At Mon, 12 Jul 2004 07:51:29 -0400,
Ben Collins wrote:
There is no reason for libc6 to depend on libgcc.
Then is it safe to remove dependency? If some userland application
need to use lib64gcc1, user has to install it manually? debian-sparc
guys, BenC, is it OK? Nikita, please ask
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
At Sun, 11 Jul 2004 00:51:14 +0400,
Nikita V. Youshchenko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: libc6-sparc64
Version: 2.3.2.ds1-13
Package libc6-sparc64 has no reason to depend on lib64gcc1. None of
libraries provided by libc6-sparc64 are
Debian's dependency system NEVER made any sense.
Seen today on my Debian/i386 system:
bombur:~/aac-plugin-for-xmms# dpkg --install autoconf_2.59-5_all.deb
Selecting previously deselected package autoconf.
dpkg: regarding autoconf_2.59-5_all.deb containing autoconf:
autoconf conflicts with
At Mon, 12 Jul 2004 09:17:27 +0400,
Nikita V. Youshchenko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nikita V. Youshchenko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: libc6-sparc64
Version: 2.3.2.ds1-13
Package libc6-sparc64 has no reason to depend on lib64gcc1. None of
libraries provided by libc6-sparc64
On Mon, Jul 12, 2004 at 03:51:45PM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:
At Mon, 12 Jul 2004 09:17:27 +0400,
Nikita V. Youshchenko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nikita V. Youshchenko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: libc6-sparc64
Version: 2.3.2.ds1-13
Package libc6-sparc64 has no reason to
At Sun, 11 Jul 2004 00:51:14 +0400,
Nikita V. Youshchenko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: libc6-sparc64
Version: 2.3.2.ds1-13
Package libc6-sparc64 has no reason to depend on lib64gcc1. None of
libraries provided by libc6-sparc64 are linked agains this library.
The problem is they don't
6 matches
Mail list logo
