On Fri, Aug 11, 2006 at 11:40:24AM +0200, Izak Burger wrote:
On 8/11/06, Christian Schuerer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Isn't it strange that there is an DHCP client running on lo? I don't get
the
point of doing that.
The pid is the same for all three (29184), so it is obviously a
process
On Sunday 13 August 2006 23:38, Nicolas Haller wrote:
It remains strange because normally, lo is a non-broadcast interface.
With version 0.46 it get this result:
Checking `sniffer'... lo: not promisc and no packet sniffer sockets
lan: PACKET SNIFFER(/sbin/dhclient3[6515])
Maybe it's just
Hi,
It remains strange because normally, lo is a non-broadcast interface.
Maybe it would help to know how Henri has his network configured. Mine
is configured with ifupdown, /etc/network/interfaces looks like this:
auto lo eth0
iface lo inet loopback
iface eth0 inet dhcp
and chkrootkit
Hello,
just a question: I can't find a package by this name shadow. So
what's this all about?
Greetings
Steffen Hoffmann
Martin Schulze, 12.08.2006 18:50:
--
Debian Security Advisory DSA 1150-1[EMAIL
On Sun, Aug 13, 2006 at 09:11:16PM +0200, Steffen Hoffmann wrote:
Hello,
just a question: I can't find a package by this name shadow. So
what's this all about?
That's the source package name - if you look towards the end of the
advisory you'll see a list of binary packages that are built
5 matches
Mail list logo