> Most of the other init systems aren't actually maintained either. Upstart
> was dropped by Canonical and OpenRC and runit are merely moving along.
> It's
> just too much of a big effort trying to keep up when the rest of the Linux
> plumberland is moving so quickly.
Most of them? Then there are
On 12/22/2016 12:09 PM, transmail wrote:
>> If the people who invested all the time and effort to set up websites like
>> 'without-systemd.org' actually took that energy to pick up the sysvinit
>> maintainership and start fixing the almost 400 issues the packages
>> has [2], these people would actu
> Compiling a package from source is not maintaining it. Maintaining a package
> means that there is someone who is looking after bugs and regressions and
> fixing them.
I have never said i am gonna maintain it. I just want to install and use it.
> There is no maintainer for sysvinit anymore whic
On 12/22/2016 08:57 AM, transmail wrote:
> Okay, thanks for warning me. If the binary support will be dropped,
> then i can still compile it manually.
Compiling a package from source is not maintaining it. Maintaining a package
means that there is someone who is looking after bugs and regressions
4 matches
Mail list logo
