Re: debian-installer: cdrom vs. netboot

r0' terminated by signal BUS. Jan 24 19:51:46 ristkon systemd[1]: Unmounting /mnt... Jan 24 19:51:46 ristkon systemd[1]: Unmounted /mnt. Jan 24 19:52:46 ristkon kernel: [ 281.642516] ISO 9660 Extensions: RRIP_1991A Actually, it mounts the CD after the second try (19:52:46), HTH, Uli -- Dip

Re: debian-installer: cdrom vs. netboot

rc64-smp #1 SMP Tue May 1 22:54:26 UTC 2007 sparc64 GNU/Linux ceteol:~> su Password: ceteol:/home/ut# mount -r -t iso9660 /dev/sr0 /cdrom/ ceteol:/home/ut# ls /cdrom README.html README.mirrors.txt boot debian install pics README.mirrors.html README.txt css dists md5su

Re: New working sparc64 netinst image

uz /boot/vmlinuz-4.3.0-1-sparc64 Which is right, as there's only one CPU :-) The install went exactly as for the other systems, but network and disk were automatically found and configured, as it's PCI based, HTH, Uli -- Dipl. Inf. Ulrich Teichert|e-mail: ulrich.teich...@gmx.de

Re: New working sparc64 netinst image

ng days, I am >just too busy with many other things at the same time ... Don't try too much; see above CU, Uli -- Dipl. Inf. Ulrich Teichert|e-mail: ulrich.teich...@gmx.de | Listening to: Stormweg 24 |Imperial State Electric, The Estranged, 24539 Neumuenster, Germany|The About Blanks, Cyanide Pills, Fu Manchu.

Re: New working sparc64 netinst image

online CPU1: online Sorry for the late reply, CU, Uli -- Dipl. Inf. Ulrich Teichert|e-mail: ulrich.teich...@gmx.de | Listening to: Stormweg 24 |Imperial State Electric, The Estranged, 24539 Neumuenster, Germany|The About Blanks, Cyanide Pills, Fu Manchu.

Re: New working sparc64 netinst image

e too, you just have to point it to the right config file. HTH, Uli -- Dipl. Inf. Ulrich Teichert|e-mail: ulrich.teich...@gmx.de | Listening to: Stormweg 24 |Imperial State Electric, The Estranged, 24539 Neumuenster, Germany|The About Blanks, Cyanide Pills, Fu Manchu.

Re: New working sparc64 netinst image

SZs : 8K,64K,512K,4MB State: CPU0: online CPU1: online Well done, CU, Uli -- Dipl. Inf. Ulrich Teichert|e-mail: ulrich.teich...@gmx.de | Listening to: Stormweg 24 |Imperial State Electric, The Estranged, 24539 Neumuenster, Germany|The About Blanks, Cyanide Pills, Fu Manchu.

Re: systemd again

Hi, >On 01/02/2016 10:22 PM, Ulrich Teichert wrote: >> For reasons, see [1] for example, but I'm sorry to stirr this all up >> again on this ML, where all people are tired of the discussion, > >Yes, I'm tired of this as well because it always boils down to "

systemd again (was: Re: New working sparc64 netinst image)

are tired of the discussion, CU, Uli [1] http://without-systemd.org/wiki/index.php/Arguments_against_systemd -- Dipl. Inf. Ulrich Teichert|e-mail: ulrich.teich...@gmx.de | Listening to: Stormweg 24 |Imperial State Electric, The Estranged, 24539 Neumuenster, Germany|The About Blanks, Cyanide Pills, Fu Manchu.

Re: New working sparc64 netinst image

infamous segfault of xsltproc which I wanted to debug on the system where the install has failed... I still can't stand systemd, can we please have back sysvinit as default? Groan, Uli -- Dipl. Inf. Ulrich Teichert|e-mail: ulrich.teich...@gmx.de | Listening to: Stormweg 24 |I

Re: New working sparc64 netinst image

econfiguration is not permitted (--auto-deconfigure might help) The version of ifupdown on d-p has a timestamp of 2016-01-02 00:10, so I wasn't running into it yesterday. Well, I think I'm blocked here, I can't think around this issue without a local mirror with the older version. D

