[On 04 Apr, @19:26, Steve wrote in "Re: updated sendmail package: ..."]
> I updated mine using apt-get and didn't run into a problem. Everything
> seems to be working correctly on my side.
I couldn't connect to security.debian.org. So I downloaded the packages myself
I updated mine using apt-get and didn't run into a problem. Everything
seems to be working correctly on my side.
From: Markus Wennrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Miek Gieben <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: updated sendmail package: config error
Date: F
[On 04 Apr, @19:26, Steve wrote in "Re: updated sendmail package: ..."]
> I updated mine using apt-get and didn't run into a problem. Everything
> seems to be working correctly on my side.
I couldn't connect to security.debian.org. So I downloaded the packages myself
On Fri, Apr 04, 2003 at 05:01:07PM +0200, Miek Gieben wrote:
> I'm trying to install the updated sendmail packages that fix the latest
> security hole. But after the installation I get this: see below.
> 8.12.3-6.2. didn't work
Same here, with the same error-messages.
Markus
[On 04 Apr, @16:44, debian-sec wrote in "updated sendmail package: conf ..."]
> hello,
>
> I'm trying to install the updated sendmail packages that fix the latest
> security hole. But after the installation I get this: see below.
>
> I've installed version
hello,
I'm trying to install the updated sendmail packages that fix the latest
security hole. But after the installation I get this: see below.
I've installed version 8.12.6-7 from testing, which runs fine. My system
is a your basic woody system plus some packags from testing.
To
On Fri, Apr 04, 2003 at 05:01:07PM +0200, Miek Gieben wrote:
> I'm trying to install the updated sendmail packages that fix the latest
> security hole. But after the installation I get this: see below.
> 8.12.3-6.2. didn't work
Same here, with the same error-message
[On 04 Apr, @16:44, debian-sec wrote in "updated sendmail package: conf ..."]
> hello,
>
> I'm trying to install the updated sendmail packages that fix the latest
> security hole. But after the installation I get this: see below.
>
> I've installed version
hello,
I'm trying to install the updated sendmail packages that fix the latest
security hole. But after the installation I get this: see below.
I've installed version 8.12.6-7 from testing, which runs fine. My system
is a your basic woody system plus some packags from testing.
To
On Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 07:57:35AM -0700, Tom Clements wrote:
> --Sendmail Users Face Second Major Security Flaw
> (31 March 2003)
Yes, it's on its way. Expect it very soon. I think the updated
packages have all (or almost all) completed building.
> Most versions of sendmail do
On Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 07:57:35AM -0700, Tom Clements wrote:
> --Sendmail Users Face Second Major Security Flaw
> (31 March 2003)
Yes, it's on its way. Expect it very soon. I think the updated
packages have all (or almost all) completed building.
> Most versions of sendmail do
Hi hadn't seen this mentioned on list. Forwarded from Bugtraq.
-- Forwarded message --
Sendmail, Inc., and the Sendmail Consortium announce the availability
of sendmail 8.12.9. It contains a fix for a critical security
problem discovered by Michal Zalewski whom we than
--- Forwarded message --
CVE: CAN-2003-0161
CERT: VU#897604
*** FORCED RELEASE -- VENDOR NOTIFIED AS OF 03/18/03 ***
There is a vulnerability in Sendmail versions 8.12
Hi hadn't seen this mentioned on list. Forwarded from Bugtraq.
-- Forwarded message --
Sendmail, Inc., and the Sendmail Consortium announce the availability
of sendmail 8.12.9. It contains a fix for a critical security
problem discovered by Michal Zalewski whom we than
--- Forwarded message --
CVE: CAN-2003-0161
CERT: VU#897604
*** FORCED RELEASE -- VENDOR NOTIFIED AS OF 03/18/03 ***
There is a vulnerability in Sendmail versions 8.12
Rich Puhek schrieb:
Jeremy T. Bouse wrote:
It's been discussed plenty on the Debian mailing lists as well
as having the package maintainer give an update on the status of the
packages that are being prepared/ready at this time... Might suggest
checking a bit further before making such a
Rich Puhek schrieb:
Jeremy T. Bouse wrote:
It's been discussed plenty on the Debian mailing lists as well
as having the package maintainer give an update on the status of the
packages that are being prepared/ready at this time... Might suggest
checking a bit further before making such a ras
Debian more than 3 years and it really made my administrator's life
_very_ simpler and easier. I'm strong believer of Open Source and Debian, and
i'm not want to offend someone. And i _very_ glad to Debian team for their
job.
