> > problems on SunBlades100 which were solved by turning DMA off on the
disks...
> How do you do that?
append "ide=nodma" to the kernel command line.
Ingo
Hello again...
Is it possible to get decent looking 3D graphics on an Ultra 10 with a
Creator3D? I'm running at 1280x1024 & 16 bit color (15 bit?). When I try to
run anything with 3D, it looks awful. It looks like it's trying to display
things in 256 colors, or something. When I try
Hello, all
Has anyone successfully gotten sound to work under KDE on Woody on an
Ultra
10 with a cs4321 sound card? I can't get it to work. XMMS locks up when I
try and play something, and I get no sounds from KDE's system events.
I have gotten sound to work under WindowM
Hello,
I have recently been handed a SPARC Box with Debian. Normally I work with PC
boxes, but I'm new to SPARC.
I am getting the error below in my vncserver log. I've tried the FAQ section
on the Sparc site, but wasn't able to fix the problem with what was recommended.
Any help is apprecia
xpdf has worked successfully for most
*.pdfs but not for the code charts at
http://www.unicode.org/. All it shows
is a blank white viewer. Apparently
not a version problem: the files I
checked, Basic Latin and Latin-1
Supplement, are pdf 1.3 and the xpdf
here says it handles that.
The only
Hello all.
Some new informations regarding my problem (see my last posting): I attached
a CD-ROM drive and tried to install from it. That failed, too. But the error
message on tty3 was a little bit different.
The hfs.o error still shows up, but the installation doesn't stop here. A
little bit
mtl> use this:
mtl> man -Tlatin1 man | col -bx > manpage.txt
Beautiful. Thanks Maurizio,
... Peter E.
Peter Easthope http://carnot.pathology.ubc.ca/
On Mon, 21 Oct 2002, Martin Herren wrote:
>[...]
> some people had problems on SunBlades100 which were solved by turning DMA off
> on the disks... but i don't see why this would give MMU misses...
> Martin
>
How do you do that?
Marco Rodriguez M.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
U. Bio Bio Concepcion
Chile
>
It was suggest I hook up the serial console, and I have done so again,
this time a bit more thoroughly, and I did NOT use diag mode on the
machine. Also, I tried removing the PGX64 card in accordance with
recent observations (doing so made no difference in my case whatsoever).
The following is usi
My opinion is that Ben knows a lot more about this stuff than I do, plus he's
the one that would end up having to support it. I personally think of 2.4
on sparc32 as experimental. sun4d is completely broken, sun4c breaks at
whim, and sun4m has a bunch of smaller problems. The only reason I put u
On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 09:52:17PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
> > BTW, why aren't there any sun4cdm kernel-image-2.4.x debs? I'd rather
> > have an Ultra but I haven't stolen enough money to buy one yet ...
>
> Because kernel 2.4.x is not stable on sun4cdm yet. You've noted that
> already :)
In m
Hello everybody.
I have problems installing woody on a SparcStation 5 Clone. I checked the
archive, but I could not find any hint.
Some months ago, I installed a woody (testing state) without problems - my
first Linux on a Sparc. But this installation died during an online update.
So I try to
On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 05:51:34PM +0200, Arne Nordmark wrote:
> Ben Collins wrote:
> >On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 04:35:13PM +0200, Arne Nordmark wrote:
> >
> >>Hello,
> >>
> >>I have no luck booting a Sun Blade 100 with 512M memory and PROM version
> >>4.6 from the Debian install media. I have tried
* domenica 20 ottobre 2002, alle 13:48, [EMAIL PROTECTED] scrive:
> All the "man -T" forms I tried produced
> PostScript.
use this:
man -Tlatin1 man | col -bx > manpage.txt
--
Maurizio - Tannoiser - Lemmo
Founder Member of ERLUG http://erlug.linux.it
Ben Collins wrote:
On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 04:35:13PM +0200, Arne Nordmark wrote:
Hello,
I have no luck booting a Sun Blade 100 with 512M memory and PROM version
4.6 from the Debian install media. I have tried the Official Woody CD,
and BenC's latest netinst.iso and tftpboot.img. After the m
On Wednesday, October 23, 2002, at 10:35 AM, Arne Nordmark wrote:
Hello,
I have no luck booting a Sun Blade 100 with 512M memory and PROM
version 4.6 from the Debian install media. I have tried the
Official Woody CD, and BenC's latest netinst.iso and tftpboot.img.
After the message
Bootin
On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 04:35:13PM +0200, Arne Nordmark wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have no luck booting a Sun Blade 100 with 512M memory and PROM version
> 4.6 from the Debian install media. I have tried the Official Woody CD,
> and BenC's latest netinst.iso and tftpboot.img. After the message
What
Hello,
I have no luck booting a Sun Blade 100 with 512M memory and PROM version
4.6 from the Debian install media. I have tried the Official Woody CD,
and BenC's latest netinst.iso and tftpboot.img. After the message
Booting Linux..
nothing more seems to happen. Other sparcs (Ultra 10, Ultra
On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 09:05:22AM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 10:35:21AM +0200, Thomas 'Mike' Michlmayr wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 21:52:17 -0400,
> > Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > [...]
