I constantly get unknown partition table:
| rapunzel~# fdisk -l /dev/sdb
|
| Disk /dev/sdb: 18.2 GB, 18210037760 bytes
| 64 heads, 32 sectors/track, 17366 cylinders
| Units = cylinders of 2048 * 512 = 1048576 bytes
|
| Disk /dev/sdb doesn't contain a valid partition table
|
| rapunzel:~#
* on the Mon, Jun 14, 2004 at 10:10:30AM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
Settings according to /dev/sda which is a SEAGATE-SX118273LC-6367
Use the default values for everything in here.
Didn't work either. So I did a dd if=/dev/sda of=/dev/sdb bs=1k count=1
which got me a useable partition table.
* on the Thu, Nov 27, 2003 at 05:22:06PM -0800, David S. Miller wrote:
On Thu, 27 Nov 2003 17:26:53 +0100
Peter Keel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I got my E250 running with my own kernel (2.4.23-rc5-grsec), to be
correct, I got it crawling for some applications:
Do the slowdowns happen
* on the Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 10:16:58AM +, Brian Teeman wrote:
I dont think Steve was commenting on if users wanted sparc CDs. He was
talking about if anyone in Debian wanted to support sparc CDs.
I don't know. I'm running Debian on Sparcs since a few years, and
on about 8 machines. And
Hello
I got my E250 running with my own kernel (2.4.23-rc5-grsec), to be
correct, I got it crawling for some applications:
time dpkg -l -a 2 /dev/null
real0m34.671s
user0m15.090s
sys 0m19.610s
I already can rule out grsecurity. But what could this be?
strace'ing the above shows
[sorry for writing the last few messages with a wrong email-address]
Hello
I'm trying to recompile some essential libraries for Sparc, since
I know that some of those are meant for V7-architecture, whereas
binaries for V8 and V9 could be much faster.
Now, I'd like to do this the Debian way.
Hello
I'm trying to recompile some essential libraries for Sparc, since
I know that some of those are meant for V7-architecture, whereas
binaries for V8 and V9 could be much faster.
Now, I'd like to do this the Debian way. The question is:
if I do apt-get -b source glibc, which optimizations
* on the Fri, May 09, 2003 at 10:03:37AM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
On Fri, May 09, 2003 at 11:05:15AM +0200, Peter Keel wrote:
Hello
I know this probably doesn't really belong here, but this is the
only Sparc-ML I'm reading, and it may be of interest to you.
ping6 on an IPv6
* on the Sun, May 11, 2003 at 11:45:53AM +0200, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
You have to use egcs64 for 2.4 kernels.
Yes, seems so. It boots. I verified also the whole patch-situation,
and it seems I was wrong: This was with the USAGI-patch. The stock
kernel (even with grsecurity and
Hello
I know this probably doesn't really belong here, but this is the
only Sparc-ML I'm reading, and it may be of interest to you.
ping6 on an IPv6-enabled Sparc32 or Sparc64 on Kernel 2.4.20
bombs really nasty. Machine halts instantly. No matter what patches.
This is sparc32:
oldlady:~#
Hello
I finally managed to compile 2.4.20 on my SS10. Since I recently got
2001:8A8:30:30::/60 I now definitely want to do ipv6. It works, BUT:
josephine:~# ip6tables -L
ip6tables v1.2.6a: can't initialize ip6tables table `filter': Table
does not exist (do you need to insmod?)
Perhaps
* on the Mon, Jan 28, 2002 at 11:10:25PM +, Wilmer van der Gaast wrote:
NAV for Microsoft [EMAIL PROTECTED]@Tue, 29 Jan 2002 04:36:39 +1100:
Content-Type: application/ms-tnef
Wht?
What kind of crap is that, and since when does any program use it? :-(
apt-get install tnef
Peter
Update:
On Thu, Oct 25, 2001 at 07:18:54PM +0200, Peter Keel wrote:
On Mon, Oct 22, 2001 at 06:41:22AM -0400, Joe Stevens wrote:
Yea, the recent CVS versions should work, I only keep that 2.4.8 up there
because its 'stable' (I use it on a number of production machines, uptimes
of more than
Where has /proc/net/rarp in kernel 2.4 gone? Is it impossible
to run a rarp-SERVER with 2.4? The user-space utility rarp
can't find it. Me neither.
Peter
--
Those who give up essential liberties for temporary safety deserve
neither liberty nor safety. -- Benjamin Franklin
: 74.95
MMU type: TI Viking/MXCC
contexts: 65536
nocache total : 1048576
nocache used: 772864
CPU0: online
CPU1: online
Whooohooo!
On Mon, 22 Oct 2001, Peter Keel wrote:
On Sun, Oct 21, 2001 at 01:22:39AM -0400, Joe Stevens wrote:
I have
On Sun, Oct 21, 2001 at 01:22:39AM -0400, Joe Stevens wrote:
I have a complete source tree of 2.4.8 that I have patched up to work on
sparc32 available at http://home.att.ne.jp/iota/joe/ . It have it running
on a number of Sparc 5s.
