uccessfully:
$ uname -a
Linux debian-sparc 6.8.12-sparc64-smp #1 SMP Debian 6.8.12-1 (2024-05-31)
sparc64 GNU/Linux
Regards,
--
-Peter Tribble
http://www.petertribble.co.uk/ - http://ptribble.blogspot.com/
structions available that would get me
closer to a working install?
Thanks,
--
-Peter Tribble
http://www.petertribble.co.uk/ - http://ptribble.blogspot.com/
ot that large that it would justify dropping support for such a large
> > userbase.
> >
> > Removing Solaris 11.3 support might make sense in the future when SPARC
> > support in Illumos has matured enough that people can switch over their
> > machines.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Adrian
> >
> > --
> > .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
> > : :' : Debian Developer
> > `. `' Physicist
> > `-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
>
>
--
-Peter Tribble
http://www.petertribble.co.uk/ - http://ptribble.blogspot.com/
On Thu, Apr 06, 2023 at 05:01:07PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
> On 06-04-2023 15:37, Peter Pentchev wrote:
> > I feel like I cannot ask for an unblock from the release
> > managers since the sparc64 buildd started failing on this package
> > at some point i
On Thu, Apr 06, 2023 at 04:37:16PM +0300, Peter Pentchev wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The libzstd package in testing is currently missing a couple of
> build-time tests and a fix for a very rare data corruption bug.
> Both of these have been fixed in libstd-1.5.4+dfsg2-5 in unstable;
..
ully. Is it possible that
something is wrong with the sparc64 buildd? Could somebody with
an actual sparc64 box try to build libstd-1.5.4+dfsg2-5 and
let me know if it works for them?
Thanks in advance!
G'luck,
Peter
--
Peter Pentchev r...@ringlet.net r...@debian.org p...@storpool.co
On 05/06/16 13:00, Holger Levsen wrote:
On Sun, Jun 05, 2016 at 01:26:39PM +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
ppc64:
This architecture is basically on par with the release architectures. We have
over
11.000 packages installed
[...]
sparc64:
We are close to 11.000 installed
set them up as buildds for Debian ports.
The machines have broken disks so their raids have failed. And the
mgmt stuff is complaining about CPU and/or other fans too.
I don't think you'd want those machines.
--
| .''`. ** Debian **
Pete
Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
Hello all,
gmp has been recently re-licensed and all architectures and ports have
the updated gmp in jessie/sid. Well, all but powerpcspe & x32 both of
which recently have negative slope on their build status graphs.
Thus GPLv2 and LGPLv3 compatible software packages c
Johannes Schauer wrote:
Hi,
the following is a report of a successful implementation of what I have been
talking about with Niels Thykier during debconf13. The question was how
important it is for a source package to be compilable or exist in the first
place given an incomplete port which is in
Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
Any feedback will be kindly appreciated.
I've always thought there is something fundamentally wrong.
What is qreal supposed to be used for? If it's supposed to be used for
things where float would be adequate then shouldn't it be float on all
plat
Johannes Schauer wrote:
Until these two issues are fixed we will not be able to get an algorithmic
answer to the question of what constitutes the minimum required set of
packages.
There is also the complication of what I will call "non-key self
building compilers". fpc is an example
These a
peter green wrote:
Unfortunately I wasn't quick enough with the uploads and the chroots
on the sparc buildd were updated to the new binutils (which makes
versions of the fpc package prior to 2.6.2-3 uninstallable) before I
managed to get the new upload in. This will mean a manual bui
Abou Al Montacir wrote:
Hi Peter,
I've committed fixes of this bug, can you please upload?
Just thought i'd keep you informed.
I uploaded with my changes and your changes. I also had to make a couple
of follow uploads to deal with a couple of small but build-breaking
issues, i&
scheme) except for localization of course.
I've been trying to install using the XFCE CD on a zx6000. The boot
rom doesn't recognise the CD as being bootable.The netinst CD does
work.
--
Dr Peter Chubb peter.chubb AT nicta.com.au
http://www.ssrg.n
:-) I'm one who asked there some time back why java7 is no longer in
the archives (unstable/experimental), while the last binaries I had
installed still work OK on my mini-pc...
