On 2016-11-24 12:33, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
Hi Dave!
As promised in another mail earlier today, here is the current patch
changes that we are currently using on top of silo HEAD to build
it as a 64-bit package in Debian unstable (sparc64).
The silo package has been shipped in Debian w
On 2016-08-02 19:49, James Clarke wrote:
(Including debian-sparc this time...)
Not sure why, but when it was built (17 Oct 2014) it picked up
libgnustep-base-dev (1.22.1-4.3) rather than a 1.24 version, though as
far as I can tell the latter was already built on sparc64. A binNMU
should suffice.
On 2016-08-02 21:34, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
On 08/03/2016 01:49 AM, James Clarke wrote:
Not sure why, but when it was built (17 Oct 2014) it picked up
libgnustep-base-dev (1.22.1-4.3) rather than a 1.24 version,
though as far as I can tell the latter was already built on sparc64.
A bi
This may be because the package is currently updating in the repository,
is there any way to tell when this is happening?
But anyways, as of now openvpn-auth-ldap depends on libgnustep-base1.22
which has been replaced by libgnustep-base1.24. This makes
openvpn-auth-ldap uninstallable.
On 2016-07-29 13:18, alexmcwhir...@triadic.us wrote:
On 2016-07-29 12:45, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
On 07/29/2016 05:16 PM, alexmcwhir...@triadic.us wrote:
Just add sparc64 to the arch case in this file.
https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/scripts/package/builddeb
Man, you s
On 2016-07-29 12:45, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
On 07/29/2016 05:16 PM, alexmcwhir...@triadic.us wrote:
Just add sparc64 to the arch case in this file.
https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/scripts/package/builddeb
Man, you should really add a bit more information in your mails
On 2016-07-29 06:25, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
On 07/29/2016 05:06 AM, alexmcwhir...@triadic.us wrote:
Turns out the kernel's deb build script needed a bit of tweaking,
i noted this down to be put on the wiki.
No, that's not for the wiki, this is something for the bug tracker.
Please f
On 2016-07-28 13:19, alexmcwhir...@triadic.us wrote:
I've been working on some kernel customizations to fix a few issues,
and went ahead and compiled a kernel with " make deb-pkg". The problem
is that the resulting .deb is the wrong arch.
dpkg -i linux-headers-4.6.4-rt6-5yn3r6y_4.6.4-1_sparc.deb
This issue has been resolved for me with the following kernel patch.
Tested on an E6K and V210 with a customized debian 4.6.4 kernel. This
also resolves issues with ssh / ssl corruption.
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/653511/
Hopefully this can get pushed out into the debian sparc64 repo as
I've been working on some kernel customizations to fix a few issues, and
went ahead and compiled a kernel with " make deb-pkg". The problem is
that the resulting .deb is the wrong arch.
dpkg -i linux-headers-4.6.4-rt6-5yn3r6y_4.6.4-1_sparc.deb
dpkg: error processing archive
linux-headers-4.6.4
On 2016-07-26 20:48, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
firmware is outdated...
I would say this is most likely, i've run into issues with this in the
past. I don't think oracle specifies a minimum version to run oracle
linux, but i know OpenBSD does require newer firmware in order to run in
a
On 2016-07-26 18:56, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> Just try with "console=ttyS0". systemd reads this parameter from the kernel
> command line and sets up the proper getty.
>
> The systemd documentation has lots of information on that.
