Re: SILO problems on an E450

2003-06-22 Thread Nathan E Norman
On Fri, Jun 13, 2003 at 08:59:00PM -0400, Scott Walker wrote: > Speaking of SILO... Can SILO boot from a Raid 1 root drive like lilo > can? Yes. You need something like append="md=0,/dev/scsi/host1/bus0/target0/lun0/part1,/dev/scsi/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/part1" in your silo.conf. -- Nathan

Re: error on boot up

2003-04-03 Thread Nathan E Norman
On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 08:16:52AM -0500, Ben Collins wrote: > On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 04:32:03PM +0800, lito lampitoc wrote: > > Hi Nathan, > > > > Thank you for answering my questions. I followed every step you told me > > but it didn't work. Running 'silo -r /boot' gives me the following > > er

Re: error on boot up

2003-04-01 Thread Nathan E Norman
On Tue, Apr 01, 2003 at 03:15:38PM +0800, lito lampitoc wrote: > Hi All, > > Sorry if this is OT, but I seems to be the only one on debian-sparc > list, that why I'm cross posting this. Er, I never saw your post on debian-sparc ... taking it back there. > I installed debian 3 on my Sun sparc ne

Re: SILO and Create Boot Floppy Fails.

2003-03-27 Thread Nathan E Norman
On Wed, Mar 26, 2003 at 05:55:40PM -0500, Andrew Bolyea wrote: [ please don't top post ] > I have a small /boot partition (/dev/sda1) consisting of the > first 10M of sda. > > /boot /dev/sda1 > /usr /dev/sda2 > / /dev/sdb1 > swap /dev/sdb2 > > Currently silo.conf is pointing to

Re: SILO and Create Boot Floppy Fails.

2003-03-26 Thread Nathan E Norman
On Wed, Mar 26, 2003 at 01:37:21PM -0500, Andrew Bolyea wrote: [ one post is enough, thanks. Please wrap your lines; a right margin in the neighbourhood of 65 to 72 seems decent. ] > I am attempting to resurrect an old SpacStation10... > > I booted the machine using a rescue floppy, and procee

Re: no postfix-tls for sparc?

2003-02-22 Thread Nathan E Norman
On Sat, Feb 22, 2003 at 10:46:31AM -0500, Ben Collins wrote: > On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 10:36:11AM -0600, Nathan E Norman wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Does anyone know why postfix-tls is not built for sparc? I built it > > locally and the build seemed to go alright; I haven&#

no postfix-tls for sparc?

2003-02-20 Thread Nathan E Norman
Hi, Does anyone know why postfix-tls is not built for sparc? I built it locally and the build seemed to go alright; I haven't tested the package yet. It struck me as rather odd that it wasn't available from the mirrors ... -- Nathan Norman - Incanus Networking mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Q:

Re: Unidentified subject!

2003-02-17 Thread Nathan E Norman
[ please don't top post ] On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 10:19:48PM +0100, Daniel van Eeden wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >Hi, > > > >I have the NONUS Debain 3 Sparc CD available and a sun4u (Ultra 5/10) > >machine. When I try to boot from the cd and begin the installation > >everyting works fine

Re: Sparc5 woody boot woes update

2003-01-28 Thread Nathan E Norman
On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 08:27:00PM +, Roger Burton West wrote: > On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 01:06:58PM -0600, Nathan E Norman wrote: > >DHCP != RARP. > >Install the RARP server (rarpd); create/edit /etc/ethers, and have > >fun. > > Yup. > > Also: it appears t

Re: Sparc5 woody boot woes update

2003-01-28 Thread Nathan E Norman
On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 06:00:17PM +, Taras Ciuriak wrote: > An update for those interested in my progress with getting this working. > :-) > > I set up my Linux laptop as a DHCP server. I can confirm it's working > as, quite coincidentally, a colleague popped by my desk to ask what the >

Re: raid 1 on Sun E250 running 3.0 sparc r1 (kernel 2.4.18 - patched)

2003-01-28 Thread Nathan E Norman
On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 09:14:35AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > All, > > I am trying to mirror our root disk. I am on Debian > 3.0, r1 kernel 2.4.18 with patches running on an E250 > sun box. > > Building the raid works fine (mkraid /dev/md0), and > has no complaints. Rebooting the system sh

Re: sparc64 and ipsec anyone?

2003-01-28 Thread Nathan E Norman
On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 08:21:42AM -0500, Ben Collins wrote: > On Sun, Jan 26, 2003 at 09:35:03PM +0100, Daniel van Eeden wrote: > > Is it an sparc64 only problem or is ipsec also unusable on sparc32? > > The problem is specific to any arch where the userspace and kernel run > different bitness. L

Re: 2.4.20 doesn't boot (watchdog reset)

2003-01-24 Thread Nathan E Norman
On Fri, Jan 24, 2003 at 07:38:38AM -0700, santiago wrote: > With regards to booting with a kernel with initrd enabled: > the kernel will boot fine if an initrd image is made and pointed to in > your silo.conf; e.g. > sparc/boot> mkinitrd myinitrdname.img 2.4.19-ac4 > you should subsistute you

Re: 2.4.20 doesn't boot (watchdog reset)

2003-01-23 Thread Nathan E Norman
On Thu, Jan 23, 2003 at 10:57:00PM +0100, Daniel van Eeden wrote: > SILO boot: linux > Uncompressing image... > PROMLIB: obio_ranges 1 > bootmem_init: Scan sp_banks, init_bootmem(spfn[1fa],bpfn[1fa],mlpfn[3faa]) > free_bootmem: base [0] size[3faa000] > reserve_bootmem: base[0] size[1fa000] > reserv

compile sun4cdm kernel on sun4u ?

