On Sat, Aug 02, 2003 at 05:28:52PM -0600, Otto Solares wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 02, 2003 at 06:47:57PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 02, 2003 at 04:21:22PM -0600, Otto Solares wrote:
> > > On Sat, Aug 02, 2003 at 05:17:03PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
> > > > You don't need egcs64 in unstable
On Sat, Aug 02, 2003 at 06:47:57PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 02, 2003 at 04:21:22PM -0600, Otto Solares wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 02, 2003 at 05:17:03PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
> > > You don't need egcs64 in unstable. Use the latest gcc-3.2 or gcc-3.3
> > > packages instead.
> >
> > 2
On Sat, Aug 02, 2003 at 04:21:22PM -0600, Otto Solares wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 02, 2003 at 05:17:03PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
> > You don't need egcs64 in unstable. Use the latest gcc-3.2 or gcc-3.3
> > packages instead.
>
> 2.6.0-testX compiles with gcc-3.3 now?
Has since 3.3.1-0ds2 packages (7/2
On Sat, Aug 02, 2003 at 05:17:03PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
> You don't need egcs64 in unstable. Use the latest gcc-3.2 or gcc-3.3
> packages instead.
2.6.0-testX compiles with gcc-3.3 now?
-solca
On Sat, Aug 02, 2003 at 08:05:35PM +0100, ayoj wrote:
> hi guys
>
>
> were can i find the egcs64 package
> do any off you have the link
Please kill the 35 line sig.
You don't need egcs64 in unstable. Use the latest gcc-3.2 or gcc-3.3
packages instead.
--
Debian - http://www.debian.org/
L
hi guys
were can i find the egcs64 package
do any off you have the link
__ _
- | | | |
- | |__ _ __ ___ ___| |_ ___
- | __| | '__/ _ \/ _ \ __/ _ \
- | || | | __/ __/ || (_) |
- |__|_| \___|\___|\__\___/
-
- _| __|_
- (_|
All,
After installing woody on my Ultra 10, I noticed hwclock barfs at boot
because it can't open /dev/misc/rtc.
Should rtc.o automagically be loaded on at least an Ultra 10 system, or
should there be some "You really could use installing this!" dialog at
installation?
Peter.
P.S. I was
Hi guys
it now time for me to upgrade my kernal to a 2.4.21. But i have problems
i have downloaded the gcc 3.x but when i do a gcc -v i am still getting the
default gcc 2.95 etc..
i don't think iam linking this the right way can someone help me.
this is a snapshot of my errors..
#make dep
/bin/
On Sat, Aug 02, 2003 at 02:23:14PM +0100, ayoj wrote:
> Hi guys
>
> it now time for me to upgrade my kernal to a 2.4.21. But i have problems
> i have downloaded the gcc 3.x but when i do a gcc -v i am still getting the
> default gcc 2.95 etc..
>
> i don't think iam linking this the right way can
9 matches
Mail list logo