I'm just curious, sorry for asking to the lists... I want to
understand if the mini-pc is still a low performance de
reassign 651934 libjavascriptcoregtk-3.0-0 1.6.1-5
retitle 651934 unaligned access problems in libjavascriptcore on sparc
leading to seed FTBFS
affects 651934 seed
tags 651934 patch
thanks
Jurij Smakov wrote:
It built successfully this time! And after I installed the resulting
debs, seed built
Michael Biebl wrote:
Could you try building seed 3.2 against the same version of webkit as
seed 3.0 was built?
I removed all webkit and javascriptcore packages and installed
http://snapshot.debian.org/archive/debian/20110505T052259Z/pool/main/w/webkitgtk%2B/libwebkitgtk-3.0-0_1.4.0-1_sparc.de
forwarded 659793 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52425
thanks
Matthias Klose wrote:
tags 659793 + moreinfo help
thanks
does it work with 4.5, 4.7 (snapshot)?
Works with both 4.5 and snapshot, only 4.6 seems to suffer the problem.
please forward it upstream after investigating.
Do
Found 651934 3.0.0-2
Thanks
Thanks jurij for your help.
'disassemble' command may be used to look up the assembler code around
the instruction which caused the crash:
Some further notes on the dissasemble command I ran into while trying to
use it.
1: it seems you have to explicitly select
seed currently FTBFS on sparc with a bus error.
I've reproduced this on a sparc box that Tom Theisen made available
(thanks tom) but i'm kinda stuck on how to debug it.
Any ideas on how to debug this? Normally i'd start by turning down the
optimisation but this package doesn't seem to be usin
Audacious failed to build on sparc with an internal compiler error.
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=audacious&arch=sparc&ver=3.2-1&stamp=1327623171
unfortunately the build log is a pain to read as the package uses a
paralell build.
Could someone try and reproduce this. If yo
got one screen and
wrote the text while watching it on my hurd computer.)
Does anyone have any idea on how to get past this?
Thanks!
/Peter
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-sparc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.
July 27, 2009 2:08:09 AM, Joel BERTRAND wrote,
> In text mode only, etch is usable.
My objective is merely to keep an Apache server
running. A GUI is unnecessary. According to all
discussion, Etch should be sufficient.
Still, I'm interested to install NetBSD. Should be
harmless.
Mon, 25 May 2009 11:29:27 +0200 Joël BERTRAND wrote,
"Etch worked fine."
Whereas http://www.debian.org/releases/stable/sparc/ch02s01.html.en#sparc-cpus
states
"sun4, sun4c, sun4d, sun4m
...
The last Debian release to support sparc32 was Etch, but even then only
for sun4m systems. Su
external
drive and keep NetBSD in mind. What is likely
to fail if Etch is left on the SS2 for years?
The lifespan of these Sparcs is amazing. The SS2
demonstrates hardware durability and is good
for low demand http service.
Regards, ..
4.0.1 (or 5.0 in UP). ...
Well I prefer to stick with Debian if possible. Another
system would absorb more precious hours. One reason
for choosing Debian originally was the claim to universality.
Thanks, ... Peter E.
_
Michelle wrote,
> ... for the SS10 Woody was the last
> release which worked. I suspect, that Sarge, Etch or even Lenny/Squeeze
> will work on the SS2.
I'm puzzled. If Woody was the last release to work
on the SS10, why will a later release work on the
SS2?
Martin wrote,
> ... check when supp
An old Sparcstation 2 has been running Woody since
it was installed ca. 2002 by diskette -> network.
Recently I've added an external 18 GB drive and
am interested to install a newer Debian to it. Can
anyone comment _pro_ or _con_ about installing etch
or lenny or squeeze on a Sparc 2?
Efforts de
debian-po...@lists.debian.org as user.
--
| .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux **
Peter Palfrader | : :' : The universal
http://www.palfrader.org/ | `. `' Operating System
| `-http://www.debian.o
mode, see boot log.
This seems to be an old problem. So there are early postings from year
2000.
http://monkey.org/openbsd/archive/tech/0007/msg00017.html
Do you see an chance to find a solution for this issue because this makes
the Sun Blade 100 pretty slow?
