Warren Turkal [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On the 2, it gets to SILO. When you press enter to start the
install, it proceeds to uncompress the kernel. It then fails with
something like IDPROM: failed reading format. The 10 claims that it
cannot find a sun boot label or something like
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Okay, I moved a floppy drive from the SS2 to the SS10 and the SS10
booted. The SS2 does not boot with the same disk drive.
Warren
On Friday 09 November 2001 10:11 am, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
Warren Turkal [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On the 2, it gets
Hello,
I was running woody for about four weeks on an ultra10 till I messed
upped the system. So I had to install woody again.
The new installation ended in a horror story:
I am installing for three days now.
Installing woody directly does not work. So I installed potato then
edit
Hey, all.
Thanks for all the help getting my SS10 booting from HD. Works like a
charm.
I've decided to go all out and get woody on there. However, it doesn't
appear that Xsun has been upgraded to 4.0.2 like most of the other X
apps. Is this gonna throw me for a big ugly loop?
apt-get upgrade
I've decided to go all out and get woody on there. However, it doesn't
appear that Xsun has been upgraded to 4.0.2 like most of the other X
apps. Is this gonna throw me for a big ugly loop?
AFAIK, there's no such thing as Xsun 4.0.2. The new server
is xserver-xfree86 and installing it
I've decided to go all out and get woody on there. However, it doesn't
appear that Xsun has been upgraded to 4.0.2 like most of the other X
apps. Is this gonna throw me for a big ugly loop?
AFAIK, there's no such thing as Xsun 4.0.2. The new server
is xserver-xfree86 and installing it
Hey, all.
Thanks for all the help getting my SS10 booting from HD. Works like a
charm.
I've decided to go all out and get woody on there. However, it doesn't
appear that Xsun has been upgraded to 4.0.2 like most of the other X
apps. Is this gonna throw me for a big ugly loop?
apt-get upgrade
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for all the help getting my SS10 booting from HD. Works like a
charm.
I've decided to go all out and get woody on there. However, it doesn't
appear that Xsun has been upgraded to 4.0.2 like most of the other X
apps. Is this gonna throw me for a big ugly
hopes with 2.4.x.
Guess I'll wait for now.
The potato-woody dist-upgrade went mostly fine. Apart from setting up XF4
it was a breeze. (kudos to all!)
However, at boot I now get these messages (2.2.19pre16):
Adding Swap: 65396k swap-space (priority -1)
cp[171]: Unimplemented SPARC
On Wed, Mar 14, Ragga Muffin wrote:
Ben Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 04:38:16PM +0900, Ragga Muffin wrote:
Ben Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Mar 09, 2001 at 02:38:25PM +0900, Ragga Muffin wrote:
- Are there any issues with 2.4.x on
On Mon, 12 Mar 2001, Ben Collins wrote:
Ok, let me rephrase, I doubt it will work on ultrasparc :) Nice to see
it has made some progress since the last time I checked into it where I
was told it wasn't going to happen in the forseeable future.
Just for the sake of interest: How far depends
* on the Tue, Mar 13, 2001 at 08:20:19AM +0100, Andreas Tille was blubbering:
Just for the sake of interest: How far depends filesystem code from the
processor architecture?
- Endianness
- 32bit/64bit ... (and counting ;)
These would be the most prominent, I guess.
Peter
--
Any good Unix
Ben Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 04:38:16PM +0900, Ragga Muffin wrote:
Ben Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Mar 09, 2001 at 02:38:25PM +0900, Ragga Muffin wrote:
- Are there any issues with 2.4.x on sun4m ?
A few, but you don't need kernel
Ok, ok, I'll bite.
In order to further my understanding of my place in the world (that is, ask
silly questions, see what happens), I feel the need to ask this (from
blissful ignorance, so be gentle).
Let us imagine an operating system that is built from a whole lot of
different modules that
On Wed, Mar 14, 2001 at 10:00:20AM +0800, Onno Benschop wrote:
So, then someone asks, how come reiserfs doesn't work on sparc.
I wonder what am I missing?
This is what's known as bad, non-portable coding. You see, on different
architectures, things are, well, different. We have big and
caveats with reiserfs ?
Yeah, it does not work on sparc (only works on i386, and maybe alpha by
now).
Well, reiserfs, iptables and a better vm/mm were my hopes with 2.4.x.
Guess I'll wait for now.
The potato-woody dist-upgrade went mostly fine. Apart from setting up XF4
it was a breeze. (kudos
).