When i saw updates for sendmail in Debian secur
at this moment we have update for sendmail for "woody" (for "potato"
> i not checked). :) So, Debian was vulnerable too (nothing strange, it must
> be).
>
> Damn, now i must replace just updated (by me, from sources) sendmails by
> updated Debian packages. ;) But that&#
Debian more than 3 years and it really made my administrator's life
_very_ simpler and easier. I'm strong believer of Open Source and Debian, and
i'm not want to offend someone. And i _very_ glad to Debian team for their
job.
When i saw updates for sendmail in Debian secur
Hi, All !
As I see, at this moment we have update for sendmail for "woody" (for "potato"
i not checked). :) So, Debian was vulnerable too (nothing strange, it must
be).
Damn, now i must replace just updated (by me, from sources) sendmails by
updated Debian packages.
at this moment we have update for sendmail for "woody" (for "potato"
> i not checked). :) So, Debian was vulnerable too (nothing strange, it must
> be).
>
> Damn, now i must replace just updated (by me, from sources) sendmails by
> updated Debian packages. ;) But that&#
Hi, All !
As I see, at this moment we have update for sendmail for "woody" (for "potato"
i not checked). :) So, Debian was vulnerable too (nothing strange, it must
be).
Damn, now i must replace just updated (by me, from sources) sendmails by
updated Debian packages.
Hello,
I applied the patch on Sendmail's web page to the sendmail
sources for potato (8.9.3). I put the compiled package
here:
http://www.sci.fi/~pfp/sendmail-deb-ca-2003-07/
I haven't tested this (does an exploit exist yet?),
other than confirming that sendmail itself works...
--
p
Hello,
I applied the patch on Sendmail's web page to the sendmail
sources for potato (8.9.3). I put the compiled package
here:
http://www.sci.fi/~pfp/sendmail-deb-ca-2003-07/
I haven't tested this (does an exploit exist yet?),
other than confirming that sendmail itself works...
--
p f
(debian-security) have any ties with CERT
to do it?
- Original Message -
From: "Ramon Kagan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, March 03, 2003 4:00 PM
Subject: CERT Advisory CA-2003-07 Remote Buffer Overflow in Sendmail (fwd)
HI,
I don't see Debian listed in the
Jeremy T. Bouse wrote:
It's been discussed plenty on the Debian mailing lists as well
as having the package maintainer give an update on the status of the
packages that are being prepared/ready at this time... Might suggest
checking a bit further before making such a rash judgement on i
, 4 March 2003 12:35
To: debian-security@lists.debian.org
Cc: Jeremy T. Bouse
Subject: Re: Sendmail vulnerability : is Debian falling behind?
On Monday 03 March 2003 23:06, Jeremy T. Bouse wrote:
> > In case noone noticed, news of a Sendmail vulnerability appeared
> > on Slashdot
Quoting Bernard Lheureux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Monday 03 March 2003 23:06, Jeremy T. Bouse wrote:
> > > In case noone noticed, news of a Sendmail vulnerability appeared
> > > on Slashdot. The really interesting piece of the story for me was the
> >
On Monday 03 March 2003 23:06, Jeremy T. Bouse wrote:
> > In case noone noticed, news of a Sendmail vulnerability appeared
> > on Slashdot. The really interesting piece of the story for me was the
> > portion of the blurb with said "...RedHat and OpenBSD have alr
-security) have any ties with CERT
to do it?
- Original Message -
From: "Ramon Kagan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, March 03, 2003 4:00 PM
Subject: CERT Advisory CA-2003-07 Remote Buffer Overflow in Sendmail (fwd)
HI,
I don'
Jeremy T. Bouse wrote:
It's been discussed plenty on the Debian mailing lists as well
as having the package maintainer give an update on the status of the
packages that are being prepared/ready at this time... Might suggest
checking a bit further before making such a rash judgement on iss
, 4 March 2003 12:35
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Jeremy T. Bouse
Subject: Re: Sendmail vulnerability : is Debian falling behind?
On Monday 03 March 2003 23:06, Jeremy T. Bouse wrote:
> > In case noone noticed, news of a Sendmail vulnerability appeared
> > on Slashdot. The really
nt
so they are all available...
