Try to set `rootdelay=N' kernel option. See #678696 and merged bugs.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-sparc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130927202647.GA8674@deneb
So still no joy on my Sun Blade2500 going to post my exact steps, and maybe
I'm still just missing something stupid.
tar xfv linux-3.11.1.tar.xz
cd linux-3.11.1
cp /boot/config-3.2.0-4-sparc64-smp ./.config
make oldconfig
make clean
make -j2 deb-pkg
cd ../
dpkg -i *.deb
vi /etc/silo.conf
reboot
I am a linux guy too, but on my Sun Blade 100, I run OpenBSD - I could
never get Debian to work right with it, but with OpenBSD, I have fvwm2,
firefox3.6, R, perl, etc. It's not bad, it's fast, and it worked with no
tweaking.
On Tue, 24 Sep 2013, Kieron Gillespie wrote:
So still no joy
Kieron,
First off, do you see your initrd in /boot? If not, then that's clearly a
problem. Can you run 'silo' without parameters? I believe that just checks
the configuration.
Second, I'm assuming you're mounting a local disk. Do you:
1) Have the right filesystem driver compiled (root of ext4 -
Hi.
Last night, I've built a kernel 3.11.1 from kernel.org the Debian way (as
described in Debian Linux Kernel Handbook) - without any problems.
My test environment: a fresh installation of Wheezy (7.0.1) on a Sun Ultra 60,
i.e. a SCSI machine.
I'm going to do a test with an ATAPi/IDE Blade
Could you send me a link to the exact procedure you used. I keep find like
four different ways to make a vanilla kernel for Debian.
Two of my systems are SCSI based and both of those have problems when I do
the standard
cp /boot/config-Old Version ./.config
make oldconfig
make deb-pkg
dpkg -i
Hi.
I used the Debian Linux Kernel Handbook:
http://kernel-handbook.alioth.debian.org/
I fetched the 3.11.1 kernel source from kernel.org (wget) and unpacked it
under /usr/src.
During installation of Wheezy, I installed my usual tool set including make,
gcc, g++ etc.
To build the kernel, I
Strange as those steps you mentioned are exactly what I am doing on my two
SPARC systems.
I am going to have to guess this is an issue with these particular pieces
of hardware the Sun Blade 2500 and the Sun Fire T2000.
Thanks for the help, I just wanted to eliminate the possibility I was just
Hi.
Hmm, the same problem on two different boxes? What might be the difference
compared to my Ultra 60?
The Ultra 60 has Openboot 3, my Blades Openboot 4. What about the T2000?
I'm just setting up a Blade 100 as a dual boot test machine (Wheezy / Jessie),
maybee I should build the kernel
I didn't have any problems, but I'm not using initramfs. To build a kernel
'the debian way', you might need to find a guide or maybe someone else can
chime in?
On Sep 18, 2013 10:05 PM, Kieron Gillespie ciaran.gilles...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hello everyone,
Was wondering if anyone had any success
So current when I build the vanilla kernel using the typical Debian method
with make deb-pkg I end up with a kernel that panic's on boot.
It says,
--CUT--
Kernel panic - not syncing: VFS: Unable to mount root fs on
unknown-block(0,0)
CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/1 Not tainted 3.12.0-rc #1
Call
That's right. It sounds like your initramfs is missing drivers for the
IDE/SATA/SAS system. In other words, your kernel loads, but without the
drivers either a) built-in to the kernel or b) present in the initramfs, it
has no way of detecting and subsequently mounting your disks which contain
the
Hello everyone,
Was wondering if anyone had any success compiling any of the vanilla Linux
kernel's on their SPARC wheezy systems with anything after version 3.8.x.
Every time I try to build myself a new kernel I seem to end up with a
kernel that is unable to boot complaining about not being
Actually, I believe I was thinking of make bzImage ... not vmlinuz ;/
also, I believe with 2.6 kernels, you can just type make .. no
commands, and it will do the kernel and the modules i believe.
Tyler.
Tyler wrote:
try make vmlinuz ... possibly a typo with an X on the end.
Tyler.