2003-01-13 Thread Nathan E Norman
Is it possible to compile a sun4cdm kernel on a sun4u? Reason I ask is I have a couple sun4m boxen and 2 sun4u boxen, one of whch is an ultra 60 SMP and compiles kernels in a hurry. I'd like to compile all my kernels on this box, but I'm not getting what to do to end up with a sun4cdm kernel. Se

Re: Help with Sparc

2003-01-09 Thread Nathan E Norman
On Wed, Jan 08, 2003 at 08:46:57PM -0800, Curt Howland wrote: > Good evening. Please reply directly, as I cannot keep up with the > traffic on debian-user. So subscribe to debian-sparc :-) > I'm trying to install Debian Woody on a Sparc. I have successfully > gotten the cdrom to boot, but the bo

ext3 root partitions bad?

2003-01-09 Thread Nathan E Norman
Hello, It's my understanding that SILO cannot handle a dirty ext3 root partition as it really only understands ext2. Is this correct? If so, I think the sparc install docs should mention that at least your root should be ext2; ext3 (or some other fs) is ok for the rest of your partitions. -- N

Re: kernel 2.4.x on sun4c

2002-10-23 Thread Nathan E Norman
On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 09:52:17PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote: > > BTW, why aren't there any sun4cdm kernel-image-2.4.x debs? I'd rather > > have an Ultra but I haven't stolen enough money to buy one yet ... > > Because kernel 2.4.x is not stable on sun4cdm yet. You've noted that > already :) In m

kernel 2.4.x on sun4c

2002-10-22 Thread Nathan E Norman
I have a Netra i which is a sun4c (right?). It runs fine with kernel 2.2.x. However, I'm trying to get a 2.4.x kernel working. I've tried 2.4.18 and 2.4.19, but both fail at the "init_bootmem" line which is apparently printed by arch/sparc/mm/init.c . I've googled to see if anyone has experienc

Re: Floppy Installation on Sparcstation 1

1999-01-28 Thread Nathan E Norman
On Thu, 28 Jan 1999, Ashok Gopalakrishnan wrote: : Eric Delaunay wrote: : > : > Are you sure the root.bin file was written without errors on your floppy disk? : > Can you read back out then try to compare it or gunzip it to test its : > integrity? : > Another suggestion: have you tried new

Screwed up libc

1998-05-28 Thread Nathan E Norman
*sigh* I think I've managed to screw up my system here. I installed the libc6 from Incoming, and then reinstalled the version in the "frozen" tree, due to a misunderstanding of versioning on my part (I use the words "scrwed up" for good reason) Anyway, here's what I get now. /bin/login: error i

Re: New boot disks work!

1998-05-28 Thread Nathan E Norman
On Wed, 27 May 1998, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote: : : : On Wed, 27 May 1998, Nathan E Norman wrote: : : > Hmm, I've got a Netra I5 (headless) and I'm using the 25May disks to no : > avail. It doesn't matter whether I pass a console parameter or not; the : > system won

Re: New boot disks work!

1998-05-27 Thread Nathan E Norman
On Tue, 26 May 1998, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote: : : Yay! With the new boot disks I was finally able to install Debian on my : headless Netra. The installation was really smooth. The only flaw I : noticed was at the stage "Install OS Kernel and Modules." After picking : floppy as the installation

Re: Convert RedHat install to Debian ..

1998-05-11 Thread Nathan E Norman
On Mon, 11 May 1998, The Thought Assassin wrote: : On Wed, 29 Apr 1998, Nathan E Norman wrote: : > I've got a Sun Netra I5, with serial console only. The current Debian : > boot disks don't like the serial console, so I used RedHat's instead. : > Now I've got this

whiptail package for sparc?

1998-04-30 Thread Nathan E Norman
I admit I'm not using the recommended install path - I'm hacking a RedHat install into a Debian one (that's the plan, anyway). Thanks to Jaldhar Vyas for pointing out the dpkg tarball in experimental. Package modconf will not install - it says it depends on whiptail. I don't see a whiptail packa

Convert RedHat install to Debian ..

1998-04-29 Thread Nathan E Norman
Part of this question has been hashed over a zillion times; for that I apologise. I've got a Sun Netra I5, with serial console only. The current Debian boot disks don't like the serial console, so I used RedHat's instead. Now I've got this Netra Linux box :) Now for the hashed over part. Is the

Netra I5 (headless box)

1998-04-23 Thread Nathan E Norman
A while ago I posted a message about not being able to use the Debian install disks on my I5 because I have no "real" tty ... the console is a serial terminal. Someone (Eric Delaunay iirc) said this was due to some problems with init wanting to open a non-serial tty ... I don't have the email in f

Sun Netra I5

1998-04-16 Thread Nathan E Norman
Hi everyone! (how many are on here anyway?) I'm a happy Debian user on the i386 platform. Recently we inherited a Sun Netra I5 server, and I'm unhappy with Solaris ... no development tools means no fun. So, I decided to try debian-sparc. The rescue disk boots fine, but I can't get the system t