Jeremy
On Mon, Mar 03, 2003 at 03:17:16PM -0600, Jor-el wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In case noone noticed, news of a Sendmail vulnerability appeared
> on Slashdot. The really interesting piece of the story for me was the
> portion of the blurb with
Quoting Bernard Lheureux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Monday 03 March 2003 23:06, Jeremy T. Bouse wrote:
> > > In case noone noticed, news of a Sendmail vulnerability appeared
> > > on Slashdot. The really interesting piece of the story for me was the
> >
Debian systems tend to use Exim by default? my installs certainly do. Mind
you I remove it and install Sendmail usually as its our "standard". So Im a
we bit concerned. No updates from security.debian as of 2:00AM NZT. Im not
blaming Debian ppl here of being slow or anything, they do a f
with CERT
to do it?
- Original Message -
From: "Ramon Kagan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, March 03, 2003 4:00 PM
Subject: CERT Advisory CA-2003-07 Remote Buffer Overflow in Sendmail (fwd)
> HI,
>
> I don't see Debian listed in the notification li
Hi,
In case noone noticed, news of a Sendmail vulnerability appeared
on Slashdot. The really interesting piece of the story for me was the
portion of the blurb with said "...RedHat and OpenBSD have already issued
patches.links to an update from SuSE, too".
What ab
On Monday 03 March 2003 23:06, Jeremy T. Bouse wrote:
> > In case noone noticed, news of a Sendmail vulnerability appeared
> > on Slashdot. The really interesting piece of the story for me was the
> > portion of the blurb with said "...RedHat and OpenBSD have alr
HI,
I don't see Debian listed in the notification list at the bottom of the
CERT Advisory. Is there any estimate on the release of patched sendmail
packages?
Ramon Kagan
York University, Computing and Network Services
Unix Team - Intermediate System Administrator
(416)736-2100 #20263
[
nt
so they are all available...
Jeremy
On Mon, Mar 03, 2003 at 03:17:16PM -0600, Jor-el wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In case noone noticed, news of a Sendmail vulnerability appeared
> on Slashdot. The really interesting piece of the story for me was the
> portion of the blurb with
Debian systems tend to use Exim by default? my installs certainly do. Mind
you I remove it and install Sendmail usually as its our "standard". So Im a
we bit concerned. No updates from security.debian as of 2:00AM NZT. Im not
blaming Debian ppl here of being slow or anything, they do a f
with CERT
to do it?
- Original Message -
From: "Ramon Kagan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, March 03, 2003 4:00 PM
Subject: CERT Advisory CA-2003-07 Remote Buffer Overflow in Sendmail (fwd)
> HI,
>
> I don't see Debian li
Hi,
In case noone noticed, news of a Sendmail vulnerability appeared
on Slashdot. The really interesting piece of the story for me was the
portion of the blurb with said "...RedHat and OpenBSD have already issued
patches.links to an update from SuSE, too".
What ab
HI,
I don't see Debian listed in the notification list at the bottom of the
CERT Advisory. Is there any estimate on the release of patched sendmail
packages?
Ramon Kagan
York University, Computing and Network Services
Unix Team - Intermediate System Administrator
(416)736-2100 #20263
[
hi ya
you can try some of my *.mc files w/ rbl
http://www.Linux-Sec.net/Mail
- click on the sendmail stuff
and i'd install check_local too so that i can check headers,
message id and some virus
c ya
alvin
On Thu, 10 Oct 2002, Hantzley wrote:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIG
hi ya
you can try some of my *.mc files w/ rbl
http://www.Linux-Sec.net/Mail
- click on the sendmail stuff
and i'd install check_local too so that i can check headers,
message id and some virus
c ya
alvin
On Thu, 10 Oct 2002, Hantzley wrote:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIG
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>Is there other ways to configure sendmail with RBL
If you arn't using ancient sendmail, (woody's is fine) use the dnsbl
feature in your sendmail.mc: (examples from my sendmail.mc, see the
web pages before you use a
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>Is there other ways to configure sendmail with RBL
If you arn't using ancient sendmail, (woody's is fine) use the dnsbl
feature in your sendmail.mc: (examples from my sendmail.mc, see the
web pages before you use a
ruleset 192 returns: $# error $@ 5 . 7 . 1 $: "Mail from " 127 . 0
. 0 . 2 " refused; see http://www.mail-abuse.org/cgibin/lookup?127.0.0.2";
Is there other ways to configure sendmail with RBL
Please advise..