I resolve my problem thanks to all
The problems was the kernel-source down with apt-get !!!
I try with the last source 2.6.12 down in kernel.org with this command
make make image modules_install and it works
make vmlinuz
make modules
make modules_install
Works to but with make image the
On Thursday 08 September 2005 12:38, Patrick Dos Santos wrote:
Hi
How to compile a kernel manualy with tue commande
make
I try make bzImage and make vmlinux but it don't work
If you're building a 2.6 kernel it's 'make all' else 'make vmlinux' should
work as long as you've done 'make
Yes it's
On Thursday 08 September 2005 12:38, Patrick Dos Santos wrote:
Hi
How to compile a kernel manualy with tue commande
make
I try make bzImage and make vmlinux but it don't work
If you're building a 2.6 kernel it's 'make all' else 'make vmlinux' should
work as long as
On Sat, Aug 02, 2003 at 02:23:14PM +0100, ayoj wrote:
Hi guys
it now time for me to upgrade my kernal to a 2.4.21. But i have problems
i have downloaded the gcc 3.x but when i do a gcc -v i am still getting the
default gcc 2.95 etc..
i don't think iam linking this the right way can
Hi guys
it now time for me to upgrade my kernal to a 2.4.21. But i have problems
i have downloaded the gcc 3.x but when i do a gcc -v i am still getting the
default gcc 2.95 etc..
i don't think iam linking this the right way can someone help me.
this is a snapshot of my errors..
#make dep
On Fri, Jun 27, 2003 at 02:37:28PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
First, compile a stock sparc64 kernel, without any of these patches. Use
2.4.21, and do:
cd /usr/src/linux-2.4.21
cp arch/sparc64/defconfig .config
make oldconfig
make dep
make vmlinux
After that, try to boot vmlinux.
It
On Sun, Jun 29, 2003 at 08:05:40PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
On Mon, Jun 30, 2003 at 11:07:00AM +1000, Craig Small wrote:
On Fri, Jun 27, 2003 at 02:37:28PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
First, compile a stock sparc64 kernel, without any of these patches. Use
2.4.21, and do:
cd
On Sun, Jun 29, 2003 at 09:12:53PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
That worked fine, once I included the ext3 (which I remembered) and the
tulip card (which I forgot)
That seems happy. I normally use make-kpkg and install the resulting
.deb file. Could that be the reason why it is breaking?
Craig Small said:
Hello,
I seem to be having a lot of problems getting a kernel that will work
on the sparc64 arch. All I need it to do is to use a VPN protocol - any
VPN protocol.
be sure your using the egcs64 compiler to build the kernel.
I have built 2.4.x kernels on my ultra 1 with
Old-Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2003 15:57:38 +1000
Content-Disposition: inline
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Craig Small)
X-Spam-Level:
Resent-From: debian-sparc@lists.debian.org
X-Mailing-List: debian-sparc@lists.debian.org archive/latest/12322
X-Loop:
On Mon, Jun 30, 2003 at 11:07:00AM +1000, Craig Small wrote:
On Fri, Jun 27, 2003 at 02:37:28PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
First, compile a stock sparc64 kernel, without any of these patches. Use
2.4.21, and do:
cd /usr/src/linux-2.4.21
cp arch/sparc64/defconfig .config
make oldconfig
That worked fine, once I included the ext3 (which I remembered) and the
tulip card (which I forgot)
That seems happy. I normally use make-kpkg and install the resulting
.deb file. Could that be the reason why it is breaking?
Nope...I use make-kpkg aswell. I'd say you are just creating a
This happens even if I put it on the silo line, eg
linux root=/dev/hda1
The only way to get it to work is to break to the ok prompt and type
boot linux root=/dev/hda1
it then knows the kernel paramters are root=/dev/hda1 and mounts /
correctly and happily goes on its way.
Not sure what
When I try to compile a kernel and then boot it I get this:
Boot device: disk File and args:
SILO boot:
Uncompressing image...
On Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 03:57:38PM +1000, Craig Small wrote:
Hello,
I seem to be having a lot of problems getting a kernel that will work
on the sparc64 arch. All I need it to do is to use a VPN protocol - any
VPN protocol.
