Re: Mail Server Questions

2001-12-05 Thread Jean-Paul Blaquiere
> On Dec 06, Del Campo, Damian illuminated : mor appropraite for debian-users but ... replied to anyway > 1) I want to set up a mail server to download my mail from a POP account on > www > 2) Have this downloaded mail available to various clients on my local lan > (windows & linux machines) but

Mail Server Questions

2001-12-05 Thread Del Campo, Damian
I've got Debian Potata on a SS2 which I'm setting up as the gateway from a private LAN that has Win and Linux comps on it. 1) I want to set up a mail server to download my mail from a POP account on www 2) Have this downloaded mail available to various clients on my local lan (windows & linux mach

get in the action

2001-12-05 Thread get some
Title: Untitled Document

Re: Kernel 2.4.16

2001-12-05 Thread Tille, Andreas
On Wed, 5 Dec 2001, Andrew Sharp wrote: > Sounds like maybe something is wrong with the preceding lines. How > about deleting all the comment lines before hand. Or adding one. > Mine looks like this: > > benedict:/usr/share/kernel-package# cat /etc/exports > # /etc/exports: the access control li

Re: Kernel 2.4.16

2001-12-05 Thread Andrew Sharp
"Tille, Andreas" wrote: > > On Tue, 4 Dec 2001, Andrew Sharp wrote: > > > Excellent, so you have a work around ~:^) Seriously, the kernel > > version will only give you better performance (depending on what the > > processor is), and who really needs that? > Performance and security. Well NFS i

Re: Kernel 2.4.16

2001-12-05 Thread Andrew Sharp
MPfeifer wrote: > > > Excellent, so you have a work around ~:^) Seriously, the kernel > > version will only give you better performance (depending on what the > > processor is), and who really needs that? Anyway, this sounds like > > what do you mean with "depending on what the processor is"? >

Re: Kernel 2.4.16

2001-12-05 Thread Tille, Andreas
On Tue, 4 Dec 2001, Andrew Sharp wrote: > Excellent, so you have a work around ~:^) Seriously, the kernel > version will only give you better performance (depending on what the > processor is), and who really needs that? Performance and security. Well NFS is insecure anyway and I'm sitting behin

Re: need recompiles

2001-12-05 Thread Wichert Akkerman
Previously Ben Collins wrote: > ssh auric cat /etc/debian_version woody libssl on there -> can't use Wichert. -- _ /[EMAIL PROTECTED] This space intentionally left occupied \ | [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.lia

Re: Kernel 2.4.16

2001-12-05 Thread MPfeifer
> Excellent, so you have a work around ~:^) Seriously, the kernel > version will only give you better performance (depending on what the > processor is), and who really needs that? Anyway, this sounds like what do you mean with "depending on what the processor is"? does NFS not work very well

Re: Kernel 2.4.16

2001-12-05 Thread Andrew Sharp
"Tille, Andreas" wrote: > > On Tue, 4 Dec 2001, Andrew Sharp wrote: > > > What happens when you try the user level nfs server? > The nfs-user-server always worked like a charm and does now as well. > But I really thought it would be depreciated and wanted to try > nfs-kernel-server over and over

Re: Kernel 2.4.16

2001-12-05 Thread Tille, Andreas
On Tue, 4 Dec 2001, Andrew Sharp wrote: > What happens when you try the user level nfs server? The nfs-user-server always worked like a charm and does now as well. But I really thought it would be depreciated and wanted to try nfs-kernel-server over and over again. Kind regards Andreas.