Rgds,
Hantzley
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGPfre
rewrite: ruleset 192 returns: $# error $@ 5 . 7 . 1 $: "Mail from " 127 . 0
. 0 . 2 " refused; see http://www.mail-abuse.org/cgibin/lookup?127.0.0.2";
Is there other ways to configure sendmail with RBL
Please advise..
Rgds,
Hantzley
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGPfre
--- Begin Message ---
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
CERT Advisory CA-2002-28 Trojan Horse Sendmail Distribution
Original release date: October 08, 2002
Last revised: --
Source: CERT/CC
A complete revision history is at the end of this file.
Overview
The CERT/CC has
[Please do not use HTML in email]
On Wed, Sep 18, 2002 at 21:53:58 +0800, Glen Tapley wrote:
>Periodically when I run ps x, I find processes running and tonight I found
>the following process
>
>sendmail: server debian.org [65.125.64.134] child wai
>s
Can anyone help me as I am having trouble with mail
being sent from my system.
Periodically when I run ps x, I find processes
running and tonight I found the following process
sendmail: server debian.org [65.125.64.134] child
wai
sendmail: server debian.org [65.125.64.134] cmd
read
I
[Please do not use HTML in email]
On Wed, Sep 18, 2002 at 21:53:58 +0800, Glen Tapley wrote:
>Periodically when I run ps x, I find processes running and tonight I found
>the following process
>
>sendmail: server debian.org [65.125.64.134] child wai
>s
Can anyone help me as I am having trouble with mail
being sent from my system.
Periodically when I run ps x, I find processes
running and tonight I found the following process
sendmail: server debian.org [65.125.64.134] child
wai
sendmail: server debian.org [65.125.64.134] cmd
read
I
.. And they *HAVE* its
>IP, they check forward/reverse resolution on it, and only it.
I think I wasn't clear, sorry. In the headers below
>On Tue, 21 May 2002, Carlos Carvalho wrote:
>> The problem is that sendmail puts in the headers the internal host
>>
.. And they *HAVE* its
>IP, they check forward/reverse resolution on it, and only it.
I think I wasn't clear, sorry. In the headers below
>On Tue, 21 May 2002, Carlos Carvalho wrote:
>> The problem is that sendmail puts in the headers the internal host
>>
People,
I'm having a problem with sendmail and masquerading. We use NAT so
that the only address visible outside is the external one. All access
is done through the firewall.
The problem is that sendmail puts in the headers the internal host
name, as you can see from this message itself and
People,
I'm having a problem with sendmail and masquerading. We use NAT so
that the only address visible outside is the external one. All access
is done through the firewall.
The problem is that sendmail puts in the headers the internal host
name, as you can see from this message itsel
Look at /etc/mail/mailertable
hostname.com smtp:exchange.hostname.com
exchange.hostname.comsmtp:exchange.hostname.com
Define exchange.hostname.com in /etc/hosts of your sendmail machine.
--
Rob Carlson [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://vees.net/
On Tue, 14 May 2002, Marcel Welschbillig wrote
Look at /etc/mail/mailertable
hostname.com smtp:exchange.hostname.com
exchange.hostname.comsmtp:exchange.hostname.com
Define exchange.hostname.com in /etc/hosts of your sendmail machine.
--
Rob Carlson [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://vees.net/
On Tue, 14 May 2002, Marcel Welschbillig
On Tue, 14 May 2002, Marcel Welschbillig wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Can anyone tell me how to setup sendmail to forward all INCOMING mail to
> an exchange server ? I have a Debian firewall running send mail with an
> exchange server behind the fire wall on a private IP. I would like al
nside DNS
system for queries. When it performs an MX lookup for the the same mail
domain(s) (which sendmail in the process of trying to deliver the mail),
it'll get the address of the Exchange system and relay on to it. As far
as I know, this is a fairly common configuration; it's how I
Hi,
Can anyone tell me how to setup sendmail to forward all INCOMING mail to
an exchange server ? I have a Debian firewall running send mail with an
exchange server behind the fire wall on a private IP. I would like all
mail to be MXed to the Debian box and then forwarded to the Exchange box
On Tue, 14 May 2002, Marcel Welschbillig wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Can anyone tell me how to setup sendmail to forward all INCOMING mail to
> an exchange server ? I have a Debian firewall running send mail with an
> exchange server behind the fire wall on a private IP. I would like al
nside DNS
system for queries. When it performs an MX lookup for the the same mail
domain(s) (which sendmail in the process of trying to deliver the mail),
it'll get the address of the Exchange system and relay on to it. As far
as I know, this is a fairly common configuration; it's how I&
Hi,
Can anyone tell me how to setup sendmail to forward all INCOMING mail to
an exchange server ? I have a Debian firewall running send mail with an
exchange server behind the fire wall on a private IP. I would like all
mail to be MXed to the Debian box and then forwarded to the Exchange box
* Quoting César Augusto Seronni Filho ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> hi guys in my maillog I am receiving many strange message on sendmail like
> that:
> May 10 18:52:50 xserver sendmail[]: g4AIRfa02119:
> to=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, ctladdr= (638/45),
> delay=03:25:09, xdelay=0
* Quoting César Augusto Seronni Filho ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> hi guys in my maillog I am receiving many strange message on sendmail like
> that:
> May 10 18:52:50 xserver sendmail[]: g4AIRfa02119:
> to=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, ctladdr= (638/45),
> delay=03:25:09, xdelay=0
How I can limit the size of anexed files on sendmail?