I managed to compile the kernel from the cvs -- cvs-access
Indeed, 2.4.11 compiled on Sparc32, the first since a long time.
I couldn't run the one one I tried because it told me it was too
big. Before I could shrink it, 2.4.12 appeared, and of course:
/usr/src/linux-2.4.12/include/linux/interrupt.h:77: warning:
`__cpu_raise_softirq' redefined
Hello
Out of a sudden, I get
Rebooting with command:
Boot device: /iommu/sbus/[EMAIL PROTECTED],40/[EMAIL
PROTECTED],80/[EMAIL PROTECTED],0 File and args:
SProgram terminated
Type help for more information
#0 ok go
Program terminated
* on the Wed, May 30, 2001 at 02:05:38AM -0700, Andrew Sharp was blubbering:
If you find yourself in a situation where the normal recovery mechanisms
of reiserfs don't work, the file system is most likely so fubared that
reiserfsck won't be able to do much. But it might.
I've got plenty of
With mysql-server_3.23.36-2_sparc.deb I get this:
010422 14:32:28 bdb: architecture lacks fast mutexes: applications
cannot be threaded
010422 14:32:28 Can't init databases
strace turns up some strange things:
| open(/var/lib/mysql/__db.001, O_RDWR|0x4) = -1 ENOENT (No
* on the Thu, Mar 29, 2001 at 07:31:23AM +0800, Onno Benschop was blubbering:
On Wed, 28 Mar 2001, Thomas Seyrat wrote:
Does anyone on the list know how to make compressed sparc kernels?
Uhm, from the usr/src/linux/README:
- do a make zImage to create a compressed kernel image. If you
* on the Wed, Mar 21, 2001 at 09:49:16PM -0500, Ben Collins was blubbering:
On Wed, Mar 21, 2001 at 09:25:53PM -0500, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
Matt Lewandowsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Package: boot-floppies
Version: potato (downloaded 20Mar2001)
architecture: sparc
model:
* on the Tue, Mar 13, 2001 at 08:20:19AM +0100, Andreas Tille was blubbering:
Just for the sake of interest: How far depends filesystem code from the
processor architecture?
- Endianness
- 32bit/64bit ... (and counting ;)
These would be the most prominent, I guess.
Peter
--
Any good Unix
* on the Fri, Mar 09, 2001 at 02:38:25PM +0900, Ragga Muffin was blubbering:
Hi everyone,
I'd like some input about upgrading an SS5 from potato to woody.
Specifically:
- Are there any issues with 2.4.x on sun4m ?
Nonworking on my SS10. Doesn't go over
booting Linux
- Any
* on the Wed, Feb 21, 2001 at 10:52:20AM +0100, Marco Gaiarin was blubbering:
cache) Sparc? I have a Sparc 10 that runs Debian 2.2r2 fine in
uniprocessor but periodically freezes/halts when running with both procs.
Hem, excuse me but i don't know spark hardware... but SS10 are
* on the Fri, Feb 16, 2001 at 02:49:18PM +0100, sylvain was blubbering:
1 - using an i386 box as a terminal for the Sparc. I know it's via the
serial line, but all resarch gave nothing for this. Could anyone know
how?
with minicom or seyon. Even cu should work. Settings: 9600 8N1,
hardware
* on the Wed, Feb 14, 2001 at 02:07:08PM -0500, John F. Davis was blubbering:
Hello
I am running woody and I tried to build the 2.4 kernel source.
I was unsucessful when compiling the modules. (I think it was because I
had selected the dbri module.) How can I install the latest 2.4
* on the Sun, Jan 14, 2001 at 10:04:42PM +0100, Peter Keel was blubbering:
quotacheck (from quota_2.00-8) bombs. I can't make out why with
strace, and ltrace has no available version but is in the database.
Kernel is 2.2.18, with quota turned on, of course.
(nb: This is on Sparc10, Woody
* on the Fri, Jan 19, 2001 at 03:31:56PM +0100, Peter Keel was blubbering:
Can I set my quota with a hexeditor until this gets fixed?
I did. ;)) repquota shows it, quota and edquota still report no quota.
I guess it's unuseable anyway in that case.
Peter
--
Any good Unix security engineer
I tried to compile a 2.2.18 with reiserfs-support. This happens:
make[3]: Entering directory `/usr/src/linux-2.4.0/fs/reiserfs'
gcc -D__KERNEL__ -I/usr/src/linux/include -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -O2 \
-fomit-frame-pointer -fno-strict-aliasing -m32 -pipe -mno-fpu \
* on the Thu, Jan 11, 2001 at 04:51:05PM -0500, Tad Bilby was blubbering:
I've got exactly the same problem. My vmlinux won't let itself boot
or whatever. It doesn't display Loading Linux, instead something
(dunno what this is) is displayed, and Watchodg reset or something.
Any ideas? Why
31 matches
Mail list logo
