Adam Lydick wrote:
> Fantastic idea! (as others have said) Have you filed a bug against
> nautilus (and other shells) to this effect? You might also file one at
> the various upstream bug tracking systems as well.
I'm glad you like it (I do too), but it wasn't my idea. Search the ubuntu-devel
list
On Tue, Jan 18, 2005 at 07:14:29PM -0800, Moe wrote:
> After all these months/years of warnings to NEVER open email
> attachments, why are you sendinf attachments instead of in-line?
>
> Martin Schulze wrote:
> >
> >Part 1 Type: C
> > Encoding: 8bit
>
What mail client are
On Wed, Jan 19, 2005 at 06:52:17AM -0500, David Mandelberg wrote:
> I'm just suggesting that it should be harder for them to shoot
> themselves in the foot i.e. by making .desktop's have the x bit before
> they can be launched.
I strongly agree. No, I STRONGLY agree!
If they are to be marked exe
Incoming from Florian Weimer:
> * s. keeling:
>
> > People who don't use stupid Windows email clients have no trouble with
> > attachments at all. Attachments are a very useful tool; for instance,
> > for code listings, they arrive unmangled by line wrap.
> >
> > Get a better email client, runnin
* s. keeling:
> People who don't use stupid Windows email clients have no trouble with
> attachments at all. Attachments are a very useful tool; for instance,
> for code listings, they arrive unmangled by line wrap.
>
> Get a better email client, running on a better OS.
You mean the OS whose use
s. keeling wrote:
> No, I assume people have half a brain in their heads, look at the
> attachment type, maybe save it to a file and inspect it, then maybe
> look at it or delete it. Too much work?
Whether it's too much work or not, most non-geeks I know don't bother.
> Okay, slap a lot of autoloa
Quoting s. keeling ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> The problem here is the nitwit factor.
Yes, well, a bunch of us have been keeping an eye on Linux MUAs and
default mailcap behaviour for 10+ years, to make sure zeal for
simplicity doesn't lead coders or distro assemblers to do something
dumb. Thus my qu
Incoming from Rick Moen:
> Quoting s. keeling ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> > Well, even mutt will, if you turn on autoload crap in .muttrc and load
> > up your .mailcap with stupid helper apps.
> >
> > Out of the box, no, mutt doesn't do that.
>
> Ja. We might call the .mailcap scenario the "aim-gu
Incoming from Denis O'Toole:
> Can you please OT: this
Hint: the "d" key will probably do this for you. Please stop
interfering with discussions of insecure applications on
debian-security. TVM. :-)
--
Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced.
(*)http://www.s
Quoting s. keeling ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Well, even mutt will, if you turn on autoload crap in .muttrc and load
> up your .mailcap with stupid helper apps.
>
> Out of the box, no, mutt doesn't do that.
Ja. We might call the .mailcap scenario the "aim-gun-at-my-foot-please"
mutt extension. Ma
Incoming from Rick Moen:
> Quoting David Mandelberg ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> > Do you mean to say that opening "message.txt\t\t\t.desktop" which
> > happens to be a freedesktop.org compliant launcher for the program "rm
> > -rf $HOME" is safe because it's designed for people running one of the
> >
Incoming from David Mandelberg:
> s. keeling wrote:
> > Incoming from Moe:
> >
> >>Martin Schulze wrote:
> >>
> >>> Part 1 Type: C
> >>>Encoding: 8bit
> >>
> >>After all these months/years of warnings to NEVER open email
> >>attachments, why are you sending attachments instead
Can you please OT: this
Regards
Denis O'Toole
Moe wrote:
After all these months/years of warnings to NEVER open email
attachments, why are you sendinf attachments instead of in-line?
Martin Schulze wrote:
Part 1 Type: C
Encoding: 8bit
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [E
Quoting David Mandelberg ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Do you mean to say that opening "message.txt\t\t\t.desktop" which
> happens to be a freedesktop.org compliant launcher for the program "rm
> -rf $HOME" is safe because it's designed for people running one of the
> F/OSS products GNOME or KDE on a F/O
s. keeling wrote:
> Incoming from Moe:
>
>>Martin Schulze wrote:
>>
>>> Part 1 Type: C
>>>Encoding: 8bit
>>
>>After all these months/years of warnings to NEVER open email
>>attachments, why are you sending attachments instead of in-line?
>
>
> People who don't use stupid Win
Incoming from Moe:
> Martin Schulze wrote:
> >
> >Part 1 Type: C
> > Encoding: 8bit
>
> After all these months/years of warnings to NEVER open email
> attachments, why are you sending attachments instead of in-line?
People who don't use stupid Windows email clients have no
After all these months/years of warnings to NEVER open email
attachments, why are you sendinf attachments instead of in-line?
Martin Schulze wrote:
>
>Part 1 Type: C
> Encoding: 8bit
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?
test
tir, 18,.01.2005 kl. 10.41 +0100, skrev Martin Schulze:
plain text document-vedlegg
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- --
Debian Security Advisory DSA 644-1 [EMAIL PROTECT
Martin Schulze wrote:
This message was modified by F-Secure Anti-Virus E-Mail Scanning.
This is what F-Secure gave me. Martin do you send viruses? ;)
Sebastian
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
19 matches
Mail list logo