First, compile a stock sparc64 kernel, without any of these
Hello,
I seem to be having a lot of problems getting a kernel that will work
on the sparc64 arch. All I need it to do is to use a VPN protocol - any
VPN protocol.
Here is my sorry tale of VPNs
- IPsec - doesn't work because the ioctls fail
- l2tpd - bus error
- pptpd kernel oops if i try
Disable USB and the Input interfaces. Make sure you disable IEEE1394
aswell.
disabling the input interfaces solved my problems. the kernel package I am
using is available here, in case anyone with an Ultra 1 (or possibly 2)
finds it useful. it has no Creator support, as mine is a plain U1.
with:
in function 'emulate_raw'
undefined reference to 'handle_scancode'
in function 'keybdev_init'
undefined reference to 'kbd_ledfunc'
I found a reference on another list that suggested it could be a USB issue,
but all the USB options in menuconfig seem to be inactive. I am new to
kernel compiling
Hello,
Trying to compile a native kernel (2.2.20 from cvs on vger) on an Ultra
1 running Debian sid.
First got sparc64-linux-gcc not found, so I did apt-get install egcs64
as mentioned in the ultralinux faq.
Then got sparc64-linux-ld / as not found so I did:
cd /usr/bin
ln -s as
I had the same problem myself. The solution (for me) was to modify the
/usr/src/linux/arch/sparch64/Makefile
so that, instead of calling sparc64-linux-ld, it used sparc64-linux-ld -m
elf64_sparc. You'll also need to make
sure sparc64-linux-as ends up calling as -m64 as well.
Ian Chilton wrote:
Ack! That flag to as (or sparc64-linux-as) should be -64, not -m64
Patrick Morris wrote:
I had the same problem myself. The solution (for me) was to modify the
/usr/src/linux/arch/sparch64/Makefile
so that, instead of calling sparc64-linux-ld, it used sparc64-linux-ld -m
elf64_sparc.
Hello,
I had the same problem myself. The solution (for me) was to modify
the
/usr/src/linux/arch/sparch64/Makefile
so that, instead of calling sparc64-linux-ld, it used
sparc64-linux-ld
-m elf64_sparc. You'll also need to make
sure sparc64-linux-as ends up calling as -m64 as well.
Glad
On Wed, Dec 12, 2001 at 10:53:49PM +, Ian Chilton wrote:
Hello,
Trying to compile a native kernel (2.2.20 from cvs on vger) on an Ultra
1 running Debian sid.
First got sparc64-linux-gcc not found, so I did apt-get install egcs64
as mentioned in the ultralinux faq.
Then got
From: Ben Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2001 19:20:01 -0500
Edit arch/sparc64/Makefile and find the NEW_GAS line, and
change --version to -V
CVS is updated.
cd /usr/src/linux
make menuconfig (again, whatever you prefer)
make-kpkg kernel-image
cd ..
dpkg -i kernel-image-x.x.x_sparc.deb
Hello,
I installed egcs-sparc64, now I am get this error after
make-kpkg kernel-image
.
make[2]: Entering directory
I installed egcs-sparc64, now I am get this error after
make-kpkg kernel-image
.
make[2]: Entering directory `/usr/src/kernel-source-2.4.9/arch/sparc64/kernel'
sparc64-linux-gcc -D__KERNEL__ -I/usr/src/kernel-source-2.4.9/include -Wall -
Wstrict-prototypes -Wno-trigraphs -O2
[atomic_dec_and_lock' undeclared]
I'm not quite sure but I think I've seen this on the list some weeks
ago. You might want to search the archives. However, the solution for
me was to use current vger sources (2.4.11).
The atomic_dec_and_lock function was only defined when the kernel was
after make-kpg kernel-image I get following error message:
.
make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/kernel-source-2.4.9'
/usr/bin/makeARCH=sparc64 \
vmlinux
/bin/bash: sparc64-linux-gcc: command not found
You're missing the egcs64 package.
Gruss
Steffan
---
This isn't Debian-specific, but I hope someone here can help me.
