> >>And finally: Shouldn't packages like 'make' and 'sed' have checksums
> >>generated?
> >Yes. ;-)
Are they supposed to have sums?
Also, I should probably mention that this is a Sid system and it's so
far from prodcution I don't even have to spell it correctly. I just
don't want it to become
...
And finally: Shouldn't packages like 'make' and 'sed' have checksums generated?
Yes. ;-)
This could be included in the famaus automatic build and/or packaging
system, coundn't it?
And/or there could be an automatic email warning to a developer
uploading a package without the a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
You could also do something like this to generate md5sums for packages
that don't have them yet:
cd /var/cache/apt/archives
apt-get --download-only --reinstall install `debsums -l`
debsums --generate=keep,nocheck *.deb
(redownload all deb pac
Fredrik "Demonen" Vold wrote:
> ...
> I've just installed debsums and ran it to see if there were any oddness.
>
> Output of a silent run follows below the message.
>
> My question is:
> Should I be alarmed about so many packages not having md5sums?
Should you be alarmed? Yes. Is it unusual?
Greetings.
I've just installed debsums and ran it to see if there were any oddness.
Output of a silent run follows below the message.
My question is:
Should I be alarmed about so many packages not having md5sums?
I'm sure the first thing I'd do if I were to breach a Debian system
and replace bin
5 matches
Mail list logo