Best regards peter
I tried to run the installer on a sparcstation 10, the hardware
detection was working fine on that system.
Is there some known problem with the Installation of etch on the SS4?
Thanks,
Peter
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
nnect both
the Sun and the PC with the DHCP/TFTP-Server to the router. Consumer
class routers often only route between the internet and a built-in
switch, so all ports on the "Lan"-side are on the same switch.
Have Fun
Peter
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Am Montag, 8. Oktober 2007 21:27 schrieb Chris Andrew:
> Don't suppose you have any spare RAM for a sparcstation?
>
I do, 4 Modules, 16MB each from a Sparcstation 10, untested (but should
work), Label says MH1M144CTJ-6, must be third party modules.
Greetings
Peter
--
To UNSUBSCRIB
spare PSU (used,
but it was working a year ago) for it, just in case you want to avoid
the fan change. I live in Switzerland, but sending it to Germany would
be ok for me. I can pay for the shipping, BUT you would need to pay
import taxes (if there are any).
Greetings
Peter
--
To UNSUB
Sorry to add to the list but here's another
SunBlade 1500, OBP 4.17.1 gives the Illegal Instruction, cold reboot
makes no difference. OBP 4.9.5 would allow for a cold boot using
netinst. NB Same error results using Ubuntu 6.06, 6.06.1 and 7.04
releases on this hardware.
Pete
--
To UNSUBSC
I'm afraid I'm seeing the same with a SunBlade 1500 (Red). Regrettably
the cold reboot doesn't help when running latest OBP (4.17.1) although
OBP 4.9.5 did allow a cold boot-> netinst under Etch.
Pete
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Cont
anyone knows what might be
the problem here ?
Merry Christmas,
gausus
I had the same problem installing on an ultra 10. It worked when I
installed sarge instead of etch. Then I upgraded from within the vserver
Peter
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
Am Dienstag, 5. Dezember 2006 06.06 schrieb Jurij Smakov:
> On Tue, Dec 05, 2006 at 01:43:27AM +0100, Peter Rohrer wrote:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ gcc --version
> > gcc (GCC) 4.1.2 20061028 (prerelease) (Debian 4.1.1-19)
> >
> >
> > output from "fakeroot ma
dware
problem, the system was running Debian Woody in the past.
More general asked, am I wrong, or is the manual wrong/outdated?
Thanks,
Peter
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ gcc --version
gcc (GCC) 4.1.2 20061028 (prerelease) (Debian 4.1
>> gaim-librvp failed to build on sparc due to a transiant issue with
>> build-deps. Other than wait times this is now the only thing holding gaim
2
>> out of testing.
>
>> contacting the buildd guys at [EMAIL PROTECTED] (that is the
address
>> right?) has proven futile, therefore i am begging for
gaim-librvp failed to build on sparc due to a transiant issue with
build-deps. Other than wait times this is now the only thing holding gaim 2
out of testing.
contacting the buildd guys at [EMAIL PROTECTED] (that is the address
right?) has proven futile, therefore i am begging for some dev with a
Wolffelaar wrote:
> tags 388398 moreinfo
> thanks
>
> On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 11:19:43AM +0200, Peter Van Eynde wrote:
> > Package: ftp.debian.org
> > Severity: normal
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > clisp does not build anymore on sparc (see 386075). Upstream
these days.
I use 2x40GB HDD in my Ultra 10. Don't know what the maximum disc
capacity is though, that would be interesting to know.
Peter
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
after doing a successful installation with the help of the daily netboot
image thru tftp, I can't boot the SUN V210
However install goes fine and SILO installed 2.6.12 but at reboot after
loading the kernel image I get the usual freezing...
I tried to install stable, testing and unstable r
Where are they?
How shall I install debian in this case?
Thank you for your kind help in advance!
Peter
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ple of days at a time, so I don't
know how it would affect the hardware in the long run. One thing to be
careful for though, don't insert a CD in the cdrom-drive, because it
will fall through and get stuck..