>
> On Jul 26, 2016, at 11:37 PM, alexmcwhir...@t
On 2016-07-26 17:31, alexmcwhir...@triadic.us wrote:
On 2016-07-26 17:25, alexmcwhir...@triadic.us wrote:
On 2016-07-26 17:15, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
Perhaps both are panicing? In this situation it seems that systemd,
initramfs, etc... are all on one console and the kernel messages ar
On 2016-07-26 17:25, alexmcwhir...@triadic.us wrote:
On 2016-07-26 17:15, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
Perhaps both are panicing? In this situation it seems that systemd,
initramfs, etc... are all on one console and the kernel messages are
on another. I.E. kernel messages are on ttyS0 and ev
On 2016-07-26 17:15, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
On 07/26/2016 11:02 PM, alexmcwhir...@triadic.us wrote:
On 2016-07-26 16:58, alexmcwhir...@triadic.us wrote:
The second one is panicing because ttyS0 doesn't exist,
"[244919.084723] Warning: unable to open an initial console."
do you have
On 2016-07-26 16:58, alexmcwhir...@triadic.us wrote:
The second one is panicing because ttyS0 doesn't exist,
"[244919.084723] Warning: unable to open an initial console."
do you have a serial port configured on this ldom?
Well actually it does seem to exist,
"[244919.066269] f0296cdc: ttyS0
On 2016-07-26 15:13, rod...@netbsd.org wrote:
On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 02:21:38PM -0400, alexmcwhir...@triadic.us
wrote:
On 2016-07-26 07:44, rod...@netbsd.org wrote:
>On Sun, Jul 24, 2016 at 07:31:38PM +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
>wrote:
>>On 07/24/2016 06:50 PM, rod...@netbsd.org wrote:
>>
On 2016-07-26 07:44, rod...@netbsd.org wrote:
On Sun, Jul 24, 2016 at 07:31:38PM +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
wrote:
On 07/24/2016 06:50 PM, rod...@netbsd.org wrote:
> Thanks for your help. Somehow, i made it through the install after selecting
> just the base utilities. The ldom has booted
Well i'm bringing this email back from the dead, original thread can be
found here https://lists.debian.org/debian-sparc/2013/01/msg8.html
In a nutshell the qlogicpti driver isn't handling traffic demands very
well, the request queue will overflow and the system will panic. Just
letting a
On 2016-07-08 03:56, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
On 07/08/2016 12:01 AM, alexmcwhir...@triadic.us wrote:
Is there are reason this package is missing
Yes, the package was just recently uploaded [1] and it can sometimes
take some
hours until all arch-all packages have been synced over to t
On 2016-07-07 10:29, Anatoly Pugachev wrote:
Hi!
Compiled linux kernel (git version 4.7.0-rc6+) using my own kernel
config file, enabling :
CONFIG_BTRFS_FS_RUN_SANITY_TESTS=y
CONFIG_BTRFS_DEBUG=y
CONFIG_BTRFS_ASSERT=y
and now I can't load btrfs module:
# modprobe btrfs
modprobe: ERROR: could
I came across this when attempting to install amavisd-new. amavis
depends on libmail-dkmi-perl which depends on liberror-perl.
liberror-perl is missing from the repo.
liberror-perl is an "arch all" package and should run fine, so i added
this to
/var/lib/apt/lists/ftp.ports.debian.org_debian-
On 2016-07-06 13:39, Hartwig Atrops wrote:
Hi all.
I tried to install Sparc64 on some of my Suns - base install only.
Iso-Image used: Debian-9.0-sparc64-netinst-1, 2016-05-04
Blade 1500: Success
Fire V210: Success
Ultra60: Success - ttyS0 only (Creator 3D does not work during
installation)
On 2016-07-01 05:25, Frans van Berckel wrote:
On Fri, 2016-07-01 at 04:43 -0400, Alex McWhirter wrote:
At the silo boot prompt try typing "modprobe.blacklist=qla2xxx" then
press enter.
That will disable the on board fiber, but it may boot.
Does the blade 1000 use fc-al disks? I dont remember i
On 2016-06-29 10:15, Anatoly Pugachev wrote:
On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 9:35 PM, Alex McWhirter
wrote:
/export/test is an entire debian minimal install made from
debootstrap. I am
not certain if this issue effects sun4v or not.
