Thomas Buhk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you don't want any spam, it's up to *you*.
i don't think so. i think spam is a problem *all* have!
That's true, fair enough. But in the end, if you don't wanna receive any
spam, you should set up good Procmail recipes. Or, the easy way; install
i just want to add a warning about spamassassin. i had it setup for
about a week and it was very good at catching spam, but occassionally it
would drive the cpu load into the 20s. i didn't spend any time trying
to track down the problem. i was using procmail to send all my mail
through SA so
Christian == Christian G Warden [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Christian i just want to add a warning about spamassassin. i had
Christian it setup for about a week and it was very good at
Christian catching spam, but occassionally it would drive the cpu
Christian load into the 20s.
Hi,
Just noticed this advisory, stating a remote vulnerability
in mozilla:
http://sec.greymagic.com/adv/gm001-ns/
It claims to affect 0.9.7+ but on 1.0 all it does
is crashing my browser.
Please CC to contact me, not subscribed.
--
Robert Millan
5 years from now everyone will be running
On Wed, May 08, 2002 at 03:26:46PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
http://sec.greymagic.com/adv/gm001-ns/
It claims to affect 0.9.7+ but on 1.0 all it does
is crashing my browser.
That bug was fixed in the version of mozilla from sid, but *not* woody.
Woody appears vulnerable and had probably
On Wed, May 08, 2002 at 02:51:51PM -0400, Noah L. Meyerhans imagined:
On Wed, May 08, 2002 at 03:26:46PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
http://sec.greymagic.com/adv/gm001-ns/
It claims to affect 0.9.7+ but on 1.0 all it does is
crashing my browser.
That bug was fixed in the version of
This bug has been fixed in Mozilla upstream and will be included in the
1.0 release. You can dig in Bugtraq for more info.
-nicole
At 15:26 on May 8, Robert Millan combined all the right letters to say:
Hi,
Just noticed this advisory, stating a remote vulnerability
in mozilla:
Previously Raymond Wood wrote:
but I would really like to see either:
a) woody receiving security patches as soon as sid and potato;
or
b) no woody.
From a security viewpoint b) is the only option, and we have always said
so.
Wichert.
--
At 10:58 PM 5/8/2002 +0200, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
Previously Raymond Wood wrote:
but I would really like to see either:
a) woody receiving security patches as soon as sid and potato;
or
b) no woody.
From a security viewpoint b) is the only option, and we have always said
so.
What
At 15:38 2002-05-08 -0600, Tim Uckun wrote:
The situation right now is that for production you run an ancient system
or cross your fingers, hold your breath and run unstable.
Coming from a corporate environment I hardly feel that stable is ancient.
With most commercial operating systems the
Hello,
When I use -j DROPLOG in iptables, my woody complains:
iptables v1.2.6a: Couldn't load target
`DROPLOG':/lib/iptables/libipt_DROPLOG.so: cannot open shared object file: No
such file or directory
Try `iptables -h' or 'iptables --help' for more information.
Any way to deal with that?
11 matches
Mail list logo
