Re: More security for screensavers

2002-01-03 Thread Benoît Sibaud
Hi, Xscreensaver has options that let you prevent screensavers from grabbing = desktop images. If you run xscreensaver-demo, it's in the options tab. = =46rom my brief look, none of the xlockmore modes grab the screen. It's correct, but that grabbing desktop images is enable by default

Re: strange proftpd segfault and conntrack_ftp messages

2002-01-03 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Wed, Jan 02, 2002 at 05:48:58PM +0100, Christian Hammers wrote: Hello Does anybody know a security bug for which this could be a hint? (hostname and ip's faked for obvious reasons) The server runs: kernel 2.4.11-pre6 xined_2.1.8.8p3-1.1.deb proftpd_1.2.4-2.deb

Re: mounting /tmp noexec

2002-01-03 Thread David Wright
Quoting Alexey Vyskubov ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): noexec has no good purpose, really. But it's intention was for networked filesystems in certain environments, not a generalized security tool. It's very useful for mounting filesystems like vfat, where otherwise all the files are

Re: mounting /tmp noexec

2002-01-03 Thread Alexey Vyskubov
That's not my experience. I can only assume your /tmp filesystem, like mine, is not vfat-like. Whereas this floppy is: You probably have some additional settings somewhere (where?). [terrapin] 02:52:29 ~$ sudo mount -t vfat /dev/fd0 /mnt [terrapin] 02:52:55 ~$ sudo touch /mnt/a [terrapin]

Re: mounting /tmp noexec

2002-01-03 Thread Preben Randhol
Alexey Vyskubov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 03/01/2002 (09:23) : [terrapin] 08:46:52 ~$ sudo mount -o remount,noexec /tmp Password: [terrapin] 08:47:11 ~$ touch /tmp/a [terrapin] 08:47:14 ~$ chmod +x /tmp/a [terrapin] 08:47:17 ~$ ls -l /tmp/a -rwxr-xr-x1 alexey alexey 0 ñÎ×

RE: strange proftpd segfault and conntrack_ftp messages

2002-01-03 Thread Gary MacDougall
I find it interesting that the seg fault happened, then xinetd reported it failed. I wonder if its not proftp, but xinet... just a thought. g. -Original Message- From: Sven Hoexter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 5:24 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Christian

Re: strange proftpd segfault and conntrack_ftp messages

2002-01-03 Thread Christian Hammers
On Thu, Jan 03, 2002 at 11:31:38AM -0500, Gary MacDougall wrote: I find it interesting that the seg fault happened, then xinetd reported it failed. xinetd was proftpd's daddy: ServerType inetd bye, -christian- -- Christian HammersWESTEND GmbH - Aachen und Dueren

RE: strange proftpd segfault and conntrack_ftp messages

2002-01-03 Thread Gary MacDougall
Right, and I think its strange that the parent process felt the need to kill the child process. It might be justified if the child seg'd or died, but i thought xinetd handled this with more grace than say inetd... just curious, thats all. g. -Original Message- From: Christian Hammers

Re: [d-security] RE: strange proftpd segfault and conntrack_ftp messages

2002-01-03 Thread Christian Hammers
On Thu, Jan 03, 2002 at 11:44:49AM -0500, Gary MacDougall wrote: Right, and I think its strange that the parent process felt the need to kill the child process. It might be justified if the child seg'd or died, but i thought xinetd handled this with more grace than say inetd... just curious,

Re: [d-security] Re: strange proftpd segfault and conntrack_ftp messages

2002-01-03 Thread Christian Hammers
On Thu, Jan 03, 2002 at 04:47:29PM +, Mark Lowes wrote: I find it interesting that the seg fault happened, then xinetd reported it failed. Can you replicate the failure / segv in standalone mode? Sadly not and the IP belongs a /16 network from UUNet so nearly no chance to simply ask