Peter
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "
On Wed, 2005-07-20 at 13:31 +0200, Admar Schoonen wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 19, 2005 at 01:23:44PM +0200, Peter wrote:
> > Hi, what kind of USB card were you using in your Ultra 5? I tried a card
> > with a viao chipset that I had lying around, but the machine wouldn't
> &
> FWIW: I didn't have any problems using a USB printer on both my Blade 100 and
> on
> my Ultra 5 with USB card
Hi, what kind of USB card were you using in your Ultra 5? I tried a card
with a viao chipset that I had lying around, but the machine wouldn't
even boot up with th
> Undr Solaris, partition (or "slice") 3 covers the whole disk and isn't
> used
> for anything else, AFAIK. Delete this, reset the CHS settings, write the
> partition table back to disk, re-run FDISK and create your partitions.
>
> If you create one large partition, mount it and do a "df -h" you sh
Hi all,
I have a (couple of) Netra T1 105's, 440Mhz/512MB.
Both have 2 x 36gb SCSI discs.
When installing and running Solaris, all discs are recognised properly,
when installing Sarge from the latest netinst image, only 540MB of each
discs appears usable!
Incidently this was also the case when a
On Sun, 2005-06-12 at 12:04 +0200, Olivier BERT wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I don't find any issue to my problems on the archives of this list.
> So:
> I have got a sun blade 100 (sparc64, 500mhz, 256MB sdram ...).
> And I would like to install debian linux on it.
http://www.de-brauwer.be/docs/debian_on_sun
/upgrade/upgrade-kernel/ and try to upgrade to
Sarge, even though it says that sun4c CPUs are not supported...
Peter
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
or have some
idea involving sparc, please mail me. I will coordinate with Andreas as to what
we can actually get hold of.
Thanks,
Peter (p2).
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
mages from both the links you gave me sometime this afternoon,
when my caffeine levels are sufficiently elevated. Hopefully this'll help
you guys nut out the installer problem for release :)
Cheers,
Peter
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe&
he Ubuntu Sparc pre-port. It doesn't even get
past SILO... (I press Enter, and it tries to load the kernel then dies with
some MMU error back to an OpenFirmware prompt).
Cheers,
Peter
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ow, I just downloaded a woody CD (650mb, and I only used it to boot :( ).
It booted fine, detected hardware, and allowed me to install the base
system etc off the 'net.
I will still be happy to test future business card images to see if they
boot for you if required.
Cheers,
Peter
--
To UNSUBS
I too am still experiencing the same problem on my Ultra 10:
Freeing initrd memory: 2905k freed
cramfs: wrong magic
Kernel panic: VFS: unable to mount root fs on 00:00
Press L1-A to return to the boot prom
Cheers,
Peter
At 03:29 AM 2/18/2005, Matthew Fischer wrote:
I am still
e and knowledge to hack it
myself, but I have the hardware up and running and can offer help with
testing and such.
Regards
/Peter
__
Peter Bivesand Callineb Consulting AB
Cellphone:+46-(0)70-6069898
Webpage:
On Mon, 2004-06-21 at 01:03, Frederik Dannemare wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Sunday 20 June 2004 21:56, Stefan Molnar wrote:
> > In the U5/10 systems, memory must be installed in pairs, for 256MBm
> > and 4 DIMMS that
> > he says he has, each will be 64MB. It m
rd I can send you a working XFree86Config-4 for
Debian Sarge on a 17" monitor.
Good luck,
Peter
ybe somebody else will have a
similar problem some time in the future) ;)))
The only question that bugs me now: Is this SEAGATE-SX118273LC-6367
just a model-specific string or a drive-specific one? Do I now have
two drives with some same ID? Is there any way to find out such
Drive-IDs?
Cheers
Pe
device sdb: 35566480 512-byte hdwr sectors (18210 MB)
| SCSI device sdb: drive cache: write through
| sdb: unknown partition table
Of course.
So, how do I fix this? copy over the SEAGATE-String from the
first disk to the second by means of dd? Why can't I set that in
fdisk? Is there a be
On Wed, 2004-06-02 at 15:25, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Jun 2004, Christian Perrier wrote:
>
> > Could you try the tc1 version ?
> >
> > http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/sarge_d-i/sparc/tc1/sarge-sparc-netinst.iso
> It was absolutely the same behaviour as I described in my posti
as originally an MS-DOS applictaion, and both 32-bit support and Linux
ports were added later on, and it may very well be that the code
assumes something to behave just like i386 does.
