Craig wrote:
>
> Goodday ladies and fellas
>
> I have potato installed on a box that will be a proxy and firewall. I needed
> to have the facility of port forwarding so i was told to install kernel 2.4.
>
Does kernel 2.4 have some special feature of port forwarding that the
2.2.x kernels don'
Ethan Benson wrote:
> security.debian.org is only for stable, it won't work on woody or
> unstable since they almost invariably have newer versions then what
> goes in security.debian.org. the fact you have so far seen good
> results with security is mostly chance. if a security fix has some
> de
On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 03:35:29AM -0800, Ethan Benson wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 08:52:24PM +1000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > >
> > What is the security link?
>
> deb http://security.debian.org/debian-security/ stable/updates main contrib
>
> note that says stable. there is no security l
On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 08:52:24PM +1000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> What is the security link?
deb http://security.debian.org/debian-security/ stable/updates main contrib
note that says stable. there is no security link for woody/testing or
unstable. they do not get security updates from th
On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 12:21:44PM +0200, Joris Mocka wrote:
> Ethan Benson wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 11:01:10AM +0200, Johan Segernäs wrote:
> > > And no, i wouldn't use woody on a firewall, it's to many packet-updates
> > > all
> > > the time, takes
> > > to much time to keep track
On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 12:21:44PM +0200, Joris Mocka wrote:
>
> ...this is a thing where i can't agree, in the last 6 month, all
> security-fixes were as soon implemented as in potato (i have both, so
> i'd compared). e.g. bind probs, man-db probs for mention a few. but i
> have also the security
Craig wrote:
>
> Goodday ladies and fellas
>
> I have potato installed on a box that will be a proxy and firewall. I needed
> to have the facility of port forwarding so i was told to install kernel 2.4.
>
Does kernel 2.4 have some special feature of port forwarding that the
2.2.x kernels don
Ethan Benson wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 11:01:10AM +0200, Johan Segernäs wrote:
> > And no, i wouldn't use woody on a firewall, it's to many packet-updates all
> > the time, takes
> > to much time to keep track of everything imho.
>
> woody also does not get security updates, in fact it c
Ethan Benson wrote:
> security.debian.org is only for stable, it won't work on woody or
> unstable since they almost invariably have newer versions then what
> goes in security.debian.org. the fact you have so far seen good
> results with security is mostly chance. if a security fix has some
> d
On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 03:35:29AM -0800, Ethan Benson wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 08:52:24PM +1000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > >
> > What is the security link?
>
> deb http://security.debian.org/debian-security/ stable/updates main contrib
>
> note that says stable. there is no security
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi!
as Giacomo already mailed, you have the possibility to use Adrian's
packages from people.debian.org/~bunk/debian. But I had several
problems with them using isdn and proxy, etc.
I have woody installed on my router/firewall/proxy/fax-server. It'
On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 11:01:10AM +0200, Johan Segernäs wrote:
> And no, i wouldn't use woody on a firewall, it's to many packet-updates all
> the time, takes
> to much time to keep track of everything imho.
woody also does not get security updates, in fact it can take a very
long time for securi
On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 08:52:24PM +1000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> What is the security link?
deb http://security.debian.org/debian-security/ stable/updates main contrib
note that says stable. there is no security link for woody/testing or
unstable. they do not get security updates from t
Hi Craig,
> Now what i need to know, is woody stable enough for a proxy/firewall machine
...no prob at all, woody is nearly stable and i use it since half a year
without any probs as a firewall/squid-proxy and as a productive system
(intranet-server) for 20 users. for sure these are two different
Title: RE: Kernel 2.4 SOS
> Now what i need to know, is woody stable enough for a
> proxy/firewall machine
Just take the packages you need to run 2.4-kernel from woody and continue use potato.
That's what i do, works perfect.
And no, i wouldn't use woody on a firewa
On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 10:48:22AM +0200, Craig wrote:
> Now what i need to know, is woody stable enough for a proxy/firewall machine
I do not know the answer to this as I haven't really used woody yet.
But, the stuff you need to make it work smoothly on a potato box can be
found starting from her
On Wed, 13 Jun 2001, Craig wrote:
> I have the source downloaded and am busy going though the
> documentation but some of the packages that the documentation makes
> reference to is to low a version.
You don't need to install a full woody system to run a 2.4.x kernel. I
administer a large number
Goodday ladies and fellas
I have potato installed on a box that will be a proxy and firewall. I needed
to have the facility of port forwarding so i was told to install kernel 2.4.
I have the source downloaded and am busy going though the documentation but
some
of the packages that the documentati
On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 12:21:44PM +0200, Joris Mocka wrote:
> Ethan Benson wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 11:01:10AM +0200, Johan Segernäs wrote:
> > > And no, i wouldn't use woody on a firewall, it's to many packet-updates all
> > > the time, takes
> > > to much time to keep track of ev
On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 12:21:44PM +0200, Joris Mocka wrote:
>
> ...this is a thing where i can't agree, in the last 6 month, all
> security-fixes were as soon implemented as in potato (i have both, so
> i'd compared). e.g. bind probs, man-db probs for mention a few. but i
> have also the securit
Ethan Benson wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 11:01:10AM +0200, Johan Segernäs wrote:
> > And no, i wouldn't use woody on a firewall, it's to many packet-updates all
> > the time, takes
> > to much time to keep track of everything imho.
>
> woody also does not get security updates, in fact it
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi!
as Giacomo already mailed, you have the possibility to use Adrian's
packages from people.debian.org/~bunk/debian. But I had several
problems with them using isdn and proxy, etc.
I have woody installed on my router/firewall/proxy/fax-server. It
On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 11:01:10AM +0200, Johan Segernäs wrote:
> And no, i wouldn't use woody on a firewall, it's to many packet-updates all
> the time, takes
> to much time to keep track of everything imho.
woody also does not get security updates, in fact it can take a very
long time for secur
Hi Craig,
> Now what i need to know, is woody stable enough for a proxy/firewall machine
...no prob at all, woody is nearly stable and i use it since half a year
without any probs as a firewall/squid-proxy and as a productive system
(intranet-server) for 20 users. for sure these are two differen
Title: RE: Kernel 2.4 SOS
> Now what i need to know, is woody stable enough for a
> proxy/firewall machine
Just take the packages you need to run 2.4-kernel from woody and continue use potato.
That's what i do, works perfect.
And no, i wouldn't use woody on a firewa
On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 10:48:22AM +0200, Craig wrote:
> Now what i need to know, is woody stable enough for a proxy/firewall machine
I do not know the answer to this as I haven't really used woody yet.
But, the stuff you need to make it work smoothly on a potato box can be
found starting from he
On Wed, 13 Jun 2001, Craig wrote:
> I have the source downloaded and am busy going though the
> documentation but some of the packages that the documentation makes
> reference to is to low a version.
You don't need to install a full woody system to run a 2.4.x kernel. I
administer a large number
Goodday ladies and fellas
I have potato installed on a box that will be a proxy and firewall. I needed
to have the facility of port forwarding so i was told to install kernel 2.4.
I have the source downloaded and am busy going though the documentation but
some
of the packages that the documentat
28 matches
Mail list logo
