On Mon, Sep 06, 2004 at 07:53:49PM +0200, Loic Minier wrote:
> doug jensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Mon, Sep 06, 2004:
> > I respectfully disagree, that open-source/bazaar models are more at risk
> > for trojans, or any other kind of corruption for that matter.
> > Cathedral/closed-source models are m
On Sun, Sep 05, 2004 at 06:07:43PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
The binary is needed because otherwise the -all packages would be
missing and there would be no deb package in the archive holding the
source in.
That's an implementation issue, not an absolute. An alternate
implementation would
doug jensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Mon, Sep 06, 2004:
> I respectfully disagree, that open-source/bazaar models are more at risk
> for trojans, or any other kind of corruption for that matter.
> Cathedral/closed-source models are more at risk simply because they
> contain more and better hiding pla
On Mon, Sep 06, 2004 at 10:13:12AM +0200, Javier Fern?ndez-Sanguino Pe?a wrote:
> Seriously though, all open-source projects have, in one way or another,
> different ways in which trusted parties can introduce trojans. The more
> they approach the bazaar model (vs. the cathedral model) the more the
Hello,
I would like to use vsftpd as a central download portal for all cutomers
and also as an upload portal for customers willing to send files to our
service. Naturally no other customer is allowed to see the files from
other customers. For some reasons I don't want to make each customers a
local
On Sun, Sep 05, 2004 at 06:17:36PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
>
> I was not aware of this, and I consider it a horrible state of
> affairs. Seriously, if this becomes public, Debian is in serious
> trouble, I think.
I always believed this to be a public list.
Seriously though, all open-sour
6 matches
Mail list logo
