking this. Any help would
be greatly aprechiated.
I uploaded a new version 1.4.0-2 of limereg that fixes #792624 and
On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 11:42:19AM +0100, Sandro Tosi wrote:
On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 11:36 AM, Sergey B Kirpichev
skirpic...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 09:55:47AM +0100, Sandro Tosi wrote:
Do I have access to it?
Any member of debian-science group has.
$ ssh
Hi Doug,
I think you need to update the symbols file (or remove it at all - I
personally do not provide symbols files in my library packages since
it makes maintainance hard).
I attached the relevant part of the build log.
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
dh_makeshlibs
Hi Zeev,
I was on vacation and thus did not responded soonish. Since I can not
find any response on this list to your mail (which I consider unusual,
but anyway) I would like to ask whether you might have been able to
make some progress anyway. See inline for more comments.
On Fri, Jun 05,
Hi Zeev,
On Wed, Jul 08, 2015 at 09:46:04PM +0300, Zeev Pekar wrote:
So you responded just in time :)
:-)
By now one can generate a basic .deb package running `cpack -G DEB` - a
good starting point probably.
I don't know cpack and I'm afraid this will not really help to get an
official
On Thu, Jul 09, 2015 at 09:03:36AM +0300, Zeev Pekar wrote:
cpack is part of Kitware's cmake. It will not create an official Debian
package, but at least some initial files to start with...
OK, having some initial files might help.
I'm there
nd some examples in /usr/share/doc/libblitz-doc/examples.
> -There is a Makefile.examples to build and test all examples.
> -
> -The benchmark directory has not been installed here, because it
> -tests blitz++ against FORTRAN 90, which is not available for debian.
> -
> -Pa
Hi Roelof,
On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 11:36:38PM +0200, Roelof Berg wrote:
> On 22.08.2015 15:12, Andreas Tille wrote:
> >Roelof,
> >
> [...]
> >Just add a proper
> >
> >Closes: #792624, #792625
> >
> >line in your changelog entry.
> Fixed
Hi,
by chance I found out that there is only one remaining package
maintained by pkg-scicomp (or rather not maintained since the team is
declared dead and the repository readonly). Christian, would you mind
uploading it under Debian Science or ask for removal if the package is
not needed any
Hi,
some packages in Debian Med depend from libvtk-java version 6.x. Is
there any chance to get libvtk-java back and how can I help with this?
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
--
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
As announced on Debian Science list[1] I hereby request the removal of
the last package of a team that does not exist any more (Debian
Scientific Computing) since it was merged to Debian Science. This
last package obviously did not found any maintainer
Hi,
the Python module was moved to python-vtk6 and the Java support removed
from the package (unfortunately - that's why I stumbled upon this bug).
So the topic of this bug is done IMHO. Shouldn't this bug be closed
then?
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
--
Hi Johannes,
when checking reverse dependencies of insighttoolkit3 and vtk5 I
stumbled upon vmtk. I noticed that the project moved to Github and has
a new version. Unfortunately it seems there was no switch to
insighttoolkit4 and vtk6 (and it also needs vtkjava which is not (yet)
available in
Hi,
the Python module was moved to python-vtk6 and the Java support removed
from the package (unfortunately - that's why I stumbled upon this bug)
and there is also no tcltk package any more. So the topic of this bug
is done IMHO. Shouldn't this bug be closed then?
Kind regards
team.
What do you think?
Kind regards
Andreas.
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 10:44:03AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Anton,
>
> besides this I wonder whether we could / should / are able to get
> libvtk6-java back since the removal in #773422 was no solution
> everybody is ha
Hi Bas,
thanks for working on the libgsl migration. I commited a patch to SVN[1]
to circumvent the check by configure but that's not sufficient to do the
migration. The build fails with
gcc -std=gnu99 -I/usr/share/R/include -DNDEBUG -I/usr/include -I. -fpic -g
-O2
Hi Andreas,
thanks a lot for caring!
Would you mind commiting your changes to Debian Science svn. It has
ACLs set to grant commit permissions to any DD.
Thanks again
Andreas.
On Sun, Nov 22, 2015 at 07:49:47PM +0100, Andreas Bombe wrote:
> Control: tags 803755 + patch
> Control: tags
On Sun, Nov 22, 2015 at 06:04:23AM +0100, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
> > I've just run your get-orig-source rule and ended up with a 3rd
> > version of the orig.tar.xz.
> > I guess re-compressing with uscan is not reproducible (yet?).
>
> It appeared that tar does not produced reproducible balls.
Hi Oliver,
it seems Bastien has lost interest in this package. It just popped up
in my sentinel of packages that are in the focus of Debian Med but not
uploaded for a long time. If you have no idea how to maintain a package
I'd consider a "Mentoring of the Month"[1] for Debian Science.
Kind
Hi ftpmasters,
vtk6[1] is no new package. It has just a new binary package. Since
vtk6 is quite complex and we need a lot of testing of its dependencies
we are even now short in time for the Jessie freeze. It would help a
lot if you could accept it for unstable.
Thanks a lot for your
Hi Bastien,
On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 03:58:15PM +0100, roucaries bastien wrote:
> > it seems Bastien has lost interest in this package. It just popped up
> > in my sentinel of packages that are in the focus of Debian Med but not
> > uploaded for a long time. If you have no idea how to maintain a
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Andreas Tille <ti...@debian.org>
* Package name: r-cran-mlbench
Version : 2.1-1
Upstream Author : Friedrich Leisch <friedrich.lei...@r-project.org>
* URL : http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/mlbench/
* License
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Andreas Tille <ti...@debian.org>
* Package name: r-cran-mlmrev
Version : 1.0-6
Upstream Author : Steve Walker <steve.wal...@utoronto.ca>
* URL : http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/mlmRev/
* License : GPL
Hi Chris,
On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 02:31:40PM -0400, Chris Marshall wrote:
> I saw that you have had activity with the Debian pdl packaging
> from 15 Jan 2016. I'm hoping to update the pdl package from
> the current version PDL-2.007 to the soon to be released
> PDL-2.016.
>
> PDL-2.007 is more
gt; things if you could find an experienced Debian
> science maintainer to try things out. I don't want
> to blindly start editing without knowing how things
> work. If we can get the process bootstrapped, I can
> see about finding a new maintainer (maybe me if I can
> install a
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Andreas Tille <ti...@debian.org>
* Package name: clapack
Version : 3.2.1
Upstream Author : The University of Tennessee
* URL : http://www.netlib.org/clapack/
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: C
Description :
Hi Roger,
thanks for the information. I've uploaded the changes to the Debian
new queue.
Kind regards
Andreas.
On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 08:43:24PM +0200, Roger Bivand wrote:
> Hi Andreas,
>
> spdep_0.6-5 submitted to CRAN.
>
> Roger
>
>
> On Tue, 31 May 2
1 - 100 of 410 matches
Mail list logo