Re: New working sparc64 netinst image

Hi, >On 01/01/2016 10:35 PM, Ulrich Teichert wrote: >> Partitioning is OK, but creating an ext4 filesystems still gets no further >> than 33%. Looks unchanged to me - from the outside. > >Did you check whether the change that Kieron was talking about: > >>

Re: New working sparc64 netinst image

strap-base' failed. Never seen the kernel message in the logs before, HTH, Uli -- Dipl. Inf. Ulrich Teichert|e-mail: ulrich.teich...@gmx.de | Listening to: Stormweg 24 |Imperial State Electric, The Estranged, 24539 Neumuenster, Germany|The About Blanks, Cyanide Pills, Fu Manchu.

Re: New working sparc64 netinst image

Hi, >On 01/01/2016 07:45 PM, Ulrich Teichert wrote: >> Jan 1 18:15:11 base-installer: error: Unable to execute >> /usr/lib/post-base-installer.d/60partman-zfs >> Jan 1 18:15:20 base-installer: info: could not determine kernel flavour >> Jan 1 18:15:20 base-installer

Re: New working sparc64 netinst image

rity limit from 'hig--More-- (99% of 1309h' to 'medium' Jan 1 18:17:06 debconf: Setting debconf/priority to medium Jan 1 18:17:21 main-menu[150]: INFO: Menu item 'di-utils-shell' selected Hope this is helpful, CU, Uli -- Dipl. Inf. Ulrich Teichert|e-mai

Re: New working sparc64 netinst image

alling it in the target via chroot works. That's where I have to stop now, getting hungry :-) HTH, Uli -- Dipl. Inf. Ulrich Teichert|e-mail: ulrich.teich...@gmx.de | Listening to: Stormweg 24 |Imperial State Electric, The Estranged, 24539 Neumuenster, Germany|The About Blanks, Cyanide Pills, Fu Manchu.

Re: New working sparc64 netinst image

: Sending select for 192.168.XXX.PPP... Dec 31 12:31:45 main-menu[176]: (process:781): Lease of 192.168.XXX.PPP obtained, lease time 86400 Dec 31 12:31:45 main-menu[176]: DEBUG: resolver (libc6-udeb): package doesn't exist (ignored) But that may be a generic installer bug, I believe. Anyway,

Re: New working sparc64 netinst image

r' succeeded but requested to be left unconfigured. Dec 29 21:04:53 main-menu[164]: DEBUG: resolver (libc6-udeb): package doesn't exist (ignored) Dec 29 21:04:56 main-menu[164]: INFO: Menu item 'di-utils-shell' selected Am I grateful for my serial console :-) But to me it looks li

Re: New working sparc64 netinst image

a bit noisy with a lot of messages on the console: [ 127.261369] IRQ pre handler NOT supported. [ 127.261394] IRQ pre handler NOT supported. [ 127.261412] IRQ pre handler NOT supported. But the installer kicks in OK, so thumbs up! CU, Uli -- Dipl. Inf. Ulrich Teichert|e-mail: ulrich.teich...@gmx.de |

Re: First sparc64 netinst image available

me behaviour as before. I'll try another of my boxes tomorrow, just to be sure, CU, Uli -- Dipl. Inf. Ulrich Teichert|e-mail: ulrich.teich...@gmx.de | Listening to: Stormweg 24 |Imperial State Electric, The Estranged, 24539 Neumuenster, Germany|The About Blanks, Cyanide Pills, Fu Manchu.

Re: First sparc64 netinst image available

ust loaded does not appear to be executable. CU, Uli -- Dipl. Inf. Ulrich Teichert|e-mail: ulrich.teich...@gmx.de | Listening to: Stormweg 24 |Imperial State Electric, The Estranged, 24539 Neumuenster, Germany|The About Blanks, Cyanide Pills, Fu Manchu.