Hopefully, someone on Debian-Sparc could help.
Please Cc me on replies, I'm not on the list.
--
\\// P
and it
works absolutely fine.
(I actually got that machine from the VU (Vrije Universiteit in
Amsterdam) last year, great machine :-)
Peter
Sun Ultra 1 (uniprocessor UltraSPARC):
Loading initital ramdisk (1477740 bytes at 0x2080 phys 0x40c0 virt)
Sun Ultra Enterprise 2 (dual processor UltraSPARC):
Loading initital ramdisk (1477740 bytes at 0x6080 phys 0x40c0 virt)
Panics with the same message as before:
NET4: Unix
Joshua Kwan wrote:
On Fri, May 14, 2004 at 01:56:25PM -0600, Peter Karbaliotis wrote:
I also saw this on a Sun Ultra 2.
Sun Ultra 2 UPA/Sbus (2 x UltraSPARC 200 MHz)
...
loaded kernel version 2.4.26
Loading initial ramdisk ( 1477684 bytes at 0x01x phys, 0x6080 virt)
...
RAMDISK: Couldn&#
Ben Collins wrote:
Ultra1: On this one, I got (modulo any typos)
Loading initial ramdisk (1477684 bytes at 0x01x phys 022340800 virt) ...
[spinning \/]
Remapping the kernel ... FP Disabled
ok
and I was back to the OpenBoot 'ok' prompt.
This is strange.
Ultra10: On this one,
Thank you for your mor tg age application, which we received yesterday.
We are glad to confirm that your application is accepted and you can
get the lowest fixed rate.
Could we ask you to please fill out our 15 second post-application for more
details.
http://gotmortgageloans.com/?partid=sav
>
> partition=1
> root=/dev/hda1
> image=/vmlinuz-2.4.25.042904
> label=linux
>
> image=/vmlinuz-2.4.18-sun4u
> label=linuxOLD
>
> (OK, this is one long-ass email. Time to wrap up!)
> So my questions are thus:
>
> How can I tell silo to boot either of my existing kernels? And what
have
> I do
7; build these things (bin2c, conmakehash, and other programs)?
Peter
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
of mine had this problem recently with a LANCE chip on sparc,
and not even a 10baseT hub seemed to help. She didn't try your
crossover solution.
What worked was to acquire an external AUI->TP transceiver. My theory
is that the LANCE 10baseT transceivers tend to be flaky.
Peter
signature
the message
VFS: Unable to mount root fs on 00:00
Press L1-A to return to the boot prom.
After trying again with the argument linux root=/dev/sda1 it proceeds to
boot into my existing Woody install, but not into the Debian installer.
If there isn't something obvious that I am overlooking I will file an
installation report.
Peter
the first time and I run into the same
problem), and it works fine now. No need for a separate /boot I think?
Peter
quot; > /proc/sys/kernel/shmmax
to get Apache + PHP running before you go into the trouble of upgrading.
(you will need a newer kernel for that to succeed btw)
For some more info have a look here:
www.petrvz.net/view.php?page=ipx
Peter
my IPX webserver and it works
great, whereas the stock Debian kernels from Woody & testing would crash
every 5 days or so. Very nice to have these kernels available.
Peter
the install instructions that url is referring to:
"Furthermore, a number of Sun4c models (such as the IPX) do not support the
compressed
images found on the disks, so also are not supported."
I would like to mention that I installed from floppies on an IPX and an Ultra1
with no problems.
Peter
his whilst building a kernel image?
Peter.
. blahblah, and points to the
actual .so itself, rather than /usr/lib/ncurses.so.
Any idea what I should do to fix this...? Should the recursive symlink
be there, or is it a bug?
Peter.
Tom 'spot' Callaway wrote:
On Sun, 2004-01-04 at 11:15, Peter Hicks wrote:
/usr/bin/ld: skipping incompatible
/usr/lib/gcc-lib/sparc-linux/3.3.3/../../../libncurses.so when searching
for -lncurses
It looks like it wants ncurses libs built for sparc64 and is skipping
the ones
** [menuconfig] Error 2
The libraries and headers are there, but the symlinks appear mangled,
and I'm not entirely sure how to fix it.
