Re: egcs64 package

2003-08-02 Thread Ben Collins
On Sat, Aug 02, 2003 at 05:28:52PM -0600, Otto Solares wrote: > On Sat, Aug 02, 2003 at 06:47:57PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote: > > On Sat, Aug 02, 2003 at 04:21:22PM -0600, Otto Solares wrote: > > > On Sat, Aug 02, 2003 at 05:17:03PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote: > > > > You don't need egcs64 in unstable

Re: egcs64 package

2003-08-02 Thread Otto Solares
On Sat, Aug 02, 2003 at 06:47:57PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote: > On Sat, Aug 02, 2003 at 04:21:22PM -0600, Otto Solares wrote: > > On Sat, Aug 02, 2003 at 05:17:03PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote: > > > You don't need egcs64 in unstable. Use the latest gcc-3.2 or gcc-3.3 > > > packages instead. > > > > 2

Re: egcs64 package

2003-08-02 Thread Ben Collins
On Sat, Aug 02, 2003 at 04:21:22PM -0600, Otto Solares wrote: > On Sat, Aug 02, 2003 at 05:17:03PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote: > > You don't need egcs64 in unstable. Use the latest gcc-3.2 or gcc-3.3 > > packages instead. > > 2.6.0-testX compiles with gcc-3.3 now? Has since 3.3.1-0ds2 packages (7/2

Re: egcs64 package

2003-08-02 Thread Otto Solares
On Sat, Aug 02, 2003 at 05:17:03PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote: > You don't need egcs64 in unstable. Use the latest gcc-3.2 or gcc-3.3 > packages instead. 2.6.0-testX compiles with gcc-3.3 now? -solca

Re: egcs64 package

2003-08-02 Thread Ben Collins
On Sat, Aug 02, 2003 at 08:05:35PM +0100, ayoj wrote: > hi guys > > > were can i find the egcs64 package > do any off you have the link Please kill the 35 line sig. You don't need egcs64 in unstable. Use the latest gcc-3.2 or gcc-3.3 packages instead. -- Debian - http://www.debian.org/ L

egcs64 package

2003-08-02 Thread ayoj
hi guys were can i find the egcs64 package do any off you have the link __ _ - | | | | - | |__ _ __ ___ ___| |_ ___ - | __| | '__/ _ \/ _ \ __/ _ \ - | || | | __/ __/ || (_) | - |__|_| \___|\___|\__\___/ - - _| __|_ - (_|

Ultra 10 Real Time Clock

2003-08-02 Thread Peter Hicks
All, After installing woody on my Ultra 10, I noticed hwclock barfs at boot because it can't open /dev/misc/rtc. Should rtc.o automagically be loaded on at least an Ultra 10 system, or should there be some "You really could use installing this!" dialog at installation? Peter. P.S. I was

compiling my kernel on ultra 10 (sparc64)

2003-08-02 Thread ayoj
Hi guys it now time for me to upgrade my kernal to a 2.4.21. But i have problems i have downloaded the gcc 3.x but when i do a gcc -v i am still getting the default gcc 2.95 etc.. i don't think iam linking this the right way can someone help me. this is a snapshot of my errors.. #make dep /bin/

Re: compiling my kernel on ultra 10 (sparc64)

2003-08-02 Thread Ben Collins
On Sat, Aug 02, 2003 at 02:23:14PM +0100, ayoj wrote: > Hi guys > > it now time for me to upgrade my kernal to a 2.4.21. But i have problems > i have downloaded the gcc 3.x but when i do a gcc -v i am still getting the > default gcc 2.95 etc.. > > i don't think iam linking this the right way can