RE: [d-security] RE: strange proftpd segfault and conntrack_ftp messages

2002-01-03 Thread Gary MacDougall
ahhh ok, I should have read that. I missed it. -Original Message- From: Christian Hammers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 11:50 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [d-security] RE: strange proftpd segfault and conntrack_ftp messages On Thu, Jan 03, 2002

Re: mounting /tmp noexec

2002-01-03 Thread Tollef Fog Heen
* Preben Randhol | Alexey Vyskubov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 03/01/2002 (09:23) : | | [terrapin] 08:46:52 ~$ sudo mount -o remount,noexec /tmp | Password: | [terrapin] 08:47:11 ~$ touch /tmp/a | [terrapin] 08:47:14 ~$ chmod +x /tmp/a | [terrapin] 08:47:17 ~$ ls -l /tmp/a | -rwxr-xr-x

Re: mounting /tmp noexec

2002-01-03 Thread Preben Randhol
Tollef Fog Heen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 03/01/2002 (18:09) : * Preben Randhol | what happens if you do: | | sh -x /tmp/a It works just fine. That is part of why noexec is pointless. Just as I thought. Preben -- () Join the worldwide campaign to protect fundamental human rights.

Re: More security for screensavers

2002-01-03 Thread Ted Cabeen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], =3D?iso-8859-1?Q?Ben= o=3DEEt?=3D = Sibaud writes: Hi, Xscreensaver has options that let you prevent screensavers from grabbi=

Re: the right way to access CDROM as non-root

2002-01-03 Thread Oohara Yuuma
Thank you for information. I will do chgrp cdrom /dev/hdc and see what will happen after several apt-get upgrade. -- Oohara Yuuma [EMAIL PROTECTED] Graduate-school of Science, Kyoto University PGP key (key ID F464A695) http://www.interq.or.jp/libra/oohara/pub-key.txt Key fingerprint = 6142 8D07

Re: More security for screensavers

2002-01-03 Thread Benoît Sibaud
Hi, Xscreensaver has options that let you prevent screensavers from grabbing = desktop images. If you run xscreensaver-demo, it's in the options tab. = =46rom my brief look, none of the xlockmore modes grab the screen. It's correct, but that grabbing desktop images is enable by default

Re: strange proftpd segfault and conntrack_ftp messages

2002-01-03 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Wed, Jan 02, 2002 at 05:48:58PM +0100, Christian Hammers wrote: Hello Does anybody know a security bug for which this could be a hint? (hostname and ip's faked for obvious reasons) The server runs: kernel 2.4.11-pre6 xined_2.1.8.8p3-1.1.deb proftpd_1.2.4-2.deb

Re: mounting /tmp noexec

2002-01-03 Thread David Wright
Quoting Alexey Vyskubov ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): noexec has no good purpose, really. But it's intention was for networked filesystems in certain environments, not a generalized security tool. It's very useful for mounting filesystems like vfat, where otherwise all the files are

Re: mounting /tmp noexec

2002-01-03 Thread Alexey Vyskubov
That's not my experience. I can only assume your /tmp filesystem, like mine, is not vfat-like. Whereas this floppy is: You probably have some additional settings somewhere (where?). [terrapin] 02:52:29 ~$ sudo mount -t vfat /dev/fd0 /mnt [terrapin] 02:52:55 ~$ sudo touch /mnt/a [terrapin]

Re: mounting /tmp noexec

2002-01-03 Thread Preben Randhol
Alexey Vyskubov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 03/01/2002 (09:23) : [terrapin] 08:46:52 ~$ sudo mount -o remount,noexec /tmp Password: [terrapin] 08:47:11 ~$ touch /tmp/a [terrapin] 08:47:14 ~$ chmod +x /tmp/a [terrapin] 08:47:17 ~$ ls -l /tmp/a -rwxr-xr-x1 alexey alexey 0 ñÎ×

Re: Securing bind..