tkx
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
How I can limit the size of anexed files on sendmail?
tkx
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ACK set, since your server can't get to them the connection
is stuck in the SYN_SENT state until it times out)
-Greg
> hi guys in my maillog I am receiving many strange message on sendmail like
> that:
> May 10 18:52:50 xserver sendmail[]: g4AIRfa02119:
> to=<[EMAIL PROTEC
hi guys in my maillog I am receiving many strange message on sendmail like
that:
May 10 18:52:50 xserver sendmail[]: g4AIRfa02119:
to=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, ctladdr= (638/45),
delay=03:25:09, xdelay=00:00:00, mailer=esmtp, pri=607606,
relay=company.com., dsn=4.0.0, stat=Deferred: Conn
ACK set, since your server can't get to them the connection is stuck in the SYN_SENT
state until it times out)
-Greg
> hi guys in my maillog I am receiving many strange message on sendmail like
> that:
> May 10 18:52:50 xserver sendmail[]: g4AIRfa02119:
> to=<[EMAIL PRO
hi guys in my maillog I am receiving many strange message on sendmail like
that:
May 10 18:52:50 xserver sendmail[]: g4AIRfa02119:
to=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, ctladdr= (638/45),
delay=03:25:09, xdelay=00:00:00, mailer=esmtp, pri=607606,
relay=company.com., dsn=4.0.0, stat=Deferred: Conn
(2002-05-06) Informasjon sed :
| Hello!
|
|
| Can anyone help me find a solution to this message I get in my logfile in
Sendmail.
|
| stat=I/O error: Input/output error
|
| It happens only when I send to one special host/recipient.
|
| Please!
|
| Stian Kristoffersen
I had this
(2002-05-06) Informasjon sed :
| Hello!
|
|
| Can anyone help me find a solution to this message I get in my logfile in Sendmail.
|
| stat=I/O error: Input/output error
|
| It happens only when I send to one special host/recipient.
|
| Please!
|
| Stian Kristoffersen
I had this
Hello!
Can anyone help me find a solution to this message
I get in my logfile in Sendmail.
stat=I/O error: Input/output
error
It happens only when I send to one special
host/recipient.
Please!
Stian Kristoffersen
Hello!
Can anyone help me find a solution to this message
I get in my logfile in Sendmail.
stat=I/O error: Input/output
error
It happens only when I send to one special
host/recipient.
Please!
Stian Kristoffersen
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>In the last weeks I`ve installed twice Debian 3.0 * with sendmail
>.12.3-5 ). And I get some stupid error every few minutes:
>
>
>May 6 16:40:01 velikov sm-msp-queue[26216]: STARTTLS=client: file
>/etc/mail/ssl/se
In article
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>In the last weeks I`ve installed twice Debian 3.0 * with sendmail
>.12.3-5 ). And I get some stupid error every few minutes:
>
>
>May 6 16:40:01 velikov sm-msp-queue[26216]: STARTTLS=client: file
>/etc/mail
These errors occure because sendmail cannot find the ssl certificate in
the default dir.
As off this version sendmails supports relaying on the basis off
certificate authentication. It took me a while to get things going. This
website was a big help for me:
http://www.ofb.net/~jheiss/sendmail
Hi there!