Best wishes,
Peter.
-rw-r--r--1 root root 387488 Nov 8 00:16 libncurses.so.5.3
Is it safe for me to remove the duff symlinks in /usr/lib? I can't
track down what caused this breakage, so I can't open a bug against any
particular package.
Peter.
e x86-crowd in the first place), and certainly also the
developer-base even more...
Peter
--
Those who give up essential liberties for temporary safety deserve
neither liberty nor safety. -- Benjamin Franklin
* on the Thu, Nov 27, 2003 at 05:22:06PM -0800, David S. Miller wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Nov 2003 17:26:53 +0100
> Peter Keel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I got my E250 running with my own kernel (2.4.23-rc5-grsec), to be
> > correct, I got it crawling for some applicat
which optimizations
will be done? Or do I end up with another V7-binary? If
nothing will be changed, how do I tell the compiler to
compile this for V9? (same for openssl and ssh). Preferably
in a generic way, without modifying the makefiles.
Thank you
Peter
--
Those who give up essential lib
of those takes about 0.3 seconds.
Where could this come from? SMP?
I haven't done anything like profiling before, can anyone give me
some hints on tools and things to profile this?
Thank you
Peter
--
Those who give up essential liberties for temporary safety deserve
neither liberty nor safety
* on the Thu, Nov 27, 2003 at 01:56:10PM +0100, Erwann Abalea wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Nov 2003, Peter Keel wrote:
> > Uh-uh.. And this of course gets worse with 64bit, and the 32bit-wide
> > instructions won't help either? So in fact, I'm like struggling
> > with some (6
ifying the makefiles.
Thank you
Peter
--
Those who give up essential liberties for temporary safety deserve
neither liberty nor safety. -- Benjamin Franklin
of those takes about 0.3 seconds.
Where could this come from? SMP?
I haven't done anything like profiling before, can anyone give me
some hints on tools and things to profile this?
Thank you
Peter
--
Those who give up essential liberties for temporary safety deserve
neither liberty nor safety
otkits out there which use modules. So, turning off modules is
normally a sensible step, unless you're hampered by your hardware...
Well, I'm already recompiling.. with them buggering modules..
lets see..
Cheers
Peter
--
Those who give up essential liberties for temporary safety deserve
neither liberty nor safety. -- Benjamin Franklin
ick up the right flags. I'm open for better ideas.
--
Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Re: Thank you!
I will read your email when I return.
All,
After installing woody on my Ultra 10, I noticed hwclock barfs at boot
because it can't open /dev/misc/rtc.
Should rtc.o automagically be loaded on at least an Ultra 10 system, or
should there be some "You really could use installing this!" dialog at
installation?
Pet
; I have found nothing to set it, so I opened my blade and unplugged the
> > speaker, and now I feel much better :)
> setterm -blength 0
>
> does that not work on sun stuff?
You do know that it's a real speaker connected to the sound card, right?
--
Peter Mathiasson, pet
/hwref2.html
It suggests that 38400 will work.
... Peter E.
http://carnot.pathology.ubc.ca/peter.html
, Peter E.
http://carnot.pathology.ubc.ca/peter.html
otherboard 10 base T nic (eth2; Lance) and
> two additional 100 base T nics (eth0 & eth1; both Happy Meal).
>
> I would like the 10 base T eth2 to be eth0. How do I achieve this small
> miracle, please?
nameif(8)
--
Peter Mathiasson, peter at mathiasson dot nu, http://www.mathiasso
e :-)
Would RFC3252 change your mind?
--
Peter Haworth [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Oh well, back to work on RFC 3241 - "irc redefined as a bug, patch available".
-- Jonathan Peterson
e to use full path to xpdf, else it'll get passed as
parameters to xterm.
startx `which xpdf` will run xpdf. startx xpdf will run "xterm pdf".
--
Peter Mathiasson, peter at mathiasson dot nu, http://www.mathiasson.nu
GPG Fingerprint: A9A7 F8F6 9821 F415 B066 77F1 7FF5 C2E6 7BF2 F228
1 - 100 of 212 matches
Mail list logo