The potato-woody dist-upgrade went mostly fine. Apart from setting up XF4
it was a breeze. (kudos to all!)
Excellent!
However, at boot I now get these messages (2.2.19pre16):
Adding Swap: 65396k swap-space (priority -1)
cp[171]: Unimplemented SPARC system call 69
chown[206]: Unimplemented
On Mon, Mar 12, Ben Collins wrote:
- Any caveats with reiserfs ?
Yeah, it does not work on sparc (only works on i386, and maybe alpha by
now).
Well, reiserfs, iptables and a better vm/mm were my hopes with 2.4.x.
Guess I'll wait for now.
I doubt we'll ever see reiser on sparc
On Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 08:36:31PM +0100, Thorsten Kukuk wrote:
On Mon, Mar 12, Ben Collins wrote:
- Any caveats with reiserfs ?
Yeah, it does not work on sparc (only works on i386, and maybe alpha by
now).
Well, reiserfs, iptables and a better vm/mm were my hopes with
* on the Fri, Mar 09, 2001 at 02:38:25PM +0900, Ragga Muffin was blubbering:
Hi everyone,
I'd like some input about upgrading an SS5 from potato to woody.
Specifically:
- Are there any issues with 2.4.x on sun4m ?
Nonworking on my SS10. Doesn't go over
booting Linux
- Any
On Fri, Mar 09, 2001 at 02:38:25PM +0900, Ragga Muffin wrote:
Hi everyone,
I'd like some input about upgrading an SS5 from potato to woody.
Specifically:
- Are there any issues with 2.4.x on sun4m ?
A few, but you don't need kernel 2.4.x to run woody.
- Any caveats with reiserfs ?
Hi everyone,
I'd like some input about upgrading an SS5 from potato to woody.
Specifically:
- Are there any issues with 2.4.x on sun4m ?
- Any caveats with reiserfs ?
- How about XF4.0.2 with a cgsix ?
Also, what's the status of the installer package in woody ?
I didn't find anything looking
BM == Brian Macy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
BM I'm thinking it's a libc issue too. Which if you don't want to downgrade
you
BM can add:
BM ifconfig lo 127.0.0.1
BM #right before the ifup -a call in /etc/init.d/networking
BM #Add any other static routes before there.
ifconfig didn't run at
Quoting Dave Love [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
BM == Brian Macy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
BM I'm thinking it's a libc issue too. Which if you don't want to
downgrade you
BM can add:
BM ifconfig lo 127.0.0.1
BM #right before the ifup -a call in /etc/init.d/networking
BM #Add any other static
This happens with 2.2.18. Doing an strace gives you the pasted dump. SYS_63()
and nfssvc() seem to be the unimplemented system calls.
Via dmesg I get Unimplemented system calls in init (call 155) and rcS (calls
44,154, and 155).
This is on my SMP Sparc10 (2 ROSS 90s). I'd try it with 2.4.0 but
ED == Evan DiBiase [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
ED Configuring network interfaces: /etc/network/interfaces: Function not
ED implemented
ED ifup: couldn't read interfaces file /etc/network/interfaces
Downgrading to libc6 2.2-4 fixed this for me on an Ultra -- see
previous messages. However, the
Quoting Dave Love [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
ED == Evan DiBiase [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
ED Configuring network interfaces: /etc/network/interfaces: Function
not
ED implemented
ED ifup: couldn't read interfaces file /etc/network/interfaces
Downgrading to libc6 2.2-4 fixed this for me on an
Hey,
I recently upgraded my SPARCstation2 from Debian potato to woody, which
seemed to work fine... until the power went out and it came time to boot
the system anew. Now, the system won't boot normally, and I have to boot
in linux single mode (that is, typing linux single at the SILO
prompt).
Hello all,
Configuring network interfaces: /etc/network/interfaces: Function not
implemented
ifup: couldn't read interfaces file /etc/network/interfaces
This happens with basically anything in /etc/network/interfaces: this
error was generated with a completely commented-out file, but the
On Sat, Jan 06, 2001 at 03:34:18PM -0500, Evan DiBiase wrote:
Hey,
I recently upgraded my SPARCstation2 from Debian potato to woody, which
seemed to work fine... until the power went out and it came time to boot
the system anew. Now, the system won't boot normally, and I have to boot
in
Here is a fixed package for anyone that got bit by the current version:
http://auric.debian.org/~bcollins/modutils_2.3.11-1.0.1_sparc.deb
Sorry for the inconvience,
Ben
--
---===-=-==-=---==-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic
31 matches
Mail list logo
