Re: [SECURITY] [DSA 4272-1] linux security update

the high threshold below the low one (and is probably right). For the stable distribution (stretch), this problem has been fixed in version 4.9.110-3+deb9u2. (just a note for those who can't just reboot). -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish

Re: [SECURITY] [DSA 2954-1] dovecot security update

of the above. -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. I drive way too fast to worry about cholesterol. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian

Re: [SECURITY] [DSA 2954-1] dovecot security update

/rather/other/ there? At Tue, 10 Jun 2014 12:13:35 +0200, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: AFAIK rather is correct, some of people are the same (and thus not other). On 10.06.14 13:01, Jeroen Dekkers wrote: I am a non-native speaker so I might be interpreting it wrong, but when I read your sentence

Re: [Secure-testing-team] Security support for volatile?

is exactly the place where they should be. -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. Spam = (S)tupid (P)eople's (A)dvertising (M)ethod