Re: First sparc64 netinst image available

File and args: SILO Version 1.4.13 ... Welcome to Debian GNU/Linux etch! So, the hardware is OK and hasn't turned into a toaster ;-) HTH, Uli -- Dipl. Inf. Ulrich Teichert|e-mail: ulrich.teich...@gmx.de | Listening to: Stormweg 24 |Imperial State Electric, The E

Re: Interesting apt problem during update

end, just came home from work CU, Uli -- Dipl. Inf. Ulrich Teichert|e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Stormweg 24 |listening to: Channel 13 Is Haunted (Hex Dispensers) 24539 Neumuenster, Germany|Is It Good Or Is It Bad? (Opération S) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Interesting apt problem during update

)" not changed gpg: Total number processed: 4 gpg: unchanged: 4 Setting up aptitude (0.4.4-4) ... Setting up apt-utils (0.6.46.4-0.1) ... Setting up libapt-pkg-dev (0.6.46.4-0.1) ... All was well. I would like to know *why* gpg needs a 2.6 kernel and fails without giving a prop

Interesting apt problem during update

xpires: 2010-03-30] Could it be the case that the etch-gnupg can only work with a devfs-enabled kernel? Even when I'm copying over the keyrings from another etch installation, the same error persists, same when I use --allow-unauthenticated (which I would call a bug). TIA, Uli -- Dipl.

Re: Any progress?

then the sparc(64) port. So, a sparc32 porter has to read both lists anyway. HTH, Uli -- Dipl. Inf. Ulrich Teichert|e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Stormweg 24 |listening to: Channel 13 Is Haunted (Hex Dispensers) 24539 Neumuenster, Germany|Is It Good Or Is It Bad? (Opération S) --

Re: Applying OBP upgrade to SS20.

e the image of choice into an EPROM, rip out your old one and put in the new one. AFAIK there never was a sparc 32 bit box with an EEPROM. Personally, I once bought a ready made EPROM on ebay and upgraded my SS20 that way, HTH, Uli -- Dipl. Inf. Ulrich Teichert|e-mail: [EMAIL P

Re: Creation of Sparc (32-bit) port.

r 32-/64-bit architectures support that. It may be not formally maintained, but there are patches being sent to Dave Miller and to [EMAIL PROTECTED] at a promising rate lately, HTH, Uli -- Dipl. Inf. Ulrich Teichert|e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Stormweg 24 |listening to: Channel 13 Is Haunted

Re: New SILO package version available for testing

Hi, >> On Thu, Aug 16, 2007 at 08:37:11PM +0200, Ulrich Teichert wrote: >>> Will it work on sparc32 systems, too? >> >> Sure, to my knowledge, there is no need to compile a bootloader with >> gcc -m64, except if you want it to access more than 4 GB of memory >

Re: New SILO package version available for testing

- Dipl. Inf. Ulrich Teichert|e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Stormweg 24 |listening to: Channel 13 Is Haunted (Hex Dispensers) 24539 Neumuenster, Germany|Is It Good Or Is It Bad? (Opération S) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". T

Re: New to the list

ere's nothing wrong with installing it. Only when you want testing/unstable on it, you should be prepared for all kinds of fun. HTH, Uli -- Dipl. Inf. Ulrich Teichert|e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Stormweg 24 |listening to: Channel 13 Is Haunted (Hex Dispensers) 24539 Neumuenster, Ger

Re: Debian GNU/(k)NetBSD and sparc32 hardware?

imilar issues may also arise with other architectures, too. Right. m68k and mipsel are springing to my mind. Well, as I am not a debian developer, I probably should keep my mouth shut now and leave the discussion (and of course the final decision) for long term or short term investment to debian m

Re: Debian GNU/(k)NetBSD and sparc32 hardware?

Hi, >On Sun, Jul 29, 2007 at 03:13:03PM +0200, Maciej Jan Broniarz wrote: >> Dnia 2007-07-29, o godz. 15:11:55 >> Ulrich Teichert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> napisa=C5=82(a): >> >> > I tend to differ. It will be easier to fix the Linux kernel, find a >> >

Re: Sparc32 systems and power consumption

TED] is a very good idea, but it depends on >how many people would like to contribute. I tend to differ. It will be easier to fix the Linux kernel, find a maintainer for it and then get it into Debian again. We would leveraging the existing work better that way. Just my 2 cents, Uli -- Dipl.

Re: Debian network installation

couple of days/weeks... >Is it possible to install Debian via network boot from OpenBoot >Firmware using "boot net" or tftp? Sure. "boot net" on the prompt will attempt a tftp boot. Check out the install instructions from debian, it's all there. HTH, Uli -- Dipl.