What fs are you using ext4? I've found that it doesn't happen on btr
I posted about this in the kernel lists a few months ago to no avail. I
see it on gentoo as well with any kernel newer than 3.18. I came across
this when using lxc on sparc64. The debian template uses rsync to move
the cache's rootfs to the actual container directory.
I've since modified the t
Ok, so here is my todo list as of today. I'm mostly writing this out to
help myself later, but if anyone has anything to add to these points let
me know.
1. The installer is not respecting the debian-ports gpg key, this needs
fixed or else the installer will always fail on the "Select and Inst
On 2016-06-23 04:30, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
On 06/23/2016 07:54 AM, Alex McWhirter wrote:
I spend most of my time working on pure 64 bit sparc linux. simply
because that's where all the work is currently being done. That being
said there are
noticeable speed improvements with some ap
On 2016-06-20 10:29, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
On 06/20/2016 04:15 PM, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 04:11:32PM +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
wrote:
Well, we just did a full archive rebuild of "ppc64" to be able to
support ppc64 on the e5500 cores by disabling AltiVe
On 2016-06-14 03:06, Philipp Kern wrote:
On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 07:33:56PM +, Niels Thykier wrote:
Philipp Kern:
> On 2016-06-05 12:01, Niels Thykier wrote:
>> * amd64, i386, armel, armhf, arm64, mips, mipsel, powerpc, ppc64el,
>>s390x
>>- *No* blockers at this time from RT, DSA no
Ok, so i have a new CD the works well enough. I took some time to dig
through the source and i have a few questions.
1. Are we allowed to sign the sparc64 unstable repo? I'm 90% certain
that this is why "select & install software" fails. Even if its signed
unofficially and the signature is pus
On 2016-06-12 04:30, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
Possible, but it's doesn't explain why debian-installer still cant
find the package after
reprepro includeudeb unstable /path/to/udeb/*udeb
reprepro includeudeb unstable /path/to/deb/*deb
It's possible that i've done the reprepro update ste
On 2016-06-12 03:13, Frans van Berckel wrote:
Checking the repo, its always good to see it's there.
http://ftp.ports.debian.org/debian-ports/pool-sparc64/main/s/sparc-util
s/sparc-utils-udeb_1.9-5+sparc64_sparc64.udeb
But if i am well, you are only able to download & install udeb's within
the
On 2016-06-11 17:30, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
On 06/11/2016 06:22 PM, alexmcwhir...@triadic.us wrote:
So one issue i came across with building the installer.
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
E: Unable to locate package sparc-utils-udeb
It doesn't look like
On 2016-06-09 02:58, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
Hi Alex!
Sorry, i didn't catch this message before the others...
On 06/09/2016 06:44 AM, Alex McWhirter wrote:
If it helps i have access to a decent amount of gear. E6K, V210, V215,
M4000, T1000, T5120, Netra X1, Blade 150, and a V890.
On 2016-06-11 12:22, alexmcwhir...@triadic.us wrote:
So one issue i came across with building the installer.
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
E: Unable to locate package sparc-utils-udeb
It doesn't look like that file is in the list of packages, but i can
find it
On 2016-06-11 09:58, alexmcwhir...@triadic.us wrote:
On 2016-06-11 05:06, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
On 06/10/2016 08:31 PM, alexmcwhir...@triadic.us wrote:
Something that might be worth doing it having the install check
loaded modules on initialization, then compare that to the loaded
m
On 2016-06-11 05:18, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
Hi Alex!
On 06/11/2016 01:27 AM, alexmcwhir...@triadic.us wrote:
Using the qlogicpti driver i seem to get these issue when writing data
to an ext4 disk. I've tried three different disks. Im on kernel 4.6.1,
but it also
happens on 4.5.2
K
On 2016-06-11 05:15, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
On 06/10/2016 08:46 PM, alexmcwhir...@triadic.us wrote:
Squeeze may be stable on x86, but it's quite the contrary on sparc.