In the last weeks I`ve installed twice Debian 3.0 * with sendmail
.12.3-5 ). And I get some stupid error every few minutes:
May 6 16:40:01 velikov sm-msp-queue[26216]: STARTTLS=client: file
/etc/mail/ssl/sendmail-server.crt unsafe: No such file or directory
May 6 16:40:01 velikov sm
These errors occure because sendmail cannot find the ssl certificate in
the default dir.
As off this version sendmails supports relaying on the basis off
certificate authentication. It took me a while to get things going. This
website was a big help for me:
http://www.ofb.net/~jheiss/sendmail
Hi there!
In the last weeks I`ve installed twice Debian 3.0 * with sendmail
.12.3-5 ). And I get some stupid error every few minutes:
May 6 16:40:01 velikov sm-msp-queue[26216]: STARTTLS=client: file
/etc/mail/ssl/sendmail-server.crt unsafe: No such file or directory
May 6 16:40:01 velikov
Hi,
> > I wonder whether a sendmail security patch (input validation
> > error, BUGTRAQ ID: 3163) will be available soon?
>
> No:
> 1) The version in unstable(sid) Beta19 isn't vulnerable
> 2) The version in testing (held back by ia64) is vulnerable,
Hi,
> > I wonder whether a sendmail security patch (input validation
> > error, BUGTRAQ ID: 3163) will be available soon?
>
> No:
> 1) The version in unstable(sid) Beta19 isn't vulnerable
> 2) The version in testing (held back by ia64) is vulnerable,
Hi,
I wonder whether a sendmail security patch (input validation
error, BUGTRAQ ID: 3163) will be available soon?
It is reported that a working exploit is available on the net.
So I consider to get an updated version from sendmail.org, if
a debian package will not be available in the near future
Hi,
I wonder whether a sendmail security patch (input validation
error, BUGTRAQ ID: 3163) will be available soon?
It is reported that a working exploit is available on the net.
So I consider to get an updated version from sendmail.org, if
a debian package will not be available in the near
, sometimes saying from [EMAIL PROTECTED] and
other times
with ip addresses or resolved hosts... I have sendmail: LOCAL in my hosts.allow
and ALL:
ALL in hosts.deny, so I'm wondering how to better prevent what looks like
failing
connections to my sendmail server, maybe I'm just confu
, sometimes saying from root@localhost and other times
with ip addresses or resolved hosts... I have sendmail: LOCAL in my hosts.allow and
ALL:
ALL in hosts.deny, so I'm wondering how to better prevent what looks like failing
connections to my sendmail server, maybe I'm just confused thoug
Hello Berend,
You're right, it's a good question but:
It *is* Sendmail ;-)
I will try the features you told me, what do you think of this
setting, there is 150 PCs behind a 128k leased line.
O RefuseLA=15
O MaxDaemonChildren=30
O ConnectionRateThrottle=2
I
mail script when crazy and caused too many
| >connections.
| >
| >Anyway, Debian Potato ships with Exim, not sendmail.
| >
|
| So?
So does Nessus talk to sendmail or Exim? I've had security scanners
scan my OpenBSD ftp server and list wu-ftpd vulnerabilities.
Just checking :)
tato ships with Exim, not sendmail.
So?
Antti
On Thu, 22 Feb 2001 12:59:06 Jean-Francois JOLY wrote:
| Hello Everybody,
|
| I've ran Nessus against some servers and it reports me that
| sendmail
| is vulnerable to a Syn Flood. I've grabbed utilities to test the
| vulnerabilitie and haven't succeed to reprod
Hello Everybody,
I've ran Nessus against some servers and it reports me that sendmail
is vulnerable to a Syn Flood. I've grabbed utilities to test the
vulnerabilitie and haven't succeed to reproduce the problem.
I've found no information about this vuln
Hello Berend,
You're right, it's a good question but:
It *is* Sendmail ;-)
I will try the features you told me, what do you think of this
setting, there is 150 PCs behind a 128k leased line.
O RefuseLA=15
O MaxDaemonChildren=30
O ConnectionRateThrottle=2
I
hen a mail script when crazy and caused too many
| >connections.
| >
| >Anyway, Debian Potato ships with Exim, not sendmail.
| >
|
| So?
So does Nessus talk to sendmail or Exim? I've had security scanners
scan my OpenBSD ftp server and list wu-ftpd vulnerabilities.
Just checking :)
>
>Anyway, Debian Potato ships with Exim, not sendmail.
>
So?
Antti
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
101 - 200 of 217 matches
Mail list logo
