* Henrique de Moraes Holschuh:
> On Wed, 23 Jan 2008, Rolf Kutz wrote:
>> On 23/01/08 08:29 -0700, Michael Loftis wrote:
>>> It's better to leave the service disabled, or even better, completely
>>> uninstalled from a security standpoint, and from a DoS standpoint as
>>> well. The Linux kernel
On Wed, Jan 23, 2008 at 11:22:41PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> The daemon might have been installed by a package dependency, more or
> less by accident. Debian should have a policy that all daemons bind to
> the loopback interface by default, but as long as this is not the case,
> I can underst
Hello,
As Javier says:
> See
>
> http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/securing-debian-howto/ch-sec-services..en.html#s-firewall-setup
> :
>
>
Just in case somebody doesn't notice, there is a typo in this URL
(double-dot), so I will post it correctly
http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/securing-debian
On Wed, Jan 23, 2008 at 01:15:18PM -0600, William Twomey wrote:
> I guess my point is if the 'iptables' package is installed by default on
> Debian, then better integration with Debian would probably be a good
> idea.
Iptables provides the tools, the init.d script was removed since it
conflicte
4 matches
Mail list logo