> > > Because kernel 2.4.x is not stable on sun4cdm yet. You've no
THE GATOSON (HOLDINGS) LIMITED
E-mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Our Ref.: 12 main items (GGG-1)23rd Oct. 2002
Dear Sir,
We can get the follow good quality products which made
in China at the SPECIAL LOWEST PRICES.
If you are interested them, kindly contact us by return
e-mail, we wi
On Wednesday, October 23, 2002, at 05:07 AM, Hermes wrote:
Your email was rejected because it was not on the recipient's
accept list.
You may however send the recipient an email by clicking on the
following link or copy and paste the link to your browser
http://develop.nmdg.com/sendemail.
On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 10:35:21AM +0200, Thomas 'Mike' Michlmayr wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 21:52:17 -0400,
> Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [...]
> > Because kernel 2.4.x is not stable on sun4cdm yet. You've noted that
> > already :)
>
> actually, 2.4.19 was behaving quite well o
On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 09:48:46PM -0400, iudicium ferat wrote:
> I am somewhat confused about the appropriate setting for
> /etc/apt/sources.list
>
> deb http://security.debian.org/ stable/updates main contrib
> non-free pool/updates
>
> I want to get SPARC and Sparc64 related updates -- the s
* iudicium ferat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I'm not sure if -sparc or -www is the appropriate list for handling
the SPARC web pages, but please fix this, either of you. :)
| The below lists are mentioned on the various SPARC ports pages at
| www.debian.org -- but apparently they no longer exist.
|
|
|
On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 11:35:36AM +0200, christian mock wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 10:35:21AM +0200, Thomas 'Mike' Michlmayr wrote:
>
> > actually, 2.4.19 was behaving quite well on my SS20 (even in SMP mode)
> > and LX. i'm running the dual-SS20 as my two-headed desktop, and it works
>
>
On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 10:35:21AM +0200, Thomas 'Mike' Michlmayr wrote:
> actually, 2.4.19 was behaving quite well on my SS20 (even in SMP mode)
> and LX. i'm running the dual-SS20 as my two-headed desktop, and it works
IBTD; I've compiled 2.4.19 as non-SMP to finally get my 2 CPU SS10
stable; i
On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 10:48:25AM +0200, Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
> Hi Alfred!
>
> You wrote:
>
> > > And could someone please submit the develop.nmdg.com server to as many
> > > RBL lists as you can ??
> > > The webform they have is even worse than formmail.pl.
> >
> > A simpler solution is just t
Bas Zoetekouw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> So, I presume that you don't get any spam?
Sure I do, a lot of it to. But it is actually faster and saves you
more time if you just ignore the spam. And complaining about spam is
just as bad as spam anyway.
Cheers,
--
Alfred M. Szmidt
On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 10:35:21AM +0200, Thomas 'Mike' Michlmayr wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 21:52:17 -0400,
> Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [...]
> > Because kernel 2.4.x is not stable on sun4cdm yet. You've noted that
> > already :)
>
> actually, 2.4.19 was behaving quite well o
Hi Alfred!
You wrote:
> > And could someone please submit the develop.nmdg.com server to as many
> > RBL lists as you can ??
> > The webform they have is even worse than formmail.pl.
>
> A simpler solution is just to ignore it.
So, I presume that you don't get any spam?
--
Kind regards,
+
Bart-Jan Vrielink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> And could someone please submit the develop.nmdg.com server to as many
> RBL lists as you can ??
>
> The webform they have is even worse than formmail.pl.
A simpler solution is just to ignore it.
--
Alfred M. Szmidt
On Wed, 2002-10-23 at 10:29, Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
> > Your email was rejected because it was not on the recipient's accept list.
> > You may however send the recipient an email by clicking on the following
> > link or copy and paste the link to your browser
> > http://develop.nmdg.com/sendemail.ht
On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 21:52:17 -0400,
Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> Because kernel 2.4.x is not stable on sun4cdm yet. You've noted that
> already :)
actually, 2.4.19 was behaving quite well on my SS20 (even in SMP mode)
and LX. i'm running the dual-SS20 as my two-headed desktop
> Your email was rejected because it was not on the recipient's accept list.
> You may however send the recipient an email by clicking on the following link
> or copy and paste the link to your browser
> http://develop.nmdg.com/sendemail.html?emailto=
> debian-devel@lists.debian.org, [EMAIL PROTE
Your email was rejected because it was not on the recipient's accept list.
You may however send the recipient an email by clicking on the following link
or copy and paste the link to your browser
http://develop.nmdg.com/sendemail.html?emailto= debian-devel@lists.debian.org,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Good news first. It becomes more tedious to track the bug-free
packages. Besides the usual serious bugs, the following issues remain:
- wxwindows2.2 is still unbuildable in unstable, not yet removed
from unstable, package maintainer does not respond. Oh fun!
- postgresql: doesn't go to testing
36 matches
Mail list logo