2002-01-03 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach P Prince [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2001.12.30.1846 +0100]: The eaisest and most failsafe way to secure bind is to install djbdns. you are kidding me, right? the question was how to secure bind. the asker wasn't in need of other religious beliefs. while i strongly believe that djb is a real

Re: mounting /tmp noexec

2002-01-03 Thread Johan Kiviniemi
On Thu, Jan 03, 2002 at 02:45:27PM +0100, Preben Randhol wrote: Alexey Vyskubov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 03/01/2002 (09:23) : [terrapin] 08:47:21 ~$ /tmp/a bash: /tmp/a: Permission denied what happens if you do: sh -x /tmp/a Or $ cp /bin/echo /tmp $ /lib/ld-linux.so.2 /tmp/echo foo --

RE: strange proftpd segfault and conntrack_ftp messages

2002-01-03 Thread Gary MacDougall
I find it interesting that the seg fault happened, then xinetd reported it failed. I wonder if its not proftp, but xinet... just a thought. g. -Original Message- From: Sven Hoexter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 5:24 AM To: debian-security@lists.debian.org

Re: strange proftpd segfault and conntrack_ftp messages

2002-01-03 Thread Christian Hammers
On Thu, Jan 03, 2002 at 11:31:38AM -0500, Gary MacDougall wrote: I find it interesting that the seg fault happened, then xinetd reported it failed. xinetd was proftpd's daddy: ServerType inetd bye, -christian- -- Christian HammersWESTEND GmbH - Aachen und Dueren

RE: strange proftpd segfault and conntrack_ftp messages

2002-01-03 Thread Gary MacDougall
Right, and I think its strange that the parent process felt the need to kill the child process. It might be justified if the child seg'd or died, but i thought xinetd handled this with more grace than say inetd... just curious, thats all. g. -Original Message- From: Christian Hammers

Re: [d-security] RE: strange proftpd segfault and conntrack_ftp messages

2002-01-03 Thread Christian Hammers
On Thu, Jan 03, 2002 at 11:44:49AM -0500, Gary MacDougall wrote: Right, and I think its strange that the parent process felt the need to kill the child process. It might be justified if the child seg'd or died, but i thought xinetd handled this with more grace than say inetd... just curious,

Re: mounting /tmp noexec

2002-01-03 Thread Tollef Fog Heen
* Preben Randhol | Alexey Vyskubov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 03/01/2002 (09:23) : | | [terrapin] 08:46:52 ~$ sudo mount -o remount,noexec /tmp | Password: | [terrapin] 08:47:11 ~$ touch /tmp/a | [terrapin] 08:47:14 ~$ chmod +x /tmp/a | [terrapin] 08:47:17 ~$ ls -l /tmp/a | -rwxr-xr-x

Re: mounting /tmp noexec

2002-01-03 Thread Preben Randhol
Tollef Fog Heen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 03/01/2002 (18:09) : * Preben Randhol | what happens if you do: | | sh -x /tmp/a It works just fine. That is part of why noexec is pointless. Just as I thought. Preben -- () Join the worldwide campaign to protect fundamental human rights.

Re: Re: mounting /tmp noexec

2002-01-03 Thread Phillip Hofmeister
-Original Message- From: Tollef Fog Heen [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: debian-security@lists.debian.org Date: 03 Jan 2002 17:34:02 +0100 Subject: Re: mounting /tmp noexec snip Toll: It works just fine. That is part of why noexec is pointless. /Toll: it does serve to help anyone who is not so

Re: More security for screensavers

2002-01-03 Thread Ted Cabeen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], =3D?iso-8859-1?Q?Ben= o=3DEEt?=3D = Sibaud writes: Hi, Xscreensaver has options that let you prevent screensavers from grabbi= ng

Re: the right way to access CDROM as non-root

2002-01-03 Thread Oohara Yuuma
Thank you for information. I will do chgrp cdrom /dev/hdc and see what will happen after several apt-get upgrade. -- Oohara Yuuma [EMAIL PROTECTED] Graduate-school of Science, Kyoto University PGP key (key ID F464A695) http://www.interq.or.jp/libra/oohara/pub-key.txt Key fingerprint = 6142 8D07