Your talking about a release that was so unmaintained on sparc that
they had to pull the
plug on it afterwards.Squeez
On 2016-06-11 05:06, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
On 06/10/2016 08:31 PM, alexmcwhir...@triadic.us wrote:
Something that might be worth doing it having the install check loaded
modules on initialization, then compare that to the loaded modules
before finalizing. If
any new modules have show
On 2016-06-10 20:17, alexmcwhir...@triadic.us wrote:
On 2016-06-10 19:27, alexmcwhir...@triadic.us wrote:
Using the qlogicpti driver i seem to get these issue when writing data
to an ext4 disk. I've tried three different disks. Im on kernel 4.6.1,
but it also happens on 4.5.2
[ 700.648449] scs
On 2016-06-10 19:27, alexmcwhir...@triadic.us wrote:
Using the qlogicpti driver i seem to get these issue when writing data
to an ext4 disk. I've tried three different disks. Im on kernel 4.6.1,
but it also happens on 4.5.2
[ 700.648449] scsi_io_completion: 18 callbacks suppressed
[ 700.714696
Using the qlogicpti driver i seem to get these issue when writing data
to an ext4 disk. I've tried three different disks. Im on kernel 4.6.1,
but it also happens on 4.5.2
[ 700.648449] scsi_io_completion: 18 callbacks suppressed
[ 700.714696] sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] tag#0 FAILED Result: hostbyte=DI
On 2016-06-10 16:55, Chris wrote:
On 06/10/16 11:26, Hermann Lauer wrote:
Hello Chris,
On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 11:00:25AM +, Chris wrote:
I know Debian 7 is unsupported on Sparc and that bugs won't be fixed,
but I don't care. Once the OS is installed and stable, I really don't
need or expe
On 2016-06-10 07:00, Chris wrote:
Warning, long reply, may need coffee :-)...
I know Debian 7 is unsupported on Sparc and that bugs won't be fixed,
but I don't care. Once the OS is installed and stable, I really don't
need or expect support or patches. Apart from adding a few packages,
nothing
On 2016-06-10 04:50, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
On 06/10/2016 03:55 AM, alexmcwhir...@triadic.us wrote:
Adding a note to point D, the modules are there but not loaded. Doing
a "modprobe sunesp" then running the installer will find the cdrom.
Where
do we determine what modules to load at
On 2016-06-09 22:15, alexmcwhir...@triadic.us wrote:
On 2016-06-09 21:55, alexmcwhir...@triadic.us wrote:
On 2016-06-09 18:41, alexmcwhir...@triadic.us wrote:
Here are some areas i intend to work on, any info / comments on the
implementation of these would be appreciated.
A. ZFS Modules shoul
On 2016-06-09 21:55, alexmcwhir...@triadic.us wrote:
On 2016-06-09 18:41, alexmcwhir...@triadic.us wrote:
Here are some areas i intend to work on, any info / comments on the
implementation of these would be appreciated.
A. ZFS Modules should not be loaded by the installer unless explicitly
cho
On 2016-06-09 18:41, alexmcwhir...@triadic.us wrote:
Here are some areas i intend to work on, any info / comments on the
implementation of these would be appreciated.
A. ZFS Modules should not be loaded by the installer unless explicitly
chosen by the user.
ZFS works on most sparc64 boxes, but
Here are some areas i intend to work on, any info / comments on the
implementation of these would be appreciated.
A. ZFS Modules should not be loaded by the installer unless explicitly
chosen by the user.
ZFS works on most sparc64 boxes, but not all of them. Especially the
older sbus machin
On 2016-06-09 05:19, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
Hi Alex!
On 06/09/2016 09:12 AM, Alex McWhirter wrote:
How "new" does a system have to be in order to meet these
requirements. T-5
machines are probably not too hard to come by, but the starting price
of a T-7
machine is around 40K USD IIR
51 matches
Mail list logo
