ew burd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> btw what speed is that processor? I have an Ultra 5 w/ 333Mhz 2M cache
> and
> it compiles in about 15 minutes
>
> ----- Original Message -
> From: "Mike Mestnik" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "andrew burd&quo
patches would make there
way into Herbert's tree. Since thay don't look like thay would break any
other arch. It could be SOP to reassign any sparc build bug to
kernel-image-sparc pkgs.
--- Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 31, 2004 at 06:17:34PM -0800, Mike M
Thank you for clearing this up. It workes great now.
--- Christian Guggenberger
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 2004-04-01 at 07:45, Mike Mestnik wrote:
> > 1. This pkg dose not exist, did you mean kernel-image-2.4-sparc?
> > 2. This pkg dose not contain the kernel-
> - Original Message -
> From: "Mike Mestnik" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "andrew burd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2004 1:43 AM
> Subject: Re: kernal-source package for sparc?
>
>
> >I used to do this untill I started us
-01 at 04:17, Mike Mestnik wrote:
> > I was told by "Herbert Xu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, the
> maintainer
> > of kernel-source-2.4.24, that his package was not the for use with
> sparcs.
> > I looked all over and could not find another pkg. Dose any one know
&g
1. This pkg dose not exist, did you mean kernel-image-2.4-sparc?
2. This pkg dose not contain the kernel-source or a buildable kernel tree.
3. There is also no
--- Christian Guggenberger
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 2004-04-01 at 04:17, Mike Mestnik wrote:
> > I was told
I.E. That I have the wrong package.
>
> ----- Original Message -
> From: "Mike Mestnik" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "lists.debian.org debian-sparc"
> Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2004 9:17 PM
> Subject: kernal-source package for sparc?
>
>
> >I
I was told by "Herbert Xu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, the maintainer
of kernel-source-2.4.24, that his package was not the for use with sparcs.
I looked all over and could not find another pkg. Dose any one know how
to file bugs like #241263 with ought them being closed cause thay are
against the wrong
AIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 17, 2004 at 03:06:59AM -0800, Mike Mestnik wrote:
> > What do I need to do to help get some newer kernel images released for
> > sparc?
>
> Wait. I have new images ready, but they are getting too big for SILO to
> boot. So I am fixing
What do I need to do to help get some newer kernel images released for sparc?
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Hotjobs: Enter the "Signing Bonus" Sweepstakes
http://hotjobs.sweepstakes.yahoo.com/signingbonus
- Forwarded message from "Mike Mestnik) (The Archmage Forever" <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> -
Envelope-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivery-date: Wed, 31 Dec 2003 13:13:37 -0600
From: "Mike Mestnik) (The Archmage Forever" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Herbert Xu <[EMA
Sleepy me it's http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=225526.
err Silly.
--- Mike Mestnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have posted a kernel patch to
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=225521.
> This patch will allow make config to use pci_domain
mp; lspci & scanpci work as thay did.
I have not had a chance to boot with the new kernel, I'l do this on Wensday.
--- Mike Mestnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have a sparc64 with a mach64 on a pci bus. The format of /proc/bus/pci/
> has changed in 2.6 to
> include a
ree86 drivers and pci buses. What should I have
read, be reading?
--- "David S. Miller" wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Dec 2003 18:02:24 -0800 (PST)
> Mike Mestnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I have a sparc64 with a mach64 on a pci bus. The format of /proc/bus/pci/
>
I have a sparc64 with a mach64 on a pci bus. The format of /proc/bus/pci/ has
changed in 2.6 to
include a pci [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have not been able to locate a patch and even debian's experimental branch /w
(4.3.0-0pre1v3
20030929061855) dose not have support. I'm currently building DRI-XV dr
mplayer works and I think it's even possible to use transcode.
WHO
Mike Mestnik : for being me.
Christian Marillat : for putting the source
debs together.
and every one else how's packages appear within. With a special thanx to:
Mean : for his help with avidemux and for mostly
Did you ever fix this, I get the same thing on sarge.
Hi,
I need some help in configuring X on an ultrasparc (ultra 10).
I am running woody. I have the following packages installed.
kernel-image-2.4.10-sun4u
x*-4.1.0-8
I configured X for the ati card using the ati driver.
startx blanks the
Alas it didn't work, I get the same error no mater what.
I now have another problem, where do I get libdivxencore for sparc?
--- Mean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mike Mestnik wrote:
>
> >Getting closer.
> >
> >With or withoguht the new config you s
Hello.
I'm having problems with building avidemux, I am using dpkg and the source
provided by
http://marillat.free.fr/. 2.0.20 clains to work, but instead it builds for
i386, but fails.
Would just finding where it says ppc and adding sparc fix my problems? Has any
one reported this
working a
I was buinding your deb [1]archive on my sparc(64) and came across an error.
In the avilib pkg...
1. http://marillat.free.fr/
It seams that the sparc GCC will bail ought if given a
no-omit-leaf-frame-pointer, so it must be
ommited for the sparc ARCH. Dose any sparc user know why gcc dose not d
20 matches
Mail list logo