I've been running Linux on Sparc for a year or so now, and have never
once managed to compile a working kernel. I follow the instructions
to the letter, but always end up with an unbootable file.
I believe that the problem lies in
On Wed, Oct 10, 2001 at 11:28:50PM +0100, David Cantrell wrote:
This isn't Debian-specific, but I hope someone here can help me.
I've been running Linux on Sparc for a year or so now, and have never
once managed to compile a working kernel. I follow the instructions
to the letter, but
Do make xconfig and make menuconfig work for you ?
etabeta:/usr/src/linux# make xconfig
rm -f include/asm
( cd include ; ln -sf asm-sparc64 asm)
make -C scripts kconfig.tk
make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/kernel-source-2.4.2/scripts'
cat header.tk ./kconfig.tk
./tkparse
Hi,
You should try the kernel sources from the CVS.
http://vger.samba.org/
However the loop device was broken when I downloaded the source a
some weeks ago.
Gabor
On Tue, 9 May 2000, Aaron Daniels wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to upgrade from slink to potato on my sparc, which is running the
default kernel until now.
libc6 says it needs kernel 2.2.7 to install so I have downloaded 2.2.7 and
configured it then ran make dep clean modules modules_install
Hi,
I am trying to upgrade from slink to potato on my sparc, which is running the
default kernel until now.
libc6 says it needs kernel 2.2.7 to install so I have downloaded 2.2.7 and
configured it then ran make dep clean modules modules_install bzImage as I
normally would on my i386 box and all
Hallo,
I installed Debian/Sparc on an ultra 5. Since I want to use the
solaris-emulation I have to recompile the kernel this solris-emul on. The
stock slink kernel-image is lacking this.
Compiling a kernel failed with this:
atyfb.c: In function `atyfb_ioctl':
atyfb.c:2213: `FBTYPE_PCI_GENERIC
Hi...
Kernel-source 2.2.9 or 2.2.10. I guess it compiles sparc and not sparc64
but how to change this.
No clue about this :-( Maybe somebody can help...?
I also tried to create a tftpboot from the potato kernel-image but I'm not
able to make it ;-(.
Your Sun can only boot from an
Andreas Jaehnigen wrote:
Your Sun can only boot from an A.OUT image- however, the kernel image is
ELF binary format. (Also, this will be the format of every kernel you
compile youself.) You may check this (in a rather sloppy way) by
issuing a
file your kernel image
Result will be ELF
I've experience on compiling the Linux kernel for i386 systems but not for
SPARC. I want to compile a kernel myself for my SPARC, but have no idea on
how to do it. Is there any information somewhere about it?
It's the same as on Intel, really, except that the kernel image
produced is /usr/src
Hello!
I've experience on compiling the Linux kernel for i386 systems but not for
SPARC. I want to compile a kernel myself for my SPARC, but have no idea on
how to do it. Is there any information somewhere about it?
Thanks a lot,
Angel
I just came into a Sparc 1+ and instantly installed Linux upon it...(via
floppies) and I then proceeded to update the kernel image to 2.2.1 so I can
install all the new versions of libc6 and such for compiling a 2.2.x
kernelI got a kernel source for 2.2.9 and when I try to make config or
At 18:01 -0400 1999-05-10, Ben Collins wrote:
Just a note, you can skip the entire portion dealing with the binutils
if you install the binutils-multiarch package, which can handle objects
from any of binutils supported architecures. This means you only need
to build the cross-compiler itself.
/tmp/prog.o
Link it and run it on the target machine:
sun$ egcc prog.o -o prog
sun$ ./prog
Hello, world!
We can't link on the host machine because there aren't any libraries,
but we don't need any libraries for compiling the kernel, so we just
ignore that problem for now and unpack the kernel
On Mon, May 10, 1999 at 07:52:07PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Unpack the source packages:
$ tar xzf binutils_2.9.1.0.19a.orig.tar.gz
$ bzcat egcs-1.1.2.tar.bz2
Just a note, you can skip the entire portion dealing with the binutils
if you install the binutils-multiarch package, which can
57 matches
Mail list logo
