On Fri, 21 Jul 2023, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
>
> You've misunderstood. Google have decided to subject the entire kernel
> (including obsolete unmaintained filesystems) to stress tests that it's
> never had before. IOW these bugs have been there since the code was
> merged. There's nothing to
On Fri, 21 Jul 2023, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > I suspect that this is one of those catch-22 situations: distros are
> > going to enable every feature under the sun. That doesn't mean that
> > anyone is actually _using_ them these days.
I think the value of filesystem code is not just a question o
On Mon, 23 Dec 2013, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Finn Thain dixit:
>
> >Why is CONFIG_SERIAL_PMACZILOG to be disabled? And why was
>
> See the discussion in the thread before this message.
I've seen no discussion of this on debian-68k or linux-m68k. What
discussion are
On Mon, 23 Dec 2013, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> > CONFIG_EARLY_PRINTK=y and CONFIG_SERIAL_PMACZILOG=n
Why is CONFIG_SERIAL_PMACZILOG to be disabled? And why was
CONFIG_EARLY_PRINTK disabled?
> I think we need to file bugs in the BTS for each of these instances in
> the future, instead of trying
4 matches
Mail list logo