Re: [etch]netinstall

get the names of the configured kernels. Just pressing RETURN will give you the default (which is right for an installation). I suspect your CD has been burned just fine. HTH, Uli -- Dipl. Inf. Ulrich Teichert|e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Stormweg 24 |listening to: Channel 13 Is Haunt

Re: X server fails to start after netinstall of Etch on Ultra 60

t;manually, and I got the same error message: > >mmap user regs: Invalid argument [del] Some, maybe silly, questions: 1. Are you root when you're running afbinit? 2. Does /dev/fb0 exist? 3. Does it point to the right card? HTH, Uli -- Dipl. Inf. Ulrich Teichert|e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Updating Openboot PROM

ems. However, quite some time after that, somebody suggested that booting the patch over silo could have been possible. If you'll try that out, I would be interested in the results, HTH, Uli -- Dipl. Inf. Ulrich Teichert|e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Stormweg 24 |listening to:

Re: PROM update with linux

sible installation type. I can netboot almost anything here, from DECstations to SUNs and Alphas, but absolutely nothing worked. I finally installed Solaris on a spare disk, copied the patch into the root-fs and booted it from PROM. That worked with my Ultra-2. HTH, Uli -- Dipl. Inf. Ulrich Teichert

Re: OT:U10 Won't boot, possible hardware failure

alright since then. HTH, Uli -- Dipl. Inf. Ulrich Teichert|e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Stormweg 24 |listening to: Suicide Drive (The Deep Eynde) 24539 Neumuenster, Germany|Public Pervert (Interpol) Cauchemar (Opération S) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a sub

Re: Cannot boot 2.6.8 kernel from ext3 root partition on Ultra5

pile the stuff in and be done with it? I mean, I understand why the installation kernel relays on initrd, but for a tuned, self compiled kernel, this isn't necessary. HTH, Uli -- Dipl. Inf. Ulrich Teichert|e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Stormweg 24 |listening to: Suicide Drive (The Deep Eynde) 24539 Neumuenster, Germany|Public Pervert (Interpol) Clé De Contact (Metal Urbain)

Re: Cannot boot 2.6.8 kernel from ext3 root partition on Ultra5

27;s: >CONFIG_BLK_DEV_CMD64X=m [del] I haven't checked the rest of the config closely, but I haven't found any other problems, HTH, Uli -- Dipl. Inf. Ulrich Teichert|e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Stormweg 24 |listening to: Suicide Drive (The Deep Eynde) 24539 Neumuenster,

Re: stop-a

ou ask me. HTH, Uli PS: Yes, I like sending BREAKs on the serial console ;-) -- Dipl. Inf. Ulrich Teichert|e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Stormweg 24 |listening to: Suicide Drive (The Deep Eynde) 24539 Neumuenster, Germany|Public Pervert (Interpol) Clé De Contact (Metal Urbain)

Re: SMP Kernel?

Inf. Ulrich Teichert|e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Stormweg 24 |listening to: Thrown Away The Key (Thanes) 24539 Neumuenster, Germany|Public Pervert (Interpol) Clé De Contact (Metal Urbain)

Working 2.4.25 config (was: Re: U5 - woody (2.4.24)...)

See my attached .config for a 2.4.25 SMP UltraSparc kernel, running on a dual Ultra2. Problems to look out for: the silo size limit on *uncompressed* kernels, missing/wrong whole disk partition 3, /boot partition over 2 Gig. BTW: you should be a bit more patient on public mailing lists. HTH, Uli --

Re: Debian 3.0 on Netra X1, installs but won't run

ruption, 'cause the controler was switched to parity OFF. (before I found out I had already pulled out *some* hair...) How many SCSI-devices are on your bus and how are they wired together? HTH, Uli -- Dipl. Inf. Ulrich Teichert|e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Stormweg 24 |listening t

Re: Kaffe porting issues

he Agenda on http://www.javalinux.net/AgendaKaffe/ so perhaps, everything is already done?-) HTH, Uli -- Dipl. Inf. Ulrich Teichert|e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Stormweg 24 |listening to:Something Good To Go By(The Decibels) 24539 Neumuenster, Germany|Cheap Excitement (Stratford Mercenaries)